12:22:09 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #er
12:22:09 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-er-irc
12:22:11 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
12:22:11 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #er
12:22:13 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 3794
12:22:13 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
12:22:14 <trackbot> Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference
12:22:14 <trackbot> Date: 24 June 2009
12:22:36 <MikeS> Chair: Mike
12:24:01 <MikeS> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0081.html
12:24:42 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ Document versioning
12:24:42 <Zakim> agendum 1 added
12:24:57 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ EARL 1.0 Guide
12:24:57 <Zakim> agendum 2 added
12:25:11 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema
12:25:11 <Zakim> agendum 3 added
12:25:29 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ Pointers in RDF
12:25:29 <Zakim> agendum 4 added
12:26:41 <JohannesK> JohannesK has joined #er
12:27:00 <MikeS> zakim, agenda 4
12:27:00 <Zakim> I don't understand 'agenda 4', MikeS
12:27:18 <MikeS> zakim, drop agenda 4
12:27:18 <Zakim> agendum 4, Pointers in RDF, dropped
12:27:42 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ Pointers in RDF - ready for review and approval
12:27:42 <Zakim> agendum 5 added
12:28:13 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ EARL 1.0 Requirements - ready for review and approval
12:28:13 <Zakim> agendum 6 added
12:28:47 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ HTTP in RDF - ready for review and approval
12:28:47 <Zakim> agendum 7 added
12:29:07 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ Representing Content in RDF - ready for review and approval
12:29:07 <Zakim> agendum 8 added
12:29:23 <MikeS> zakim, agenda+ Next and future meetings
12:29:23 <Zakim> agendum 9 added
12:30:12 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started
12:30:12 <Zakim> +Shadi
12:30:27 <Zakim> +squillace
12:30:49 <Zakim> +??P13
12:30:58 <MikeS> zakim, squillace is MikeS
12:30:58 <Zakim> +MikeS; got it
12:31:07 <JohannesK> zakim, P13 is really me
12:31:07 <Zakim> sorry, JohannesK, I do not recognize a party named 'P13'
12:31:13 <JohannesK> zakim, ??P13 is really me
12:31:13 <Zakim> +JohannesK; got it
12:32:40 <carlosI> carlosI has joined #er
12:35:37 <Zakim> +Rodrigo
12:36:06 <carlosI> zakim, rodrigo is really carlosI
12:36:06 <Zakim> +carlosI; got it
12:37:00 <MikeS> scribe: Johannes
12:37:08 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
12:37:08 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Document versioning" taken up [from MikeS]
12:38:14 <cvelasco> cvelasco has joined #er
12:38:32 <JohannesK> ms: if there's a version for the EARL vocab, what about version for the parts
12:38:49 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0085.html
12:39:36 <Zakim> +CarlosV
12:39:37 <JohannesK> saz: what happens if one of the parts changes?
12:40:52 <JohannesK> saz: only if EARL 1.0 Schema is changed, the meaning of the EARL vocab is changed
12:41:47 <JohannesK> saz: the EARL version is defined in the Schema document
12:47:04 <JohannesK> jk: it's the EARL vocabulary which is in version 1.0 now, not the Guide or the Schema document
12:48:45 <JohannesK> saz: each publication has a date, which can be used to identify a specific "version"
12:51:02 <JohannesK> saz: the definition, of which part "versions" the EARL vocabulary in a specific version consists of, is to be put into the Conformance section of EARL Schema
12:53:49 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: a subsection in the conformance section of the Schema document defines which part versions the vocabulary consists of
12:55:34 <JohannesK> saz: HTTP-in-RDF would very rarely be updated
12:56:10 <JohannesK> cv: could be labelled version 1.1
12:56:27 <JohannesK> ms: current version can handle HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1
13:00:54 <JohannesK> saz: usually there are short names in spec URIs pointing to the latest spec version
13:03:58 <JohannesK> ms: a) no version for HTTP-in-RDF because of a conflict with HTTP version; or b) label as 1.0 and add a note to the document that the HTTP-in-RDF version does not relate to a specific HTTP version
13:08:16 <JohannesK> cv: label it HTTP-in-RDF 1.1
13:10:06 <shadi> votes: a) 1.5 b) 1.5 c) 1
13:11:59 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: HTTP-in-RDF labelled version 1.0; and add note to the document that this version is independent of HTTP versioning
13:12:46 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: Content-in_RDF labelled version 1.0
13:13:10 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: Pointers-in-RDF labelled version 1.0
13:14:11 <shadi> zakim, who is making noise?
13:14:23 <Zakim> shadi, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: MikeS (41%), JohannesK (4%), carlosI (68%)
13:14:47 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:14:47 <Zakim> agendum 2. "EARL 1.0 Guide" taken up [from MikeS]
13:15:31 <JohannesK> jk: what about versioning namespace URIs?
13:17:55 <JohannesK> saz: depends on changes
13:18:56 <JohannesK> ms: any comments about guide? questions?
13:21:32 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:21:32 <Zakim> agendum 3. "EARL 1.0 Schema" taken up [from MikeS]
13:21:57 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0048
13:22:46 <JohannesK> saz: seems to be agreement about conformance levels
13:23:13 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: adopt conformance level model proposed by saz and ms
13:23:15 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0049
13:24:35 <JohannesK> saz: import part ontologies into schema ontology?
13:25:18 <JohannesK> cv: and DCT and FOAF?
13:26:32 <JohannesK> saz will check with Ivan about OWL imports
13:26:41 <shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0071
13:26:45 <JohannesK> jk: HTTP-in-RDF does import Content-in-RDF
13:27:12 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:27:12 <Zakim> agendum 5. "Pointers in RDF - ready for review and approval" taken up [from MikeS]
13:27:39 <JohannesK> ms: any pending issues on pointers?
13:28:20 <JohannesK> saz: publish after adding version number, editing abstract
13:29:05 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: publish Pointers-in-RDF 1.0 after adding version number, editing abstract, adding owl constructors
13:29:22 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:29:22 <Zakim> agendum 6. "EARL 1.0 Requirements - ready for review and approval" taken up [from MikeS]
13:30:58 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: publish EARL 1.0 requirements after small updates
13:31:03 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:31:03 <Zakim> agendum 7. "HTTP in RDF - ready for review and approval" taken up [from MikeS]
13:32:29 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: publish HTTP-in RDF 1.0 editorial changes
13:32:35 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:32:35 <Zakim> agendum 8. "Representing Content in RDF - ready for review and approval" taken up [from MikeS]
13:33:05 <JohannesK> RESOLUTION: publish Content-in RDF 1.0 editorial changes
13:33:11 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:33:11 <Zakim> agendum 8 was just opened, MikeS
13:33:25 <MikeS> zakim, close agendum 8
13:33:25 <Zakim> agendum 8, Representing Content in RDF - ready for review and approval, closed
13:33:27 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
13:33:28 <Zakim> 9. Next and future meetings [from MikeS]
13:33:32 <MikeS> zakim, take up next
13:33:32 <Zakim> agendum 9. "Next and future meetings" taken up [from MikeS]
13:34:38 <Zakim> -JohannesK
13:34:42 <Zakim> -carlosI
13:34:43 <Zakim> -Shadi
13:34:44 <Zakim> -CarlosV
13:34:47 <Zakim> -MikeS
13:34:49 <Zakim> WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended
13:34:50 <Zakim> Attendees were Shadi, MikeS, JohannesK, carlosI, CarlosV
13:45:31 <shadi> trackbot, end meeting
13:45:31 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
13:45:31 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
13:45:32 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
13:45:32 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-er-minutes.html trackbot
13:45:33 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
13:45:33 <RRSAgent> I see no action items