14:58:36 RRSAgent has joined #swd 14:58:36 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-irc 14:58:44 Meeting: SemWeb Deployment Working Group 14:58:48 rrsagent, please make record public 14:59:21 JonP has joined #swd 15:01:07 Antoine has joined #swd 15:01:24 seanb has joined #swd 15:01:54 SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started 15:01:57 + +1.607.341.aaaa 15:02:04 - +1.607.341.aaaa 15:02:06 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 15:02:07 Attendees were +1.607.341.aaaa 15:02:33 SW_SWD()11:00AM has now started 15:02:41 +Ralph 15:03:05 +??P39 15:03:08 zakim, ??P39 is me 15:03:08 +seanb; got it 15:03:35 + +1.607.341.aaaa 15:03:48 zakim, aaaa is Jon 15:03:48 +Jon; got it 15:04:01 +??P43 15:04:30 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:04:30 +Antoine; got it 15:06:00 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0064.html 15:06:13 -> http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html previous 2009-05-05 15:12:43 edsu has joined #swd 15:13:09 zakim, list attendees 15:13:09 As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine 15:14:15 +[LC] 15:14:30 zakim, lc is Ed 15:14:30 +Ed; got it 15:14:56 +Guus_Schreiber 15:15:07 Chair: Guus 15:15:45 Guus has joined #swd 15:16:48 zakim, pick a victim 15:16:48 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose seanb 15:17:02 scribe: Ralph 15:17:08 Topic: Admin 15:17:33 RESOLVED to accept minutes of the last telecon http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html 15:17:40 PROPOSED next telecon 2 June 15:17:44 RESOLVED next telecon 2 June 15:17:48 Topic: SKOS 15:18:29 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ editor's draftof SKOS Reference 15:18:37 (currently $Revision 1.8$ 15:19:02 Sean: editorial tweaks discussed in mail are almost complete 15:19:17 ... so nearly done w/Reference 15:19:28 [DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference 15:19:28 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04] 15:19:52 [DONE] ACTION: SKOS editors to draft acknowledgements section for SKOS Reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action04] 15:20:46 Guus: issue-214 still open 15:20:57 Antoine: That doesn't really concern SKOS; it's about RDFa 15:21:03 Jon: that was my feeling as well 15:21:12 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/214 issue 214 15:22:22 Ed: DanBri's comment was about something in loc.gov 15:22:28 s/Jon:/Ed:/ 15:23:29 Ralph: is DanBri citing something in one of our documents? 15:23:42 Guus: no, an LC document 15:23:54 Antoine: so change the tracker product to RDFa 15:24:47 Ralph: but if this is going to be a frequent mistake maybe we should consider adding some advice 15:24:53 Guus: that could go in the Primer 15:24:58 Ralph: yes 15:25:14 Guus: so we conclude this does not affect the Reference? 15:25:21 +1 15:25:23 [no objections] 15:25:25 +1 15:25:41 +1 15:25:44 Guus: therefore no outstanding CR comments 15:26:16 Sean: regarding URIs in Appendix C 15:26:22 ... there are references to namespace documents 15:26:26 ... which URIs should I use? 15:26:36 Guus: we'll take that up in a moment 15:27:10 [CONTINUES] ACTION: Ralph to raise issue-214 with rdfa tf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action01] 15:28:12 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/primer/primer-20090427.html SKOS Primer Editor's Draft 15:28:33 Ralph: I presumed we'd publish the Primer together with the Reference Proposed Rec 15:28:35 Guus: yes 15:28:54 -- Implementation Report 15:29:10 Antoine: I added some historical notes 15:29:22 ... and added links to the issue tracker 15:29:42 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report 15:30:29 Guus: I suggest publishing the Use Cases as a Group Note at the same time as the Proposed Rec 15:30:33 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html 15:30:54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html#Candidate 15:31:42 Antoine: I added cross-references to the UCR 15:32:54 PROPOSED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published 15:33:10 +1 15:33:20 RESOLVED: Publish revised SKOS Use Cases and Requirements as a Group Note at the time the final SKOS Recommendation is published 15:35:38 -- Namespace document 15:35:47 Guus: what's the state of the labels in the namespace document? 15:35:52 Sean: discussion on the list 15:36:08 ... there's an HTML variant and an RDF/XML variant 15:36:24 ... the HTML variant had a lot of additional text which I've removed and put in an appendix 15:36:31 ... so each variant only describes itself 15:36:38 ... I believe the content is now OK 15:37:15 ... the SKOS namespace document is served via content negotiation 15:37:46 ... what URIs should I use for the OWL DL subset and the SKOS XL RDF/XML variant? 15:38:23 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/#namespace-documents Appendix C 15:40:17 Guus: the reference to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl in C.4. looks correct 15:40:31 Ralph: we've used that URI before, so OK to keep using it 15:40:55 Sean: what URI to use for the OWL 1 DL subset? 15:41:01 Guus: have we published it before? 15:41:09 Sean: no, but it is in the directory 15:42:20 Ralph: there's no particular reason why we could not use the 2008/04/skos/ space 15:42:33 Guus: and this is the DL version of the schema in 2008/04/skos 15:42:45 Sean: what should we call it? 15:43:01 skos-owl1-dl.rdf ? 15:43:08 Guus: fine with me 15:43:47 I meant 2004/02/skos/skos-owl1-dl.rdf ?? 15:43:55 s|2008/04|2004/02 15:44:15 2004/02/skos/owl1-dl.rdf 15:44:17 ? 15:44:33 Sean: skos/owl1-dl.rdf is fine with me 15:44:37 Ralph: ok with me too 15:45:20 ... it's a new RDF namespace so we'll need Director's approval 15:46:09 Guus: send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review 15:46:33 ACTION: Sean send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review 15:46:43 -- Implementation Report 15:47:26 Guus: looking at the issues list, of 29 issues 27 refer to implementations 15:47:42 ... so I think there's ample evidence that the SKOS specification is being implemented 15:48:03 Sean: I'm slightly worried that the capture of the various constructs used in each vocabulary is not exhaustive 15:48:21 ... the reports were not necessarily completely explicit 15:48:35 ... in particular, I'm not sure that ordered collections have been implemented 15:48:46 ... but 2 implementations do claim to use -xl 15:48:56 Guus: I couldn't find any details on the -xl implementations 15:49:24 Antoine: we do have one vocabulary that would benefit from label relations but we've not yet done it 15:49:47 Sean: I have an email from @@ that I could ask him to send to the list 15:50:02 Guus: -xl is an extension anyway 15:50:23 ... it's clear that the main part of SKOS, in particular the mapping relations, is heavily used 15:50:54 ... I don't feel the Group needs to put enormous effort into a systematic analysis 15:51:09 ... with 27 implementations I feel we can say we're done 15:51:14 Sean: I'm happy to go with that 15:51:41 Guus: I'm happy to write some text with my findings for the transition request 15:52:00 Sean: can I consider this implementation report to be completed then? 15:52:11 ... I'll paste the two tables into the HTML document 15:52:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html implementation report generated from the issues tracker 15:53:09 Sean: there are two additional tables generated from a Google spreadsheet 15:53:44 -> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rmQPwhMMWXxY62FinzE44Eg google doc 15:54:21 Sean: should I paste the spreadsheet table into the implementation report? 15:54:22 Guus: yes 15:54:24 Ralph: yes 15:54:37 Sean: it's a hassle to do that paste so I'd like to do it only once 15:54:58 Guus: how about an image paste? 15:55:03 Ralph: no, that would be frowned on 15:55:21 Guus: I suggest freezing it now 15:55:51 ... the implementation report does not have to be exhaustive 15:56:18 Sean: OK, I'll freeze and paste later today 15:56:42 [DONE] ACTION: Sean to look for SKOS constructs not used by current implementations [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action04] 15:56:50 [CONTINUES] ACTION: Sean to complete implementation report by 19th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action05] 15:57:14 PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation 15:57:35 Topic: Transition Request 15:58:03 Guus: we've met the CR exit criteria 15:58:50 PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ 15:59:15 PROPOSED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits 15:59:47 +1 15:59:49 -Ralph 16:00:11 RESOLVED to request the Director to advance the SKOS Reference to Proposed Recommendation http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ with Appendix C edits 16:00:54 scribenick:Antoine 16:01:40 ACTION: Guus to prepare the request for PR 16:02:35 Guus: once PR is requested, the WG gets out of the loop, and advisory committee vote, and the director takes direction 16:02:43 s/direction/decision 16:03:18 ACTION: Ralph publish Antoine's new intermediate pages for legacy specs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action11] 16:03:22 --CONTINUES 16:03:36 ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] 16:03:40 --CONTINUES 16:03:54 ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15] 16:03:56 --CONTINUES 16:04:13 ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03] 16:04:16 --CONTINUES 16:04:30 ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] 16:04:34 --CONTINUES 16:05:06 -Ed 16:05:06 -seanb 16:05:07 -Jon 16:05:11 -Guus_Schreiber 16:05:20 edsu has left #swd 16:05:28 Zakim, list participants 16:05:28 As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber 16:05:44 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:05:54 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:05:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html Antoine 16:09:57 TomB has joined #swd 16:10:12 disconnecting the lone participant, Antoine, in SW_SWD()11:00AM 16:10:25 I just got in from the airport - anyone there? 16:10:56 Hi Tom! 16:11:03 We're just done. 16:11:56 hi sean 16:12:13 any particular issues arise or all okay? 16:20:21 Antoine has left #swd 17:07:33 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 17:07:36 Attendees were Ralph, seanb, +1.607.341.aaaa, Jon, Antoine, Ed, Guus_Schreiber 17:19:22 Ralph -- are you there? 17:20:32 One more question about namespaces.... :-) 18:34:26 Zakim has left #swd 19:28:31 Ralph has left #swd