IRC log of rif on 2009-09-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:51:16 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rif
- 14:51:16 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-irc
- 14:51:20 [ChrisW]
- zakim, this will be rif
- 14:51:20 [Zakim]
- ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes
- 14:51:25 [ChrisW]
- Chair: Chris Welty
- 14:51:36 [ChrisW]
- Meeting: RIF Telecon 15-Sep-09
- 14:52:36 [ChrisW]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0035.html
- 14:53:19 [ChrisW]
- ChrisW has changed the topic to: 15 Sept RIF Telecon agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0035.html
- 14:53:39 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:53:39 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 14:53:48 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Admin
- 14:53:54 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Liason
- 14:53:59 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Action review
- 14:54:05 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ CR Status update
- 14:54:14 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ RIF/XML
- 14:54:23 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ OWL2RL
- 14:54:37 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ RIFIntro
- 14:54:44 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ Test Cases
- 14:54:49 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ AOB
- 14:56:53 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 15:00:06 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started
- 15:00:07 [josb]
- josb has joined #rif
- 15:00:14 [Zakim]
- +Sandro
- 15:01:01 [Zakim]
- +AxelPolleres
- 15:01:13 [csma]
- csma has joined #rif
- 15:01:15 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:01:22 [ChrisW]
- zakim, ibm is temporarily me
- 15:01:22 [Zakim]
- +ChrisW; got it
- 15:01:55 [StellaMitchell]
- StellaMitchell has joined #rif
- 15:03:04 [Zakim]
- +giorgi
- 15:03:36 [Zakim]
- +Leora_Morgenstern
- 15:03:41 [Zakim]
- +Stella_Mitchell
- 15:03:45 [DaveReynolds]
- DaveReynolds has joined #rif
- 15:04:01 [Harold]
- Harold has joined #rif
- 15:04:07 [ChrisW]
- zakim, giorgi is josb
- 15:04:07 [Zakim]
- +josb; got it
- 15:04:27 [Zakim]
- +Christian
- 15:05:21 [csma]
- zakim, christian is me
- 15:05:21 [Zakim]
- +csma; got it
- 15:05:40 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:05:40 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, josb, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, csma
- 15:05:51 [StellaMitchell]
- yes
- 15:05:53 [ChrisW]
- Scribe: StellaMitchell
- 15:05:57 [Zakim]
- +[NRCC]
- 15:06:16 [Harold]
- zakim, [NRCC] is me
- 15:06:16 [Zakim]
- +Harold; got it
- 15:06:36 [ChrisW]
- MInutes for June 23: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/23-rif-minutes.html
- 15:06:44 [ChrisW]
- PROPOSED: accept June 23 meeting minutes
- 15:06:49 [josb]
- Hey, that was my birthday!
- 15:06:56 [josb]
- Nope
- 15:07:01 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: accept June 23 meeting minutes
- 15:07:23 [ChrisW]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/08/25-rif-minutes.html
- 15:07:40 [ChrisW]
- RESOLVED: accept Aug 25 meeting minutes
- 15:08:45 [ChrisW]
- action: leora update Sept 1 minutes
- 15:08:45 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-910 - Update Sept 1 minutes [on Leora Morgenstern - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:09:05 [ChrisW]
- zakim, list agenda
- 15:09:05 [Zakim]
- I see 9 items remaining on the agenda:
- 15:09:06 [Zakim]
- 1. Admin [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:06 [Zakim]
- 2. Liason [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:07 [Zakim]
- 3. Action review [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:09 [Zakim]
- 4. CR Status update [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:09 [Zakim]
- 5. RIF/XML [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:10 [Zakim]
- 6. OWL2RL [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:10 [Zakim]
- 7. RIFIntro [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:12 [Zakim]
- 8. Test Cases [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:14 [Zakim]
- 9. AOB [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:16 [ChrisW]
- agenda+ UCR
- 15:09:28 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:09:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:32 [Zakim]
- + +1.503.533.aaaa
- 15:09:37 [ChrisW]
- zakim, close item 1
- 15:09:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 1, Admin, closed
- 15:09:38 [Zakim]
- I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:09:39 [Zakim]
- 2. Liason [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:42 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:09:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:09:54 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: Sandro, update on OWL?
- 15:10:10 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:10:21 [csma]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:10:21 [Zakim]
- csma should now be muted
- 15:10:25 [ghallmar]
- ghallmar has joined #rif
- 15:10:39 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: rif and owl 2 both use xsd 1.1, xsd 1.1 looks like won't get out of CR until Jan next year
- 15:10:44 [ChrisW]
- zakim, aaaa is ghallmar
- 15:10:44 [Zakim]
- +ghallmar; got it
- 15:11:03 [StellaMitchell]
- ...this is a problem and we might have found an acceptable compromise:
- 15:12:54 [StellaMitchell]
- owl will refer normatively to xsd 1.0 as ammeded by 1.1, and until such time as 1.1 become a recommendation any features of owl that depend on it are optional
- 15:13:08 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: will those items be called out explictly?
- 15:13:12 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: no
- 15:13:48 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: is it ok for rif to go to pr if xsd 1.1 is in pr?
- 15:13:53 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: yes
- 15:14:15 [StellaMitchell]
- ....above plan wrt to owl should work for rif to
- 15:14:19 [StellaMitchell]
- s/to/too/
- 15:14:31 [csma]
- q+
- 15:14:57 [ChrisW]
- ack csma
- 15:14:58 [csma]
- ack csma
- 15:15:18 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: sandro, did you say we are not likely to go to rec before January?
- 15:15:32 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: yes, but it could likely be sooner also
- 15:16:59 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: we still plan to leave the CR deadline where we originally set it -- even though the beginning was pushed back a week
- 15:17:45 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: ....it's near the end of October, and so four weeks is reasonable
- 15:18:02 [StellaMitchell]
- ...if we don't get the required implementations, we'll have to extend
- 15:18:58 [Leora]
- Leora has joined #rif
- 15:19:00 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:19:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Action review" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:19:14 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: we use xpath heavily, so xpath people may have comments on the way we are using them
- 15:19:41 [StellaMitchell]
- action 909 continued
- 15:19:41 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - 909
- 15:20:08 [ChrisW]
- close action-905
- 15:20:08 [trackbot]
- ACTION-905 Ask Gary about status of implementation closed
- 15:20:26 [StellaMitchell]
- action 904 continued
- 15:20:26 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - 904
- 15:20:49 [StellaMitchell]
- action-903 continued
- 15:21:16 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-901
- 15:21:16 [trackbot]
- ACTION-901 Contact WL for response closed
- 15:21:54 [ChrisW]
- action: gary to respond to laun
- 15:21:54 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-911 - Respond to laun [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:22:21 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-900
- 15:22:21 [trackbot]
- ACTION-900 Update with text and examples by end of Aug (XML data document) closed
- 15:23:06 [ChrisW]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_FAQ
- 15:23:38 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-897
- 15:23:38 [trackbot]
- ACTION-897 Ask jos and axel to answer 3.10 and 3.11 closed
- 15:24:16 [AxelPolleres]
- answer to 3.11 is fair enough :-)
- 15:25:05 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro modified that case since Jos originally wrote it also
- 15:26:00 [ChrisW]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/MalformedLists
- 15:26:18 [StellaMitchell]
- people couldn't agree on what was entailed and what was not entailed
- 15:27:20 [StellaMitchell]
- jos: discussing malformed list test case, per action-896
- 15:28:54 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-896
- 15:28:54 [trackbot]
- ACTION-896 Ask Jos about http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/MalformedLists closed
- 15:29:09 [AxelPolleres]
- drop the "@@@ ..." part you mean, yes?
- 15:29:50 [AxelPolleres]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:29:50 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, josb, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, csma, Harold, ghallmar, DaveReynolds (muted)
- 15:30:39 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-893
- 15:30:39 [trackbot]
- ACTION-893 Change implementation page closed
- 15:30:43 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-894
- 15:30:43 [trackbot]
- ACTION-894 Add possible/potential implemenations on the Wiki page (labeled as potential implementations) closed
- 15:31:00 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: csma, are you planning to put an ILOG entry on the implementations page?
- 15:31:04 [ChrisW]
- action: Chris to send email about implementation reports
- 15:31:04 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-912 - Send email about implementation reports [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:31:13 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: yes.
- 15:32:16 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: and an email should be sent whenever a new implementation is added to the page, per the instructions for submitting an implementation report
- 15:32:27 [ChrisW]
- action: christian to send ilog implementation report
- 15:32:27 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-913 - Send ilog implementation report [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:33:13 [StellaMitchell]
- close action-875
- 15:33:13 [trackbot]
- ACTION-875 Contact Evan Wallace (then Edward Barkmeyer). closed
- 15:35:19 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: I have a questions about Changhai's action-791
- 15:35:58 [StellaMitchell]
- ...he wrote some examples, but he is concerned about adding them about official test cases because he thinks they are different from the others
- 15:36:08 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0039.html on action-733
- 15:36:08 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: he can upload them and we'll review them
- 15:38:34 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 15:38:38 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 15:38:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "CR Status update" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 15:39:35 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: slight snafu, forgot to send email to the chairs mailing list
- 15:40:25 [StellaMitchell]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Sep/0040.html
- 15:41:04 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: we asked if they could review/respond to these within the week
- 15:41:30 [AxelPolleres]
- q+
- 15:41:36 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: there was a new public comment, what shall we do about it?
- 15:42:00 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-comments/2009Sep/0003.html
- 15:42:32 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: that comment is about an ambiguity in our grammar because we allow unicode strings in some places where I think we shouldn't
- 15:42:33 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0003.html
- 15:43:34 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#rPN_PREFIX
- 15:43:35 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#rPN_LOCAL
- 15:43:47 [StellaMitchell]
- ... I think for variables, prefixes, etc, we should have more constrained productions (as in sparql)
- 15:43:52 [StellaMitchell]
- ...in the PS
- 15:43:59 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: should we fix this?
- 15:44:07 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: yes, I think we need to
- 15:44:10 [Zakim]
- -josb
- 15:44:39 [Zakim]
- +josb
- 15:45:58 [AxelPolleres]
- Name ::= UNICODESTRING
- 15:45:58 [AxelPolleres]
- Var ::= '?' UNICODESTRING
- 15:46:06 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: he is particularly complaining about the above 2 productions
- 15:46:29 [StellaMitchell]
- .... I think we should make them more constrained
- 15:46:46 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: who should make this change?
- 15:47:40 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#Shortcuts_for_Constants_in_RIF.27s_Presentation_Syntax
- 15:48:20 [AxelPolleres]
- # LocalName, cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816/#NT-LocalPart
- 15:49:03 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: is it acceptable in our spec to just point to productions in other specs?
- 15:49:10 [StellaMitchell]
- ....(as DTB currently does)
- 15:50:11 [StellaMitchell]
- harold: I think Axel's approach is good
- 15:52:22 [StellaMitchell]
- sandro: since this only affects the PS, names will still be unrestricted in XML, right?
- 15:52:39 [ChrisW]
- action: axel to replace name, var, and dialect by ncname in all BNF grammars
- 15:52:39 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-914 - Replace name, var, and dialect by ncname in all BNF grammars [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:54:44 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: I responded to Dave's and Gary's reviews, and I think there is a fair amount of work left to implement their comments
- 15:55:05 [StellaMitchell]
- ...so I don't think we can publish in this round
- 15:55:42 [StellaMitchell]
- ...when would be the next opportunity to publish the RIF XML-DATA document?
- 15:56:10 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: any Tues or Thurs we can publish. When do you think you could have it ready?
- 15:56:34 [StellaMitchell]
- csma: I could update it by next week, but would Dave and Gary be able to rereview it then?
- 15:57:20 [StellaMitchell]
- ...if I have it ready next week, and Gary and Dave review in a week, we could publish in 2 weeks
- 15:57:46 [StellaMitchell]
- gary: yes, I can review it
- 15:57:49 [StellaMitchell]
- dave: yes
- 15:58:05 [Zakim]
- -csma
- 15:58:17 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0002.html
- 15:58:17 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0013.html
- 15:58:19 [ChrisW]
- action: christian to update xml data document by 1 week
- 15:58:19 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-915 - Update xml data document by 1 week [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:58:20 [AxelPolleres]
- open issues...
- 15:58:33 [ChrisW]
- action: gary to review changes to xml document by 2 weeks
- 15:58:33 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-916 - Review changes to xml document by 2 weeks [on Gary Hallmark - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:58:38 [ChrisW]
- action: dave to review changes to xml document by 2 weeks
- 15:58:38 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-917 - Review changes to xml document by 2 weeks [on Dave Reynolds - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:59:34 [mdean]
- mdean has joined #rif
- 15:59:45 [ChrisW]
- action: axel to respond to damasio after change to syntax
- 15:59:45 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-918 - Respond to damasio after change to syntax [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22].
- 15:59:56 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0002.html
- 16:00:05 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Dean
- 16:00:25 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: I just realized that there is a problem in DTB about prefix directives that mk pointed out that I have not done yet
- 16:00:45 [AxelPolleres]
- Axel to put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive
- 16:01:02 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: Axel to put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive in DTB
- 16:01:03 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-919 - Put IRIs within <...> in the Prefix directive in DTB [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:01:18 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2009Aug/0013.html
- 16:01:29 [StellaMitchell]
- Axel: and another item that might need discussion: see email above
- 16:03:08 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=DTB&diff=10665&oldid=10495
- 16:04:16 [StellaMitchell]
- Axel: above diff shows my proposed change
- 16:04:40 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: how to we handle variable arity predicates in DTB?
- 16:05:04 [StellaMitchell]
- ...concat, for example
- 16:05:35 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: xpath version of concat uses a sequence but xpath version of string-join does not
- 16:06:39 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: I don't have a strong opinion on what fix we should adopt; I chose the simplest one
- 16:07:25 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: mk expressed an opinion about this but he isn't here
- 16:09:01 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: axel, could you respond to mk's email saying we discussed it in the telecon and describing the approach you took
- 16:09:48 [ChrisW]
- q?
- 16:09:53 [ChrisW]
- ack axel
- 16:09:56 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:09:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "RIF/XML" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:10:56 [StellaMitchell]
- axel: sandro, would you review the list functions if I rework them to make them uniform with other functions in dtb
- 16:12:08 [StellaMitchell]
- ...I'm talking about writing the semantics in terms of mappings
- 16:12:08 [ChrisW]
- action: axel to look at informal list mappings
- 16:12:08 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-920 - Look at informal list mappings [on Axel Polleres - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:12:14 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:12:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "OWL2RL" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:12:44 [AxelPolleres]
- for the records: my review is not yet complete
- 16:13:07 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: dave, do you know of other reviewers for this document?
- 16:13:12 [StellaMitchell]
- dave: jos, maybe
- 16:13:36 [ChrisW]
- action: josb to review the OWL2RL by 1 week
- 16:13:36 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-921 - Review the OWL2RL by 1 week [on Jos de Bruijn - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:15:01 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:15:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "RIFIntro" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:15:01 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: any other discussion on OWL-RL?
- 16:15:40 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: we need two reviewers for this if we're going to publish it
- 16:15:50 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: mike, could you review this?
- 16:15:54 [StellaMitchell]
- miked: yes
- 16:16:13 [Harold]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Guide
- 16:16:15 [ChrisW]
- action: chris to link RIF intro from home page
- 16:16:15 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-922 - Link RIF intro from home page [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:16:39 [ChrisW]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:16:39 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, Harold, ghallmar, DaveReynolds, josb, Mike_Dean
- 16:16:49 [ChrisW]
- action: Chris to review RIF Guide
- 16:16:49 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-923 - Review RIF Guide [on Christopher Welty - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:17:02 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:17:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "Test Cases" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:21:09 [Harold]
- Sandro, http://www.w3.org/TR/ seems to be a huge area of W3C documents.
- 16:21:26 [Harold]
- ... including Recently Published Working Drafts
- 16:23:27 [sandro]
- level of indirection: http://www.w3.org/2009/owl-test-cases
- 16:23:45 [sandro]
- owl 1 test cases: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/
- 16:23:50 [Harold]
- (and Recently Published Group Notes).
- 16:24:04 [sandro]
- owl 2 test document: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-conformance/
- 16:24:49 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: need two reviewers for test cases
- 16:25:14 [ChrisW]
- action: mdean to review test cases
- 16:25:15 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-924 - Review test cases [on Mike Dean - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:25:22 [StellaMitchell]
- mdean: can review test doc
- 16:25:54 [ChrisW]
- action: leora to review RIF Guide
- 16:25:54 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-925 - Review RIF Guide [on Leora Morgenstern - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:25:55 [StellaMitchell]
- leora: I can review the RIF intro, so Mike D doesn't have to review both
- 16:26:26 [ChrisW]
- action: sandro to review test cases
- 16:26:26 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-926 - Review test cases [on Sandro Hawke - due 2009-09-22].
- 16:26:35 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:26:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 9. "AOB" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:26:43 [ChrisW]
- zakim, next item
- 16:26:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 9 was just opened, ChrisW
- 16:26:50 [ChrisW]
- zakim, take up item 10
- 16:26:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 10. "UCR" taken up [from ChrisW]
- 16:28:53 [StellaMitchell]
- cw: next telecon in 2 weeks
- 16:28:55 [Zakim]
- -Harold
- 16:28:56 [Zakim]
- -AxelPolleres
- 16:28:56 [Zakim]
- -josb
- 16:28:58 [Zakim]
- -ghallmar
- 16:28:59 [ChrisW]
- zakim, list attendees
- 16:28:59 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, josb, csma, Harold, +1.503.533.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ghallmar, Mike_Dean
- 16:29:03 [Zakim]
- -Leora_Morgenstern
- 16:29:03 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Dean
- 16:29:09 [Zakim]
- -DaveReynolds
- 16:29:15 [ChrisW]
- Regrets: AdrianPaschke MichaelKifer
- 16:29:20 [ChrisW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:29:20 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-rif-minutes.html ChrisW
- 16:29:43 [Zakim]
- -Stella_Mitchell
- 16:30:47 [Zakim]
- -ChrisW
- 16:30:48 [Zakim]
- -Sandro
- 16:30:48 [Zakim]
- SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended
- 16:30:49 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Sandro, AxelPolleres, ChrisW, Leora_Morgenstern, Stella_Mitchell, josb, csma, Harold, +1.503.533.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ghallmar, Mike_Dean
- 16:31:05 [ChrisW]
- sandro?
- 16:46:54 [AxelPolleres]
- AxelPolleres has left #rif