16:59:15 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #RDB2RDF
16:59:15 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc
16:59:17 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
16:59:17 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #RDB2RDF
16:59:19 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7322733
16:59:19 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute
16:59:20 <trackbot> Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
16:59:20 <trackbot> Date: 19 January 2010
16:59:29 <mhausenblas> Chair: Michael
16:59:35 <Ahmed> Ahmed has joined #RDB2RDF
17:00:39 <soeren> soeren has joined #RDB2RDF
17:00:43 <MacTed> Zakim, this is 7322733
17:00:43 <Zakim> ok, MacTed; that matches SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM
17:00:51 <li_ma> li_ma has joined #rdb2rdf
17:00:56 <Zakim> + +1.781.273.aacc
17:01:05 <Zakim> +??P26
17:01:05 <MacTed> Zakim, aacc is OpenLink_Software
17:01:06 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software; got it
17:01:11 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
17:01:11 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
17:01:12 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it
17:01:15 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me
17:01:15 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted
17:01:24 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
17:01:29 <nunolopes> nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF
17:01:29 <MacTed> Zakim, who's here?
17:01:29 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P16, +043316876aaaa, +39.046.188.aabb, Souri, MacTed (muted), ??P26, Ashok_Malhotra, [IPcaller]
17:01:31 <Zakim> On IRC I see nunolopes, li_ma, soeren, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, angela_UNITN, Ashok, whalb, juansequeda, Souri, Marcelo, mdean, hhalpin, MacTed, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru, trackbot,
17:01:35 <Zakim> ... ericP
17:01:49 <Zakim> + +3539149aadd
17:01:49 <soeren> zakim, [IPcaller] is soeren
17:01:54 <MacTed> mhausenblas - Orri will not be able to scribe
17:02:06 <Zakim> +soeren; got it
17:02:16 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aaee
17:02:28 <mhausenblas> scribenick: hhalpin 
17:02:34 <hhalpin> Zakim, aaee is hhalpin
17:02:40 <mhausenblas> Zakim, who is here?
17:02:42 <Zakim> +??P13
17:02:42 <cgi-irc> cgi-irc has joined #RDB2RDF
17:02:45 <cygri> cygri has joined #rdb2rdf
17:02:51 <hhalpin> Zakim, ??P13 is hhalpin
17:02:53 <juansequeda> i'll be dialing in a bit late
17:02:58 <Zakim> +hhalpin; got it
17:03:02 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P16, +043316876aaaa, +39.046.188.aabb, Souri, MacTed (muted), ??P26, Ashok_Malhotra, soeren, +3539149aadd, hhalpin, ??P13
17:03:11 <Zakim> +hhalpin; got it
17:03:21 <hhalpin> scribe: hhalpin
17:03:21 <mhausenblas> aaaa is whalb 
17:03:25 <Zakim> On IRC I see cygri, cgi-irc, nunolopes, li_ma, soeren, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, angela_UNITN, Ashok, whalb, juansequeda, Souri, Marcelo, mdean, hhalpin, MacTed, mhausenblas,
17:03:28 <hhalpin> ScribeNick: hhalpin
17:03:30 <Zakim> ... iv_an_ru, trackbot, ericP
17:03:30 <mhausenblas> Zakim, aaaa is whalb 
17:03:42 <Zakim> +whalb; got it
17:03:51 <mhausenblas> cygri is with mhausenblas 
17:03:57 <mhausenblas> nunolopes is mhausenblas 
17:04:50 <Zakim> + +1.512.484.aaff
17:05:06 <mhausenblas> Zakim, aaff is juansequeda 
17:05:08 <Zakim> +juansequeda; got it
17:05:23 <MacTed> Ted Thibodeau @ OpenLink
17:05:34 <cgi-irc> cgi-irc has joined #RDB2RDF
17:05:42 <Zakim> +EricP
17:05:46 <mhausenblas> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Jan/0030.html
17:05:47 <Zakim> -EricP
17:05:52 <Zakim> +EricP
17:06:26 <hhalpin> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/12-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
17:06:31 <cgi-irc> cgi-irc has joined #RDB2RDF
17:06:40 <hhalpin> PROPOSAL:  Accept http://www.w3.org/2010/01/12-RDB2RDF-minutes.html as the true and correct minutes?
17:06:48 <angela_UNITN> +1
17:07:04 <soeren> +1
17:07:17 <hhalpin> ACCEPTED: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/12-RDB2RDF-minutes.html accepted as correct minutes
17:07:30 <hhalpin> topic: Linked Data aspects of R2ML
17:07:33 <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects
17:07:43 <Marcelo> I am trying to connect to the conference call, but it is not working ... let me try again ...
17:07:51 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: have people tried to look at this?
17:07:59 <hhalpin> ... this conforms us to our charter
17:08:11 <hhalpin> ... my interpretation of what the charter means that we need to fulfill these principles
17:09:13 <hhalpin> ... we need to make sure we deal with Linked Data principles
17:09:20 <hhalpin> ... and solve it via best practices
17:09:49 <hhalpin> Ahmed: We need to define the scope of provenance so we don't go to far
17:10:18 <Seema> Seema has joined #RDB2RDF
17:10:24 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: I phrased it a bit stronger
17:10:32 <hhalpin> ... so that we MUST conform to Linked Data principles
17:10:46 <ericP> q+ "Use URLs for tuples with a primary/unique key'
17:10:53 <ericP> q+ to propose "Use URLs for tuples with a primary/unique key'
17:10:57 <ericP> ack
17:10:59 <ericP> ack me
17:10:59 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to propose "Use URLs for tuples with a primary/unique key'
17:11:19 <hhalpin> ericP: We can't use URIs if there's no unique key
17:11:26 <Zakim> + +44.131.467.aagg
17:11:45 <cygri> q+ "schema-level entities must have a URI" do you mean tables/columns?
17:12:00 <hhalpin> Soeren: Sometimes we don't define unique keys but there are unique keys in principle
17:12:00 <Marcelo> I finally manage to connect :-)
17:12:07 <mhausenblas> Zakim, aagg is Marcelo 
17:12:07 <Zakim> +Marcelo; got it
17:12:11 <hhalpin> ericP: SQL-aware or not, not just SQL
17:12:14 <mhausenblas> ack cygri 
17:13:09 <hhalpin> cygri: Regarding your first principle, what do you mean with schema-level entities having  URIs or not?
17:13:19 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: I mean the classes
17:13:37 <hhalpin> cygri: but if the schema is somewhere else, then we will just re-use URIs of existing vocabularies
17:13:56 <hhalpin> ericP: going up a meta-level
17:14:05 <hhalpin> ... is linked data principles critical for use-cases
17:14:38 <hhalpin> ... linked data principles means there should be a HTTP URI, ideally served.
17:14:43 <hhalpin> ... nice practice but not critical
17:14:50 <hhalpin> ... but this won't effect the use-cases
17:15:01 <hhalpin> ... so shouldn't we just use *names* that are consistent with linked data principles
17:15:17 <hhalpin> ... but not indicate that people MUST make thoese dereferencable
17:16:11 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: As long as you can do the mapping that if you want to implement the URIs, this is possible.
17:16:36 <hhalpin> ... we must be able to configure it so that we CAN put a http URI there and a domain we can control.
17:16:49 <hhalpin> ... but we can't enforce that particular configuration.
17:16:54 <hhalpin> ericP: that makes sense to me
17:17:05 <hhalpin> ... system must be able to support names compatible with linked data
17:17:16 <mhausenblas> s/mhausenblas: As long/cygri: As long
17:17:51 <hhalpin> Ahmed: There are lots of deployments that are enterprises
17:17:53 <Zakim> +??P5
17:18:12 <mhausenblas> ??P5 is Orri
17:18:48 <mhausenblas> Zakim, ??P5 is Orri
17:18:48 <Zakim> +Orri; got it
17:19:24 <hhalpin> ... so we should not make them pay that overhead
17:19:31 <hhalpin> cygri: We need to take care of 3 scenarios
17:19:42 <hhalpin> ... RDF dump, SPARQL queries, and Linked Data
17:20:20 <hhalpin> ... we should do all 3
17:20:48 <hhalpin> ericP: the language should allow conformance to linked data.
17:21:20 <mhausenblas> ACTION: ericP to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Linked_Data_Principles to say 'MUST allow to..."
17:21:20 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - ericP
17:21:43 <mhausenblas> ACTION: eric to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Linked_Data_Principles to say 'MUST allow to..."
17:21:43 <trackbot> Created ACTION-20 - Update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Linked_Data_Principles to say 'MUST allow to..." [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2010-01-26].
17:21:56 <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities
17:23:57 <hhalpin> rcygri: Another case that works quite easily
17:24:37 <hhalpin> ... is that I could put a URI into that column by using some arbitrary algorithm
17:24:59 <hhalpin> ... but do we want to specify another more algorithm
17:25:10 <hhalpin> soeren: we could identify a URI using a web service or RPC call
17:25:56 <hhalpin> cygri: I could see that as a 3rd case, so that the function is out of scope of language, with arbitrary invocations of this functions.
17:26:39 <hhalpin> +1 3rd choice
17:26:57 <hhalpin> cygri: I'd like to see these 3 cases covered.
17:27:57 <ericP> c!
17:28:13 <hhalpin> soeren: in one case we could just specify namespace prefix
17:28:20 <hhalpin> ... and the other we could do else.
17:28:53 <hhalpin> ... I can volunteer to draft this up
17:29:14 <mhausenblas> ACTION: soeren to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities to reflect discussion (3 cases)
17:29:14 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - soeren
17:29:26 <mhausenblas> ACTION: sauer to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities to reflect discussion (3 cases)
17:29:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-21 - Update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities to reflect discussion (3 cases) [on Sören Auer - due 2010-01-26].
17:30:02 <hhalpin> angela: any kind of URIs should be allowed
17:30:18 <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance
17:30:57 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: we have some notes on provenance
17:31:07 <hhalpin> ... we can liason with the provenance XG
17:31:51 <hhalpin> Ahmed: There are many situations where you want to track who did one
17:31:54 <hhalpin> ... who did what
17:32:00 <hhalpin> ... such as who changed the data from 93 to 100
17:32:05 <hhalpin> ... very interesting area
17:32:10 <hhalpin> ... very good work
17:32:30 <hhalpin> Ashok: Why is it relevant to our work?
17:32:50 <hhalpin> Ahmed: I said it is very important, and we should at least chat about it.
17:32:58 <hhalpin> ... to see if we can look into how this.
17:33:05 <hhalpin> but another group is
17:33:14 <hhalpin> chartered to look into it, so we just need to set up a group meeting
17:33:36 <hhalpin> cygri: when I think about provenance in RDB2RDF
17:33:45 <hhalpin> ... I can imagine two levels
17:33:56 <hhalpin> ... 1) THis RDF came from this database applying these mapping rules
17:34:11 <hhalpin> 2) Sometimes you have provenance info in database
17:34:31 <hhalpin> cygri: in some application specific format
17:35:04 <hhalpin> ... which we might want to translate to a specific vocaublary
17:35:22 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: Once we go rec track
17:35:28 <hhalpin> ... this will be one the question
17:35:42 <hhalpin> ... no
17:36:01 <hhalpin> ... and we punt to XG
17:36:12 <hhalpin> ... or we directly see how it would be useful
17:36:13 <mhausenblas> http://sig.ma/
17:36:29 <hhalpin> ... thinking that we could show how this mash-up from diff sources
17:36:37 <hhalpin> ... but we only trust sources from some kind of govt/etc.
17:36:47 <hhalpin> ... in that case
17:36:58 <hhalpin> ... we should allow R2ML allow us to provide this kind of info
17:37:22 <hhalpin> soeren: would like to use linked data
17:37:29 <hhalpin> ... for relational data already solves some provenance
17:37:38 <hhalpin> ... so we can at least dereference URIs and this helps alot
17:37:54 <hhalpin> ... and just enabling people to use some provenance vocabulary
17:38:03 <hhalpin> ... and attached institutional data to this problem.
17:38:31 <hhalpin> q+
17:38:39 <cygri> q+
17:38:39 <hhalpin> Ahmed: Henderson just came up with some work
17:39:03 <hhalpin> ... but you want to know where we got this data
17:39:09 <mhausenblas> ack hhalpin 
17:39:09 <hhalpin> ... especially in caching situations
17:39:44 <mhausenblas> Zakim, who's making noise?
17:40:00 <Zakim> mhausenblas, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: Orri (8%)
17:40:14 <hhalpin> ?: there is also work done at Stanford
17:40:29 <hhalpin> ... but no standard way to specify provenance
17:41:21 <mhausenblas> Zakim, queue?
17:41:21 <Zakim> I see cygri on the speaker queue
17:41:58 <mhausenblas> ack cygri 
17:42:18 <hhalpin> Note that there are multiple kinds of provenance
17:42:30 <hhalpin> in Edinburgh, we are mostly interested in looking at the changes in databases
17:42:35 <hhalpin> the "why" provenance
17:42:46 <hhalpin> and also the "where" provenance when data comes from different graphs.
17:42:57 <hhalpin> Irini Fundalaki has ported some of this work, using the idea of colouring, to RDF.
17:43:07 <hhalpin> cygri: we could attach metadata to the named graph as well
17:43:38 <ericP> q+ to show off a logged update doodle
17:43:41 <hhalpin> ... talking about the case where we map into the log
17:43:46 <hhalpin> ... or a set of named graphs
17:43:56 <Souri> multiple graphs
17:44:02 <hhalpin> ... map to a single graph or a set of named graphs
17:44:06 <hhalpin> Ahmed: I think both
17:44:24 <hhalpin> http://www.beliefproject.org/events/brainstormings/brainstorming5/ppt/irini-fundulaki-OnExplicitProvenanceManagement-Final.pdf
17:44:26 <hhalpin> Irini's work
17:44:49 <hhalpin> cygri: data model is a set of graphs, not a single graph
17:44:58 <hhalpin> ... which do we use?
17:45:02 <hhalpin> souri: we would need to 
17:45:13 <hhalpin> ... relational data needs to get to multiple graphs
17:45:29 <hhalpin> ... so we would want to say this view goes to one particular graph, i.e. assoicate a graph name with that
17:45:58 <hhalpin> orri: we have to use own graph
17:46:11 <hhalpin> ... so we can all of this graph
17:46:29 <mhausenblas> Zakim, queue?
17:46:29 <Zakim> I see ericP on the speaker queue
17:47:00 <Souri> there is a mapping between <a list of views> to an RDF graph
17:47:17 <hhalpin> ... so in the view paradigm, we can then get different graphs, even from an ETL
17:47:31 <Souri> so v1 and v2 may go to graph G1, then v3 and v4 may go to graph G2, and so on ...
17:47:31 <hhalpin> ... in some cases, we can control how this mapping is applied
17:47:47 <hhalpin> ... so we want only some for subgraph.
17:47:54 <hhalpin> ... this is also what we do
17:47:59 <hhalpin> ... when we map on demand wihtout ETL 
17:48:08 <hhalpin> ... we project graph out of some arbitrary column from the table
17:48:16 <hhalpin> ... graph is some column, say owner of blog post
17:48:27 <ericP> <update18> a :DbUpdate, mysql:logUpdate ; :updater [ :username "ericP" ] ; :rowsAffected ( <row7>, <row9> ) ; :properties ( :salary, :office ) .
17:48:30 <mhausenblas> ack ericP 
17:48:30 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to show off a logged update doodle
17:48:40 <hhalpin> ericP: I want to show off an alternative to named graph
17:49:05 <hhalpin> soeren: is this related to triplify's
17:49:09 <hhalpin> ... update approach
17:49:37 <mhausenblas> see also http://triplify.org/vocabulary/update
17:49:55 <hhalpin> soeren: we have discussed this
17:50:12 <hhalpin> ... but we were hoping to discuss this after we get the mappingg
17:50:21 <hhalpin> ... the data is sufficient for lots of prov. use cases
17:50:34 <hhalpin> ... after a few people implement it we can look back into this
17:50:47 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: anyone want to update the wiki here?
17:51:02 <hhalpin> rcygri: map to one graph or set of named graph based on views
17:51:18 <hhalpin> ... or do we map statemwnts to graph dynamically
17:51:28 <hhalpin> ... ala orri's approach
17:51:42 <hhalpin> Ahmed: this should be part of the two teams task
17:52:06 <hhalpin> orri: in the view approach, it's straightforward
17:52:34 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: what about this decision regardless of imlementation
17:52:59 <hhalpin> cygri: mapping a database into diff. named graphs
17:53:08 <hhalpin> ... then we solve some of the provenance problem 
17:53:23 <hhalpin> ... as we can attach information to each named graph
17:53:48 <hhalpin> Ahmed: don't see mapping language
17:54:00 <hhalpin> ... would like to see it on higher level
17:54:34 <hhalpin> rcygri: see my previous 2 cases
17:54:44 <hhalpin> ... what i want
17:54:50 <hhalpin> s/rcygri/cygri
17:55:02 <hhalpin> ... is to represent both
17:55:09 <Souri> +q
17:55:12 <hhalpin> ... as the latter can happen in mapping language
17:55:24 <hhalpin> Ahmed: there is this term data lineage
17:55:33 <hhalpin> ... we handle this with handling schema a certain way
17:55:45 <hhalpin> q+ SemTech
17:55:52 <hhalpin> q- SemTech
17:55:53 <hhalpin> q+
17:56:07 <hhalpin> ... can not too much in existing schema to do go for rdf mapping
17:56:22 <hhalpin> ... big projects already inside databases, dont want to get lost
17:57:39 <mhausenblas> ACTION: ericP to add Ahmed's plan to the Wiki 
17:57:39 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - ericP
17:58:00 <mhausenblas> ACTION: eric to add Ahmed's plan to the Wiki 
17:58:00 <trackbot> Created ACTION-22 - Add Ahmed's plan to the Wiki  [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2010-01-26].
17:58:11 <mhausenblas> Zakim, queue?
17:58:11 <Zakim> I see Souri, hhalpin on the speaker queue
17:58:34 <hhalpin> ack hhalpin
17:58:41 <hhalpin> Semtech face-to-face?
17:58:47 <angela_UNITN> +1
17:58:51 <hhalpin> mhausenblas: we'll keep looking
17:58:57 <Zakim> -??P26
17:59:10 <ericP> +1 to semtech (recognizing that the real decision is in doodle)
17:59:10 <hhalpin> Souri: My only curiousity is that we are already 
17:59:14 <hhalpin> ... talking about this
17:59:19 <Ahmed> Bye
17:59:19 <hhalpin> Yolanda Gil is the chair
17:59:19 <Souri> not me
17:59:28 <hhalpin> s/Juan/Souri
17:59:30 <Souri> harry that was not me
17:59:38 <mhausenblas>  ACTION: juansequeda to contact XG provenance
17:59:38 <hhalpin> s/Souri/Juan
17:59:45 <mhausenblas> Zakim, queue?
17:59:45 <Zakim> I see Souri on the speaker queue
17:59:50 <Zakim> -Orri
18:00:30 <mhausenblas> ACTION: cygri to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance re today's discussion
18:00:30 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - cygri
18:01:07 <hhalpin> Souri: database capturing provenance
18:01:14 <hhalpin> ... that should be covered by mapping
18:01:19 <hhalpin> ... but am not sure
18:01:25 <hhalpin> ... if we want to do something special
18:01:36 <hhalpin> cygri: we might want to map certain columsn to graph names
18:01:41 <hhalpin> ... that is what I think we should o.
18:01:50 <hhalpin> Souri: If we define a view
18:01:55 <hhalpin> ... to be a single poriton
18:02:00 <hhalpin> ... then we create a smaller view
18:02:04 <hhalpin> ... with only some slice
18:02:15 <hhalpin> cygri: but what about 10,000 users, 10,000 views
18:02:36 <mhausenblas> ACTION: rcygania2 to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance re today's discussion
18:02:36 <trackbot> Created ACTION-23 - Update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance re today's discussion [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2010-01-26].
18:03:25 <mhausenblas> Topic: AOB
18:04:11 <hhalpin> Meeting adjourned.
18:04:13 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
18:04:15 <Zakim> -Souri
18:04:16 <hhalpin> RRSAgent, draft minutes
18:04:16 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-minutes.html hhalpin
18:04:16 <Zakim> - +3539149aadd
18:04:16 <Zakim> -soeren
18:04:17 <Zakim> -juansequeda
18:04:17 <Zakim> -hhalpin
18:04:18 <Zakim> -whalb
18:04:19 <Zakim> -Marcelo
18:04:21 <Zakim> -MacTed
18:04:22 <Zakim> - +39.046.188.aabb
18:04:23 <hhalpin> trackbot, end meeting
18:04:23 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
18:04:24 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
18:04:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-minutes.html trackbot
18:04:24 <Zakim> -??P16
18:04:25 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-actions.rdf :
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: ericP to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Linked_Data_Principles to say 'MUST allow to..." [1]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-21-20
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: eric to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Linked_Data_Principles to say 'MUST allow to..." [2]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-21-43
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: soeren to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities to reflect discussion (3 cases) [3]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-29-14
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: sauer to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Well-known_Entities to reflect discussion (3 cases) [4]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-29-26
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: ericP to add Ahmed's plan to the Wiki  [5]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-57-39
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: eric to add Ahmed's plan to the Wiki  [6]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-58-00
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: juansequeda to contact XG provenance [7]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T17-59-38
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cygri to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance re today's discussion [8]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T18-00-30
18:04:25 <RRSAgent> ACTION: rcygania2 to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects#Provenance re today's discussion [9]
18:04:25 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/19-RDB2RDF-irc#T18-02-36
18:04:26 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been +043316876aaaa, +39.046.188.aabb, Souri, +1.781.273.aacc, Ashok_Malhotra, MacTed, +3539149aadd, soeren, +1.603.897.aaee, hhalpin, whalb,
18:04:29 <Zakim> ... +1.512.484.aaff, juansequeda, EricP, +44.131.467.aagg, Marcelo, Orri
18:04:34 <hhalpin> ok