ISSUE-64: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model?

Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
HISTORICAL: CORS [this spec uses Bugzilla for Bug/Issue tracking http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-CORS]
Raised by:
Arthur Barstow
Opened on:
2008-01-04
Description:
Doug Crockford raised this issue on 2008-01-02 via:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0008.html>

See also the follow-ups to Doug's e-mail, including but not necessarily limited to:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0009.html>
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0024.html>

Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [waf] Call for Approval of 9 January 2008 VC Minutes (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-01-10)
  2. [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2008-01-09)

Related notes:

During the WG's January 16 2008 voice conference, we resolved to Close this issue:

<http://www.w3.org/2008/01/16-waf-minutes.html>

[[
we [will] add a non-requirements section [to our requirements document] and add JSONRequest to that section
]]


17 Jan 2008, 13:27:02

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 64.html,v 1.1 2016/01/25 10:26:22 carine Exp $