IRC log of rdfa on 2009-10-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:30:47 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 14:30:47 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc
- 14:30:55 [msporny]
- zakim, this will be rdfa
- 14:30:55 [Zakim]
- ok, msporny; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 30 minutes
- 14:31:11 [msporny]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Oct/0020.html
- 14:34:54 [msporny]
- scribenick: msporny
- 14:35:07 [msporny]
- Previous: http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary
- 14:35:19 [msporny]
- Present: Manu_Sporny
- 14:35:23 [msporny]
- Regrets: Steven_Pemberton
- 14:36:53 [msporny]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML Task Force
- 14:37:14 [msporny]
- Regrets+ Ben_Adida
- 14:37:59 [msporny]
- msporny has changed the topic to: RDFa
- 14:38:09 [msporny]
- msporny has changed the topic to: RDFa Task Force
- 14:38:51 [msporny]
- Topic: Action Items
- 14:38:58 [msporny]
- ACTION: ShaneM to craft errata about case insensitive reserved words. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action03]
- 14:39:00 [msporny]
- -- done
- 14:39:15 [msporny]
- ACTION: ShaneM to craft errata text about canonical XMLLiterals [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action02]
- 14:39:17 [msporny]
- -- done
- 14:39:26 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ben to update JS xmlns getter code on implementors' guide for xhtml mime type support [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/17-rdfa-minutes.html#action02]
- 14:39:27 [msporny]
- -- continues
- 14:40:34 [manu]
- scribenick: manu
- 14:40:54 [manu]
- Chair: Manu_Sporny
- 14:41:35 [manu]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 14:41:39 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:41:39 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 14:53:05 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #rdfa
- 15:00:39 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
- 15:00:47 [Zakim]
- +??P39
- 15:00:51 [manu]
- zakim, I am ??P39
- 15:00:51 [Zakim]
- +manu; got it
- 15:01:39 [Zakim]
- + +1.763.767.aaaa
- 15:01:53 [ShaneM]
- zakim, aaaa is ShaneM
- 15:01:53 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM; got it
- 15:02:19 [ivan]
- zakim, dial ivan-voip
- 15:02:19 [Zakim]
- ok, ivan; the call is being made
- 15:02:21 [Zakim]
- +Ivan
- 15:05:21 [manu]
- Ivan: When does HTML+RDFa get published?
- 15:05:28 [manu]
- Manu: Today at some point...
- 15:06:31 [manu]
- Topic: RDFa Updates
- 15:06:37 [manu]
- Manu: Any updates from Mark?
- 15:06:59 [manu]
- Ivan: We have a book chapter on RDFa that we wrote.
- 15:07:34 [manu]
- Ivan: There is a book that Handler and Fentel and Dom?? which is published by Stringer
- 15:07:40 [manu]
- Ivan: Handbook for the Semantic Web
- 15:08:13 [manu]
- Ivan: Collects usual technologies and presents them.
- 15:08:26 [manu]
- Ivan: Still being heavily edited, published sometime late 2009
- 15:10:23 [manu]
- Manu: HTML+RDFa being published later today
- 15:10:53 [manu]
- Manu: @version and @profile are being fought in HTML WG
- 15:12:19 [manu]
- Ivan: @version and @profile are not mandatory
- 15:12:34 [manu]
- Manu: Right, but they're important for the default generation of XMLLiterals
- 15:12:47 [manu]
- Manu: We probably don't want to do it in RDFa 1.1
- 15:13:01 [manu]
- Ivan: That would be an incompatible change on RDFa 1.0
- 15:13:09 [manu]
- Shane: If there is no versioning mechanism, then we can't make the change.
- 15:15:58 [manu]
- Manu: @profile was obsoleted in HTML5, so that creates an issue for us
- 15:16:25 [manu]
- Manu: So we have an HTML5 EPB spec for addressing the @version and @profile issue.
- 15:17:10 [manu]
- Ivan: So we would be forced to not make backwards-incompatible changes.
- 15:17:33 [manu]
- Ivan: I also don't like that by default new lines and other formatting characters are saved.
- 15:20:00 [manu]
- Ivan: What about the xmlns: issue?
- 15:20:23 [manu]
- Manu: Microsoft seems to be backing it... but no proposal yet.
- 15:22:52 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 15:23:20 [markbirbeck]
- Damn...forgot.
- 15:23:28 [markbirbeck]
- Or rather distracted. :(
- 15:23:31 [manu]
- Topic: Discuss and approve Shane's errata text
- 15:23:35 [markbirbeck]
- Are you guys still there...
- 15:23:39 [markbirbeck]
- Ok...dialling in.
- 15:23:44 [manu]
- Reserved word values and case-sensitivity
- 15:23:48 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, code?
- 15:23:48 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
- 15:23:52 [manu]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Oct/0010.html
- 15:24:55 [Zakim]
- + +0208761aabb
- 15:25:00 [manu]
- Shane: New feedback from Philip Taylor
- 15:25:07 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am aabb
- 15:25:07 [Zakim]
- +markbirbeck; got it
- 15:25:16 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am very late
- 15:25:16 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'i am very late', markbirbeck
- 15:25:44 [manu]
- ... on XMLLiteral issue.
- 15:28:58 [manu]
- Manu: So, we might need to defer talking about the XMLLiteral issue based on Philips feedback
- 15:29:11 [manu]
- Ivan: Ivan is right, it should be Exclusive Canonical XML if we are going to do this
- 15:29:22 [manu]
- Ivan: Yes, it's a mess right now, so I'll try to explain clearly.
- 15:29:44 [manu]
- Ivan: It should be Exclusive Canonical XML if we are going to require this.
- 15:30:09 [manu]
- ... in my understanding, if RDFa Processors serialize the triples it will depend on which serialization they use
- 15:30:27 [manu]
- ... if they serialize into TURTLE, they have to use Exclusive XML Canonicalization.
- 15:30:39 [manu]
- ... if they serialize to RDF/XML, they don't have to.
- 15:30:59 [manu]
- ... we have to be careful in the examples and the primer, that they should be in Exclusive Canonical XML.
- 15:31:15 [manu]
- ... there are some tests today that are more permissive than they should be.
- 15:31:51 [manu]
- ... RDF/XML spec says that XML Literals must produce a canonical representation of that.
- 15:33:43 [manu]
- Manu: Do you think RDFa should place this in the spec, to ensure downstream RDF tools don't have to worry about c14n.
- 15:34:01 [manu]
- Ivan: I think it places a burden on impelmentations that only generate RDF/XML?
- 15:35:56 [markbirbeck]
- s/impelmentations/implementations/
- 15:37:29 [manu]
- Shane: It's necessary because the triples that we generate should be identical... if they aren't, it affects triple stores.
- 15:37:56 [manu]
- Ivan: I think it's good advice to give, but don't think it should be a requirement...
- 15:40:14 [manu]
- Manu: It causes a problem when RDFa Processors are used to generate RDF/XML which is then sent to SPARQL processors.
- 15:40:29 [manu]
- Ivan: I think we need feedback from developers before we make this requirement.
- 15:41:06 [manu]
- Mark: I agree with both of Ivan's point.
- 15:42:03 [manu]
- s/point./points./
- 15:42:26 [manu]
- Mark: At the very least, I think we should look at what this means for HTML+RDFa vs. XHTML+RDFa
- 15:43:53 [manu]
- Mark: So, this might only apply to the XHTML version.
- 15:44:10 [manu]
- Mark: So, we have to be very careful - because prefixes might not have come from xmlns:, they might have come from @token.
- 15:44:23 [manu]
- s/So, we have to/We have to/
- 15:44:36 [manu]
- Ivan: having something in the document that is advisory is a good idea.
- 15:46:02 [manu]
- Manu: Would we feel okay with making this a recommendation, but not a requirement?
- 15:48:17 [manu]
- Shane: I think it's Philips issue, primarily.
- 15:52:36 [manu]
- Ivan: How much work would it require to Canonicalize XML in your implementation, Shane?
- 15:55:00 [manu]
- Shane: I need to look at the new spec Philip sent out first.
- 15:55:09 [manu]
- Manu: Ok, so we just need to change the RDFa Test Suite
- 15:55:27 [manu]
- ACTION: Shane to re-draft XMLLiteral errata text
- 15:55:45 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu change test suite to use Exclusive Canonical XMLLiteral tests
- 15:56:13 [manu]
- ACTION: Manu speak with Andy Seaborne about SPARQL.org implementation re: c14n
- 15:56:43 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 15:56:44 [Zakim]
- -manu
- 15:56:44 [Zakim]
- -markbirbeck
- 15:56:46 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 15:56:47 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
- 15:56:48 [Zakim]
- Attendees were manu, +1.763.767.aaaa, ShaneM, Ivan, +0208761aabb, markbirbeck
- 15:57:25 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:57:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 15:57:33 [manu]
- Present+ Mark_Birbeck
- 15:57:39 [manu]
- Present+ Ivan_Herman
- 15:57:48 [manu]
- Present+ Shane_McCarron
- 15:57:54 [manu]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:57:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-minutes.html manu
- 16:51:56 [manu]
- s/Ivan is right/Philip is right/
- 17:30:21 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa
- 18:12:45 [manu]
- rrsagent, bye
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ShaneM to craft errata about case insensitive reserved words. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] [1]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T14-38-58
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: ShaneM to craft errata text about canonical XMLLiterals [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action02] [2]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T14-39-15
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to update JS xmlns getter code on implementors' guide for xhtml mime type support [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/17-rdfa-minutes.html#action02] [3]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T14-39-26
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane to re-draft XMLLiteral errata text [4]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T15-55-27
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu change test suite to use Exclusive Canonical XMLLiteral tests [5]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T15-55-45
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu speak with Andy Seaborne about SPARQL.org implementation re: c14n [6]
- 18:12:45 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/15-rdfa-irc#T15-56-13