19:56:11 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 19:56:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-ws-ra-irc 19:56:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves 20:15:03 Geoff has joined #ws-ra 20:15:58 GregC has joined #ws-ra 20:20:07 Bob has joined #ws-ra 20:20:57 zakim, this will be #WS_WSRA 20:20:57 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Bob 20:21:29 zakim, this will be WS_WSRA 20:21:29 ok, Bob; I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 20:21:57 meeting: WS-RA TC Distributed Meeting 20:22:09 s/TC/WG/ 20:22:57 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0045.html 20:23:08 chair: Bob Freund 20:23:21 rrsagent, make logs public 20:23:40 I guess GregC is first on the scribe list 20:24:12 and willing? 20:24:47 Tag, I'm it. 20:24:59 scribe: Greg Carpenter 20:24:59 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has now started 20:25:06 +??P4 20:25:07 -??P4 20:25:08 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 20:25:08 Attendees were 20:25:29 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has now started 20:25:36 +[Microsoft] 20:25:58 I'm am trying to get to the FAQ., but experiencing some delays ... 20:26:16 dug has joined #ws-ra 20:26:35 + +1.571.262.aaaa 20:26:41 +Bob_Freund 20:27:20 +Doug_Davis 20:27:49 how do I get the link to the minutes/rssagent? 20:28:08 thanks 20:28:22 Katy has joined #ws-ra 20:28:32 Geoff "holds" Asir?? 20:28:50 too much info :-) 20:28:52 zakim, geoff holds asir, greg 20:28:52 sorry, Geoff, I do not recognize a party named 'geoff' 20:29:11 zakim, Geoff holds asir, GregC 20:29:11 sorry, Geoff, I do not recognize a party named 'Geoff' 20:29:25 zakim, [mic is Geoff 20:29:25 +Geoff; got it 20:29:28 zakim, Geoff holds asir, GregC 20:29:28 +asir, GregC; got it 20:29:31 +??P8 20:29:46 +Wu_Chou 20:30:34 Ashok has joined #ws-ra 20:30:56 +Yves 20:31:12 zakim, who is on the phone 20:31:12 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', Bob 20:31:16 zakim, who is on the phone? 20:31:16 On the phone I see Geoff, +1.571.262.aaaa, Bob_Freund, Doug_Davis, ??P8, Wu_Chou, Yves 20:31:19 Geoff has asir, GregC 20:31:24 +[Oracle] 20:31:25 + +1.703.266.aabb 20:32:03 +Ashok_Malhotra 20:32:24 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 20:32:43 wu has joined #ws-ra 20:32:57 finally found an IRC client that can work with Oracle's proxy 20:33:43 +Prasad_Yendluri 20:33:59 Prasad2 has joined #ws-ra 20:34:08 asir has joined #ws-ra 20:34:35 zakim, [OR is gpilz 20:34:35 +gpilz; got it 20:35:00 Vikas has joined #ws-ra 20:36:03 This is Vikas 20:36:08 GregC has joined #ws-ra 20:37:20 LOL we need webconf :-) 20:37:22 The agenda is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0045.html 20:38:22 GregC has joined #ws-ra 20:38:48 The quick brown fox jumped over teh lazy dog 20:39:03 s/teh/the/ 20:39:05 s/teh/the 20:39:08 I believe Greg was suckered into that one! 20:39:27 cgi-irc has joined #ws-ra 20:39:52 TOPIC: Agenda 20:39:54 svij has joined #ws-ra 20:40:17 SumeetVij has joined #ws-ra 20:40:34 add "unilateral wihtdrawal of issues" to the agenda 20:41:11 Topic: minutes 20:41:55 People need more time to read and approve minutes from f2f 20:42:13 TOPIC: Next week's meeting 20:42:26 bob: I wont be able chair 20:42:41 bob: should we cancel or have Yves chair? 20:43:29 Meeting will be held as planned, Yves will chair 20:43:40 TOPIC: creation of frist working drafts 20:43:52 s/frist/first 20:44:23
  • Li has joined #ws-ra 20:44:28 bob: Editors should use CVS to avoid "lost updates" from multiple editors 20:45:06 Editors need to get Public Keys if they don't already have one 20:45:39 bob: first drafts in W3C format with no changes 20:46:12 bob: who will produce which first working drafts and when 20:46:28 q+ 20:46:31 dug: are there conversion tools and shoudl we use them? 20:46:44 s/shoudl/should 20:47:28 asir: conversion tools are avialable but still require significant manual effort 20:47:32 ack yves 20:47:52 yves which doc were you thinking of? 20:48:19 Yves: Perhaps some subnissions are already up to spec and will be easier? 20:49:12 q+ 20:50:08 bob: In two weeks time, all submitted specs will be converted and available in xml spec format 20:50:18 ack asir 20:50:31 bob: specs may come out independently during that time 20:50:34 +JeffM 20:51:08 bob: people will be given adequate time to review 20:51:57 ACTION: editors will have first Public Working drafts available on or before Feb 3 20:52:28 Yves - you probably want to think about a Tracker user named 'editors' 20:52:51 trackbot has joined #ws-ra 20:52:51 Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel 20:52:51 If you want to associate this channel with an existing Tracker, please say 'trackbot, associate this channel with #channel' (where #channel is the name of default channel for the group) 20:53:12 TOPIC: Primer - WHat, who, how, when 20:53:31 zakim, mute JeffM 20:53:31 JeffM should now be muted 20:53:52 tracker not assiciated to irc yet, but we can the web interface for now 20:54:04 bob: some WGs find a primer to be a useful aid to understanding the specs 20:54:08 s/assiciated/associated/ 20:54:28 bob: Shall the WS-RA WG produce a primer? 20:55:08 ??: One Primer per spec, or just one Primer? 20:55:16 While I think, in general, primers are good, until we have an area of confusion I'd prefer to wait 20:55:40 bob: Is there anyone on this call who is willing to write a Primer? 20:55:58 gpilz: maybe 20:56:08 my first choice would be to have areas of confusion be fixed in the spec 20:56:40 q+ 20:56:52 ack greg 20:57:19 q+ 20:57:29 ack gp 20:58:50 GregC: Primers are for wordy explanations that might not be appropriate for a spec 20:59:24 gpilz: tend to agree -- good place for use cases, etc 20:59:32 TOPIC: new issues 20:59:46 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6442 21:00:10 Issue 6442 21:01:22 bob: any opposition to accepting issue 6442? 21:01:31 -JeffM 21:01:37 bob: Accepted without opposition 21:02:03 q+ 21:02:11 bob: Issue assigned to gpilz 21:02:33 ack geof 21:03:01 bob: I assume the open question in the initial issue will be addressed with a more specific proposal 21:03:46 Geoff: Note that this is another example of the larger upgrade to support WS-Addressing REC 21:04:19 Geoof: do we have lots of individual issues (which is OK, just asking) 21:05:02 +1 to having separate issues, helps focus the issue to specific area or matter 21:05:32 bob - there's 6459 21:05:38 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6459 21:05:50 gpilz: bob: granularity is up to the issue submitter 21:06:05 s/gpilz:// 21:06:50 new issue 6459 21:06:52 good catch! 21:06:55 s/Geoof/Geoff/g 21:07:46 bob: issue 6459 accepted without opposition and assigned to Li 21:08:15 TOPIC: Issues with proposals: 21:08:42 this is the _easy_ one you mentioned at the f2f :-) 21:09:35 scribe: Bob 21:10:08 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6433 21:10:24 ITopic: Issue-6433 21:10:37 -Prasad_Yendluri 21:10:39 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0041.html 21:10:43 backbones? 21:10:54 gregcarp has joined #ws-ra 21:11:17 +Prasad_Yendluri 21:12:17 q+ Really Greg wants to talk 21:12:23 Can you see me now? 21:12:25 q+ 21:13:39 ack geoff 21:15:41 GregC has joined #ws-ra 21:15:58 q+ 21:17:36 ack dug 21:18:36 +1 to Doug 21:19:14 q+ 21:19:21 ack geo 21:19:51 q+ 21:19:54 +q 21:20:03 LOL 21:21:28 So, the WS-A:EPR definition has no extensibility built in? 21:21:35 ack dug 21:21:44 EPR's have extensibility in them 21:23:09 Bob: The extensibility facet of this issue was decided at the f2f to be separate from the decision of which version of epr to reference 21:23:10 q+ 21:23:16 ack gp 21:24:00 ack geo 21:24:24 GregC has joined #ws-ra 21:24:59 +q 21:25:08 ack gp 21:26:56 resolution: Resolve Issue-6433 with the proposal contained in Bugzilla Comment #1 w/o 21:27:43 latest 6398: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0043.html 21:27:50 Topic: Issue-6398 21:28:27 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6398 21:30:07 q+ 21:30:21 ack geoff 21:30:54 GregC has joined #ws-ra 21:32:00 no objection to more digestion/composting :-) 21:32:30 what was that :-) 21:32:44 send to the list and defer consideration for a future meeting 21:33:41 Topic: Issue-6426 21:34:30 since this was pretty much covered at the f2f I wouldn't object to accepting it now - but no objection to composting either :-) 21:34:34 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jan/0047.html 21:34:49 Li introduces his proposal 21:35:11 I wouldn't object to accepting it either - good work 21:35:32 q+ 21:35:38 ack dug 21:35:39 q+ 21:37:04 ack geoff 21:39:49 Topic: Issue-6427 21:40:00 Li introduces his prosal 21:40:11 q+ 21:40:49 again this looks acceptable 21:41:01 ack geo 21:44:11 Topic: Issues 6408 6409 6410 6414 6415 6416 21:44:18 q+ 21:44:25 ack geoff 21:45:22 q+ 21:45:31 Originator wishes to withdraw these issues 21:45:40 ack geo 21:46:33 q+ 21:46:47 ack geoff 21:48:30 resolution: Gudge 6408 6409 6410 6414 6415 6416 w/o 21:49:00 -Ashok_Malhotra 21:49:02 -Prasad_Yendluri 21:49:06 -gpilz 21:49:07 -Geoff 21:49:07 -Wu_Chou 21:49:09 -Yves 21:49:09 -Doug_Davis 21:49:10 - +1.571.262.aaaa 21:49:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves 21:49:12 - +1.703.266.aabb 21:49:14 -Bob_Freund 21:49:16 -??P8 21:49:16 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 21:49:19 Attendees were [Microsoft], +1.571.262.aaaa, Bob_Freund, Doug_Davis, asir, GregC, Wu_Chou, Yves, [Oracle], +1.703.266.aabb, Ashok_Malhotra, Prasad_Yendluri, gpilz, JeffM 21:49:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-ws-ra-minutes.html Yves 21:50:03 thanks 21:50:16 rrsagent, pointer 21:50:16 See http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-ws-ra-irc#T21-50-16 21:51:27 Bob has left #ws-ra 23:21:11 gpilz has left #ws-ra