SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 23 November 2010

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-11-23
Seen
Alexandre Passant, Andy Seaborne, Axel Polleres, Carlos Buil Aranda, Chimezie Ogbuji, Gregory Williams, Ivan Mikhailov, Lee Feigenbaum, Matthew Perry, Nicholas Humfrey, Olivier Corby, Paul Gearon, Sandro Hawke, Steve Harris
Regrets
Chimezie Ogbuji, Matthew Perry, Nicholas Humfrey, Olivier Corby
Chair
Axel Polleres
Scribe
Lee Feigenbaum
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16 link
  2. Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience, SteveH, LeeF, kasei abstaining link
Topics
14:54:47 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/23-sparql-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/23-sparql-irc ←

14:55:03 <AxelPolleres> trackbot, start meeting

Axel Polleres: trackbot, start meeting ←

14:55:05 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←

14:55:07 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←

14:55:07 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes ←

14:55:08 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
14:55:08 <trackbot> Date: 23 November 2010
14:55:36 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-11-23
14:55:45 <AxelPolleres> chair: Axel Polleres
14:55:54 <LeeF> zakim, this will be SPARQL

Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be SPARQL ←

14:55:54 <Zakim> ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes ←

14:55:55 <AxelPolleres> regrets: Chime, MattPerry, NickH, OlivierCorby
14:57:50 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started ←

14:57:57 <Zakim> +??P9

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P9 ←

14:58:10 <cbuilara> Zakim, +?P9 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: Zakim, +?P9 is me ←

14:58:10 <Zakim> sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+?P9'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+?P9' ←

14:58:20 <cbuilara> Zakim, +??P9 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: Zakim, +??P9 is me ←

14:58:20 <Zakim> sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+??P9'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+??P9' ←

14:58:33 <cbuilara> Zakim, +P9 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: Zakim, +P9 is me ←

14:58:33 <Zakim> sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+P9'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '+P9' ←

14:58:44 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: +AxelPolleres ←

14:58:46 <Zakim> +??P12

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12 ←

14:58:51 <cbuilara> +cbuilara

Carlos Buil Aranda: +cbuilara ←

14:59:07 <AndyS> zakim, ??P12 is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P12 is me ←

14:59:07 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←

14:59:15 <AxelPolleres> cbuilara is carlos

Axel Polleres: cbuilara is carlos ←

14:59:25 <cbuilara> zakim, ??P9 is me

Carlos Buil Aranda: zakim, ??P9 is me ←

14:59:25 <Zakim> +cbuilara; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cbuilara; got it ←

14:59:36 <Zakim> +kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: +kasei ←

15:00:05 <Zakim> + +3539149aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +3539149aaaa ←

15:00:14 <Zakim> +pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←

15:00:15 <AlexPassant> Zakim, +3539149aaaa is me

Alexandre Passant: Zakim, +3539149aaaa is me ←

15:00:15 <Zakim> +AlexPassant; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexPassant; got it ←

15:00:26 <Zakim> +SteveH

Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH ←

15:00:28 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?

Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←

15:00:28 <Zakim> On the phone I see cbuilara, AxelPolleres, AndyS, kasei, AlexPassant, pgearon, SteveH

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see cbuilara, AxelPolleres, AndyS, kasei, AlexPassant, pgearon, SteveH ←

15:01:21 <Zakim> +Lee_Feigenbaum

Zakim IRC Bot: +Lee_Feigenbaum ←

15:01:29 <LeeF> zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is me

Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, Lee_Feigenbaum is me ←

15:01:31 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +LeeF; got it ←

15:01:44 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←

15:02:10 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-11-23

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-11-23 ←

15:02:39 <AxelPolleres> scribe: leeF

(Scribe set to Lee Feigenbaum)

15:02:53 <AxelPolleres> topic: admin

1. admin

15:02:58 <LeeF> # PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16

# PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16 ←

15:03:01 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16

PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16 ←

15:03:03 <cbuilara> I can hear you

Carlos Buil Aranda: I can hear you ←

15:03:05 <AndyS> can hear you

Andy Seaborne: can hear you ←

15:03:18 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16

RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-16 ←

15:03:51 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0256.html comments summary

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0256.html comments summary ←

15:03:56 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: comments page has been updated as above ^^^

Axel Polleres: comments page has been updated as above ^^^ ←

15:04:10 <LeeF> ... still a few questions about whether responses are needed to some comments

... still a few questions about whether responses are needed to some comments ←

15:04:32 <LeeF> ... one thread from Richard C about protocol faults

... one thread from Richard C about protocol faults ←

15:04:39 <LeeF> ... another from ???

... another from ??? ←

15:04:45 <LeeF> ... do we need to reply officially?

... do we need to reply officially? ←

15:05:46 <LeeF> LeeF: we do need to reply to Richard, once we handle protocol issues

Lee Feigenbaum: we do need to reply to Richard, once we handle protocol issues ←

15:06:56 <LeeF> ... other was from Ross H, which we've replied to

... other was from Ross H, which we've replied to ←

15:07:29 <AxelPolleres> * BINDINGS in SPARQL Query 2010-10-14 Dave Beckett ... answered by Peter Ansell

Axel Polleres: * BINDINGS in SPARQL Query 2010-10-14 Dave Beckett ... answered by Peter Ansell ←

15:07:30 <AxelPolleres> * typo in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language WD: invalid property "rdf:next" Michael Schneider ... answered by Andy

Axel Polleres: * typo in SPARQL 1.1 Query Language WD: invalid property "rdf:next" Michael Schneider ... answered by Andy ←

15:07:30 <AxelPolleres> * Permit LOAD from a SPARQL CONSTRUCT endpoint David Booth ... answered by Alex

Axel Polleres: * Permit LOAD from a SPARQL CONSTRUCT endpoint David Booth ... answered by Alex ←

15:07:30 <AxelPolleres> \

Axel Polleres: \ ←

15:07:36 <AndyS> q+

Andy Seaborne: q+ ←

15:07:38 <AlexPassant> q+

Alexandre Passant: q+ ←

15:07:43 <LeeF> ack AndyS

ack AndyS ←

15:07:52 <AndyS> On emment -

Andy Seaborne: On emment - ←

15:07:56 <AndyS> One moment ....

Andy Seaborne: One moment .... ←

15:08:02 <LeeF> q+ AndyS

q+ AndyS ←

15:08:05 <LeeF> ack AlexPassant

ack AlexPassant ←

15:09:27 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table

ACTION: ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table ←

15:09:27 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - ask

Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, couldn't find user - ask ←

15:09:40 <LeeF> ACTION: Alex to ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table

ACTION: Alex to ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table ←

15:09:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-334 - Ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table [on Alexandre Passant - due 2010-11-30].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-334 - Ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table [on Alexandre Passant - due 2010-11-30]. ←

15:09:57 <LeeF> AndyS: editorial matters, checked with Lee and went ahead and replied

Andy Seaborne: editorial matters, checked with Lee and went ahead and replied ←

15:10:36 <LeeF> ack AndyS

ack AndyS ←

15:10:47 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: comment on BINDINGS does not need our action

Axel Polleres: comment on BINDINGS does not need our action ←

15:10:54 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: Please check comments list and see if you can move any forwards

Axel Polleres: Please check comments list and see if you can move any forwards ←

15:11:19 <LeeF> ... in particular, there is one on property paths that we haven't addressed yet - has anyone looked at that?

... in particular, there is one on property paths that we haven't addressed yet - has anyone looked at that? ←

15:11:43 <LeeF> AndyS: yes, it's a very good summary of everything we've talked about, but i don't think changes our position - we have been cognizant of the points raised when we made our decisions

Andy Seaborne: yes, it's a very good summary of everything we've talked about, but i don't think changes our position - we have been cognizant of the points raised when we made our decisions ←

15:11:56 <SteveH> q+

Steve Harris: q+ ←

15:12:08 <LeeF> ... raises issue of equivalence between triple patterns and path pattern, and also about considering future extensions to include length of paths

... raises issue of equivalence between triple patterns and path pattern, and also about considering future extensions to include length of paths ←

15:12:32 <SteveH> q-

Steve Harris: q- ←

15:13:06 <LeeF> AndyS: Good points, but no new information. Will draft a response

Andy Seaborne: Good points, but no new information. Will draft a response ←

15:13:09 <LeeF> +1 AndyS

+1 AndyS ←

15:13:19 <LeeF> s/+1 AndyS/LeeF: +1 AndyS

s/+1 AndyS/LeeF: +1 AndyS ←

15:14:05 <LeeF> Next regular meeting: 2010-11-30 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: Carlos Buil)

Next regular meeting: 2010-11-30 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: Carlos Buil) ←

15:14:23 <LeeF> topic: Publication schedule

2. Publication schedule

15:15:44 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: alex to address MS-1 comment

ACTION: alex to address MS-1 comment ←

15:15:45 <trackbot> Created ACTION-335 - Address MS-1 comment  [on Alexandre Passant - due 2010-11-30].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-335 - Address MS-1 comment [on Alexandre Passant - due 2010-11-30]. ←

15:15:51 <LeeF> (DIsucssion around comment MS-1, which Alex agrees to own)

(DIsucssion around comment MS-1, which Alex agrees to own) ←

15:16:14 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: In October we discussed our schedule and trying to get to Last Call

Axel Polleres: In October we discussed our schedule and trying to get to Last Call ←

15:16:14 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-10-05#schedule__2f_extension

Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-10-05#schedule__2f_extension ←

15:16:45 <AlexPassant> LeeF: you can close ACTION-334 : I've updated table and asked David (off-list) to acknowledge (on-list)

Lee Feigenbaum: you can close ACTION-334 : I've updated table and asked David (off-list) to acknowledge (on-list) [ Scribe Assist by Alexandre Passant ] ←

15:16:49 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: per our schedule, we should be reviewing docs for Last Call now

Axel Polleres: per our schedule, we should be reviewing docs for Last Call now ←

15:16:57 <LeeF> trackbot, close ACTION-334

trackbot, close ACTION-334 ←

15:16:57 <trackbot> ACTION-334 Ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-334 Ask Davidf booth for confirmation of reply and add row to comments table closed ←

15:17:09 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: what can we do / do we need to do to get to Last Call?

Axel Polleres: what can we do / do we need to do to get to Last Call? ←

15:17:56 <AxelPolleres> query?

Axel Polleres: query? ←

15:18:16 <LeeF> AndyS: Everything is marked in the document with @@ as to what needs to be done from my point-of-videw

Andy Seaborne: Everything is marked in the document with @@ as to what needs to be done from my point-of-videw ←

15:18:20 <LeeF> s/videw/view

s/videw/view ←

15:18:25 <LeeF> AndyS: There is a lot of editing to be done

Andy Seaborne: There is a lot of editing to be done ←

15:18:31 <LeeF> AndyS: I've done BIND

Andy Seaborne: I've done BIND ←

15:18:48 <LeeF> AndyS: Doing GROUP BY ... AS ...

Andy Seaborne: Doing GROUP BY ... AS ... ←

15:19:05 <LeeF> AndyS: There are consistency things that need to be done, such as aligning grammar fragments throughout the document - will do once grammar is stable

Andy Seaborne: There are consistency things that need to be done, such as aligning grammar fragments throughout the document - will do once grammar is stable ←

15:19:11 <LeeF> AndyS: And a lot of general editing to do

Andy Seaborne: And a lot of general editing to do ←

15:19:24 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: what's missing for the grammar?

Axel Polleres: what's missing for the grammar? ←

15:19:30 <LeeF> AndyS: decision on verbs for update

Andy Seaborne: decision on verbs for update ←

15:20:19 <LeeF> LeeF: what needs a group decision if anything?

Lee Feigenbaum: what needs a group decision if anything? ←

15:20:45 <LeeF> AndyS: don't think anything, there was a discussion around prefixed names which would radically change things, but don't htink there's anything right now where WG action is blocking progress

Andy Seaborne: don't think anything, there was a discussion around prefixed names which would radically change things, but don't htink there's anything right now where WG action is blocking progress ←

15:21:01 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: any time frame estimate?

Axel Polleres: any time frame estimate? ←

15:21:03 <LeeF> AndyS: about a month

Andy Seaborne: about a month ←

15:21:14 <AndyS> ... very rough estimate

Andy Seaborne: ... very rough estimate ←

15:21:15 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: Steve?

Axel Polleres: Steve? ←

15:21:30 <LeeF> SteveH: have two pages of notes on things that want to change - probably about 3 days of editing effort, hoping to find 3 days of time before the end of December

Steve Harris: have two pages of notes on things that want to change - probably about 3 days of editing effort, hoping to find 3 days of time before the end of December ←

15:21:53 <LeeF> AndyS: (to Steve) we need to link up on formal semantics of aggregation

Andy Seaborne: (to Steve) we need to link up on formal semantics of aggregation ←

15:21:59 <LeeF> SteveH: hoping first to fix information gap in how things line up

Steve Harris: hoping first to fix information gap in how things line up ←

15:22:06 <LeeF> SteveH: and then check if you (AndyS) believe it

Steve Harris: and then check if you (AndyS) believe it ←

15:23:08 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: ready before christmas?

Axel Polleres: ready before christmas? ←

15:23:15 <LeeF> SteveH: no, ready before end of December

Steve Harris: no, ready before end of December ←

15:24:00 <LeeF> LeeF: if documents are ready at the end of December, probably not publishing LC before the end of January

Lee Feigenbaum: if documents are ready at the end of December, probably not publishing LC before the end of January ←

15:24:03 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: update?

Axel Polleres: update? ←

15:24:08 <LeeF> pgearon: one issue is shortcuts

Paul Gearon: one issue is shortcuts ←

15:24:18 <LeeF> AlexPassant: comments on formal model that have not been addressed

Alexandre Passant: comments on formal model that have not been addressed ←

15:24:30 <LeeF> AlexPassant: also comments on bnodes and other things from previous reviews that need to be incorporated

Alexandre Passant: also comments on bnodes and other things from previous reviews that need to be incorporated ←

15:24:42 <LeeF> AlexPassant: shortcuts, formal model, comments from previous reviews

Alexandre Passant: shortcuts, formal model, comments from previous reviews ←

15:27:28 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: Sandro?

Axel Polleres: Sandro? ←

15:27:32 <LeeF> sandro: I can work on that any time.

Sandro Hawke: I can work on that any time. ←

15:27:43 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: We'll find a common time to discuss.

Axel Polleres: We'll find a common time to discuss. ←

15:28:04 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: ... issues about embedding RIF in RDF

Axel Polleres: ... issues about embedding RIF in RDF ←

15:28:26 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: axel to check back with Birte/chime on entailment regimes schedule

ACTION: axel to check back with Birte/chime on entailment regimes schedule ←

15:28:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-336 - Check back with Birte/chime on entailment regimes schedule [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-11-30].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-336 - Check back with Birte/chime on entailment regimes schedule [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-11-30]. ←

15:29:25 <AxelPolleres> http-update

Axel Polleres: http-update ←

15:29:43 <LeeF> AndyS: base URI matter and handling of default graphs still to be addressed in HTTP protocol document

Andy Seaborne: base URI matter and handling of default graphs still to be addressed in HTTP protocol document ←

15:29:49 <AxelPolleres> LeeF: I got back to chime to inform us about status

Lee Feigenbaum: I got back to chime to inform us about status [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:30:17 <AxelPolleres> service description?

Axel Polleres: service description? ←

15:30:19 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: service desc?

Axel Polleres: service desc? ←

15:30:22 <LeeF> kasei: two issues

Gregory Williams: two issues ←

15:30:29 <LeeF> kasei: add feature URI for basic federated queries

Gregory Williams: add feature URI for basic federated queries ←

15:30:42 <LeeF> kasei: have some links and text that need to align with a protocol document whenever that is dealt with

Gregory Williams: have some links and text that need to align with a protocol document whenever that is dealt with ←

15:31:16 <AxelPolleres> no objections to kasei address  the first item.

Axel Polleres: no objections to kasei address the first item. ←

15:31:26 <AxelPolleres> protocol?

Axel Polleres: protocol? ←

15:31:59 <AxelPolleres> LeeF: dedicated TC would probably help

Lee Feigenbaum: dedicated TC would probably help [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:32:50 <AxelPolleres> protocol doc a bit laging, no dedicated editor at the moment.

Axel Polleres: protocol doc a bit laging, no dedicated editor at the moment. ←

15:33:26 <LeeF> Who would be willing to participate in working sessions around protocol?

Who would be willing to participate in working sessions around protocol? ←

15:33:31 <SteveH> telecon, yes. editing, no

Steve Harris: telecon, yes. editing, no ←

15:33:45 <kasei> I'd be willing to help.

Gregory Williams: I'd be willing to help. ←

15:33:59 <LeeF> Lee would be willing to help

Lee would be willing to help ←

15:34:00 <AndyS> As SteveH

Andy Seaborne: As SteveH ←

15:34:30 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: LeeF to sned out a doodle poll on protocol TC

ACTION: LeeF to sned out a doodle poll on protocol TC ←

15:34:30 <trackbot> Created ACTION-337 - Sned out a doodle poll on protocol TC [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2010-11-30].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-337 - Sned out a doodle poll on protocol TC [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2010-11-30]. ←

15:35:24 <AxelPolleres> Axel: outcome needed of that dedicated TC is a schedule (Andy: and who's doing the writing)

Axel Polleres: outcome needed of that dedicated TC is a schedule (Andy: and who's doing the writing) [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:36:03 <AndyS> AndyS: schedule requires writing effort

Andy Seaborne: schedule requires writing effort [ Scribe Assist by Andy Seaborne ] ←

15:36:15 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Mikhailov: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←

15:36:15 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←

15:36:17 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←

15:36:18 <AxelPolleres> federated query extension?

Axel Polleres: federated query extension? ←

15:36:42 <AxelPolleres> carlos: want to have everything ready by 21 dec

Carlos Buil Aranda: want to have everything ready by 21 dec [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:36:44 <AndyS> q+

Andy Seaborne: q+ ←

15:37:19 <AxelPolleres> carlos: would appreciate feedback.

Carlos Buil Aranda: would appreciate feedback. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:37:23 <LeeF> AndyS: are there any syntax changes?

Andy Seaborne: are there any syntax changes? ←

15:37:27 <LeeF> carlos: no

Carlos Buil Aranda: no ←

15:37:28 <AxelPolleres> andy: any syntax changes in mind?

Andy Seaborne: any syntax changes in mind? [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

15:38:37 <AxelPolleres> overview-document

Axel Polleres: overview-document ←

15:38:40 <AxelPolleres> ?

Axel Polleres: ? ←

15:39:40 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: some changes with examples, list everyone contributing as participants

Axel Polleres: some changes with examples, list everyone contributing as participants ←

15:39:49 <AxelPolleres> update by mid of december.

Axel Polleres: update by mid of december. ←

15:40:27 <ivan> q+

Ivan Mikhailov: q+ ←

15:40:45 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: ivan is leaving us as staff contact, thanks to ivan for all of his help

Axel Polleres: ivan is leaving us as staff contact, thanks to ivan for all of his help ←

15:40:46 <AndyS> (applause)

Andy Seaborne: (applause) ←

15:41:03 <LeeF> ivan: restructuring in light of new groups and w3c resources

Ivan Mikhailov: restructuring in light of new groups and w3c resources ←

15:41:10 <LeeF> ... will be picking up rdb2rdf staff contact

... will be picking up rdb2rdf staff contact ←

15:41:16 <LeeF> ... also new rdf group coming up

... also new rdf group coming up ←

15:41:22 <LeeF> ... will stay on SPARQL mailing list

... will stay on SPARQL mailing list ←

15:41:53 <LeeF> ack AndyS

ack AndyS ←

15:42:04 <LeeF> AndyS: what's the status of the function library document?

Andy Seaborne: what's the status of the function library document? ←

15:43:11 <AxelPolleres> topic: shortcuts

3. shortcuts

15:43:13 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?

Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←

15:43:13 <Zakim> On the phone I see cbuilara, AxelPolleres, AndyS, kasei, AlexPassant, pgearon, SteveH, LeeF, Sandro, Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see cbuilara, AxelPolleres, AndyS, kasei, AlexPassant, pgearon, SteveH, LeeF, Sandro, Ivan ←

15:44:12 <AxelPolleres>  PROPOSED1: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience.

Axel Polleres: PROPOSED1: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience. ←

15:44:21 <AxelPolleres>  PROPOSED2: postpone ISSUE-59

Axel Polleres: PROPOSED2: postpone ISSUE-59 ←

15:44:33 <SteveH> strawpoll?

Steve Harris: strawpoll? ←

15:44:44 <AlexPassant> +1 for a strawpoll

Alexandre Passant: +1 for a strawpoll ←

15:44:45 <SteveH> q+

Steve Harris: q+ ←

15:44:51 <ivan> q-

Ivan Mikhailov: q- ←

15:45:22 <LeeF> SteveH: how about one strawpoll?

Steve Harris: how about one strawpoll? ←

15:45:38 <LeeF> sandro: is the reason not to do this because it slows down the schedule?

Sandro Hawke: is the reason not to do this because it slows down the schedule? ←

15:46:01 <AlexPassant> It wont slow down schedule imo

Alexandre Passant: It wont slow down schedule imo ←

15:46:08 <AndyS> q+

Andy Seaborne: q+ ←

15:46:10 <AlexPassant> not from an editing pov at least

Alexandre Passant: not from an editing pov at least ←

15:46:13 <SteveH> q-

Steve Harris: q- ←

15:46:23 <LeeF> LeeF: expresesd concerns relate to not wanting to add shortcuts into the language yet

Lee Feigenbaum: expresesd concerns relate to not wanting to add shortcuts into the language yet ←

15:46:39 <AndyS> q-

Andy Seaborne: q- ←

15:47:23 <LeeF> AxelPolleres: +1 is for adding shortcuts, -1 is for postponing work on shortcuts

Axel Polleres: +1 is for adding shortcuts, -1 is for postponing work on shortcuts ←

15:47:44 <AndyS> Small point: we already have a "shortcut" --  CLEAR

Andy Seaborne: Small point: we already have a "shortcut" -- CLEAR ←

15:48:07 <AxelPolleres> +1 is for adding shortcuts, -1 is for postponing work on shortcuts

Axel Polleres: +1 is for adding shortcuts, -1 is for postponing work on shortcuts ←

15:48:08 <kasei> -1

Gregory Williams: -1 ←

15:48:09 <SteveH> -1

Steve Harris: -1 ←

15:48:10 <AlexPassant> +1

Alexandre Passant: +1 ←

15:48:12 <LeeF> sandro: +1

Sandro Hawke: +1 ←

15:48:15 <AndyS> +1

Andy Seaborne: +1 ←

15:48:19 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←

15:48:34 <LeeF> 0

0 ←

15:48:37 <cbuilara> 0

Carlos Buil Aranda: 0 ←

15:48:42 <pgearon> +1

Paul Gearon: +1 ←

15:48:53 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Mikhailov: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←

15:48:53 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←

15:48:55 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←

15:49:12 <ivan> 0

Ivan Mikhailov: 0 ←

15:49:31 <AxelPolleres> +1

Axel Polleres: +1 ←

15:49:52 <AxelPolleres> 5/3/2

Axel Polleres: 5/3/2 ←

15:50:05 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience.

PROPOSED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience. ←

15:50:09 <LeeF> Abstain.

Abstain. ←

15:50:10 <SteveH> abstain

Steve Harris: abstain ←

15:50:27 <AndyS> seconded

Andy Seaborne: seconded ←

15:50:31 <kasei> abstain

Gregory Williams: abstain ←

15:50:47 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience, SteveH, LeeF, kasei abstaining

RESOLVED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience, SteveH, LeeF, kasei abstaining ←

15:51:26 <LeeF> ISSUE-59?

ISSUE-59? ←

15:51:26 <trackbot> ISSUE-59 -- Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html -- open

Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-59 -- Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html -- open ←

15:51:26 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/59

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/59 ←

15:51:35 <LeeF>  ISSUE-59:  RESOLVED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience, SteveH, LeeF, kasei abstaining

ISSUE-59: RESOLVED: Add update shortcuts in LC marked explicitly "AT RISK" and asking for feedback, explicitly about potentially complicating the language, and implementation experience, SteveH, LeeF, kasei abstaining ←

15:51:35 <trackbot> ISSUE-59 Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html notes added

Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-59 Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html notes added ←

15:51:40 <LeeF> trackbot, close ISSUE-59

trackbot, close ISSUE-59 ←

15:51:40 <AxelPolleres> topic: function library

4. function library

15:51:40 <trackbot> ISSUE-59 Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-59 Shall we add shortcuts for update as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0053.html closed ←

15:51:55 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0252.html

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0252.html ←

15:54:02 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0188.html

Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0188.html ←

15:54:26 <SteveH> q+

Steve Harris: q+ ←

15:54:32 <AndyS> Simple literals.

Andy Seaborne: Simple literals. ←

15:54:34 <kasei> simple literals, please

Gregory Williams: simple literals, please ←

15:54:58 <LeeF> Simple literals, can always be casted with xsd:string(...)

Simple literals, can always be casted with xsd:string(...) ←

15:55:08 <AxelPolleres> seems that we need "own versions" for all

Axel Polleres: seems that we need "own versions" for all ←

15:55:11 <AxelPolleres>         7.3.2 fn:compare

Axel Polleres: 7.3.2 fn:compare ←

15:55:12 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.1 fn:concat

Axel Polleres: 7.4.1 fn:concat ←

15:55:12 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.3 fn:substring

Axel Polleres: 7.4.3 fn:substring ←

15:55:12 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.4 fn:string-length

Axel Polleres: 7.4.4 fn:string-length ←

15:55:13 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.7 fn:upper-case

Axel Polleres: 7.4.7 fn:upper-case ←

15:55:13 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.8 fn:lower-case

Axel Polleres: 7.4.8 fn:lower-case ←

15:55:14 <AxelPolleres>         7.4.10 fn:encode-for-uri

Axel Polleres: 7.4.10 fn:encode-for-uri ←

15:55:16 <AxelPolleres>         7.5.1 fn:contains     (collation form optional)

Axel Polleres: 7.5.1 fn:contains (collation form optional) ←

15:55:18 <AxelPolleres>         7.5.2 fn:starts-with

Axel Polleres: 7.5.2 fn:starts-with ←

15:55:20 <AxelPolleres>         7.5.3 fn:ends-with

Axel Polleres: 7.5.3 fn:ends-with ←

15:55:52 <SteveH> CONCAT(...) == STR(fn:concat(...))

Steve Harris: CONCAT(...) == STR(fn:concat(...)) ←

15:56:03 <LeeF> LeeF: Would like to be able to freely compose these functions that deal in strings

Lee Feigenbaum: Would like to be able to freely compose these functions that deal in strings ←

15:57:37 <SteveH> "Atomic datatypes are those having values which are regarded by this specification as being indivisible."

Steve Harris: "Atomic datatypes are those having values which are regarded by this specification as being indivisible." ←

15:57:50 <AndyS> "Atomic datatypes are those having values which are regarded by this specification as being indivisible. "

Andy Seaborne: "Atomic datatypes are those having values which are regarded by this specification as being indivisible. " ←

16:00:02 <Zakim> -SteveH

Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH ←

16:00:40 <LeeF> adjourned, officially

adjourned, officially ←

16:00:57 <SteveH> sorry, got kicked, missed the end of AndyS's diatribe

Steve Harris: sorry, got kicked, missed the end of AndyS's diatribe ←

16:01:18 <Zakim> -LeeF

Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←

16:02:10 <ivan> zakim, drop me

Ivan Mikhailov: zakim, drop me ←

16:02:10 <Zakim> Ivan is being disconnected

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan is being disconnected ←

16:02:11 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←

16:02:42 <Zakim> -AlexPassant

Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexPassant ←

16:02:43 <Zakim> -cbuilara

Zakim IRC Bot: -cbuilara ←

16:02:44 <Zakim> -kasei

Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←

16:02:49 <Zakim> -pgearon

Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←

16:02:53 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←

16:03:15 <AxelPolleres> Axel: Andy, would there for the string related functions speak anything against defining our own that treat strings and simple literals the same and return simple lieterals instead of strings?

Axel Polleres: Andy, would there for the string related functions speak anything against defining our own that treat strings and simple literals the same and return simple lieterals instead of strings? [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

16:03:21 <AxelPolleres> Andy: that sounds doable

Andy Seaborne: that sounds doable [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←

16:03:46 <AxelPolleres> adjourned for real now... thanks all!

Axel Polleres: adjourned for real now... thanks all! ←



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#2) generated 2010-11-23 16:10:24 UTC by 'lfeigenb', comments: None