13:54:58 RRSAgent has joined #emotion 13:54:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/09/04-emotion-irc 13:55:06 zakim, this will be INC_EMOXG 13:55:06 ok, marc; I see INC_EMOXG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 13:56:35 hello marc 13:56:48 just you and me then? 13:57:25 INC_EMOXG()10:00AM has now started 13:57:32 +??P3 13:57:49 zakim, I am +??P3 13:57:49 sorry, cgi-irc, I do not see a party named '+??P3' 13:58:01 cgi-irc, who are you? 13:58:17 oops 13:58:26 Idoia has joined #emotion 13:58:31 Bjoern has joined #emotion 13:58:47 Hi Björn! 13:58:52 Ian has joined #emotion 13:59:06 Hi all! 13:59:10 zakim, I am +??P3 13:59:10 sorry, Ian, I do not see a party named '+??P3' 13:59:23 + +04989aaaa 13:59:44 +??P7 13:59:45 +??P9 13:59:54 Zakim, I am aaaa 13:59:54 +Bjoern; got it 14:00:03 +Paolo_Baggia 14:00:24 Christian has joined #emotion 14:01:01 paolo has joined #emotion 14:01:01 +Myriam_Arrue 14:01:05 zakim, who is speaking? 14:01:10 zakim, who is here? 14:01:10 On the phone I see ??P3, Bjoern, ??P7, ??P9 (muted), Paolo_Baggia, Myriam_Arrue 14:01:13 On IRC I see paolo, Christian, Ian, Bjoern, Idoia, RRSAgent, Zakim, marc, trackbot 14:01:15 marc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P7 (95%), Myriam_Arrue (20%) 14:01:29 + +0160372aabb 14:01:29 zakim, i am P3 14:01:29 zakim, I am ??P7 14:01:33 sorry, Ian, I do not see a party named 'P3' 14:01:37 +marc; got it 14:01:41 zakim, Paolo_Baggia is Paolo_Baggia,Enrico_Zovato 14:01:42 zakim, i am ??P3 14:01:45 +Paolo_Baggia,Enrico_Zovato; got it 14:01:47 +Ian; got it 14:01:49 felix has joined #emotion 14:01:54 zakim, who is here? 14:01:54 On the phone I see Ian, Bjoern, marc, ??P9 (muted), Paolo_Baggia,Enrico_Zovato, Myriam_Arrue, +0160372aabb 14:01:57 On IRC I see felix, paolo, Christian, Ian, Bjoern, Idoia, RRSAgent, Zakim, marc, trackbot 14:02:11 zakim, ??P9 is Jianhua 14:02:11 +Jianhua; got it 14:03:02 myriam arrue is Idoia and Nestor 14:03:15 zakim, aabb is AndyBreen 14:03:17 +AndyBreen; got it 14:04:57 +felix 14:05:32 + +49.381.402.aacc 14:05:46 zakim, aacc is Christian 14:05:46 +Christian; got it 14:05:58 Scribe: Paolo_Baggia 14:06:42 Chair: Marc_Schroeder 14:07:17 Topic: Discussion on continuation 14:07:42 Topic: Discussion on continuation 14:08:53 Christian: I'd like to continue 14:09:10 I also think the sub group would be fine 14:09:26 marc: I don't see why to be another subgroup 14:09:28 so do I and would clearly like to continue. 14:09:45 marc: Maybe issues on Patents 14:10:04 marc: There is policy in W3C, to disclose patent 14:11:14 paolo: Yes there are patent issues, 14:11:33 + +1.512.567.aadd 14:11:42 marc: risk people in MMI that already have patents 14:11:53 zakim, aadd is BillJarrold 14:11:53 +BillJarrold; got it 14:12:14 Christian: Can try the MMI way and afterwards to follow another option 14:13:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-emotion/2008Jul/0013.html 14:13:45 Topic: Core 1 and Core 6 discussion 14:14:32 Bjoern: different proposals 14:14:58 ... proposal 1 similar to other 14:15:26 ... Marc elegant proposal 14:16:14 ... variant 2: allows many levels and sets 14:16:37 -marc 14:17:17 +??P2 14:17:28 zakim, I am ??P2 14:17:28 +marc; got it 14:18:06 14:18:06 14:18:07 14:18:42 14:18:43 14:18:43 14:19:12 -Jianhua 14:21:49 +??P7 14:22:04 paolo1 has joined #emotion 14:22:15 Scribe: paolo1 14:22:25 Marc: example with element mood 14:24:45 14:24:46 14:24:46 14:28:26 zakim, who is talking? 14:28:37 marc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Christian (4%) 14:28:49 -BillJarrold 14:30:01 paolo has joined #emotion 14:30:40 +BillJarrold 14:30:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-emotion/2008Sep/0004.html 14:33:16 I prefer variant 5 14:36:41 agrees with leaving open variant 4 or 5 for now. 14:37:18 we also prefer variant 4 or 5 14:37:34 yes. 14:37:39 yes 14:37:46 Christian prefers variant 5 with thinking about the name of the 1st level tag (emotion/affect/emotion-related-state/ers...) 14:38:24 Core 6 14:38:34 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-emotion/2008Sep/0005.html 14:39:35 14:39:41 14:39:49 14:39:56 14:40:02 14:40:09 14:40:16 14:41:30 variant 2 14:41:40 14:41:46 14:41:52 14:41:58 yes 14:41:59 14:42:08 14:42:14 14:42:20 14:42:27 14:42:34 14:42:41 14:42:47 14:42:52 Jianhua has joined #emotion 14:42:57 14:43:03 14:43:09 14:46:29 -??P7 14:49:36 cant we simply allow more than one category per „affect“? 14:49:43 eg 14:52:39 +??P17 14:56:39 christian wonders why time information is not sufficient. If two emotions overlap in time they overlap is complex 14:57:15 we could add an attribut isComplex=true to those emotions to make it more explicit 15:00:45 -AndyBreen 15:00:56 -Ian 15:01:00 -felix 15:01:02 -BillJarrold 15:01:04 -Bjoern 15:01:04 bye 15:01:06 -Christian 15:01:08 -Myriam_Arrue 15:01:09 bye 15:01:12 -??P17 15:01:53 just one more thought from Christian: Making it explicit might make it more easy for human readers to find overlaps 15:02:32 and possibly also faster for parsers (looking for an attribute might be less expensive than calculating times) 15:02:34 -Paolo_Baggia,Enrico_Zovato 15:02:46 -marc 15:02:46 INC_EMOXG()10:00AM has ended 15:02:48 Attendees were +04989aaaa, Bjoern, Myriam_Arrue, +0160372aabb, marc, Paolo_Baggia,Enrico_Zovato, Ian, Jianhua, AndyBreen, felix, +49.381.402.aacc, Christian, +1.512.567.aadd, 15:02:50 ... BillJarrold 15:02:56 okay 15:02:58 bye 15:06:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:06:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/09/04-emotion-minutes.html marc 15:06:54 rrsagent, make logs public 15:08:04 rrsagent, bye 15:08:04 I see no action items