IRC log of xhtml on 2009-06-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:44:26 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xhtml
- 13:44:26 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-xhtml-irc
- 13:44:28 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 13:44:28 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #xhtml
- 13:44:30 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be IA_XHTML2
- 13:44:30 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
- 13:44:31 [trackbot]
- Meeting: XHTML2 Working Group Teleconference
- 13:44:31 [trackbot]
- Date: 24 June 2009
- 13:45:01 [Steven]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jun/0015.html
- 13:45:19 [Steven]
- Steven has changed the topic to: aGENDA: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jun/0015.html
- 13:45:48 [Steven]
- Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jun/0015
- 13:46:10 [Zakim]
- IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has now started
- 13:46:17 [Zakim]
- +Markus
- 13:47:11 [Zakim]
- +McCarron
- 13:47:42 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 13:47:42 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 13:47:43 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:50:56 [Steven]
- Regrets: Alessio
- 13:52:59 [Tina]
- Zakim, code?
- 13:52:59 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Tina
- 13:53:38 [Zakim]
- +Tina
- 13:53:48 [Steven]
- Scribe: Steven
- 13:54:03 [Steven]
- Topic: The issues
- 13:54:04 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE7
- 13:54:15 [Steven]
- s/#ISSUE7//
- 13:55:25 [Steven]
- Subtopic @name
- 13:55:26 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE
- 13:55:59 [Steven]
- Steven: I believe this is dealt with
- 13:56:11 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Informative references
- 13:56:23 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE1
- 13:56:48 [Steven]
- Steven: I believe also dealt with
- 13:57:43 [Steven]
- Subopic: 5th Ed
- 13:57:44 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE2
- 13:57:55 [Steven]
- Sahne: We had agreed we couldn't do that
- 13:58:01 [Steven]
- Steven: Yes, it is deliberate
- 13:58:19 [Steven]
- Subtopic: SotD
- 13:58:20 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE3
- 14:00:40 [Steven]
- Steven: This is a typo s/A/C/
- 14:00:50 [Steven]
- ACTION: Shane to fix the SotD to refer to Appx C
- 14:00:50 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-87 - Fix the SotD to refer to Appx C [on Shane McCarron - due 2009-07-01].
- 14:01:24 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Appx C
- 14:01:25 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE4
- 14:02:13 [Steven]
- Steven: This was always an informative appx, meant to advise on practise, and moving it to a note is much more suitable for such information
- 14:02:23 [Steven]
- Shane: We need to update that note
- 14:02:28 [Steven]
- Steven: That's the whole point
- 14:03:11 [Steven]
- Steven: Because people were assuming Appx C was normative, and because it was part of the TR, only made for problems
- 14:03:21 [Steven]
- ... since it made it difficult to update
- 14:03:37 [Steven]
- Steven: Bjoern is one of the worst offenders in taking this appx as gospel
- 14:03:42 [Steven]
- s/Steven/Shane/
- 14:04:03 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Broken links and xml:lang
- 14:04:04 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE5
- 14:04:31 [Steven]
- Steven: He should have talked to us
- 14:04:45 [Steven]
- Shane: I put the anchors back
- 14:05:22 [Steven]
- ... they go to a pointer to the new doc, which has the same anchors, so it is easy for him to update his document
- 14:06:09 [Steven]
- Steven: We don't say that it's compulsory to use both lang and xml:lang
- 14:06:30 [Steven]
- Shane: True, though we can still update the doc
- 14:06:42 [Steven]
- ACTION: Shane to update use of lang and xml:lang
- 14:06:42 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-88 - Update use of lang and xml:lang [on Shane McCarron - due 2009-07-01].
- 14:07:14 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Lack of nesting rules
- 14:07:26 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE6
- 14:08:34 [Steven]
- Steven: Not true. He's wrong/ We use exclusions in the formal definitions of the modules
- 14:09:07 [Steven]
- Shane: Is this a new issue, or one he has mentioned before?
- 14:09:17 [Steven]
- Steven: He doesn't include a link...
- 14:09:32 [Steven]
- Subtopic: No nesting rules for Ruby
- 14:09:42 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE7
- 14:11:16 [Steven]
- Steven: We just reference the Ruby spec
- 14:11:32 [Steven]
- ... which includes the exclusions.
- 14:11:36 [Steven]
- ... So he's wrong
- 14:12:15 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Issue 9
- 14:12:17 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE8
- 14:13:27 [Steven]
- Steven: One of his URIs is broken. Need to work out what he is talking about
- 14:14:18 [Steven]
- ... maybe about the name attribute
- 14:15:04 [Steven]
- ... it's this one: http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/voyager-issues/XHTML-1.0-SE?user=guest;selectid=6504;statetype=-1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 14:15:31 [Steven]
- ... which is the same as the issue 1 above
- 14:15:57 [Steven]
- Subtopic: References
- 14:15:57 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE9
- 14:16:11 [Steven]
- Steven: I think this has been addressed
- 14:16:13 [Steven]
- Shane: It has
- 14:16:32 [Steven]
- Subtopic: DOCTYPE Optional
- 14:16:33 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE10
- 14:16:40 [Steven]
- Shane: What do you want to do?
- 14:17:09 [Steven]
- Shane: This was TimBL's idea. I disagree with optional DOCTYPEs myself
- 14:17:27 [Steven]
- Steven: What do we do?
- 14:17:40 [Steven]
- Shane: Change it back
- 14:17:54 [Steven]
- Steven: OK by me
- 14:18:38 [Steven]
- Steven: He calls this a process error
- 14:18:49 [Steven]
- s/error/violation/
- 14:18:59 [Steven]
- Steven: Change back?
- 14:19:04 [Steven]
- Shane: Sure
- 14:19:21 [Steven]
- ACTION: Shane to make doctype required
- 14:19:21 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-89 - Make doctype required [on Shane McCarron - due 2009-07-01].
- 14:19:46 [Steven]
- Subtopic: @version
- 14:19:47 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE12
- 14:20:30 [Steven]
- Shane: We don't require it
- 14:20:36 [Steven]
- ... it is in HTML4 and XHTML 1.0
- 14:21:34 [Steven]
- ... and deprecation isn't a problem; you can reprecate
- 14:21:46 [Steven]
- ... but what change would he like to make?
- 14:21:54 [Steven]
- Steven: True, not actually an issue in that case
- 14:22:47 [Steven]
- Subtopic: Change not mentioned
- 14:23:13 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE13
- 14:23:50 [Steven]
- Shane: Modualrization widened the datatype of @version to CDATA
- 14:24:02 [Steven]
- ... so in RDFa we used something more friendly
- 14:24:56 [Steven]
- ... Not sure which change he is referring to...
- 14:25:09 [Steven]
- Steven: We should investigate if there is a case to mention this
- 14:25:34 [Steven]
- ... I'm not convinced this really is a change in the sense he means it
- 14:26:01 [Steven]
- Subtopic: @lang
- 14:26:02 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/bjoern-issues.html#ISSUE14
- 14:27:00 [Steven]
- Steven: He points to a message from someone outside the group and claims that that is our reason
- 14:27:04 [Steven]
- ... but it's not
- 14:27:19 [Steven]
- Shane: It is not a reason, it is a cause
- 14:27:47 [Steven]
- Steven: We asked accessibility people if it would help and they said yes
- 14:30:11 [Zakim]
- -McCarron
- 14:30:35 [Steven]
- Shane: I have to leave now
- 14:37:08 [Zakim]
- -Markus
- 14:37:09 [Zakim]
- -Tina
- 14:37:12 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:37:13 [Zakim]
- IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has ended
- 14:37:14 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Markus, McCarron, Steven, Tina
- 14:37:23 [Steven]
- [ADJOURN]
- 14:37:30 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:37:30 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-xhtml-minutes.html Steven
- 15:59:32 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #xhtml
- 15:59:35 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xhtml