11:58:10 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 11:58:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/03/17-mediaann-irc 11:58:25 chair: Joakim 11:58:32 zakim, who's on the phone? 11:58:32 On the phone I see +329331aaaa, ??P1 11:58:47 Zakim, ??P1 is me 11:58:47 +tobias; got it 11:59:18 zakim, +329331aaaa is me 11:59:18 +chris; got it 11:59:25 +??P4 11:59:35 + +82.10.58.00.aabb 12:00:09 Zakim, ??P4 is me 12:00:09 +wonsuk; got it 12:00:33 +??P5 12:00:57 + +46.1.07.17.aacc 12:01:12 + +43.316.876.aadd 12:01:13 Joakim...are you on the phone ? 12:01:20 +Thierry 12:01:43 zakim, aadd is wbailer 12:01:44 +wbailer; got it 12:01:54 veroniqueM has joined #mediaann 12:01:55 zakim, who is here ? 12:01:55 On the phone I see chris, tobias, wonsuk, +82.10.58.00.aabb, Felix (muted), +46.1.07.17.aacc, wbailer, Thierry 12:01:57 On IRC I see veroniqueM, RRSAgent, Zakim, joakim, wbailer, tobias, wonsuk, fsasaki, chris, daniel, tmichel, trackbot 12:02:37 topic:Agenda review and approval of previous minutes 12:02:42 http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-mediaann-minutes.html 12:02:50 +[VrijeUni] 12:03:07 zakim, [VrijeUni] is me 12:03:07 +veroniqueM; got it 12:03:09 minutes are approuved 12:03:18 topic: Selection of scribe for next meeting 12:03:48 next call still one hour in advance 12:04:07 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:07 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose veroniqueM 12:04:14 no volunteer ... 12:04:16 zakim, pick a victim 12:04:16 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose wbailer 12:04:42 who did not scribe for long time ? 12:05:03 Chris volunteer because never scribed ! 12:05:18 Thierry is scribing today 12:05:37 topic: action items 12:05:43 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open 12:05:52 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open 12:06:30 ACTION 43 ? 12:06:30 Sorry, couldn't find user - 43 12:06:45 I could not understanf Felix ... 12:06:56 ACTION 47 still pending 12:06:56 Sorry, couldn't find user - 47 12:07:09 thierry, I thought you would take AI 43 over, but maybe I misunderstood? 12:07:45 ACTION 54 to Veronique 12:07:45 Sorry, couldn't find user - 54 12:08:18 It is possible to reassigne an action 12:08:49 ACTION 80 posted feed back 12:08:49 Sorry, couldn't find user - 80 12:09:19 Felix: Might have more information latter 12:09:23 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/54 is changed to Veronique 12:09:26 s/latter/later/ 12:09:31 close ACTION 82 12:09:43 close ACTION-82 12:09:43 ACTION-82 Wey to provide mapping for itunes and quicktime closed 12:10:07 cose ACTION-85 12:10:22 close ACTION-85 12:10:22 ACTION-85 Implement agreed changes in requirements document closed 12:10:31 colse ACTION-86 12:10:40 close ACTION-86 12:10:40 ACTION-86 Update Excel sheet to support description of properties closed 12:10:55 close ACTION-87 12:10:55 ACTION-87 And Werner will look into the Google Dataset API closed 12:11:42 close ACTION-89 12:11:42 ACTION-89 Provide the list of all formats considered in the mapping table with the person who did the mapping, leading each sub-group closed 12:12:31 close ACTION-90 12:12:34 ACTION-90 Re-open the questionnaire and invite people to really respond even if they have no preferences, in order to get a quorum of responses closed 12:12:44 close ACTION-90 12:12:44 ACTION-90 Re-open the questionnaire and invite people to really respond even if they have no preferences, in order to get a quorum of responses closed 12:12:57 close ACTION-91 12:12:57 ACTION-91 Chase the non-responders closed 12:13:30 ACTION-92 does someone wants to comment ? 12:13:39 s/wants /want / 12:13:48 felix: I will take this over 12:13:52 Felix will meet Larry latter today and will report latter 12:14:12 s/Larry/someone from Adobe/ 12:14:21 topic: Publish of mapping table as it on TR pages and comments from W3C team 12:14:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009Mar/0047.html 12:15:35 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/92 is tossed to Felix 12:17:11 Thierry: talked to W3C comm Team about publishing the excel table (in an HTML format). Ian agreed to published as is. 12:17:42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009Mar/0062.html 12:17:58 http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html 12:18:08 Felix: repports about Raphael email sent today. Raphael agrees to publish with conditional remarks. Please read this email 12:18:19 +1 for the publication with the remarks 12:18:30 I read Raphael's mail before - I agree to the comments. thus: +1 12:20:38 We will have an index with a list of formats linking to each format 12:21:36 Felix: Raphael would like a publication after the F2F in spain. 12:23:26 Felix: we could review then the table at the F2F 12:23:47 for each format we will have an entry with a link to an external file 12:24:06 Move the deadline for publication after the F2F ? 12:24:11 +1 12:24:12 +1 12:24:16 +1 12:24:17 +1 12:24:26 +1 12:24:28 objection for this schedule ? 12:24:29 +1 12:24:37 no objection :) 12:24:47 no objection ! 12:24:52 cool! 12:25:54 resolution: publish the first draft after the F2F 12:26:22 ACTION: thierry to work on the document with the proper table 12:26:22 Created ACTION-93 - Work on the document with the proper table [on Thierry Michel - due 2009-03-24]. 12:26:30 Wb AP Wg http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/MediaObject/publish/ 12:27:10 media object description: how does it relates to our document ? 12:27:32 from the WebAPI WG 12:28:22 would it make sense to add thye interface to the mapping ? 12:28:26 +1 for Wbailer; I guess it would make sense. 12:28:54 +1 12:29:27 Will talk about this during the F2F meeting 12:30:43 ACTION thierry to talk about th liaison 12:30:43 Created ACTION-94 - Talk about th liaison [on Thierry Michel - due 2009-03-24]. 12:30:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009Mar/0042.html 12:30:54 topic:Results of questionnaire of mapping formats 12:30:54 Second reopen for the questionnaire: 12:31:52 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/Annot-format-survey/results 12:34:30 Thierry explain his conclusion: see his earlier email 12:34:43 Let me explain our one can conclude on the 3 questions: 12:34:43 You take the som of the ranking of 3 questions: 12:34:43 the lowest som wins: 12:34:43 Media RSS 2+1+3= 6 12:34:43 EXIF 1+5+1= 7 12:34:44 Youtube 4+2+4= 10 12:34:46 TV-Anytime 5+7+3=15 12:34:48 ID3 frames 5+4+7=16 12:34:50 MPEG-7 =8+6+2= 16 12:34:54 EBUCore 7+3+8= 19 12:35:16 I missed one part: do we need to pick up one format only to start working on? Why not the 5 selected? 12:36:58 Thierry: this is not a formal vote. just an indicator tool 12:37:32 Felix agrees thta this not a formal vote to consider as is 12:37:39 my question was about "Now the issues is which format do we want to retain?" 12:37:55 you want to focus first on only ONE format? 12:39:27 We also have to consider the people implementations 12:39:55 this is an important info for considering formats 12:40:36 agree to Joakim; the industry members are important for the group - so we should take their opinion into account. 12:41:14 Felix: we should ask here what people think about Itunes 12:41:20 and QT 12:41:42 Felix: let's have a poll about Itunes and QT 12:42:11 Daniel:industry members are important for our group 12:43:01 I have no specific opinion about whether to take into account or not Itunes and QT 12:43:10 Very difficult to her Daniel ... 12:44:08 Daniel: should have some kind of guidelines for choosing a format 12:44:18 Daniel: any suggestions ? 12:44:36 question: format selection is very controversial...so, we should have any guideline or criteria for the group 12:45:13 Felix: we have input from the questionnaire. Also the implementation of the format is an important criteria to keep it in or not 12:46:24 Joakim: but the WG members are not necessary the implementors 12:47:15 The issue is that the QT and Itunes are not in the questionnaire. 12:47:24 We should give them a chance 12:47:53 +1 to ask the group what they think about these 2 formats 12:48:36 but we can work on the other formats meanwhile... 12:48:37 Felix: We should send something to Dave Singer to say that we have nothing against QT and Itunes, but these were not in the mapping table when the Quetionnaire was setup 12:48:43 hui has joined #mediaann 12:48:55 ID3 and Itunes overlap 12:49:30 The ranking shows the interest of the participants toward these formats. 12:49:48 topic:Call for reviewers on mapping formats 12:49:49 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review 12:51:16 What is the due date for this review? 12:51:38 +??P17 12:52:02 p17 hui 12:53:04 Veronique : should we start reviewing formats that will not be kept ? 12:53:18 +1 on Tobias' comment 12:53:34 We should review at least for the publication of the mapping table 12:53:48 yes, Tobias' comment makes sense, +1 12:54:52 -Felix 12:55:29 should review all formats for publication then focus on the formats we will keep 12:56:48 Due date for people to put their name: next week 12:57:08 Due date for people to review the format: 2weeks 12:59:24 topic:Reviewing the Mapping table and discussion 12:59:29 http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mapping_table_090223_common.htm 12:59:32 postponed to the F2F 13:00:50 topic: Toy implementation 13:01:18 veronique sent a proposal for XMP and Dublin Core in RDF 13:01:56 will discuss it next week 13:02:07 rssagent, draft minutes 13:02:08 bye 13:02:10 -wbailer 13:02:13 -??P17 13:02:14 -tobias 13:02:23 next call is also the same timezone 13:02:23 - +82.10.58.00.aabb 13:02:29 -veroniqueM 13:02:30 -wonsuk 13:02:39 - +46.1.07.17.aacc 13:03:13 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:03:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/03/17-mediaann-minutes.html tmichel 13:03:25 rrsagent, bye 13:03:25 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/17-mediaann-actions.rdf : 13:03:25 ACTION: thierry to work on the document with the proper table [1] 13:03:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/17-mediaann-irc#T12-26-22