15:46:29 RRSAgent has joined #rif 15:46:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-irc 15:46:39 zakim, this will be rif 15:46:39 ok, csma; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 14 minutes 15:47:19 Meeting: RIF Telecon 4 November 08 15:47:44 Chair: Christian de Sainte Marie 15:48:06 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Nov/0000.html 15:49:19 csma has changed the topic to: 4 November RIF agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Nov/0000.html 15:50:53 Regrets: DaveReynolds, Hassan Aït-Kaci, PaulVincent 15:51:21 zakim, clear agenda 15:51:21 agenda cleared 15:51:40 agenda+ Admin 15:52:11 agenda+ Liaison 15:52:23 agenda+ Public comments 15:52:37 agenda+ Action review 15:52:53 agenda+ TF update (Core, PRD, PS) 15:53:39 agenda+ Core 15:53:51 agenda Publication plans 15:54:11 agenda+ Publication plans 15:54:48 agenda+ Test cases 15:55:09 agenda+ AOB (pick scribe!) 15:55:57 StuartTaylor has joined #rif 15:58:11 yuting has joined #RIF 15:58:52 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:58:58 +Sandro 15:59:01 mdean has joined #rif 15:59:12 + +0122427aaaa 15:59:51 +Mike_Dean 16:00:47 +??P35 16:00:51 +[IBM] 16:01:03 zakim, ??P35 is me 16:01:03 +csma; got it 16:01:04 zakim aaaa is me 16:01:08 ChrisW has joined #rif 16:01:22 StellaMitchell has joined #rif 16:01:25 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:01:25 On the phone I see Sandro, +0122427aaaa, Mike_Dean, csma, [IBM] 16:01:31 zakim, [ibm] is me 16:01:31 +ChrisW; got it 16:01:36 josb has joined #rif 16:02:27 zakim, +0122427aaaa is me 16:02:27 +StuartTaylor; got it 16:02:33 + +43.158.801.3aabb 16:02:33 zakim, yuting is with me 16:02:33 +yuting; got it 16:02:36 +[IBM] 16:02:42 + +39.047.101.aacc 16:02:46 Harold has joined #rif 16:02:47 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 16:02:47 +StellaMitchell; got it 16:03:26 zakim, who is on the phone. 16:03:26 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', Harold 16:03:53 no, cannot 16:04:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:04:15 On the phone I see Sandro, StuartTaylor, Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, +43.158.801.3aabb, StellaMitchell, josb 16:04:17 StuartTaylor has StuartTaylor, yuting 16:04:47 Gary_Hallmark has joined #rif 16:04:54 zakim, aabb is Harold 16:04:54 +Harold; got it 16:04:59 LeoraMorgenstern has joined #rif 16:05:17 AxelPolleres has joined #rif 16:05:26 +LeoraMorgenstern 16:05:29 Axel, can you scribe? 16:05:49 zakim, mute me 16:05:49 LeoraMorgenstern should now be muted 16:05:56 + +1.503.533.aadd 16:06:20 zakim, aadd is me 16:06:20 +Gary; got it 16:06:25 +??P43 16:06:52 scribe: Axel Polleres 16:06:53 Scribe: axelPolleres 16:06:54 zakim, ??P43 is AxelPolleres 16:06:54 +AxelPolleres; got it 16:06:58 scribenick: AxelPolleres 16:07:10 zakim, next item 16:07:10 agendum 1. "Admin" taken up [from csma] 16:07:20 Topic: Admin 16:07:38 Propose: to accept the minutes of Ocober 21 16:07:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Oct/att-0088/2008-10-21-rif-minutes.html 16:07:40 propoesd to accept minutes of 21 october 16:08:13 RESOLVED: to accept minutes of October 21st telecon 16:08:14 no objections. 16:08:20 StuartTaylor has joined #rif 16:08:41 Zakim, StuartTaylor is with yuting 16:08:42 sorry, StuartTaylor, I do not recognize a party named 'yuting' 16:09:08 next item 16:09:11 agernda amendments: 16:09:24 rdf:text will be discussed with publ. plan. 16:09:38 csma: anythinh new with owl? 16:09:49 s/thinh/thing/ 16:10:05 sandro: OWL wants to go to last call. 16:10:18 ... that is why they push on rdf:text. 16:10:29 ... current target Dec 1. 16:10:49 csma: HSLS? adrian not here. 16:11:16 ... I gave an update at TPAC on RIF and had some questions from HCLS. 16:11:43 ... also Policy interest group was interested, but far from using RIF at this point. 16:11:54 +??P44 16:12:00 ... anything relevant from ISWC/RR? 16:12:33 I did not attend ISWC in the end 16:12:51 Harold: Michael Kifer gave a joint keynote for RuleML & RR. (especially FLD) 16:13:08 Gary: broadcast quality wasn't ideal. 16:13:45 -??P44 16:14:56 Axel: RDB2RDF had a f2f at ISWC. 16:15:19 +??P44 16:15:27 ... it is an XG, chaired by Ashok from Oracle. 16:15:46 -??P44 16:15:48 action: axel to write an email to RDB2RDF on RIF 16:15:48 Created ACTION-635 - Write an email to RDB2RDF on RIF [on Axel Polleres - due 2008-11-11]. 16:17:32 also, nulls are problematic (3 value logic) 16:17:41 Sandro: I believe that RIF Core solved the RDB2RDF problem completely. 16:17:57 axel: maybe not if aggregates are involved in the mappings. 16:18:18 ... will send a mail to RDB2RDF inquiring about that. 16:18:36 +??P46 16:18:51 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:18:51 On the phone I see Sandro, StuartTaylor, Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, Harold, StellaMitchell, josb, LeoraMorgenstern (muted), Gary, AxelPolleres, ??P46 16:18:54 StuartTaylor has StuartTaylor, yuting 16:19:33 (csma, can yyou repeat that?) 16:19:41 zakim, ??P46 is AdrianP 16:19:41 +AdrianP; got it 16:20:07 csma: met with Dave from XBRL 16:20:24 mdean: u there? 16:20:24 next item 16:20:30 Topic: Public comments 16:20:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Oct/0114.html 16:20:49 s/met with Dave from XBRL/met with Dave Raggett from W3C about starting XBRL standards work/ 16:21:05 csma: there has been a mail from harold, see pointer. 16:21:37 chris: my response ready to go unless objections. 16:22:40 ... drafted another paragraph in relations to KIF and common logic in the overview of BLD. 16:23:04 ... the two new paragraphs should be checked. 16:23:56 next item 16:24:08 csma: nothing to add on public comments. 16:24:16 ... Kowalski will be done by me. 16:24:28 Topic: Action review. 16:24:43 Action 633 on chris is continued 16:24:43 Sorry, couldn't find user - 633 16:24:47 zakim, unmute me 16:24:47 LeoraMorgenstern should no longer be muted 16:25:05 Action 632 on sandro ? 16:25:05 Sorry, couldn't find user - 632 16:25:12 mkifer has joined #rif 16:25:23 sandro: that's done. 16:25:49 that's done 16:25:53 Action 631 on stella is done. 16:25:53 Sorry, couldn't find user - 631 16:26:18 631 is pending review. 16:26:34 Action 630 is continued 16:26:34 Sorry, couldn't find user - 630 16:26:53 Action 629 on stuart. 16:26:53 Sorry, couldn't find user - 629 16:27:00 ... is continued 16:27:20 +Michael_Kifer 16:27:25 stuart: not clear what wher the differences. 16:27:31 josb: check the changelog. 16:28:16 chrisw: we need a snapshot on RDF+OWL. 16:28:41 action 628 on Yuting. 16:28:41 Sorry, couldn't find user - 628 16:29:06 yuting: similar problem then stuart, I did a review in general, but will provide more details on differences. 16:29:20 chrisw: yuting and stuart, sned your comments to the WG. 16:29:56 action 626,627,629,630 continued. 16:29:56 Sorry, couldn't find user - 626,627,629,630 16:30:04 done 16:30:10 action 624 on stella is done. 16:30:10 Sorry, couldn't find user - 624 16:30:27 action 625 on gary is continued. 16:30:27 Sorry, couldn't find user - 625 16:30:57 action 623 on chris is completed 16:30:57 Sorry, couldn't find user - 623 16:31:12 action 622 on chris continued. 16:31:12 Sorry, couldn't find user - 622 16:31:42 action 617 on chris continued as well 16:31:42 Sorry, couldn't find user - 617 16:31:44 Sorry, both of my actions --- 614 and 588--- need to be continued. 16:31:54 action 614 on leora on testcases is continued 16:31:54 Sorry, couldn't find user - 614 16:32:36 ChrisW - please complete your actions on time 16:32:43 this is your first formal warning 16:32:46 action 606 on Michael Kifer is almost done. last thing to be done... continued. 16:32:46 Sorry, couldn't find user - 606 16:32:53 -Mike_Dean 16:32:56 ok, Chris. Sorry about that 16:33:39 csma: 606 is closed 16:33:59 action 604 is continued. 16:33:59 Sorry, couldn't find user - 604 16:34:01 where is the changelog in BLD? 16:34:10 action 603 is done. 16:34:10 Sorry, couldn't find user - 603 16:34:34 csma: 603 can be closed we will discuss it later. 16:35:11 action ??? on adrian done. 16:35:11 Sorry, couldn't find user - ??? 16:36:18 action 590 on adrian is done. 16:36:18 Sorry, couldn't find user - 590 16:37:18 continued 16:37:21 csma: action 590 is pending review. 16:37:27 (more complicated than it looks) 16:37:28 action 592 is continued 16:37:28 Sorry, couldn't find user - 592 16:37:58 leora: action 588 on leora is continued 16:38:17 axel: action 582 is continued 16:38:40 axel: action 581 is continued 16:39:05 sandro: action 579 is continued, will be done this week. 16:39:22 sandro: action 573 is continued. 16:39:47 sandro: action 565 is moved to Adrian. 16:40:04 action: adrian to provide an ssh key to sandro for cvs access 16:40:04 Sorry, couldn't find user - adrian 16:40:20 action: apaschke to provide an ssh key to sandro for cvs access 16:40:20 Sorry, couldn't find user - apaschke 16:40:42 csma: all other actions continued, let's move to the pending review actions. 16:42:23 adrian: currently not a member, but maybe I could participate via OMG. 16:42:46 sandro: if not possible we will discuss invited expert. 16:43:51 jos: action 616 is waiting for reply by OWL. 16:44:41 chrisw: talked to ian on that, datatype issue in OWL is difficult, they don't want to reopen it. would we have specific requests or would we go with theirs? 16:45:13 josb: i inquired about some datatypes which only make sense in a specific XML document, which don't make sense for us. 16:45:34 csma: they did not take it into account? 16:45:47 sandro: shall we signela them that we object last call? 16:46:13 josb: I only said we shouldn't adopt them in RIF, and I don't see reasons for them in OWL 16:46:37 id, idref, and entity. 16:46:38 ... it was ID and IDREF and ENTITY 16:47:01 chrisw: you sent it as a public comment. 16:47:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2008Oct/0000.html 16:49:08 discussion on whether we should object or not... 16:49:23 csma: we can expect reply on jkos' public comment. 16:49:46 sandro: I will try to push them a bit to respond quickly. 16:50:31 chrisw: was it the case that except the ID, IDREF and ENTITY data types we would be ok to adopt the others? 16:51:09 axel: that would have impliucations on built-ins? 16:51:23 josb: many are subtypes of types we have already. 16:51:55 csma: wouldn't we need them for interoperatbility with OWL? 16:52:57 josb: well, that depends on what conformance we want. strict vs. non-strict conformance clause. for SWC we don't have a conformance claus there, basically it is defined for any datatype. 16:53:30 +Mike_Dean 16:53:33 csma: anything else on this question? 16:53:52 next item 16:54:00 ... anything else regarding actions? no. 16:54:22 topic: TF update (core, PRD,PS) 16:54:45 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=Core&diff=6168&oldid=6018 16:55:08 harold: we have a lot of progress, everyone should have a look at it, we didn't have a telecon after it yet. 16:55:18 ... we are close. 16:55:29 ... to have a first WD. 16:55:55 csma: my naive question to Core TF: Does core support unification? 16:56:16 harold: that would mean core would not be a subset of PRD. 16:56:43 ... if you only give it facts a la PRD though, nothing bad can happen. 16:57:03 csma: if core is more general than PRD we must decide what to do. 16:57:27 gary: no function symbols solves the problem probably, but we still need to do something on equalities. 16:57:52 action: christian to open issue about unification in CORE and PRD being limited to pattern matching 16:57:52 Created ACTION-636 - Open issue about unification in CORE and PRD being limited to pattern matching [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2008-11-11]. 16:58:40 csma: PRD TF will have concluding teleconf next week. 16:59:13 ... next WD will be significantly improved. we still have to finalize gary's work on binding variables in the action part. 17:00:08 gary: things are coming together nicely, we can talk about it after next week. 17:00:33 chris: TF on PS is stalled, I got a flu. 17:01:18 next item 17:01:34 PROPOSED: Parameterize the conformance clauses of Core with safeness requirements "strict" and "none" (default: "none"). Closing ISSUE-70. 17:02:45 RESOLVED: Parameterize the conformance clauses of Core with safeness requirements "strict" and "none" (default: "none"). Closing ISSUE-70. 17:02:56 topic: core 17:03:24 rrsagent, pointer 17:03:24 See http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-irc#T17-03-24 17:03:37 harold: dave found a terminology conflict with the word "strict" 17:03:51 csma: i guess this is editorial. 17:04:18 next item 17:04:37 topic: publication plan 17:04:57 csma: let's start with SWC... everything seems ready, we just wait for the reviews. 17:05:17 q? 17:05:57 csma: chris, stuart, yuting, until when can you review? 17:06:06 sutart: mo or tue 17:06:22 chris: by end of next week. 17:06:33 for me, by this Saturday to review the swc 17:06:39 csma: BLD? do we want to give out a new version? 17:06:57 sandro: I think we should call it WD, it is still LC. 17:07:10 chrisw: comment period reopened then? 17:07:18 sandro: I guess yes. 17:07:36 s/comment period/will the comment period/ 17:08:10 sandro: we do have some editorial changes. 17:08:35 csma: question is, is it freezable? harold? 17:09:03 michael: I need to change the last section and adapt the changelog. 17:09:40 chris: I added the 2 new paragraphs in overview and put the references, references still need to be added to references section. 17:10:35 michael: what's the point in publishing now another draft? 17:10:50 harold: that people don't read the old version. 17:11:35 chris: new people might come along and find it and give more comments, but I don't feel strongly. 17:12:12 ... I think we should publish after all issues are resolved. 17:12:41 csma: shall we resolve that? 17:13:56 sandro: latest version on the wiki is linked from the WD. 17:14:41 chrisw: i would be confused to re-publish LC before CR 17:15:41 csma: I buy this argument. 17:16:09 chrisw: another thing we should have resolved is the result of the PS TF. 17:16:17 ... before republishing BLD. 17:16:27 csma: let's move to FLD. 17:16:32 sandro: with the new open issues in BLD, yeah, I'm okay with no publishing it right now. Focus on DTB. 17:17:46 michael: I hope to finish FLD by end of nov. gave a talk at RR on it, lot of interest, some people expressed interest to join the group. 17:18:47 ... mid dec is realistic for next WD (if we freeze by end nov) 17:20:19 csma: what about SWC, given the decision on BLD? 17:20:29 ... shall we also postpone? 17:20:43 schedule: new FLD WD probably by EOY 17:20:46 ... nobody insists on publishing now. 17:21:07 .... we can still freeze it. 17:21:38 ... we have three actions to review it. 17:22:30 ... we don't need the reviews now... actions 626,627,628,629 cancelled. 17:22:42 ... but the reviews are still welcome. 17:23:38 csma: DTB? 17:24:28 axel: freezable version by two weeks frm now. 17:24:41 ... moves publication to rather end of november. 17:24:48 csma: core? 17:25:16 harold: the unresolved issues could just become editor's notes. 17:25:36 csma: when can we freeze as early as possible? 17:25:53 harold: second half of november. 17:26:02 chris: let's try to freeze in two weeks. 17:26:27 csma: both core and dtb due nov 18th for freeze. 17:26:38 csma: prd? 17:26:54 gary: we can work two more weeks on that. 17:27:10 csma: also due to nov 18 for freezing prd. 17:27:16 csma: test cases? 17:27:54 chrisw: actions? 17:28:01 action: sandro to generate test case manifests 17:28:01 Created ACTION-637 - Generate test case manifests [on Sandro Hawke - due 2008-11-11]. 17:30:06 csma: also nov 18 as due tate for test cases. 17:30:15 csma: ucr? 17:30:21 adrian: I got some comments. 17:30:51 we need to extend the meeting by 5 mins 17:30:57 ... should be ready nov 18th as well. we should discuss new requirements on next weeks agenda. 17:31:14 action: christian put UCR on agenda for next week 17:31:14 Created ACTION-638 - Put UCR on agenda for next week [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2008-11-11]. 17:31:24 PROPOSED: extend meeting by 5 mins 17:31:29 RESOLVED: extend meeting by 5 mins 17:31:33 topic: rdf:text 17:32:17 q? 17:32:31 action: sandro to freeze rdf:text 17:32:31 Created ACTION-639 - Freeze rdf:text [on Sandro Hawke - due 2008-11-11]. 17:33:18 josb does 17:33:24 csma: freeze rdf:text today, review by friday, FPWD next week. 17:33:52 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:33:52 On the phone I see Sandro, StuartTaylor, csma, ChrisW, Harold, StellaMitchell, josb, LeoraMorgenstern, Gary, AxelPolleres, AdrianP, Michael_Kifer, Mike_Dean 17:33:56 StuartTaylor has StuartTaylor, yuting 17:34:15 action: StuartTaylor to review rdf:text 17:34:15 Sorry, couldn't find user - StuartTaylor 17:34:22 action: Stuart to review rdf:text 17:34:22 Created ACTION-640 - Review rdf:text [on Stuart Taylor - due 2008-11-11]. 17:34:46 action: debruij2 to review rdf:text by friday 17:34:46 Sorry, couldn't find user - debruij2 17:34:58 action: jdebruij2 to review rdf:text by friday 17:34:59 Created ACTION-641 - Review rdf:text by friday [on Jos de Bruijn - due 2008-11-11]. 17:35:15 -LeoraMorgenstern 17:35:19 action: chris to review rdf:text 17:35:19 Created ACTION-642 - Review rdf:text [on Christopher Welty - due 2008-11-11]. 17:35:26 As we discussed some time ago, DaveR's "OWL 2 RL in RIF" should also become a FPWD: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/OWLRL 17:35:38 +LeoraMorgenstern 17:36:39 harold: we should also talk about including OWL2 RL to RIF" as a published draft. 17:36:49 adjourn 17:36:54 -AdrianP 17:36:55 -Harold 17:36:55 -LeoraMorgenstern 17:36:59 -StellaMitchell 17:37:00 -Gary 17:37:00 -Michael_Kifer 17:37:02 -StuartTaylor 17:37:02 -josb 17:37:04 -Mike_Dean 17:37:06 zakim, attendees? 17:37:06 I don't understand your question, csma. 17:37:07 regrets: DaveReynolds Hassan Aït-Kaci PaulVincent 17:37:12 zakim, list attendees 17:37:12 As of this point the attendees have been Sandro, Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, StuartTaylor, +43.158.801.3aabb, yuting, +39.047.101.aacc, StellaMitchell, josb, Harold, LeoraMorgenstern, 17:37:16 ... +1.503.533.aadd, Gary, AxelPolleres, AdrianP, Michael_Kifer 17:37:23 rrsagent, make minutes 17:37:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 17:37:54 rrsagent, make logs public 17:38:44 -AxelPolleres 17:43:10 -ChrisW 17:43:11 -csma 17:43:16 -Sandro 17:43:17 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 17:43:18 Attendees were Sandro, Mike_Dean, csma, ChrisW, StuartTaylor, +43.158.801.3aabb, yuting, +39.047.101.aacc, StellaMitchell, josb, Harold, LeoraMorgenstern, +1.503.533.aadd, Gary, 17:43:20 ... AxelPolleres, AdrianP, Michael_Kifer 17:48:36 csma has left #rif