IRC log of sparql on 2009-10-06

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:59:08 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #sparql

13:59:08 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/10/06-sparql-irc

13:59:22 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, this will be sparql

13:59:22 [Zakim]

I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, AxelPolleres

13:59:36 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, this will be SPARQL

13:59:36 [Zakim]

I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, AxelPolleres

13:59:56 [kasei]

yeah, can't get on the call with the code, either

14:00:13 [AxelPolleres]

now that's weird

14:00:32 [AndyS]

I don't get "please your conf code" part of the message.

14:00:35 [pgearon]

I'm guessing that Zakim sets up the conference call

14:00:35 [AxelPolleres]

ivan, eric, help?

14:00:51 [ivan]

what is the problem?

14:00:57 [ivan]

hm

14:01:05 [AndyS]

and then "not valid *pass* code"

14:01:12 [SteveH]

here

14:01:14 [SteveH]

same here

14:01:15 [ivan]

sigh...

14:01:15 [AxelPolleres]

seems we have no valid passcode on zakim and zakim doesn'

14:01:22 [AxelPolleres]

t know about the meeting

14:01:26 [LukeWM]

same here

14:01:40 [SteveH]

could be that SPARQL has elapsed, and the new group doesn't have a meeting slot?

14:02:14 [AxelPolleres]

AxelPolleres has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-10-06

14:02:28 [LeeF]

ericP?

14:02:40 [ivan]

eric is not around, I am trying to find out what is going on

14:02:45 [LeeF]

k

14:02:49 [AxelPolleres]

looks like eric isn't available.

14:02:57 [AxelPolleres]

(he said at risk last time already)

14:03:07 [SteveH]

FWIW, Luke and I are at risk, this hotmail thing has meant were quite busy...

14:03:16 [ivan]

in the meantime we can set up a temporary zakim call, which would need a different code access

14:03:21 [ivan]

would that work?

14:03:30 [AxelPolleres]

thanks ivan, apologies all for the trouble. think that should work.

14:03:31 [ivan]

we can then check what is going on later

14:03:36 [AxelPolleres]

+1

14:03:43 [ivan]

we are around 10 people, right?

14:03:48 [SteveH]

yes

14:03:51 [ivan]

zakim, room for 15

14:03:53 [Zakim]

I don't understand 'room for 15', ivan

14:03:57 [ivan]

zakim, room for 15?

14:04:00 [Zakim]

ok, ivan; conference Team_(sparql)14:03Z scheduled with code 772775 (SPARQL) for 60 minutes until 1503Z; however, please note that capacity is now overbooked

14:04:09 [ivan]

ok, let us use this one then

14:04:12 [chimezie]

chimezie has joined #sparql

14:04:17 [ivan]

zakim, dial ivan-voip

14:04:17 [Zakim]

ok, ivan; the call is being made

14:04:18 [Zakim]

Team_(sparql)14:03Z has now started

14:04:19 [Zakim]

+Ivan

14:04:30 [ivan]

(and it works)

14:04:31 [Zakim]

+ +1.310.729.aaaa

14:04:32 [ivan]

I am in

14:04:35 [kasei]

Zakim, aaaa is me

14:04:35 [Zakim]

+kasei; got it

14:04:36 [Zakim]

+??P31

14:04:47 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, code?

14:04:47 [Zakim]

the conference code is 772775 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), AxelPolleres

14:04:49 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P31 is me

14:04:50 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

14:04:51 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:04:51 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:04:54 [Zakim]

+??P33

14:04:58 [AndyS]

zakim, ??P33 is me

14:04:58 [Zakim]

+AndyS; got it

14:05:00 [Zakim]

+??P37

14:05:07 [SteveH]

??P37 is [Garlik]

14:05:17 [SteveH]

Zakim, ??P37 is [Garlik]

14:05:17 [Zakim]

+[Garlik]; got it

14:05:19 [Zakim]

+AxelPolleres

14:05:25 [SteveH]

Zakim, [Garlik] has SteveH and LukeWM

14:05:25 [Zakim]

+SteveH, LukeWM; got it

14:05:31 [KjetilK]

hmm, Zakim didn't ask me for the code...

14:05:44 [SimonS]

Hi, I will not be able to call in, but I will be on IRC for the first 60 mins.

14:05:47 [AxelPolleres]

AxelPolleres has changed the topic to: the conference code is 772775 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152)

14:05:50 [Zakim]

+OlivierCorby

14:05:51 [Zakim]

+Chimezie_Ogbuji

14:06:10 [Zakim]

+??P38

14:06:18 [KjetilK]

Zakim, ??P38 is me

14:06:18 [Zakim]

+KjetilK; got it

14:06:37 [AxelPolleres]

Agenda is: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-10-06

14:07:04 [Zakim]

+pgearon

14:07:06 [AlexPassant]

ok

14:07:15 [pgearon]

whew! That was hard!

14:07:40 [AxelPolleres]

proposed: approve minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-09-29

14:07:53 [AxelPolleres]

topic: admin

14:07:53 [AlexPassant]

how can I tell zakim that I'm sribing , cannot remember the command ?

14:08:12 [KjetilK]

ok

14:08:14 [AxelPolleres]

scribe: kjetil

14:08:37 [AxelPolleres]

resolved: approve minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-09-29

14:09:06 [LukeWM]

scribe: KjetilK

14:09:23 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:09:23 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:09:34 [AxelPolleres]

scribe next time andy

14:09:47 [Zakim]

+ +1.617.588.aabb - is perhaps wonsuk

14:09:56 [KjetilK]

AlexPassant, yeah, that'll work

14:10:06 [AlexPassant]

KjetilK: ok, sorry for the confusion

14:10:26 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Axel to come up with a concrete agenda for F2F

14:10:27 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-112 - Come up with a concrete agenda for F2F [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-10-13].

14:10:47 [KjetilK]

Topic: Liasons

14:10:48 [AxelPolleres]

topic: liaisons

14:11:00 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: anything to report?

14:11:10 [SteveH]

should we have an e-gov liasson?

14:11:34 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: there is something from RIF; it is now CR

14:12:26 [KjetilK]

+1

14:12:42 [AxelPolleres]

proposed: add SteveH as liaison contact for e-Gov xg

14:12:57 [KjetilK]

s/xg/ig/

14:13:06 [SteveH]

no, XG is correct

14:13:10 [AlexPassant]

any liaison for the provenance XG as well ?

14:13:11 [KjetilK]

oh, sorry

14:13:32 [AxelPolleres]

Orri: rdb2rdff starts this or next? week

14:13:54 [AxelPolleres]

axel: RIF is a CR since Oct 1

14:13:56 [SteveH]

oh, no, it is an IG

14:14:06 [SteveH]

sorry KjetilK

14:14:20 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

14:14:50 [KjetilK]

Topic: Using Action tracker for task forces

14:14:50 [iv_an_ru]

iv_an_ru has joined #sparql

14:15:02 [KjetilK]

Topic: ACTIONS

14:15:40 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/open

14:16:01 [Zakim]

+??P7

14:16:03 [kasei]

ericP: still waiting on cvs access :\

14:16:05 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P7 is me

14:16:05 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

14:16:14 [kasei]

s/:/,/

14:16:31 [KjetilK]

I have completed LeeF's ACTION-107

14:16:33 [LukeWM_]

LukeWM_ has joined #sparql

14:16:58 [AxelPolleres]

close ACTION-92

14:16:58 [trackbot]

ACTION-92 Make a comment making it clear that we intend to merge this content with the old document. closed

14:17:59 [AxelPolleres]

close ACTION-93

14:17:59 [trackbot]

ACTION-93 talk with AndyS on ISSUE-41, closed

14:18:01 [ericP]

kasei, w3c web id?

14:18:14 [kasei]

ericP, gwilliam

14:18:15 [AxelPolleres]

simonS?

14:18:24 [KjetilK]

SimonS is on IRC

14:18:39 [SimonS]

here

14:18:57 [SimonS]

cannot call in atm

14:19:01 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: has there been any discussion on the structure of the Query and Update documents?

14:19:33 [KjetilK]

...: it is in the works

14:19:45 [chimezie]

Zakim, mute me

14:19:45 [Zakim]

Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted

14:20:26 [ericP]

kasei, it looks like i have a couple reqs fro you

14:20:40 [ericP]

will have to look after this session (i'm in a conference)

14:20:49 [AndyS]

See related notes comment for this action

14:21:02 [kasei]

ericP, ok thanks (as always)

14:21:07 [AndyS]

"This is probably not going to be done until/unless were clear on whether the function library will be included in /Query 1.1. [Steve Harris]"

14:21:48 [AndyS]

action #97

14:21:48 [trackbot]

Sorry, bad ACTION syntax

14:23:07 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: I suggest we discuss this after FPWD

14:23:22 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: re-issue inclusion of time-allowed features in next iterations of the document

14:23:23 [SteveH]

we should discuss it when we know whether term permits or not

14:23:27 [SteveH]

it's premature until then

14:23:32 [AndyS]

+1

14:23:40 [KjetilK]

+1

14:23:53 [AxelPolleres]

+1

14:23:54 [ivan]

+1

14:23:58 [pgearon]

+1

14:24:04 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: re-issue inclusion of time-allowed features in next iterations of the document

14:24:05 [chimezie]

0

14:24:08 [AndyS]

(+1 to steve)

14:24:49 [AxelPolleres]

topic: status of reviews

14:25:26 [SteveH]

link?

14:28:06 [AndyS]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0011.html

14:28:14 [AndyS]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0008.html

14:28:28 [AndyS]

Reviews of SPARQL 1.1. (Axel and Birte)

14:30:09 [Prateek]

Prateek has joined #sparql

14:30:13 [KjetilK]

AndyS: which documents are we voting on?

14:30:51 [Zakim]

+Prateek

14:30:54 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: I think we should do it next time, since there are quite a few regrets this time

14:31:15 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: Ivan, should we vote this time to finish it before ISWC?

14:31:18 [LeeF]

Sorry I'm not on the call, everyone - wanted to say that if we think we're ready or close-to-ready for FPWD for Query and for Update

14:31:25 [LeeF]

then it would be great for us to resolve to publish those

14:31:32 [LeeF]

even if the rest of the docs need to evolve a bit more

14:31:40 [SteveH]

Update is not in a state to review it

14:31:48 [LeeF]

I think it's a publicity win to have Query and Update published in advance of ISWC

14:31:50 [LeeF]

OK

14:31:54 [LeeF]

well, even query

14:32:01 [LeeF]

s/even query/even just query

14:32:25 [kasei]

LeeF, ivan says on the call that voting next week should be enough time for publcation before iswc...

14:32:34 [LeeF]

thanks, kasei

14:32:51 [KjetilK]

ivan: voting next week should be enough time for publcation before iswc...

14:33:07 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query11/

14:34:29 [KjetilK]

AndyS: the material we are voting on is going to be merged into one single document

14:34:37 [AxelPolleres]

"The final version of this draft shall be integrated with the earlier SPARQL/Query 1.0 document to produce a new document."

14:34:42 [KjetilK]

AndyS: is that new document going to be SPARQL 1.1?

14:35:13 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: AndyS asks if we should publish this under the proposed name, right?

14:36:09 [KjetilK]

AxelPolleres: another possibility is to publish this under a different name

14:36:28 [KjetilK]

ivan: I think it is OK to use that name for it allready

14:36:38 [SteveH]

AxelPolleres, I think the wording is fine

14:36:44 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: remove "to produce a new document" from Status section.

14:36:50 [SteveH]

-1

14:36:56 [KjetilK]

0

14:38:43 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/

14:38:45 [KjetilK]

ivan: I will look into it

14:39:27 [ivan]

http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/

14:39:49 [KjetilK]

ivan: the shortname on IRC is ok

14:40:03 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ as FPWD under http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query11/

14:40:10 [SteveH]

2nded

14:40:21 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:41:04 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ as FPWD under http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query11/ modulo editorial changes

14:41:23 [ivan]

+1 (W3C)

14:41:35 [SteveH]

+1 (Garlik)

14:41:39 [AndyS]

+1 (HP)

14:41:39 [kasei]

+1 (RPI)

14:41:43 [KjetilK]

0 (Computas) # I haven't really had time to review it

14:41:48 [AlexPassant]

+1 (DERI, NUIG)

14:42:07 [chimezie]

+1 (CCF)

14:42:17 [SimonS]

+1

14:42:23 [KjetilK]

Zakim: unmute me

14:42:32 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:42:32 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:42:33 [OlivierCorby]

+1(INRIA)

14:43:08 [ivan]

+1 (OpenLink) (from Orri who does not have IRC)

14:43:35 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:43:35 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:43:36 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: to publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ as FPWD under http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query11/ modulo editorial changes

14:43:41 [ivan]

clap clap clap

14:44:09 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:44:09 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:44:12 [LukeWM_]

q+

14:44:25 [AndyS]

Which update?

14:44:30 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0024.html

14:44:33 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:44:44 [AxelPolleres]

topic: SPARQL/Update

14:45:07 [AndyS]

So this is update language?

14:45:13 [SteveH]

yes

14:45:25 [AxelPolleres]

paul: not quite ready for review.

14:45:30 [AndyS]

Email link is to protocol review.

14:46:04 [AxelPolleres]

simonS, could we get realistically the doc in status to vote next time?

14:46:58 [SimonS]

I think so.

14:47:55 [SimonS]

Paul is up to date again, and I will have time Thursday and Friday.

14:48:01 [KjetilK]

Zakim, mute me

14:48:01 [Zakim]

KjetilK should now be muted

14:48:03 [SimonS]

The todos are clear.

14:48:53 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Luke to Review http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.0/ for FPWD readiness

14:48:53 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-113 - Review http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.0/ for FPWD readiness [on Luke Wilson-Mawer - due 2009-10-13].

14:49:07 [SteveH]

I think LeeF volunteered too

14:49:08 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Steve to Review http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.0/ for FPWD readiness

14:49:15 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Lee to Review http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.0/ for FPWD readiness

14:49:15 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-114 - Review http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.0/ for FPWD readiness [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2009-10-13].

14:50:00 [AxelPolleres]

topic: http-update

14:50:02 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/

14:50:04 [chimezie]

Zakim, unmute me

14:50:04 [Zakim]

Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted

14:50:12 [KjetilK]

Zakim, unmute me

14:50:12 [Zakim]

KjetilK should no longer be muted

14:50:32 [AndyS]

Review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0004.html

14:50:57 [AndyS]

Review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0024.html

14:51:15 [AxelPolleres]

kjetil: who is our audience here?

14:51:49 [AxelPolleres]

... do we need all update features or just a tiny subset?

14:53:04 [AxelPolleres]

...

14:54:26 [AxelPolleres]

Axel: Are all you concerns in your mail?

14:56:45 [AxelPolleres]

chime: all bust last issue could be addressed.

14:57:40 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:57:57 [LukeWM_]

ack me

14:58:18 [KjetilK]

I propose to not mention the proxy graph identifier for now

14:59:40 [KjetilK]

INSERT INTO <http://foobar.com> { payload }

15:00:04 [SteveH]

but that's horribly unfreindly, if youhave eg RDF/XML data

15:00:36 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

15:01:37 [Zakim]

+??P54

15:01:40 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Kjetil to draft a paragraph/sentence to put in the document that clrifies "at risk" status of proxy graph identifier

15:01:40 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-115 - Draft a paragraph/sentence to put in the document that clrifies "at risk" status of proxy graph identifier [on Kjetil Kjernsmo - due 2009-10-13].

15:01:41 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P54 is me

15:01:41 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

15:02:12 [AlexPassant]

scribe: AlexPassant

15:02:27 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Chime to address the concerns in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0024.html

15:02:27 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-116 - Address the concerns in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0024.html [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2009-10-13].

15:02:50 [Zakim]

-KjetilK

15:02:59 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: next topic is Service Description document

15:03:16 [AxelPolleres]

topic: Service Description document

15:03:18 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

15:03:26 [AlexPassant]

... status ?

15:03:33 [AlexPassant]

kasei: not having CVS access

15:03:37 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

15:03:43 [AlexPassant]

... but got some feedback from AndyS and AxelPolleres

15:03:53 [AlexPassant]

... some questions regarding the feedback exchanged by e-mail

15:04:00 [AndyS]

(Un)review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0015.html

15:04:14 [AlexPassant]

... AndyS brought up the point of entailement based on the graph and not on the whole dataset

15:04:18 [AndyS]

Review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0010.html

15:04:32 [AlexPassant]

... property that discuss the entailement for a graph ?

15:04:46 [AlexPassant]

... on the dataset, or ability to say both ?

15:04:47 [Zakim]

-wonsuk

15:04:57 [chimezie]

haven't we essentially made that decision by deciding not to support the user being specific about which entailment regimes are applicable and to which graphs?

15:05:06 [AlexPassant]

... is that necessary ?

15:05:15 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: issue also related to the entailement document

15:05:19 [AlexPassant]

... needs further clarification

15:05:20 [AndyS]

?

15:05:30 [AlexPassant]

... any issue on that ?

15:05:35 [AlexPassant]

... need to raise one

15:05:57 [AndyS]

q+

15:06:20 [AlexPassant]

AndyS: agree with greg

15:06:32 [AlexPassant]

... common case, dataset have only a default graph

15:07:04 [AlexPassant]

kasei: will it be ok to describe the entailement for the whole dataset ?

15:07:17 [AlexPassant]

... describing default graph, etc. with other properties (as entailement per graph)

15:07:31 [AlexPassant]

AndyS: happy if there is a note in the doc mentioning that there can be graph-based entailement

15:07:35 [AlexPassant]

... that can be discussed later

15:07:57 [AlexPassant]

kasei: pointing it in the realm of service description

15:08:09 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: suggested working for that issue ?

15:08:27 [kasei]

s/pointing/punting/

15:08:36 [SteveH]

do we really need an issue for that?

15:08:42 [AxelPolleres]

ISSUE: should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or indicidual graphs?

15:09:07 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: raising the issue will help to link from the doc

15:09:19 [AlexPassant]

SteveH: worrying about duplicating

15:09:24 [AlexPassant]

... get comments on documents and comments on the issues

15:09:45 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: godd to have it in the doc, but tracker keeps an overview of what's open

15:09:55 [AlexPassant]

... continue the policy that we had so far

15:10:01 [AlexPassant]

s/godd/good

15:10:45 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: any other question on the reviews ?

15:10:59 [AlexPassant]

kasei: AxelPolleres mentioned a way to discuss default and named graphs

15:11:18 [AlexPassant]

... will go into a note - ony one property to link a service to the desription on the SD vocabulary

15:11:28 [AlexPassant]

s/ony/only

15:11:34 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: mention it in the doc ?

15:11:59 [AlexPassant]

kasei: AndyS and AxelPolleres mentioned an example to void

15:12:21 [AlexPassant]

AndyS: what is normative and informative in the SD document

15:12:53 [AxelPolleres]

to make example on extensibility by other vocabs informative seems good.

15:13:08 [AndyS]

s/is/if/

15:14:10 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: mention explicitely (ideally with an example) how such extensibility could include

15:14:19 [AlexPassant]

kasei: ok

15:14:33 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: do not need to agree on a vocabulary at the moment, example vocab should work

15:14:47 [AlexPassant]

+1 for mentioning it as an example

15:14:51 [AlexPassant]

along maybe with DARQ

15:15:10 [SimonS]

void is undergoing revision anyway.

15:15:22 [SimonS]

+1 for AlexPassant

15:16:06 [AlexPassant]

http://darq.sf.net/dose/0.1# is 404 :-(

15:16:17 [AlexPassant]

kasei: will sent tothe list before next t-con

15:16:22 [AlexPassant]

... will try by the end of the week

15:16:27 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: greg to incorporate an example for extensibility by the end of the week into SD

15:16:27 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-117 - Incorporate an example for extensibility by the end of the week into SD [on Gregory Williams - due 2009-10-13].

15:17:32 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

15:17:32 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

15:18:07 [AxelPolleres]

topic: entailment regimes doc.

15:19:41 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: ivanH to review sparql-entailment

15:19:41 [trackbot]

Sorry, couldn't find user - ivanH

15:19:48 [AndyS]

q+

15:20:42 [ivan]

action: ivan to review sparql-entailement

15:20:42 [trackbot]

Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - ivan

15:20:42 [trackbot]

Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. ivan, imikhail)

15:21:08 [ivan]

action: ivanherman to review sparql entailement document

15:21:08 [trackbot]

Sorry, couldn't find user - ivanherman

15:22:04 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: ivan to review the RDFS part of sparql-entailment

15:22:04 [trackbot]

Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - ivan

15:22:04 [trackbot]

Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. ivan, imikhail)

15:22:29 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: axel to enter ivan's action manuallty

15:22:29 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-118 - Enter ivan's action manuallty [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-10-13].

15:23:39 [Zakim]

-Chimezie_Ogbuji

15:23:45 [AlexPassant]

AxelPolleres: meeting ajourned

15:23:45 [LukeWM_]

bye

15:23:46 [Zakim]

-Ivan

15:23:51 [pgearon]

bye. And thanks

15:23:51 [Zakim]

-[Garlik]

15:23:53 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

15:23:54 [Zakim]

-Prateek

15:23:54 [Zakim]

-AxelPolleres

15:23:56 [Zakim]

-kasei

15:23:57 [Zakim]

-pgearon

15:24:01 [Zakim]

-OlivierCorby

15:25:35 [Zakim]

-AndyS

15:25:36 [Zakim]

Team_(sparql)14:03Z has ended

15:25:38 [Zakim]

Attendees were Ivan, +1.310.729.aaaa, kasei, AlexPassant, AndyS, AxelPolleres, SteveH, LukeWM, OlivierCorby, Chimezie_Ogbuji, KjetilK, pgearon, +1.617.588.aabb, Prateek

15:28:43 [OlivierCorby]

OlivierCorby has left #sparql

15:34:29 [AlexPassant]

RRSAgent, make minutes public

15:34:29 [RRSAgent]

I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', AlexPassant. Try /msg RRSAgent help

15:35:34 [AlexPassant]

rrsagent, make records public

15:51:25 [SimonS]

SimonS has left #sparql

16:57:49 [AndyS]

AndyS has joined #sparql

17:22:36 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #sparql

18:31:27 [AxelPolleres]

AxelPolleres has left #sparql

20:03:43 [LukeWM]

LukeWM has joined #sparql

20:30:57 [LukeWM_]

LukeWM_ has joined #sparql

20:57:59 [LukeWM]

LukeWM has joined #sparql

21:13:10 [KjetilK]

KjetilK has joined #sparql

21:39:49 [KjetilK]

KjetilK has joined #sparql

21:49:09 [KjetilK]

KjetilK has joined #sparql

22:56:24 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #sparql

23:10:15 [LeeF]

LeeF has joined #sparql

23:52:57 [pgearon]

pgearon has joined #sparql