Draft reply to: AM-1
Thank you for your comment about the SPARQL 1.1 Query specification.
We agree that there was some inconsistency in the specification and your observation about the wrong order of items at the beginning of 18.2.4 is fixed in the current editors' draft, see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertGroupAggSelectExpressions.
We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
Birte, on behalf of the SPARQL-WG