15:55:30 RRSAgent has joined #hcls 15:55:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/12/12-hcls-irc 15:55:34 Zakim, this is hcls 15:55:34 "hcls" matches SW_HCLS(Term TF)10:00AM, and SW_HCLS()11:00AM, ericP 15:55:58 Zakim, this will be hcls 15:55:58 "hcls" matches SW_HCLS(Term TF)10:00AM, and SW_HCLS()11:00AM, ericP 15:56:00 paolo_ciccarese has joined #HCLS 15:56:09 Zakim, this is SW_HCLS() 15:56:09 ericP, I see SW_HCLS()11:00AM in the schedule but not yet started. Perhaps you mean "this will be SW_HCLS()". 15:56:17 Zakim, this will be SW_HCLS() 15:56:17 ok, ericP; I see SW_HCLS()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 15:56:32 meeting: SWANSIOC 15:57:58 SW_HCLS()11:00AM has now started 15:58:05 +??P3 15:59:17 daveruss has joined #HCLS 15:59:22 matthias has joined #hcls 15:59:55 -??P3 15:59:57 SW_HCLS()11:00AM has ended 15:59:57 Attendees were 16:00:01 SW_HCLS()11:00AM has now started 16:00:08 +??P8 16:00:22 +??P3 16:00:39 + +1.317.277.aaaa 16:00:41 Zakim ??P3 is matthias 16:02:01 curoli has joined #hcls 16:02:38 + +0196266aabb 16:02:48 +??P16 16:03:11 + +1.813.396.aacc 16:03:29 -??P16 16:04:09 sorry trying to dial in but mic not working 16:04:16 Susie has joined #hcls 16:05:19 the call has not really started yet anyways, we are waiting for Tim. 16:05:36 (reply to John) 16:05:45 +EricP 16:06:01 -EricP 16:06:23 +EricP 16:06:42 +??P25 16:07:00 +??P24 16:07:18 Zakim, who is here? 16:07:19 On the phone I see ??P8, ??P3, +1.317.277.aaaa, +0196266aabb, +1.813.396.aacc, EricP, ??P25, ??P24 16:07:22 On IRC I see Susie, curoli, matthias, david_newman, paolo_ciccarese, RRSAgent, Zakim, Cloud, ericP 16:07:39 + +1.617.818.aadd 16:07:59 +??P28 16:08:18 Zakim, +1.617.818.aadd is curoli 16:08:18 +curoli; got it 16:08:22 - +1.813.396.aacc 16:08:40 alexpassant has joined #hcls 16:08:58 hi - I'm on the phone but can only hear you - will try on skype 16:09:01 tim - two items on agenda 16:09:04 Zakim, +??P28 is JohnB 16:09:04 sorry, ericP, I do not recognize a party named '+??P28' 16:09:05 -??P24 16:09:09 1) swansioc related 16:09:14 2) myexperiment related 16:09:34 1) most of the interesting work has been done on swansioc - did some work on swan to align to sioc 16:09:45 +??P5 16:09:58 tim: requests report from paolo and alex on the work so far 16:10:07 Zakim, ??P5 is alexpassant 16:10:07 +alexpassant; got it 16:10:27 alexpassant: SIOC DL alignment 16:10:37 alex: did the sioc owl-dl alignments, map swan properties to sioc properties, and added some new classes to sioc 16:10:37 http://rdfs.org/sioc/swan 16:10:49 alex: has the file somewhere on rdfs.org - link pasted 16:10:51 -> http://rdfs.org/sioc/swan SWAN SIOC mappings 16:10:55 http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns 16:11:12 + +0186528aaee 16:11:34 alex: worked mainly on the model and not on the apps, so next step is to look at scf and see how to implement the model 16:11:49 q+ 16:12:00 tim: proposed that stephane corlosquet will join in the SCF team and tim, axel polleres and john breslin will discuss this on monday 16:12:09 Jun has joined #hcls 16:12:31 paolo: have been discussing mainly about tagging, wondering about using own qualifiers 16:13:19 tim: has seen a lot of the detailed work that has come out, and thinks it is very strong, so believes it is worthwhile to do a member submission 16:13:28 ... requests info from ericP on how to do this 16:13:48 ericP: a member submission requires a sig of at least one member of w3c 16:14:08 ... look at the w3c TR page and you will see what a technical report should look like 16:14:26 ... You submit the doc, w3c looks at it and they check from a publication perspective for format, links, etc. 16:14:48 ... then a team comment will be returned saying "you should look at X which is related, or should have done Y" 16:14:59 mscottm has joined #hcls 16:15:11 ... The submission gets a URI, where people can refer to it as a "defacto" standard although it is not actually a standard 16:15:16 ... any questions? 16:15:25 tim: asks if there is a typical timeline for these things? 16:15:27 http://www.w3.org/Submission/ 16:16:30 ericP: have chance to make changes before published finally 16:16:40 tim: is there a requirement for deployment 16:16:56 ericP: no, can be published before full implementation (hair brained scheme!) 16:17:02 +Scott_Marshall 16:17:11 tim: any other suggestions / objections to submission? 16:17:29 alex: three documents, one about SWAN, one about SWANSIOC and one about SIOCTypes with which SWAN is also aligned 16:17:52 paolo: question, if we send in three documents in the same submission, how do we submit changes in the future 16:18:08 ericP: If you make one submission that is three documents, do you have to do it all over again 16:18:42 ... Best have an index document saying here are the three things that are being submitted, independent pages for each document (SWAN, SWANSIOC, SIOC Types) 16:19:16 ... did this for previous documents (e.g. RDF) for a better user experience 16:20:57 tim: Everyone comfortable with proceeding in this way? 16:21:07 all: no objections 16:21:27 tim: David Newman met with Tim in England last week, and trading slides along with info on v1.2 of the SWAN ontology 16:22:06 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Meetings/2008-12-12_Conference_Call?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SWAN-myExp-Notes.rtf 16:22:29 tim: quick review shows two types of problems 16:22:49 ... There are parts of our use cases that are similar enough to be overlapping and defined somewhat differently 16:23:09 ... myExp:actor and swan:Agent, and some other examples I missed 16:23:25 ... first instinct is to have a use case first before we go around aligning these things 16:23:34 ... the gaps here are the real physical experiments 16:23:51 ... myExperiment has a notion of an experiment being a container for computational experiments 16:24:08 ... not focussing on things being mixed in a test tube and centrifuging 16:24:20 ... Tim did a sketch on how this gap could be filled 16:24:27 ... http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Meetings/2008-12-12_Conference_Call?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SWAN-myExp-Gap-Filling-Sketch.pdf 16:25:13 ... (the integration issues are in http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Meetings/2008-12-12_Conference_Call?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SWAN-myExp-Notes.rtf) 16:26:14 ... have an Experiment superclass with info on whose it was, conditions, when it was done, what pages in whose lab notebook 16:26:26 ... subclass of Physical and Computational experiments 16:27:20 ... (the orange stuff in http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Meetings/2008-12-12_Conference_Call?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=SWAN-myExp-Gap-Filling-Sketch.pdf is what would have to be built, this document is titled "A Rough Sketch of Potential Connections between SWAN and myExperiment Ontologies") 16:27:26 ... this is a strawman 16:27:48 dave: no reason this information couldn't be stored within a myExperiment:Experiment 16:28:14 dave: apart from that, have it all right about how SWAN and myExperiment can interact 16:29:12 tim: In process of getting a project started in Harvard that could be a source of data, a cross-disciplinary thing with the stemcell institute regarding medical expressions about stem cells in blood 16:29:36 ... project would be to do analysis on this but also to create a repository for the analysis using SCF 16:29:51 ... would involve building a repository that would have its own ontology that could fit in with this 16:30:01 ... Anyone else interested in this to test out some ideas? 16:30:17 q+ 16:30:23 ... There has been work on Experimental ontologies in Lilly? 16:30:36 susie: Yes, in Singapore 16:30:57 tim: Would welcome any involvement from experimental people, e.g. the Lilly Singapore group 16:31:13 matthias: May be interested in Ontology of Biomedical Investigations (OBI) 16:31:20 http://obi-ontology.org/ 16:31:22 ... may see the usefulness of OBI for this use case 16:32:06 ... International collaboration, Matthias peripherally involved, coordinator is Alan Ruttenberg from Science Commons (or at least one of them) 16:32:47 Susie: OBI would be worth linking into, the Singapore folks found that OBI didn't meet needs at the time but it is better to move towards an open standard approach rather than a proprietary solution 16:32:58 ... Alan leading charge in one part of it 16:33:35 ... Not sure was it Susannah Saranson from EVI (sp.) who was involved 16:33:45 People involved in OBI http://obi-ontology.org/page/Consortium 16:33:55 scribenick: Cloud 16:34:26 ... Good quality people involved, Lilly were looking for concepts that weren't in it (Chip?) at the time 16:35:04 -Scott_Marshall 16:35:06 ... Susanna Sansone was that person from EBI 16:35:20 dave: Will look at OBI and see how it ties into SWAN and myExperiment 16:35:52 tim: May be able to adapt what they have, or it may be possible that there are many right generalisations without the detailed stuff that is needed 16:35:59 ... shouldn't be an impediment to this work 16:36:23 ... Tim thanks matthias for making us aware of that 16:36:32 ericP: Has more info on the submissions approach 16:37:17 tim: Take a real project that is relevant and use as an initial test bed 16:38:33 dave: has details of a second possible testbed 16:39:28 tim: experimental notebook idea, like pages is a lab book, but also include readouts automatically 16:39:41 ... also include chemical analysis experimental data 16:40:37 dave: Electronic Lab notebook, generate plans and carry out these plans, all in RDF 16:41:21 ... will dig up a reference 16:41:52 ericP: Should have noticed that since some of this is happening within the interest group, that some of this can be done within the IG as an interest group note 16:42:03 ... downside is that you have to get more buy in from the IG 16:43:11 ... more weight in that it shows consensus from the group, and it is easier to imagine the examination of the subject material, as the IG would be able to assess it more readily than a member submission 16:43:23 ... would have to go to a Thursday HCLS meeting for approval 16:43:24 http://www.combechem.org/tour.php?tourpage=smart.html 16:43:33 ... and it would have more weight 16:43:41 need to leave, bye! 16:43:43 matthias has left #hcls 16:43:50 -??P3 16:44:50 ... More familiar with IG path, and can have older version links and latest version links, and sets of documents that are conceptually related can make use of version links to help a user navigate - helps a user to better access the relevant versions 16:45:22 tim: asks if ericP recommends IG note as opposed to Member Submission 16:45:37 ... is it the consensus that we should proceed to construct this note 16:45:41 all: yes 16:45:49 ericP: Timeline for this? 16:45:59 tim: maybe February 16:47:45 ... Next meeting on (sorry missed it) 16:48:27 ... Discuss how to connect PhysicalExperiments to data 16:48:38 ... Next meeting on Friday January 2nd at the same time! 16:49:05 Zakim, plesae draft minutes 16:49:05 I don't understand 'plesae draft minutes', ericP 16:49:06 - +1.317.277.aaaa 16:49:06 - +0186528aaee 16:49:08 -??P25 16:49:13 -??P8 16:49:16 Zakim, please draft minutes 16:49:16 I don't understand 'please draft minutes', ericP 16:49:17 - +0196266aabb 16:49:22 -curoli 16:49:23 Zakim, draft minutes 16:49:23 -alexpassant 16:49:23 I don't understand 'draft minutes', ericP 16:49:36 RRSagent, please draft minutes 16:49:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/12/12-hcls-minutes.html ericP 16:49:44 RRSagent, please make log world-visible 16:50:11 http://www.w3.org/2008/12/12-hcls-minutes 16:51:01 -EricP 16:51:02 -??P28 16:51:02 SW_HCLS()11:00AM has ended 16:51:03 Attendees were +1.317.277.aaaa, +0196266aabb, +1.813.396.aacc, EricP, curoli, alexpassant, +0186528aaee, Scott_Marshall 19:09:53 Zakim has left #hcls