14:54:27 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-sparql-irc ←
14:54:29 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
14:54:31 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
14:54:31 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes ←
14:54:32 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
14:54:32 <trackbot> Date: 22 November 2011
14:54:36 <LeeF> zakim, this will be SPARQL
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be SPARQL ←
14:54:36 <Zakim> ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes ←
14:54:39 <LeeF> Chair: LeeF
14:54:42 <LeeF> Scribe: chimezie
(Scribe set to Chimezie Ogbuji)
14:54:57 <LeeF> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0194.html
14:57:03 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started ←
14:57:08 <Zakim> +??P2
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P2 ←
14:57:13 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P2 is me
Carlos Buil Aranda: zakim, ??P2 is me ←
14:57:13 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cbuilara; got it ←
14:59:19 <Zakim> + +33.4.92.38.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.92.38.aaaa ←
14:59:38 <Olivier> Zakim, aaaa is me
Olivier Corby: Zakim, aaaa is me ←
14:59:42 <Zakim> +Olivier; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Olivier; got it ←
14:59:46 <Zakim> +kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: +kasei ←
14:59:49 <Zakim> +??P3
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P3 ←
15:00:12 <Zakim> +sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +sandro ←
15:00:18 <bglimm> Zakim, ??P3 is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, ??P3 is me ←
15:00:18 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
15:00:27 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:00:27 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:00:47 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:00:52 <AndyS> zakim, IP is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IP is me ←
15:00:52 <Zakim> sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named 'IP'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named 'IP' ←
15:00:56 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me ←
15:00:56 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
15:02:26 <Zakim> +pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←
15:02:38 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:02:38 <Zakim> On the phone I see cbuilara, Olivier, kasei, bglimm (muted), sandro, AndyS, pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see cbuilara, Olivier, kasei, bglimm (muted), sandro, AndyS, pgearon ←
15:02:40 <Zakim> +??P13
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P13 ←
15:02:47 <swh> Zakim, ??P13 is me
Steve Harris: Zakim, ??P13 is me ←
15:02:47 <Zakim> +LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: +LeeF ←
15:02:48 <Zakim> +swh; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +swh; got it ←
15:02:58 <LeeF> zakim, who's on the phone?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
15:02:59 <Zakim> On the phone I see cbuilara, Olivier, kasei, bglimm (muted), sandro, AndyS, pgearon, swh, LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see cbuilara, Olivier, kasei, bglimm (muted), sandro, AndyS, pgearon, swh, LeeF ←
15:03:32 <LeeF> topic: Admin
15:03:47 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve Last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-11-15
PROPOSED: Approve Last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-11-15 ←
15:03:53 <Zakim> +??P5
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P5 ←
15:04:17 <NickH> zakim, ??P5 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, ??P5 is me ←
15:04:17 <Zakim> +NickH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←
15:04:20 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Approve Last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-11-15
RESOLVED: Approve Last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-11-15 ←
15:04:25 <NickH> zakim, mute me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, mute me ←
15:04:25 <Zakim> NickH should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: NickH should now be muted ←
15:04:39 <LeeF> Next meeting: 2011-Nov-29 at standard time
Lee Feigenbaum: Next meeting: 2011-Nov-29 at standard time ←
15:05:04 <NickH> I will check
Nicholas Humfrey: I will check ←
15:05:23 <LeeF> Regrets: AxelPolleres
15:05:33 <swh> I'm unlikely to be around next week (on holiday, in theory)
Steve Harris: I'm unlikely to be around next week (on holiday, in theory) ←
15:05:49 <NickH> yes, I can scribe next week
Nicholas Humfrey: yes, I can scribe next week ←
15:05:56 <LeeF> thanks, NickH!
Lee Feigenbaum: thanks, NickH! ←
15:06:00 <LeeF> scribe next week: NickH
Lee Feigenbaum: scribe next week: NickH ←
15:06:04 <LeeF> AndyS: no new news from RDF WG
Andy Seaborne: no new news from RDF WG [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:06:31 <LeeF> topic: query document
15:08:04 <LeeF> LeeF: ready for review next week?
Lee Feigenbaum: ready for review next week? [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:08:13 <LeeF> AndyS: I have a couple of major things - order by with aggregates and escape sequences
Andy Seaborne: I have a couple of major things - order by with aggregates and escape sequences [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:08:44 <LeeF> AndyS: possibly ready next week
Andy Seaborne: possibly ready next week [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:09:57 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:09:57 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
15:11:47 <swh> in the interests of expedience, I suggest we should "Consider ORDER BY count(*)" and not do it
Steve Harris: in the interests of expedience, I suggest we should "Consider ORDER BY count(*)" and not do it ←
15:12:16 <LeeF> AndyS: I will send escaping changes to RDF WG
Andy Seaborne: I will send escaping changes to RDF WG [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:12:40 <bglimm> Can't you just do (COUNT(*) AS ?x) ... ORDER BY ?x ?
Birte Glimm: Can't you just do (COUNT(*) AS ?x) ... ORDER BY ?x ? ←
15:13:50 <LeeF> AndyS: I think it's a one line change to make it allowed in ORDER BY, just missing right now
Andy Seaborne: I think it's a one line change to make it allowed in ORDER BY, just missing right now [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:14:09 <LeeF> swh: I'm not sure if that's true, need to look through the algebra to see if all the information you need is available at the time that you run the ORDER BY
Steve Harris: I'm not sure if that's true, need to look through the algebra to see if all the information you need is available at the time that you run the ORDER BY [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:15:15 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:15:15 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:15:23 <LeeF> LeeF: don't want to spend weeks and weeks on this (would rather punt), but hopefully we can see this week if it's easy or not
Lee Feigenbaum: don't want to spend weeks and weeks on this (would rather punt), but hopefully we can see this week if it's easy or not [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:16:09 <LeeF> topic: Overview & Fed Documents
15:16:16 <LeeF> LeeF: we published them, yay! thanks to sandro, carlos, and axel
Lee Feigenbaum: we published them, yay! thanks to sandro, carlos, and axel [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:16:31 <LeeF> topic: Graph Store Protocol Document
15:17:07 <LeeF> ACTION: Sandro to review the graph store protocol document
ACTION: Sandro to review the graph store protocol document ←
15:17:08 <trackbot> Created ACTION-563 - Review the graph store protocol document [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-29].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-563 - Review the graph store protocol document [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-29]. ←
15:17:14 <LeeF> ACTION: Andy to review the graph store protocol document
ACTION: Andy to review the graph store protocol document ←
15:17:14 <trackbot> Created ACTION-564 - Review the graph store protocol document [on Andy Seaborne - due 2011-11-29].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-564 - Review the graph store protocol document [on Andy Seaborne - due 2011-11-29]. ←
15:17:23 <LeeF> topic: Service Description Document
15:17:27 <LeeF> LeeF: Awaiting a review from Axel
Lee Feigenbaum: Awaiting a review from Axel [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:17:40 <LeeF> topic: Entailment Regimes Document
15:17:48 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:17:48 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
15:18:18 <LeeF> LeeF: Birte forwarded review from Markus, now working on the changes
Lee Feigenbaum: Birte forwarded review from Markus, now working on the changes [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:18:39 <LeeF> bglimm: part way through, don't expect to need group discussion for any of the comments
Birte Glimm: part way through, don't expect to need group discussion for any of the comments [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:19:06 <LeeF> bglimm: Markus prefers that RDF and RDFS systems check consistency, but we've decided against that
Birte Glimm: Markus prefers that RDF and RDFS systems check consistency, but we've decided against that [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:19:13 <LeeF> topic: Update Document
15:19:18 <Zakim> -NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←
15:19:18 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:19:19 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:19:40 <LeeF> LeeF: Status?
Lee Feigenbaum: Status? [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:19:48 <LeeF> pgearon: not checked off on the wiki, but i think it's all done
Paul Gearon: not checked off on the wiki, but i think it's all done [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:19:57 <Zakim> +??P5
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P5 ←
15:19:58 <NickH> zakim, ??P5 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, ??P5 is me ←
15:19:58 <Zakim> +NickH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←
15:20:02 <NickH> zakim, mute me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, mute me ←
15:20:02 <Zakim> NickH should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: NickH should now be muted ←
15:21:15 <LeeF> AndyS: memory is that we're not going to do a 2nd LC for update
Andy Seaborne: memory is that we're not going to do a 2nd LC for update [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:21:19 <LeeF> pgearon: matches my understanding
Paul Gearon: matches my understanding [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:21:23 <LeeF> LeeF: I'm getting old & forgetful
Lee Feigenbaum: I'm getting old & forgetful [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:22:06 <LeeF> topic: Protocol
15:23:25 <LeeF> LeeF: received and acted on 3 reviews
Lee Feigenbaum: received and acted on 3 reviews [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:23:38 <LeeF> ... all implemented except for reference and link cleanup
Lee Feigenbaum: ... all implemented except for reference and link cleanup ←
15:24:37 <LeeF> LeeF: should we be asking for advice on what goes into the security section for the update part of the protocol?
Lee Feigenbaum: should we be asking for advice on what goes into the security section for the update part of the protocol? [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:26:03 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#policy-security
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#policy-security ←
15:26:13 <LeeF> sandro: I can ask Thomas Roessler to take a quick look at it
Sandro Hawke: I can ask Thomas Roessler to take a quick look at it [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:27:18 <LeeF> (issues with browsers & and frag IDs with XML files)
Lee Feigenbaum: (issues with browsers & and frag IDs with XML files) ←
15:27:30 <bglimm> Fragment doesn't work for me either (not even by copying only after pressing return again) also Firefox
Birte Glimm: Fragment doesn't work for me either (not even by copying only after pressing return again) also Firefox ←
15:28:42 <LeeF> ACTION: Andy to check revised 2.2.3 in protocol doc http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#update-dataset
ACTION: Andy to check revised 2.2.3 in protocol doc http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#update-dataset ←
15:28:43 <trackbot> Created ACTION-565 - Check revised 2.2.3 in protocol doc http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#update-dataset [on Andy Seaborne - due 2011-11-29].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-565 - Check revised 2.2.3 in protocol doc http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/Overview.xml#update-dataset [on Andy Seaborne - due 2011-11-29]. ←
15:29:53 <LeeF> topic: Comments
15:30:38 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:30:38 <Zakim> bglimm was already muted, bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm was already muted, bglimm ←
15:30:50 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:30:50 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
15:31:45 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:31:45 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:34:13 <LeeF> topic: Issues
15:34:18 <LeeF> LeeF: can maybe close open issues
Lee Feigenbaum: can maybe close open issues [ Scribe Assist by Lee Feigenbaum ] ←
15:34:20 <LeeF> ISSUE-33?
15:34:20 <trackbot> ISSUE-33 -- Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL? -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-33 -- Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL? -- open ←
15:34:20 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/33
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/33 ←
15:35:19 <Zakim> -NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←
15:35:53 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-33 based on current protocol editor's draft which allows protocol implementations to use any HTTP success or failure response codes as long as they're used per the semantics of HTTP
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-33 based on current protocol editor's draft which allows protocol implementations to use any HTTP success or failure response codes as long as they're used per the semantics of HTTP ←
15:36:06 <AndyS> seconded
Andy Seaborne: seconded ←
15:36:19 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-33 based on current protocol editor's draft which allows protocol implementations to use any HTTP success or failure response codes as long as they're used per the semantics of HTTP
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-33 based on current protocol editor's draft which allows protocol implementations to use any HTTP success or failure response codes as long as they're used per the semantics of HTTP ←
15:36:25 <LeeF> ISSUE-60?
15:36:25 <trackbot> ISSUE-60 -- What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-60 -- What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? -- open ←
15:36:25 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/60
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/60 ←
15:36:45 <Zakim> +??P5
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P5 ←
15:36:45 <NickH> zakim, ??P5 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, ??P5 is me ←
15:36:46 <Zakim> +NickH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←
15:36:47 <NickH> zakim, mute me
Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, mute me ←
15:36:47 <Zakim> NickH should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: NickH should now be muted ←
15:37:56 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-60 based on current protocol editor's draft which doesn't mandate any response body for an update request but allows them to be included at an implementation's discretion
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-60 based on current protocol editor's draft which doesn't mandate any response body for an update request but allows them to be included at an implementation's discretion ←
15:38:08 <kasei> +1
Gregory Williams: +1 ←
15:38:11 <AndyS> seconded
Andy Seaborne: seconded ←
15:38:18 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-60 based on current protocol editor's draft which doesn't mandate any response body for an update request but allows them to be included at an implementation's discretion
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-60 based on current protocol editor's draft which doesn't mandate any response body for an update request but allows them to be included at an implementation's discretion ←
15:38:25 <LeeF> ISSUE-65?
15:38:25 <trackbot> ISSUE-65 -- Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-65 -- Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? -- open ←
15:38:25 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/65
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/65 ←
15:39:38 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-65 with no change, with the answer being "no"
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-65 with no change, with the answer being "no" ←
15:40:08 <AndyS> seconded
Andy Seaborne: seconded ←
15:40:18 <kasei> 0
15:40:28 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-65 with no change, with the answer being "no", kasei abstaining
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-65 with no change, with the answer being "no", kasei abstaining ←
15:40:36 <LeeF> trackbot, close ISSUE-33
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ISSUE-33 ←
15:40:37 <trackbot> ISSUE-33 Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-33 Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL? closed ←
15:40:42 <LeeF> trackbot, close ISSUE-60
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ISSUE-60 ←
15:40:42 <trackbot> ISSUE-60 What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-60 What does the response to a SPARQL Update request look like in SPARQL protocol? closed ←
15:40:45 <LeeF> trackbot, close ISSUE-65
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ISSUE-65 ←
15:40:45 <trackbot> ISSUE-65 Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-65 Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? closed ←
15:41:23 <LeeF> close ACTION-542
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-542 ←
15:41:23 <trackbot> ACTION-542 Check pubrules for fed query. closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-542 Check pubrules for fed query. closed ←
15:41:30 <LeeF> close ACTION-561
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-561 ←
15:41:30 <trackbot> ACTION-561 Review SPARQL protocol document closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-561 Review SPARQL protocol document closed ←
15:43:01 <LeeF> close ACTION-555
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-555 ←
15:43:02 <trackbot> ACTION-555 Review update as soon as it's ready closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-555 Review update as soon as it's ready closed ←
15:43:06 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0143.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0143.html ←
15:44:09 <LeeF> close ACTION-510
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-510 ←
15:44:10 <trackbot> ACTION-510 Look at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-6 closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-510 Look at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-6 closed ←
15:44:20 <LeeF> close ACTION-516
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-516 ←
15:44:20 <trackbot> ACTION-516 Email list with proposed design for dataset parameters in protocol for update requests closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-516 Email list with proposed design for dataset parameters in protocol for update requests closed ←
15:44:27 <LeeF> close ACTION-292
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-292 ←
15:44:28 <trackbot> ACTION-292 Make sure text on transactionality/concurrency gets added to protocol document closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-292 Make sure text on transactionality/concurrency gets added to protocol document closed ←
15:44:37 <LeeF> close ACTION-511
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-511 ←
15:44:37 <trackbot> ACTION-511 Ask team (Ivan) about whether the patch in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 can be applied without any W3C process closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-511 Ask team (Ivan) about whether the patch in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007 can be applied without any W3C process closed ←
15:44:51 <LeeF> close ACTION-478
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-478 ←
15:44:52 <trackbot> ACTION-478 Figure out what the status of tests for the new SPARQL 1.1 functions are closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-478 Figure out what the status of tests for the new SPARQL 1.1 functions are closed ←
15:45:28 <LeeF> ACTION-366?
15:45:28 <trackbot> ACTION-366 -- Lee Feigenbaum to remind Sandro about registering JSON & Update MIME types, and checking on the Query and XML format status -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-366 -- Lee Feigenbaum to remind Sandro about registering JSON & Update MIME types, and checking on the Query and XML format status -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN ←
15:45:28 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/366
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/366 ←
15:46:59 <AndyS> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml#content-type
Andy Seaborne: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml#content-type ←
15:47:49 <sandro> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/index.html
Sandro Hawke: http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/index.html ←
15:48:10 <LeeF> ACTION: Sandro to figure out what has to happen to register the MIME types for JSON results and Update requests
ACTION: Sandro to figure out what has to happen to register the MIME types for JSON results and Update requests ←
15:48:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-566 - Figure out what has to happen to register the MIME types for JSON results and Update requests [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-29].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-566 - Figure out what has to happen to register the MIME types for JSON results and Update requests [on Sandro Hawke - due 2011-11-29]. ←
15:48:27 <AndyS> Need sparql-update
Andy Seaborne: Need sparql-update ←
15:48:44 <LeeF> close ACTION-366
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-366 ←
15:48:44 <trackbot> ACTION-366 Remind Sandro about registering JSON & Update MIME types, and checking on the Query and XML format status closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-366 Remind Sandro about registering JSON & Update MIME types, and checking on the Query and XML format status closed ←
15:49:50 <LeeF> close ACTION-562
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-562 ←
15:49:50 <trackbot> ACTION-562 Figure out why old text is in the protocol document for specifying RDF datasets in an update operation closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-562 Figure out why old text is in the protocol document for specifying RDF datasets in an update operation closed ←
15:50:10 <sandro> (our procedure: http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype )
Sandro Hawke: (our procedure: http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype ) ←
15:50:19 <AndyS> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/ is LC
Andy Seaborne: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/ is LC ←
15:50:48 <LeeF> close ACTION-401
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-401 ←
15:50:48 <trackbot> ACTION-401 Draft an answer for JB-4 closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-401 Draft an answer for JB-4 closed ←
15:51:26 <LeeF> close ACTION-560
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-560 ←
15:51:26 <trackbot> ACTION-560 Make a best effort attempt to review or delegate a review for protocol closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-560 Make a best effort attempt to review or delegate a review for protocol closed ←
15:52:10 <Zakim> -NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←
15:52:24 <LeeF> close ACTION-549
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-549 ←
15:52:24 <trackbot> ACTION-549 Review Graph store protocol for 2nd LC/CR(?) as soon as it's ready. closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-549 Review Graph store protocol for 2nd LC/CR(?) as soon as it's ready. closed ←
15:52:34 <Zakim> +??P0
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P0 ←
15:52:45 <LeeF> close action-558
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-558 ←
15:52:45 <trackbot> ACTION-558 Discuss with lee where to put "future work" closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-558 Discuss with lee where to put "future work" closed ←
15:52:50 <NickH> Zakim, ??P0 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: Zakim, ??P0 is me ←
15:52:50 <Zakim> +NickH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←
15:52:55 <NickH> Zakim, mute me
Nicholas Humfrey: Zakim, mute me ←
15:52:55 <Zakim> NickH should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: NickH should now be muted ←
15:53:01 <LeeF> close action-479
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-479 ←
15:53:01 <trackbot> ACTION-479 Finalize overview doc closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-479 Finalize overview doc closed ←
15:53:12 <LeeF> close action-514
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-514 ←
15:53:12 <trackbot> ACTION-514 Look at Greg's review of federated query closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-514 Look at Greg's review of federated query closed ←
15:53:34 <LeeF> close action-545
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-545 ←
15:53:34 <trackbot> ACTION-545 Follow up with sandro on final publication of Overview and Fed query at earliest possible date (tentatively 10 november) closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-545 Follow up with sandro on final publication of Overview and Fed query at earliest possible date (tentatively 10 november) closed ←
15:53:45 <LeeF> close action-559
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-559 ←
15:53:45 <trackbot> ACTION-559 Review protocol closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-559 Review protocol closed ←
15:53:54 <LeeF> close action-548
Lee Feigenbaum: close ACTION-548 ←
15:53:55 <trackbot> ACTION-548 Review Graph store protocol for 2nd LC/CR(?) as soon as it's ready. closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-548 Review Graph store protocol for 2nd LC/CR(?) as soon as it's ready. closed ←
15:54:04 <swh> LeeF, I think http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#operatorExtensibility covers that action
Steve Harris: LeeF, I think http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#operatorExtensibility covers that action ←
15:55:30 <Zakim> -LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←
15:55:32 <Zakim> -sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -sandro ←
15:55:34 <Zakim> -pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←
15:55:34 <Zakim> -swh
Zakim IRC Bot: -swh ←
15:55:35 <Zakim> -Olivier
Zakim IRC Bot: -Olivier ←
15:55:37 <bglimm> bye
Birte Glimm: bye ←
15:55:44 <Zakim> -NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←
15:55:45 <Zakim> -kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←
15:55:46 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
15:55:50 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
15:55:53 <Zakim> -cbuilara
Zakim IRC Bot: -cbuilara ←
15:55:54 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
15:55:56 <Zakim> Attendees were cbuilara, +33.4.92.38.aaaa, Olivier, kasei, sandro, bglimm, AndyS, pgearon, LeeF, swh, NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were cbuilara, +33.4.92.38.aaaa, Olivier, kasei, sandro, bglimm, AndyS, pgearon, LeeF, swh, NickH ←
15:58:04 <swh> LeeF, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#extensionFunctions is what I was after, it is in there
Steve Harris: LeeF, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#extensionFunctions is what I was after, it is in there ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2011-11-29 06:21:44 UTC by 'apollere2', comments: None