David Booth said:
> Sorry for this late comment, but I just set out to make use of the > SPARQL 1.1 Service Description vocabulary, and I realized that I do not > see a machine processable version (n3 or RDF/XML) in the specification. > Is there one that I missed? If not, please provide either a normative > or non-normative version with the specification. The spec defines a > formal vocabulary; it would be most unfortunate if an n3 or RDF/XML > version were not included.
The RDF version of the service description vocabulary is available by dereferencing the service description namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description# with content negotiation providing both Turtle and RDF/XML representations.
Greg (on behalf of the SPARQL WG)