ISSUE-60: Define requirements for XML Security and EXI usage
EXI Requirements
Define requirements for XML Security and EXI usage
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- XML Security 1.1 Requirements and Design Considerations
- Raised by:
- Frederick Hirsch
- Opened on:
- 2008-10-08
- Description:
- Define requirements related to EXI
Related issues
Is there requirement to canonicalize/sign exi representation
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/6
Appropriate signing/verification position in EXI workflow, expectations and correctness review
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/40
Signing compact EXI representation of XML - is that reproducable for verification
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/41
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-390 on Frederick Hirsch to Consolidate ISSUE-127 and issue-60 - due 2009-10-13, closed- Related emails:
- Minutes 13 October2009 (from brich@us.ibm.com on 2009-10-13)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-13 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-09)
- Re: Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-08)
- Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM on 2009-10-06)
- Re: Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at on 2009-10-06)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-02)
- 2009-08-11 minutes (from edsimon@xmlsec.com on 2009-08-11)
- Issue-60 - open - Define requirements for XML Security and EXI usage (from gerald.edgar@boeing.com on 2009-08-10)
- Draft minutes for Jul 28 (from cantor.2@osu.edu on 2009-07-28)
- ISSUE-60 (EXI Requirements): Define requirements for XML Security and EXI usage [Rqmts (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-10-08)
Related notes:
ISSUE-127 has been incorporated into this issue, since essentially a duplicate:
"Should XML Security WG consider supporting and/or defining EXI canonicalization"
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/127
Display change log