19:59:57 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:59:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-irc 20:00:02 Zakim, this will be AUWG 20:00:02 ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 60 minutes ago 20:00:11 Meeting: WAI AU 20:00:35 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0048.html 20:00:45 Regrets: Jeanne S., Anne M. 20:02:27 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 20:02:34 +??P0 20:04:30 Andrew has joined #au 20:04:44 +??P1 20:05:54 +??P2 20:11:05 Scribe: Andrew 20:11:13 zakim, ??P0 is really Jan 20:11:13 +Jan; got it 20:11:21 zakim, ??P1 is really Jutta 20:11:21 +Jutta; got it 20:11:27 zakim, ??P2 is really Andrew 20:11:27 +Andrew; got it 20:11:32 Chair: Jutta Treviranus 20:11:41 Regrets: Jeanne S., Anne M., Greg P. 20:12:55 -Jan 20:13:17 -Jutta 20:13:42 +[IPcaller] 20:14:03 zakim, [IPcaller] is really Jan 20:14:03 +Jan; got it 20:14:19 Jan is back with a clear connection 20:14:20 -Andrew 20:15:13 + +1.416.946.aaaa 20:15:39 +??P2 20:16:18 zakim, ??p2 is really Andrew 20:16:18 +Andrew; got it 20:17:32 andrew can you hear Jutta ok? 20:17:59 Yes i can Jutta ok 20:18:25 -Jan 20:19:04 +Jan_Richards 20:19:05 +Tim_Boland 20:20:32 Topic: Andrew's comments 20:20:34 + +1.561.582.aabb 20:20:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0056.html 20:20:51 AR: Editorial change in B.1.2.4 20:22:19 AR: Also an example for Guideline B.1.3 20:22:47 Action AR: Writeup modified example for Guideline B.1.3 20:22:48 Created ACTION-186 - Writeup modified example for Guideline B.1.3 [on Andrew Ronksley - due 2009-09-21]. 20:23:10 Topic: TIm's Comments 20:23:36 Topic: Tim's technique comments 20:23:39 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0051.html 20:24:25 Looking at Jan's responses to Tim's comments 20:24:55 Agree on meta comments 20:25:02 Sueann has joined #au 20:25:30 JR: Suggest changing the techniques document to be called an "understanding" document 20:26:09 JR: Not sure we have the manpower to produce a full techniques document ourselves 20:26:37 TB: We should try and encourage creativity by allowing people to submit techniques, in-line with WCAG 2.0 20:26:52 JT: This makes a lot of sense. 20:27:25 JR: Very hard to write all encompassing techniques 20:28:20 JR: Techniques will depend on the nature of the tool 20:29:12 Action JR: New explanatory text about what Examples are suppoised to acheive 20:29:12 Created ACTION-187 - New explanatory text about what Examples are suppoised to acheive [on Jan Richards - due 2009-09-21]. 20:30:36 TB: WCAG has an online techniques submission form 20:31:26 TB: How do we make a decision as to what goes in the techniques / understanding document? 20:31:35 JR: Our common sense 20:31:55 TB: Think we need more of a formal approach to this. 20:32:21 TB: Are the group going to be endorsing the techniques 20:32:32 TB: And do we need a disclaimer etc? 20:33:06 TB: If we do have a techniques form we need to state what we're looking for etc 20:33:47 TB: Tools can change so we need to be current 20:34:04 JR: Agreed but some stay consistent as time goes by, e.g. text editors 20:35:04 JT: The distinction between intent and rationale isn't that well defined 20:35:33 JR: It's a fine distinction, we may merge them together 20:36:04 JR: We may move the rationale into the understanding document 20:36:18 JT: Think we'd need to be careful with that 20:36:43 JT: Only having normative information in the guidelines wouldn't aid understanding 20:36:48 JR: Agrees 20:37:36 Action JR: Propose what to so with Rationale - keep in Guideline but maybe word as intent 20:37:37 Created ACTION-188 - Propose what to so with Rationale - keep in Guideline but maybe word as intent [on Jan Richards - due 2009-09-21]. 20:41:16 TB: Querying use of the word "documentation" 20:41:33 TB: Some documentation can be bad and doesn't aid understanding 20:41:58 http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-TECHS-20090909/#gl-tool-document 20:54:14 JT: Discussing decision support within tools, which is different to providing documentation and help 20:54:54 JT: When you're choosing a technology, brief guidance about the implications 20:55:19 JR: Dreamweaver. Choosing between HTML and XML. How much would Dreamweaver say? 20:59:39 JR: Choosing a Flash video for example, there would be a lot of info that might be required 20:59:56 JR: I.e. captions, audio description etc 21:01:06 JR: We can't really throw all of WCAG / ATAG at the user 21:01:14 JR: There needs to be some bounds 21:01:47 JT: Maybe define decision support - to mean just a few points 21:01:54 JT: We can explain in the "decision support" definition 21:02:03 JT: Tips or short impact statements 21:02:06 JT: And define some short impact statements there 21:02:32 -Tim_Boland 21:02:43 - +1.561.582.aabb 21:02:47 -Jan_Richards 21:02:49 - +1.416.946.aaaa 21:02:55 Next call Sept 21 21:02:57 -Andrew 21:02:58 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended 21:03:00 Attendees were Jan, Jutta, Andrew, +1.416.946.aaaa, Jan_Richards, Tim_Boland, +1.561.582.aabb 21:03:13 Andrew has left #au 21:03:14 RRSAgent, make minutes 21:03:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-minutes.html Jan 21:03:22 RRSAgent, set logs public 21:03:28 Zakim, bye 21:03:28 Zakim has left #au 21:03:35 RRSAgent, bye 21:03:35 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-actions.rdf : 21:03:35 ACTION: AR to Writeup modified example for Guideline B.1.3 [1] 21:03:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-irc#T20-22-47 21:03:35 ACTION: JR to New explanatory text about what Examples are suppoised to acheive [2] 21:03:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-irc#T20-29-12 21:03:35 ACTION: JR to Propose what to so with Rationale - keep in Guideline but maybe word as intent [3] 21:03:35 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/14-au-irc#T20-37-36