20:25:22 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 20:25:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-ws-ra-irc 20:25:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:25:24 Zakim has joined #ws-ra 20:25:26 Zakim, this will be WSRA 20:25:26 ok, trackbot; I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 20:25:27 Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference 20:25:27 Date: 16 February 2010 20:26:06 Dug has joined #ws-ra 20:27:17 Bob has joined #ws-ra 20:27:23 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has now started 20:27:30 +Doug_Davis 20:27:50 + +984999aaaa 20:28:08 +Bob_Freund 20:28:21 Sreed has joined #ws-ra 20:28:25 Tom_Rutt has joined #ws-ra 20:28:52 trackbot, start telecon 20:28:55 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:28:57 Zakim, this will be WSRA 20:28:57 ok, trackbot, I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM already started 20:28:58 Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference 20:28:58 Date: 16 February 2010 20:29:07 chair: Bob Freund 20:29:41 + +39.331.574.aabb 20:29:43
  • li has joined #ws-ra 20:29:56 Zakim, aabb is asoldano 20:29:56 +asoldano; got it 20:30:01 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 20:30:29 + +1.908.696.aacc 20:30:52
  • zakim, aacc is li 20:30:52 +li; got it 20:31:09 + +1.408.642.aadd 20:31:17 + +1.703.860.aaee 20:31:39 Ashok has joined #ws-ra 20:31:49 +[Microsoft] 20:32:01 Vikas has joined #ws-ra 20:32:05 zakim, aadd is Gilbert 20:32:05 +Gilbert; got it 20:32:32 +Ashok_Malhotra 20:32:36 +Tom_Rutt 20:32:50 +Yves 20:32:59 +??P22 20:33:42 +??P24 20:33:56 DaveS has joined #ws-ra 20:34:43 Katy has joined #ws-ra 20:34:49 zakim pick a victim 20:34:58 zakim, pick a victim 20:34:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ??P22 20:35:22 SCRIBE: gpilz 20:35:28 asir has joined #ws-ra 20:35:40 TOPIC: agenda bashing 20:36:02 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Feb/0014.html 20:36:31 RESOLUTION: agenda approved 20:37:05 8306 is a good one too 20:37:40 TOPIC: new issues 20:38:02 RESOLUTION: 9032 accepted as new issue 20:38:56 Bob: any probs with dealing with 8306? 20:39:23 Ram: I would prefer that issues that came after the moratorium be discussed after last call 20:39:35 Bob: let's tackle MOAP and 9032 20:40:03 TOPIC: approval of minutes from Feb 9th, 2010 20:40:08 RESOLUTION: minutes approved 20:40:27 TOPIC: issue 9032 20:40:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Feb/0015.html 20:42:50 gil: describes proposal 20:43:04 bob: any probs with this proposal? 20:43:15 s/will/MUST/ in transfer too 20:43:15 doug: there is a similar sentence in WS-T 20:43:21 ... can we change this as well? 20:43:40 ram: is that change in the chat room ??? 20:43:58 Transfer: When this operation is used to replace the entire XML representation, any OPTIONAL values (elements or attributes) not specified in the Put request message will be set to a resource-specific default value. 20:44:06 asir: can you pull in the exact text from WS-T that you propose to change? 20:44:15 doug: (above) 20:44:47 RESOLUTION: 9032 resolved with proposal plus additional, corresponding change to WS-Transfer 20:45:02 TOPIC: MOAP 20:45:17 bob: where are we on the mother of all proposals 20:45:28 doug: some of us had a phone call on Fri of last week 20:45:38 ... I sent out a slightly modified proposal for further review 20:45:48 ... but I haven't heard back yet; Asir? 20:45:57 Asir: we are reviewing the latest proposal 20:46:06 bob: are we more right than wrong at this point? 20:46:18 asir: I would suggest we discuss MOAP next week 20:46:29 ... maybe we will be in a position to discuss it then 20:46:41 bob: in that case, there is relatively little new business 20:46:43 q+ 20:46:51 ... unless people would like to tackle another issue . . . 20:47:00 doug: 8306? 20:47:16 bob: people objected to discussing issues that had previously been laid over to Last Call 20:47:33 doug: this issue wasn't opened up after the moratorium 20:47:49 ... we deferred it based on the idea that we didn't have time to discuss it 20:47:53 ... we have time now 20:48:05 bob: the WG decided to defer that issue until Last Call 20:48:32 ... the WG needs to decide to take it back 20:48:37 doug: I propose we do so 20:48:46 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8306 20:48:54 ram: is there a proposal? 20:48:56 bob: yes 20:49:03 ram: I haven't had a chance to look at it yet 20:49:12 ... can I look at it and discuss it next week? 20:49:36 q+ 20:49:41 TOPIC: schedule 20:49:41 q- 20:50:11 bob: right now, we're coming up to a mid-march moratorium on publishing (something to do with the AC meeting) 20:50:22 ... the minimum Last Call interval is 3 weeks post publication 20:50:32 ... practically 3.5 to 4 weeks 20:50:56 ... in order for us to maintain our schedule of having a F2F at the end of Last Call 20:51:12 ... we need to vote/approve Last call by March 2nd 20:51:30 ... if people agree to this, we can keep the scheduled F2F 20:51:38 ack asir 20:51:48 Asir: there are a couple more Frag issues to deal with as well 20:52:04 bob: there is no requirement (by process) that all specs be advanced simultaneously 20:52:43 asir: I'm not sure that 3 weeks is sufficient for other WGs to review 20:52:56 ... I also recall at the F2F that we should allow 6 weeks 20:53:10 bob: I was hoping for 6 weeks because you get more feedback 20:53:19 asir: we think 6 weeks is reasonable 20:53:32 bob: should we leave the next F2F to be open schedule? 20:53:32 q+ 20:54:14 we agree 20:54:27 gil: i'm reluctant to have a F2F where there is nothing to talk about 20:54:43 bob: we have 2 frag issues, MOAP, and RFC 2119 on WS-Evd 20:55:11 If the WG could close on MOAP, then the WG could advance T, E, En and MEX 20:55:19 do have interop/test stuff to talk about? 20:55:21 ack gpi 20:56:21 (all): continued discussion of F2F material 20:56:44 bob: requirements for F2F in that time frame (last week of March) are weak w/out Last Call issues 20:56:52 q+ 20:56:53 ... though we will need a F2F on testing 20:57:03 ack dug 20:57:20 doug: I know there a couple big issues that may or may not get resolved before the F2F 20:57:44 ... but it seems silly to ignore the issues that have been deferred until Last Call, just because we put this stake in the ground 20:57:53 ... several of these issues are relatively minor 20:58:09 q+ 20:58:13 bob: from a process point of view, its more important to tackle the substantive issues first 20:58:19 ack tom 20:58:22 ... willing to tackle the minor things 20:58:34 q+ 20:58:38 tom: if they are really simple things, its likely that reviewers will find them 20:58:42 q+ 20:58:48 ack asir 20:58:51 ... this wastes "Last Call review cycles" 20:59:11 asir: if we just want to tell the world there is a bug in the spec, we can always just record an issue 20:59:12 ack katy 20:59:21 karty: if we have time, we might as well be resolving issues 20:59:33 bob: let's take a look at the issue list 20:59:52 ... MOAP has a wide-ranging impact and is substantive 20:59:56 q+ 21:01:06 ack gp 21:01:58 suggest that we use additional cycles to resolve 8185 and 8193 21:02:34 q+ 21:03:00 ack asir 21:04:02 8886, 9031 are easy 21:04:11 8900 too 21:04:25 disagree that 9031 is easy 21:04:41 bob: people should look at new issues (8886, 8900, 9031) 21:05:35 q+ to ask a clarification 21:06:14 bob: I think we should cancel the March F2F 21:06:25 asir: should we meet in the middle of April? 21:06:46 bob: if we decide on a 6 week Last Call, we should plan a F2F for the end of that 6 week period 21:06:48 q+ 21:07:03 ack asir 21:07:03 asir, you wanted to ask a clarification 21:07:09 ack gp 21:07:24 q+ 21:08:07 ack asir 21:08:21 gil: 6 (or 7) seven weeks is enough time to plan any travel 21:08:38 ... propose we defer any decision about next F2F until after we approve Last Call 21:08:45 asir: (agrees) 21:09:40 (all): misc. discussion of next F2F 21:09:47 asir: April 14-16th? 21:09:52 bob: tentatively 21:10:09 bob: April 13-15? 21:10:13 ... acceptable? 21:10:18 (all): silence 21:10:23 s/14-16th/13-15th/ 21:10:44 RESOLTION: next F2F tentatively scheduled for April 13-15 21:10:48 bye 21:10:49 meeting adjorned 21:10:50 -[Microsoft] 21:10:53 bye 21:10:53 -Gilbert 21:10:54 -??P22 21:10:54 - +1.703.860.aaee 21:10:55 -Bob_Freund 21:10:56 -Ashok_Malhotra 21:10:57 -Yves 21:10:57 -??P24 21:11:00 -asoldano 21:11:01 -li 21:11:03 -Doug_Davis 21:11:07 -Tom_Rutt 21:11:15 rrsagent, generate minutes 21:11:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-ws-ra-minutes.html Bob 21:12:33 - +984999aaaa 21:12:35 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 21:12:36 Attendees were Doug_Davis, +984999aaaa, Bob_Freund, +39.331.574.aabb, asoldano, +1.908.696.aacc, li, +1.408.642.aadd, +1.703.860.aaee, [Microsoft], Gilbert, Ashok_Malhotra, 21:12:38 ... Tom_Rutt, Yves 22:30:06 gpilz has left #ws-ra