14:36:50 RRSAgent has joined #xhtml 14:36:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/01/14-xhtml-irc 14:36:52 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:36:52 Zakim has joined #xhtml 14:36:54 Zakim, this will be IA_XHTML2 14:36:54 ok, trackbot; I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 14:36:55 Meeting: XHTML2 Working Group Teleconference 14:36:55 Date: 14 January 2009 14:39:19 Roland has joined #xhtml 14:39:46 trackbot, start telcon 14:39:48 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:39:50 Zakim, this will be IA_XHTML2 14:39:50 ok, trackbot; I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 14:39:51 Meeting: XHTML2 Working Group Teleconference 14:39:51 Date: 14 January 2009 14:40:06 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jan/0024.html 14:40:15 Chair: Roland 14:41:52 mgylling has joined #xhtml 14:41:53 I thought we had said we wanted to talk about xhtml media types document first today 14:42:03 (since we did not get to it last week) 14:42:20 we did 14:42:38 alessio has joined #xhtml 14:42:43 okay. I think the mail message of interest is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Dec/0020.html 14:43:14 IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has now started 14:43:22 +Roland_Merrick 14:43:59 +McCarron 14:44:07 zakim, mccarron is ShaneM 14:44:07 +ShaneM; got it 14:44:35 + +04670149aaaa 14:45:27 +??P10 14:45:57 Zakim, +04670149aaaa is Tina 14:45:57 +Tina; got it 14:46:29 zakim, dial steven-617 14:46:29 ok, Steven; the call is being made 14:46:31 +Steven 14:46:38 markbirbeck has joined #xhtml 14:47:21 zakim, code? 14:47:21 the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 14:47:42 Zakim, ??P10 is mgylling 14:47:42 +mgylling; got it 14:49:36 +[IPcaller] 14:49:49 zakim, [IPcaller] is Alessio 14:49:49 +Alessio; got it 14:50:41 Scribe: ShaneM 14:50:55 TOPIC : Status of CURIE CR 14:51:19 Document should be published today or tomorrow. 14:51:19 +markbirbeck 14:51:59 TOPIC: Status of transition for PERs 14:52:31 There is a gating problem - we need to update the XHTML Media Type document first. 14:54:30 Shane thought we could request it anyway, but Steven explained that thiis will happen quickly so we should not do it until we are ready. Might be able to move on this depending on another agenda item. Tabled. 14:54:40 TOPIC: XHTML Media Types draft 14:54:51 We received a late comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Dec/0020.html 14:55:25 Scribe: Steven 14:55:44 Shane: There a couple of comments here that are technical, but some are not 14:55:55 ... these are issues for the W3C team to deal with 14:56:06 ... we cannot respond to those parts 14:56:35 ... he says that the doc talks about 4 media types, but really it is only about 2 14:56:52 ... text/html and application/xhtml+xml 14:57:01 ... the other two are not really needed 14:57:11 Roland: Sounds reasonable, this is about recommended usage 14:57:29 Shane: Good comment from this guy, as far as I can interpret 14:58:21 Shane: He thinks we should rename the document to Media types for XHTML 1.x 14:58:33 Roland: Sounds right 14:58:47 Shane: Well Print and XHTML+RDFa wouldn't be covered then 15:00:15 Roland: It is now called XHTML Media types 15:00:33 Tina: Keep it as it is and say that it only applies to existing Recs 15:01:50 Steven: Notes are never normative 15:02:31 agree 15:02:59 Steven: We should say that it just applies to existing recs 15:03:27 Mark: We should not just fight the battles at each step anew 15:03:40 ... we should make this document applicable for generic cases 15:04:08 ... the text/html mime type is about switching into HTML mode 15:04:34 ... authors shouldn't be discouraged from that if it is a reasonable deployment strategy 15:04:48 Roland: There is more to this spec than just that 15:04:59 ... it includes authoring guidelines 15:05:15 Shane: No, Appx A gives hints for any version 15:05:57 Mark: it is more political than technical 15:06:32 ... the question is in my mind, is it OK to switch the browser to HTML mode, and since people are oding that anyway, it is 15:06:42 s/oding/doing 15:07:09 Tina: Shouldn't we just address the technical issues? 15:08:04 Steven: I suggest that we say that it applies to existing recommendations 15:09:10 Proposed text: "The suggestions in this document are relevant to all XHTML Family Recommendations at the time of its publication." 15:09:34 @shane +1 15:10:36 Roland: What do the authors who read this document want? 15:11:51 q+ 15:11:54 Mark: On the backplane XG there is a discussion about using Ubiquity to implement XHTML2 15:12:08 ... well to do that you need to be able to use the text/html mime type 15:14:42 q- 15:14:45 Shane: I proposed a sentence above 15:14:54 "The suggestions in this document are relevant to all XHTML Family Recommendations at the time of its publication." 15:16:16 Tina: I agre, keep the title, and add the sentence 15:16:21 s/agre/agree/ 15:17:15 agree 15:17:18 Roland: I propose that too 15:17:36 So resolved 15:18:27 Shane: An early question asks us to say that it is only the opinion of the WG 15:18:40 Steven: No need for that. The information comes from recommendations 15:18:47 Shane: Anyway it says it comes from our WG 15:19:05 Shane: He asks about text/xml and application/xml 15:19:14 ... we don't care about those, right? 15:19:45 ... he maintains that we don't need the space before trailing slashes on modern browsers. 15:19:56 Steven: True, but not to the point 15:20:26 Shane: He also complains that we are suggesting that authors produce invalid HTML4 15:20:33 Tina: He's wrong, it is valid 15:20:54 Mark: Anyway there is no agreed way to validate HTML4 15:21:04 Tina: Well, you can according to the DTD 15:22:04 Shane: Finally about named entities 15:22:37 ... which may not work in generic XML parsers 15:22:46 ... I don't think we care for this document 15:23:15 Shane: Then comes the political stuff that has nothing to do with this document 15:25:30 Steven: The word XHTML does not appear in there charter 15:25:36 s/there/their/ 15:26:54 Shane: I request that Steven raise the issue of the use of the name XHTML within the team 15:27:03 Steven: Three is a domain discussion coming up 15:27:14 Shane: I propose we publish this document with today's changes 15:27:30 +1 15:27:35 +1 15:27:38 +1 15:27:47 +1 15:27:57 +1 15:28:12 RESOLUTION: Publish XHTML Media Types with topday's changes 15:28:20 rrsagent, make minutes 15:28:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/14-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:28:41 Scribe: Shane 15:28:51 scribenick: shanem 15:29:36 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2009Jan/0001.html 15:30:19 TOPIC: HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined 15:30:32 There is a discussion thread started at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2009Jan/0001.html 15:31:11 markbirbeck: Benjamin has made some interesting comments that revealed existing browser behavior mark was not previously aware of. 15:31:35 markbirbeck: it seems that there are people out there who understand what we are trying to achieve with XHTML 2. 15:32:17 markbirbeck: there might be a way to make our message clearer. For example there might be confusion about what "deprecated" means. Can we help clear that up? 15:32:22 zakim, who is noisy? 15:32:32 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Tina (40%), Alessio (9%) 15:32:41 zakim, mute alessio 15:32:41 Alessio should now be muted 15:32:45 Zakim, mute me 15:32:45 Tina should now be muted 15:33:03 Roland: thinks this is an interesting thread. 15:33:44 Roland: he points out that he cannot find anything in web space that describes the goals and philosophy of XHTML 2. 15:34:01 Steven: willing to take an action to draft a document. 15:34:19 ACTION: Steven to write a draft of a short document on the philosophy of xhtml 2 for use in web space. 15:34:19 Created ACTION-44 - Write a draft of a short document on the philosophy of xhtml 2 for use in web space. [on Steven Pemberton - due 2009-01-21]. 15:34:25 http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2005/01/xhtml-2-as-universal-document.html 15:34:27 :) 15:35:34 Roland: Is there a way to define a profile of HTML5 that maps to XHTML 2? And would that be valuable? 15:36:46 Steven: Does not think it is as difficult as it appears. We broke XHTML2 up into other bits so we could produce them separately. Completing XHTML 2 is just a matter of collecting those bits and we are done! 15:37:26 Steven: He does not think we need to refer to HTML 5 in order to deploy XHTML 2. There is a client-side strategy via Ubiquity, and server-side strategies that involve transformation. 15:37:51 Steven: "HTML is the assembly language that we are compiling down to." 15:39:00 Roland: The difference is that XHTML 2 is a very large language spec. 15:39:42 markbirbeck: HTML 5 has borrowed ideas from XHTML 2. That's fine. The bits that Mark finds frustrating is that they incorporate those ideas rather than referencing the modules that we have already produced. 15:40:12 markbirbeck: Basing XHTML 2 on HTML 5 seems circular. 15:41:22 Roland: we need to try to support our audience (paraphrase) 15:42:33 markbirbeck: We can't ignore how we got here. The modules are the basis of creating future languages and having extensibility. We can accelerate the process by using this architecture. A monolithic document makes that extension challenging. 15:43:38 Roland: profiling doesn't just mean subsetting. You can subset and extend. 15:43:52 yes 15:45:37 markbirbeck: we could produce a document that describes the rendering behavior of the various html document types (?) 15:46:35 markbirbeck: The HTML 5 approach goes against the general modular philosophy that the W3C has pursued for years. People want to merge things together in ways that we will never imagine. 15:47:46 Roland: The thought process should be "what do we need to do to XHTML 2 to help ease deployment?" Are there things we should rethink based upon new information? 15:49:08 Steven: We have done this evaluation at times. There are things in XHTML 2 that are unavoidably different than HTML 4 / 5. XForms, XML Events 15:49:23 completely agree 15:49:48 Steven: The HTML 5 approach to events is not scalable to the future, for example. 15:51:32 Roland: Can we take the time to evaluate where we feel that HTML 5 and XHTML 2 have common ground? 15:53:26 Will return to this next week. 15:53:44 ShaneM: and Welcome to the editing team, Markus! 15:53:55 -markbirbeck 15:53:57 bye :) 15:53:58 -Steven 15:54:01 -Tina 15:54:04 -Alessio 15:54:09 -mgylling 15:54:10 -ShaneM 15:55:03 This conference is in overtime; all ports must be freed 15:59:10 disconnecting the lone participant, Roland, in IA_XHTML2()9:45AM 15:59:12 IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has ended 15:59:16 Attendees were Roland, ShaneM, Tina, Steven, mgylling, Alessio, markbirbeck 15:59:50 Roland has left #xhtml 16:03:10 rrsagent, make minutes 16:03:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/01/14-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 17:00:10 Shane, Nick and Leigh in XForms have relax implementations in some form or another, Leigh will contact you 17:59:04 Zakim has left #xhtml