ISSUE-1: Explore providing a mechanism for extending reserved words while processing the current document

RDFa Vocabularies

Explore providing a mechanism for extending reserved words while processing the current document

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDFa 1.1 Core
Raised by:
Manu Sporny
Opened on:
2010-02-07
Description:
Provide an extension to the the syntax and processing rules that would allow the list of reserved words recognized by RDFa to be extended. The goal of this mechanism is to make authoring RDFa easier for web developers and designers.

This may be accomplished by loading and processing external documents, using a default prefixing mechanism, using a token declaration mechanism, or any other mechanism that removes the exclusive requirement to use the xmlns: mechanism.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Closing ACTIONS and ISSUES (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-04-21)
  2. Re: Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2010-03-17)
  3. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-16)
  4. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ben@adida.net on 2010-03-16)
  5. Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-16)
  6. RDF or key-value pairs (on ISSUE-1) (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-15)
  7. Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-15)
  8. Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-15)
  9. Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via @map (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-15)
  10. ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-14)
  11. ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via @map (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-14)
  12. Re: ISSUE-1: Using RDF to express tokens/keywords (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-14)
  13. ISSUE-1: Using RDF to express tokens/keywords (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-14)
  14. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-14)
  15. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-14)
  16. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-14)
  17. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-14)
  18. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-14)
  19. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-13)
  20. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-13)
  21. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-12)
  22. Re: ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-12)
  23. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-12)
  24. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-12)
  25. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-03-12)
  26. Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from ben@adida.net on 2010-03-11)
  27. Re: ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-03-11)
  28. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-11)
  29. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-03-11)
  30. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  31. ISSUE-1: Backward compatibility issues (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  32. ISSUE-1: Default profile document (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  33. ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  34. Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-11)
  35. ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  36. ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  37. ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  38. ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  39. RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-11 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-11)
  40. Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from markus.gylling@gmail.com on 2010-03-11)
  41. Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-11)
  42. Re: ISSUE-1: JSONP as a vocabulary encoding format (from ben@adida.net on 2010-03-09)
  43. ISSUE-1: JSONP as a vocabulary encoding format (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-08)
  44. Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-08)
  45. RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-04 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-04)
  46. Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  47. Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-04)
  48. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  49. Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  50. ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-03)
  51. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-03)
  52. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  53. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  54. Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-01)
  55. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-01)
  56. ISSUE-1 (RDFa Vocabularies): Explore providing a mechanism for extending reserved words while processing the current document [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-07)

Related notes:

Initial RDFa Vocabularies Proposal:
http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFa_Vocabularies

RDFa Vocabularies discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Jan/0009.html

RDFa CORS testing:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Feb/0013.html

Manu Sporny, 7 Feb 2010, 00:06:57

See also the thread starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Mar/0034.html

Ivan Herman, 9 Mar 2010, 12:12:51

RDFa Profiles have been integrated into the latest RDFa draft and a number of resolutions have been made that resolve this issue:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-08#resolution_1

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-15#resolution_1
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-15#resolution_3
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-15#resolution_6

Manu Sporny, 22 Apr 2010, 00:54:46

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 1.html,v 1.1 2015/03/27 14:12:16 vivien Exp $