ISSUE-1 |
CLOSED |
How to specify BasicFederatedQuery in a way that acknowledges optional nature of feature & security issues |
2009-05-06 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-2 |
CLOSED |
Scope of function library to be clarified further for the charter |
2009-05-06 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-3 |
CLOSED |
Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces) |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-4 |
CLOSED |
What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-5 |
CLOSED |
ASK queries in FILTERs? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-6 |
CLOSED |
SELECT queries in FILTERs? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-7 |
CLOSED |
CONSTRUCT & DESCRIBE queries in FROM [NAMED]? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
ISSUE-8
subquery-dataset |
CLOSED |
What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-9 |
CLOSED |
SELECT queries in graph patterns? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-10 |
CLOSED |
ASK queries in graph patterns? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-11 |
CLOSED |
Implicit vs explicit GROUPing |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-12 |
CLOSED |
Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-13 |
CLOSED |
Subqueries in HAVING analogous to subqueries in FILTERs |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-14 |
CLOSED |
Which aggregates to include |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-15 |
CLOSED |
Extensibility of aggregate functions |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-16 |
CLOSED |
Dealing with aggregates over mixed datatypes |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-17 |
CLOSED |
Minimal vs fully-fledged update language |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-18 |
CLOSED |
Concurrency in SPARQL/update |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-19 |
CLOSED |
Security issues on SPARQL/UPdate |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-20 |
CLOSED |
Graphs aware stores vs. quad stores for SPARQL/update (empty graphs) |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-21 |
CLOSED |
More complex update operations, e.g. CHANGE objects |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-22 |
CLOSED |
Support of SOAP/WSDL in protocol for SPARQL/Update |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-23 |
CLOSED |
Content negotiation/switch for mediatype |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-24 |
CLOSED |
Move data between graphs (select on one graph and insert into another... copy from/to) |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-25 |
CLOSED |
Dynamic graph (variable) for INTO graph to update/modify |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-26 |
CLOSED |
Conjunction of operation vs atomocity, transactions |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-27 |
CLOSED |
Subqueries in Update operations, full expressivity |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-28 |
CLOSED |
Entailment regimes vs. update? |
2009-05-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-29 |
CLOSED |
Should negation be done via a binary operator on subqueries, a binary operator within graph patterns, or a filter+subquery? |
2009-05-19 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-30 |
CLOSED |
What RESTful update operations should be defined? |
2009-06-02 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-31 |
CLOSED |
Is service description part of the protocol, the query language, or something else altogether? |
2009-06-09 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-32 |
CLOSED |
Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods |
2009-07-14 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-33 |
CLOSED |
Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL? |
2009-08-04 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-34 |
CLOSED |
How do other entailment regimes interact with aggregate grouping vis a vis blank nodes? |
2009-08-11 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-35 |
CLOSED |
Can aggregate functions take DISTINCT as an argument a la SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ?X)? |
2009-08-11 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-36 |
CLOSED |
What happens when expressions are projected with the same name as an existing variable? |
2009-08-25 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-37 |
CLOSED |
How does basic federated query interact with SPARQL/Update? |
2009-08-31 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-38 |
CLOSED |
How do property paths interact with SPARQL/Update? |
2009-08-31 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-39 |
CLOSED |
Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other expressions? |
2009-09-08 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-40 |
CLOSED |
How can other entailment regimes plug in their semantics to SPARQL/Update? |
2009-09-15 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-41 |
CLOSED |
Does GROUP BY allow variables or expressions, and does it allow mutiple expressions? |
2009-09-22 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-42 |
CLOSED |
TF-ENT What should happen for RDFS entailment in the face of inconsistencies? |
2009-09-29 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-43 |
CLOSED |
should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or individual graphs? |
2009-10-07 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-44 |
CLOSED |
Suitability of term "networked RDF knowledge" |
2009-10-13 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-45 |
CLOSED |
Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside SELECT queries? |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-46 |
CLOSED |
Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside update language queries? |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-47 |
CLOSED |
Is MODIFY syntax required? |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-48 |
CLOSED |
Is DELETE too verbose? |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-49 |
CLOSED |
Is a graph an information resource |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-50 |
CLOSED |
Should the average/arithmetic mean aggregate be called AVG, MEAN, both, or something else? |
2009-10-20 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-51 |
CLOSED |
Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/update? |
2009-11-03 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-52 |
CLOSED |
Do we need the availability of an unnamed graph in SD? |
2009-12-01 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-53 |
CLOSED |
How are unbounds and errors treated in aggregate evaluation? |
2009-12-23 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-54 |
CLOSED |
Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? |
2010-02-16 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-55 |
CLOSED |
Can/how can a separator string be supplied to the GROUP_CONCAT aggregate? |
2010-03-05 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-56 |
CLOSED |
Does HTTP PATCH affect either the SPARQL Protocol or the SPARQL Uniform etc. HTTP etc. Protocol? |
2010-03-25 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-57 |
CLOSED |
Assignment/LET |
2010-06-28 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-58 |
CLOSED |
Register a MIME type for SPARQL Update requests? |
2010-07-21 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-59 |
CLOSED |
Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html |
2010-07-27 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-60 |
CLOSED |
What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? |
2010-08-10 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-61 |
CLOSED |
Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html |
2010-08-17 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-62 |
CLOSED |
Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html |
2010-08-17 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-63 |
CLOSED |
Handling of default graph in HTTP update protocol |
2010-10-05 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-64 |
CLOSED |
Should we incude an entailment regime for OWL with non-distinguished variables and no result bnodes? |
2010-12-21 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-65 |
CLOSED |
Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? |
2011-01-25 |
|
0 |
| ISSUE-66 |
CLOSED |
Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT |
2011-02-15 |
|
0 |