ISSUE-125: Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com?

Refine CURIE syntax

Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDFa 1.1 Core

Raised by:

Manu Sporny

Opened on:

2012-01-18

Description:

The RDF WG has performed a review of the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. Gavin Carothers (of the RDF WG) pinged me offline and said that they're considering asking us to refine the CURIE syntax to be more restrictive, specifically, so that it uses a modified version of the PN_PREFIX and PN_LOCAL definitions:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-query-20120105/#rPN_PREFIX

Note: This would be a backwards-incompatible change, but would probably not result in any great effect on currently deployed RDFa documents.

The argument is that languages that use CURIEs should use the same set of allowable characters in PREFIX and REFERENCE.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Official Response to ISSUE-125 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
2. Re: Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-28)
3. Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
4. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-26)
5. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
6. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-26)
7. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-26)
8. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
9. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
10. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-25)
11. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-25)
12. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-25)
13. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-24)
14. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-24)
15. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from asimong@gmail.com on 2012-01-24)
16. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-24)
17. A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-24)
18. My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-19)
19. Telecon Agenda - January 19th 2012, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-18)
20. ISSUE-125 (Refine CURIE syntax): Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-18)

Related notes:

Display change log