ISSUE-124: Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different?
RDFa Lite Document Conformance
Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Lite
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2011-12-08
- Description:
- Raised by Paul Cotton:
Paul Cotton raises the question about whether or not we should provide two levels of document conformance for RDFa in HTML, or just one.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0040.html
The question of a subset of attributes creating a new conformance class also came up, but we had decided to not have two conformance classes based on a subset of RDFa attributes. We should verify that this is still true. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Official Response to ISSUE-124 from RDF Web Apps WG (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-30)
- Official Response to ISSUE-124 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
- Telecon Agenda - December 15th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-12-11)
- Re: ISSUE-124 (RDFa Lite Document Conformance): Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different? [RDFa 1.1 Lite] (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-12-08)
- ISSUE-124 (RDFa Lite Document Conformance): Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different? [RDFa 1.1 Lite] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-08)
- RDF Web Apps ISSUE-124 (was: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-12-07)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: RDFa Lite 1.1 will make normative statements about Document Conformance, but stay silent on RDFa Processor conformance. HTML+RDFa 1.1 will depend on RDFa Core 1.1 and RDFa Lite 1.1 and will make normative statements both on Document Conformance and RDFa Processor conformance.
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-12-15#resolution_2
Display change log
