WidgetsPR

NOTE: This document is no longer maintained because the Web Applications Working Group was closed in October 2015 and its deliverables transferred to the Web Platform Working Group.

This document defines the Proposed Recommendation status and data for the following widget specs by the Web Applications Working Group: Widget Packaging and XML Configuration, Widget Interface, Widget Digital Signature, View-mode Media Feature and Widget Access Request Policy (WARP).

Widget Packaging and XML Configuration

1. Document title: Widget Packaging and XML Configuration

2. Document URI: the document that serves as the Draft PR is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> and its TR location will continue to be <http://w3.org/TR/widgets/>

3. Estimated Publication Date: 9-August-2011. (The Call for Exclusion period for the 7-June-2011 LCWD ends 6-August-2011.)

4. Record of the WG's Decision to Advance: the decision to advance this spec to PR is recorded in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1383.html>. Note that a CR for the specification was not published because two or more implementations passed the test suite in the timeframe of LC comment period. The intent to go from LC to PR was announced on May 26 in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0712.html>.

5. Document Abstract: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#abstract>

6. Status of This Document: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#sotd>

7. Report of Important Changes to the Document: the spec has undergone no substantive changes since the 7-June-2011 LCWD was published.

8. Evidence That the Document Satisfies Group's Requirements: the requirements addressed by the spec are included in the spec: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#design-goals-and-requirements>

9. Evidence That Dependencies With Other Groups Met: this specification has no normative dependency issues <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#normative-references>

10. Evidence for Wide Review: in addition to review by the WebApps WG, the spec also had review and collaboration with the I18N WG and WAC (formerly OMTP BONDI).

11. Evidence That Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: No issues were raised during the 7-June-2011 Last Call

12. Objections: there are NO objections associated with this spec.

13. Implementation Information: the implementation report is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/imp-report/>. 4 implementations pass 100% of the test suite.

14. Patent Disclosures: there are no known patent issues with this spec <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status>.

XML Digital Signatures for Widgets

1. Document title: XML Digital Signatures for Widgets

2. Document URI: the document that serves as the Draft PR is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/> and its TR location will continue to be <http://w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/>

3. Estimated Publication Date: 9-August-2011. (The Call for Exclusion period for the 7-June-2011 LCWD ends 6-August-2011.)

4. Record of the WG's Decision to Advance: the decision to advance this spec to PR is recorded in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1384.html>. Note that a CR for this specification was not published because two or more implementations passed the test suite in the timeframe of the LC comment period. The intent to go from LC to PR was announced on May 26 in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0712.html>.

5. Document Abstract: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#abstract>

6. Status of This Document: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#sotd>

7. Report of Important Changes to the Document: the spec has undergone no substantive changes since the 7-June-2011 LCWD was published.

8. Evidence That the Document Satisfies Group's Requirements: the requirements addressed by the spec are included in the spec: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#requirements>

9. Evidence That Dependencies With Other Groups Met: this specification has normative references for two XML Signature Candidate Recommendations <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#references>

10. Evidence for Wide Review: in addition to review by the WebApps WG, the spec also had review and collaboration with the I18N WG and WAC (formerly OMTP BONDI).

11. Evidence That Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: No issues were raised during the 7-June-2011 Last Call

12. Objections: there are NO objections associated with this spec.

13. Implementation Information: the implementation report is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/imp-report/>. At least two implementations pass 100% of the Mandatory tests.

14. Patent Disclosures: there are no known patent issues with this spec <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status>.

View-mode Media Feature

1. Document title: The 'view-mode' Media Feature

2. Document URI: the document that serves as the Draft PR is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/> and its TR location will be <http://www.w3.org/TR/view-mode/>

3. Estimated Publication Date: 9-August-2011.

4. Record of the WG's Decision to Advance: the decision to advance this spec to PR is recorded in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0384.html>.

5. Document Abstract: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/#abstract>

6. Status of This Document: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/#sotd>

7. Report of Important Changes to the Document: the spec has undergone no substantive changes since the 1-June-2010 Candidate Recommendation was published.

8. Evidence That the Document Satisfies Group's Requirements: the requirements addressed by the spec are included in the spec: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/#design-goals-and-requirements>

9. Evidence That Dependencies With Other Groups Met: this specification includes normative references to Media Queries CR <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/#normative-references>

10. Evidence for Wide Review: in addition to review by the WebApps WG, the spec also had review and collaboration with the CSS WG and WAC (formerly OMTP BONDI).

11. Evidence That Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: No substantive issues were raised by Implementers during the Candidate phase.

12. Objections: there are NO objections associated with this spec.

13. Implementation Information: the implementation report is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/imp-report/>. The CR's exit criteria has been met: at least two implementations pass each of the tests.

14. Patent Disclosures: there are no known patent issues with this spec <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status>.

Widget Access Request Policy (aka WARP)

1. Document title: Widget Access Request Policy

2. Document URI: the document that serves as the Draft PR is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/> and its TR location will be <http://w3.org/TR/widgets-access/>

3. Estimated Publication Date: 15 December 2011

4. Record of the WG's Decision to Advance: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011OctDec/1220.html>

5. Document Abstract: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/#abstract>

6. Status of The Document: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/#sotd>

7. Report of Important Changes to the Document: the spec has undergone no substantive changes since the 20-April-2010 Candidate Recommendation was published.

8. Evidence the Document Satisfies Group's Requirements: the requirements addressed by the spec are included in the spec: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/#design-goals-and-requirements>

9. Evidence that Dependencies With Other Groups Met: this specification has no normative dependency issues <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/#normative-references>

10. Evidence of Wide Review: in addition to review by the WebApps WG, the spec also had review and collaboration with the WAC (formerly OMTP BONDI).

11. Evidence That Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: No substantive issues were raised by Implementers.

12. Objections: there are NO objections associated with this spec.

13. Implementation Information: the implementation report is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/imp-report/>. 3 implementations pass 100% of the test suite.

14. Patent Disclosures: Apple filed exclusions from the Patent Policy <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status> and a Patent Advisory Group (PAG) for this spec recommended the group continue without changes (see the PAG Report <http://www.w3.org/2009/11/widgets-pag/pagreport.html>).

Widget Interface

1. Document title: Widget Interface

2. Document URI: the document that serves as the Draft PR is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/> and its TR location will be <http://w3.org/TR/widgets-apis/>

3. Estimated Publication Date: @TBD. A Proposed Recommendation is Blocked by Web Storage and Web IDL not being in Candidate Recommendation and a Normative dependency on HTML5.

4. Record of the WG's Decision to Advance: the decision to advance this spec to PR is recorded in <@TBD>.

5. Document Abstract: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#abstract>

6. Status of the Document: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#sotd>

7. Report of Important Changes to the Document: the spec has undergone no substantive changes since the 7-June-2011 LCWD was published.

8. Evidence That the Document Satisfies Group's Requirements: the requirements addressed by the spec are included in the spec: <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#design-goals-and-requirements>

9. Evidence That Dependencies With Other Groups Met: this specification depends on HTML5 (LC), Web Storage (WD) and Web IDL (LC) <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/#normative-references>

10. Evidence for Wide Review: in addition to review by the WebApps WG, the spec also had review and collaboration with the I18N WG and WAC (formerly OMTP BONDI).

11. Evidence That Issues Have Been Formally Addressed: No issues were raised during the 7-June-2011 Last Call

12. Objections: there are NO objections associated with this spec.

13. Implementation Information: the implementation report is <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/imp-report/>. Currently, 4 implementation passes 100% of the test suite.

14. Patent Disclosures: there are no known patent issues with this spec <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42538/status>.