14:51:16 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:51:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-irc 14:51:20 zakim, this will be rif 14:51:20 ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 14:51:25 Chair: Chris Welty 14:51:36 Meeting: RIF Telecon 15-Sep-09 14:52:36 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0035.html 14:53:19 ChrisW has changed the topic to: 15 Sept RIF Telecon agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0035.html 14:53:39 rrsagent, make minutes 14:53:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 14:53:48 agenda+ Admin 14:53:54 agenda+ Liason 14:53:59 agenda+ Action review 14:54:05 agenda+ CR Status update 14:54:14 agenda+ RIF/XML 14:54:23 agenda+ OWL2RL 14:54:37 agenda+ RIFIntro 14:54:44 agenda+ Test Cases 14:54:49 agenda+ AOB 14:56:53 rrsagent, make logs public 15:00:06 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:00:07 josb has joined #rif 15:00:14 +Sandro 15:01:01 +AxelPolleres 15:01:13 csma has joined #rif 15:01:15 +[IBM] 15:01:22 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 15:01:22 +ChrisW; got it 15:01:55 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 15:03:04 +giorgi 15:03:36 +Leora_Morgenstern 15:03:41 +Stella_Mitchell 15:03:45 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:04:01 Harold has joined #rif 15:04:07 zakim, giorgi is josb 15:04:07 +josb; got it 15:04:27 +Christian 15:05:21 zakim, christian is me 15:05:21 +csma; got it 15:05:40 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:05:40 On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, josb, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, csma 15:05:51 yes 15:05:53 Scribe: StellaMitchell 15:05:57 +[NRCC] 15:06:16 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:06:16 +Harold; got it 15:06:36 MInutes for June 23: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/23-rif-minutes.html 15:06:44 PROPOSED: accept June 23 meeting minutes 15:06:49 Hey, that was my birthday! 15:06:56 Nope 15:07:01 RESOLVED: accept June 23 meeting minutes 15:07:23 http://www.w3.org/2009/08/25-rif-minutes.html 15:07:40 RESOLVED: accept Aug 25 meeting minutes 15:08:45 action: leora update Sept 1 minutes 15:08:45 Created ACTION-910 - Update Sept 1 minutes [on Leora Morgenstern - due 2009-09-22]. 15:09:05 zakim, list agenda 15:09:05 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda: 15:09:06 1. Admin [from ChrisW] 15:09:06 2. Liason [from ChrisW] 15:09:07 3. Action review [from ChrisW] 15:09:09 4. CR Status update [from ChrisW] 15:09:09 5. RIF/XML [from ChrisW] 15:09:10 6. OWL2RL [from ChrisW] 15:09:10 7. RIFIntro [from ChrisW] 15:09:12 8. Test Cases [from ChrisW] 15:09:14 9. AOB [from ChrisW] 15:09:16 agenda+ UCR 15:09:28 zakim, next item 15:09:28 agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:09:32 + +1.503.533.aaaa 15:09:37 zakim, close item 1 15:09:37 agendum 1, Admin, closed 15:09:38 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:09:39 2. Liason [from ChrisW] 15:09:42 zakim, next item 15:09:42 agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:09:54 cw: Sandro, update on OWL? 15:10:10 +[IPcaller] 15:10:21 zakim, mute me 15:10:21 csma should now be muted 15:10:25 ghallmar has joined #rif 15:10:39 sandro: rif and owl 2 both use xsd 1.1, xsd 1.1 looks like won't get out of CR until Jan next year 15:10:44 zakim, aaaa is ghallmar 15:10:44 +ghallmar; got it 15:11:03 ...this is a problem and we might have found an acceptable compromise: 15:12:54 owl will refer normatively to xsd 1.0 as ammeded by 1.1, and until such time as 1.1 become a recommendation any features of owl that depend on it are optional 15:13:08 cw: will those items be called out explictly? 15:13:12 sandro: no 15:13:48 cw: is it ok for rif to go to pr if xsd 1.1 is in pr? 15:13:53 sandro: yes 15:14:15 ....above plan wrt to owl should work for rif to 15:14:19 s/to/too/ 15:14:31 q+ 15:14:57 ack csma 15:14:58 ack csma 15:15:18 csma: sandro, did you say we are not likely to go to rec before January? 15:15:32 sandro: yes, but it could likely be sooner also 15:16:59 cw: we still plan to leave the CR deadline where we originally set it -- even though the beginning was pushed back a week 15:17:45 cw: ....it's near the end of October, and so four weeks is reasonable 15:18:02 ...if we don't get the required implementations, we'll have to extend 15:18:58 Leora has joined #rif 15:19:00 zakim, next item 15:19:00 agendum 3. "Action review" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:19:14 sandro: we use xpath heavily, so xpath people may have comments on the way we are using them 15:19:41 action 909 continued 15:19:41 Sorry, couldn't find user - 909 15:20:08 close action-905 15:20:08 ACTION-905 Ask Gary about status of implementation closed 15:20:26 action 904 continued 15:20:26 Sorry, couldn't find user - 904 15:20:49 action-903 continued 15:21:16 close action-901 15:21:16 ACTION-901 Contact WL for response closed 15:21:54 action: gary to respond to laun 15:21:54 Created ACTION-911 - Respond to laun [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-09-22]. 15:22:21 close action-900 15:22:21 ACTION-900 Update with text and examples by end of Aug (XML data document) closed 15:23:06 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_FAQ 15:23:38 close action-897 15:23:38 ACTION-897 Ask jos and axel to answer 3.10 and 3.11 closed 15:24:16 answer to 3.11 is fair enough :-) 15:25:05 sandro modified that case since Jos originally wrote it also 15:26:00 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/MalformedLists 15:26:18 people couldn't agree on what was entailed and what was not entailed 15:27:20 jos: discussing malformed list test case, per action-896 15:28:54 close action-896 15:28:54 ACTION-896 Ask Jos about http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/MalformedLists closed 15:29:09 drop the "@@@ ..." part you mean, yes? 15:29:50 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:29:50 On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, josb, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, csma, Harold, ghallmar, DaveReynolds (muted) 15:30:39 close action-893 15:30:39 ACTION-893 Change implementation page closed 15:30:43 close action-894 15:30:43 ACTION-894 Add possible/potential implemenations on the Wiki page (labeled as potential implementations) closed 15:31:00 cw: csma, are you planning to put an ILOG entry on the implementations page? 15:31:04 action: Chris to send email about implementation reports 15:31:04 Created ACTION-912 - Send email about implementation reports [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22]. 15:31:13 csma: yes. 15:32:16 sandro: and an email should be sent whenever a new implementation is added to the page, per the instructions for submitting an implementation report 15:32:27 action: christian to send ilog implementation report 15:32:27 Created ACTION-913 - Send ilog implementation report [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-09-22]. 15:33:13 close action-875 15:33:13 ACTION-875 Contact Evan Wallace (then Edward Barkmeyer). closed 15:35:19 csma: I have a questions about Changhai's action-791 15:35:58 ...he wrote some examples, but he is concerned about adding them about official test cases because he thinks they are different from the others 15:36:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0039.html on action-733 15:36:08 cw: he can upload them and we'll review them 15:38:34 q? 15:38:38 zakim, next item 15:38:38 agendum 4. "CR Status update" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:39:35 cw: slight snafu, forgot to send email to the chairs mailing list 15:40:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0040.html 15:41:04 cw: we asked if they could review/respond to these within the week 15:41:30 q+ 15:41:36 csma: there was a new public comment, what shall we do about it? 15:42:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments/2009Sep/0003.html 15:42:32 axel: that comment is about an ambiguity in our grammar because we allow unicode strings in some places where I think we shouldn't 15:42:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0003.html 15:43:34 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#rPN_PREFIX 15:43:35 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#rPN_LOCAL 15:43:47 ... I think for variables, prefixes, etc, we should have more constrained productions (as in sparql) 15:43:52 ...in the PS 15:43:59 cw: should we fix this? 15:44:07 axel: yes, I think we need to 15:44:10 -josb 15:44:39 +josb 15:45:58 Name ::= UNICODESTRING 15:45:58 Var ::= '?' UNICODESTRING 15:46:06 axel: he is particularly complaining about the above 2 productions 15:46:29 .... I think we should make them more constrained 15:46:46 cw: who should make this change? 15:47:40 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#Shortcuts_for_Constants_in_RIF.27s_Presentation_Syntax 15:48:20 # LocalName, cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816/#NT-LocalPart 15:49:03 axel: is it acceptable in our spec to just point to productions in other specs? 15:49:10 ....(as DTB currently does) 15:50:11 harold: I think Axel's approach is good 15:52:22 sandro: since this only affects the PS, names will still be unrestricted in XML, right? 15:52:39 action: axel to replace name, var, and dialect by ncname in all BNF grammars 15:52:39 Created ACTION-914 - Replace name, var, and dialect by ncname in all BNF grammars [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22]. 15:54:44 csma: I responded to Dave's and Gary's reviews, and I think there is a fair amount of work left to implement their comments 15:55:05 ...so I don't think we can publish in this round 15:55:42 ...when would be the next opportunity to publish the RIF XML-DATA document? 15:56:10 cw: any Tues or Thurs we can publish. When do you think you could have it ready? 15:56:34 csma: I could update it by next week, but would Dave and Gary be able to rereview it then? 15:57:20 ...if I have it ready next week, and Gary and Dave review in a week, we could publish in 2 weeks 15:57:46 gary: yes, I can review it 15:57:49 dave: yes 15:58:05 -csma 15:58:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0002.html 15:58:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0013.html 15:58:19 action: christian to update xml data document by 1 week 15:58:19 Created ACTION-915 - Update xml data document by 1 week [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-09-22]. 15:58:20 open issues... 15:58:33 action: gary to review changes to xml document by 2 weeks 15:58:33 Created ACTION-916 - Review changes to xml document by 2 weeks [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-09-22]. 15:58:38 action: dave to review changes to xml document by 2 weeks 15:58:38 Created ACTION-917 - Review changes to xml document by 2 weeks [on Dave Reynolds - due 2009-09-22]. 15:59:34 mdean has joined #rif 15:59:45 action: axel to respond to damasio after change to syntax 15:59:45 Created ACTION-918 - Respond to damasio after change to syntax [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22]. 15:59:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0002.html 16:00:05 +Mike_Dean 16:00:25 axel: I just realized that there is a problem in DTB about prefix directives that mk pointed out that I have not done yet 16:00:45 Axel to put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive 16:01:02 ACTION: Axel to put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive in DTB 16:01:03 Created ACTION-919 - Put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive in DTB [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22]. 16:01:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0013.html 16:01:29 Axel: and another item that might need discussion: see email above 16:03:08 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=DTB&diff=10665&oldid=10495 16:04:16 Axel: above diff shows my proposed change 16:04:40 cw: how to we handle variable arity predicates in DTB? 16:05:04 ...concat, for example 16:05:35 axel: xpath version of concat uses a sequence but xpath version of string-join does not 16:06:39 axel: I don't have a strong opinion on what fix we should adopt; I chose the simplest one 16:07:25 cw: mk expressed an opinion about this but he isn't here 16:09:01 cw: axel, could you respond to mk's email saying we discussed it in the telecon and describing the approach you took 16:09:48 q? 16:09:53 ack axel 16:09:56 zakim, next item 16:09:56 agendum 5. "RIF/XML" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:10:56 axel: sandro, would you review the list functions if I rework them to make them uniform with other functions in dtb 16:12:08 ...I'm talking about writing the semantics in terms of mappings 16:12:08 action: axel to look at informal list mappings 16:12:08 Created ACTION-920 - Look at informal list mappings [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22]. 16:12:14 zakim, next item 16:12:14 agendum 6. "OWL2RL" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:12:44 for the records: my review is not yet complete 16:13:07 cw: dave, do you know of other reviewers for this document? 16:13:12 dave: jos, maybe 16:13:36 action: josb to review the OWL2RL by 1 week 16:13:36 Created ACTION-921 - Review the OWL2RL by 1 week [on Jos de Bruijn - due 2009-09-22]. 16:15:01 zakim, next item 16:15:01 agendum 7. "RIFIntro" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:15:01 cw: any other discussion on OWL-RL? 16:15:40 cw: we need two reviewers for this if we're going to publish it 16:15:50 cw: mike, could you review this? 16:15:54 miked: yes 16:16:13 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Guide 16:16:15 action: chris to link RIF intro from home page 16:16:15 Created ACTION-922 - Link RIF intro from home page [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22]. 16:16:39 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:16:39 On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, Harold, ghallmar, DaveReynolds, josb, Mike_Dean 16:16:49 action: Chris to review RIF Guide 16:16:49 Created ACTION-923 - Review RIF Guide [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22]. 16:17:02 zakim, next item 16:17:02 agendum 8. "Test Cases" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:21:09 Sandro, http://www.w3.org/TR/ seems to be a huge area of W3C documents. 16:21:26 ... including Recently Published Working Drafts 16:23:27 level of indirection: http://www.w3.org/2009/owl-test-cases 16:23:45 owl 1 test cases: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/ 16:23:50 (and Recently Published Group Notes). 16:24:04 owl 2 test document: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-conformance/ 16:24:49 cw: need two reviewers for test cases 16:25:14 action: mdean to review test cases 16:25:15 Created ACTION-924 - Review test cases [on Mike Dean - due 2009-09-22]. 16:25:22 mdean: can review test doc 16:25:54 action: leora to review RIF Guide 16:25:54 Created ACTION-925 - Review RIF Guide [on Leora Morgenstern - due 2009-09-22]. 16:25:55 leora: I can review the RIF intro, so Mike D doesn't have to review both 16:26:26 action: sandro to review test cases 16:26:26 Created ACTION-926 - Review test cases [on Sandro Hawke - due 2009-09-22]. 16:26:35 zakim, next item 16:26:35 agendum 9. "AOB" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:26:43 zakim, next item 16:26:43 agendum 9 was just opened, ChrisW 16:26:50 zakim, take up item 10 16:26:50 agendum 10. "UCR" taken up [from ChrisW] 16:28:53 cw: next telecon in 2 weeks 16:28:55 -Harold 16:28:56 -AxelPolleres 16:28:56 -josb 16:28:58 -ghallmar 16:28:59 zakim, list attendees 16:28:59 As of this point the attendees have been Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, josb, csma, Harold, +1.503.533.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ghallmar, Mike_Dean 16:29:03 -Leora_Morgenstern 16:29:03 -Mike_Dean 16:29:09 -DaveReynolds 16:29:15 Regrets: AdrianPaschke MichaelKifer 16:29:20 rrsagent, make minutes 16:29:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 16:29:43 -Stella_Mitchell 16:30:47 -ChrisW 16:30:48 -Sandro 16:30:48 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:30:49 Attendees were Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, josb, csma, Harold, +1.503.533.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ghallmar, Mike_Dean 16:31:05 sandro? 16:46:54 AxelPolleres has left #rif