ISSUE-49: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?
AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- HISTORICAL: CORS [this spec uses Bugzilla for Bug/Issue tracking http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-CORS]
- Raised by:
- Arthur Barstow
- Opened on:
- 2007-07-06
- Description:
- Raised by the TAG and the POWDER WG
See:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun/0145.html>
and:
<http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/07/02-minutes.html#item02> - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-09-20)
- Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2007-09-20)
- ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-07-06)
Related notes:
The POWDER WG will align with us it seems so closing.
17 Jan 2008, 13:34:39Display change log