ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms?
Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms?
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Brian LaMacchia
- Due on:
- January 11, 2011
- Created on:
- January 4, 2011
- Related emails:
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-11 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-01-11)
- Re: ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms? (from cantor.2@osu.edu on 2011-01-11)
- Re: ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms? (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-01-11)
- Re: ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms? (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-01-11)
- Re: ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms? (from cantor.2@osu.edu on 2011-01-11)
- ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms? (from bal@microsoft.com on 2011-01-11)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log.