IRC log of rdfa on 2008-07-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:46:04 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 14:46:04 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc
- 14:46:12 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdfa
- 14:46:57 [msporny]
- zakim, this will be SW_SWD(RDFa)
- 14:46:57 [Zakim]
- ok, msporny; I see SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM scheduled to start in 14 minutes
- 14:47:16 [msporny]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML TaskForce
- 14:47:27 [msporny]
- Chair: Manu_Sporny
- 14:47:41 [msporny]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 14:47:48 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:47:48 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 14:49:15 [msporny]
- previous http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html
- 14:49:30 [msporny]
- Regrets: Michael_Hausenblas
- 14:49:35 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:49:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 14:50:05 [msporny]
- Present: Manu_Sporny
- 14:51:01 [msporny]
- Regrets+ Ben_Adida
- 14:51:06 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:51:06 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 14:52:58 [msporny]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jul/0044.html
- 14:53:01 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:53:01 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 14:57:30 [Ralph]
- Ralph has joined #rdfa
- 14:58:51 [msporny]
- Present+ Ralph_Swick
- 14:59:46 [msporny]
- Good morning, Ralph :)
- 15:00:50 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has now started
- 15:00:57 [Zakim]
- +McCarron
- 15:02:07 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 15:02:59 [Zakim]
- +??P40
- 15:03:03 [msporny]
- zakim, I am ??P40
- 15:03:12 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #rdfa
- 15:03:13 [Zakim]
- +msporny; got it
- 15:04:19 [msporny]
- Regrets+ Mark_Birbeck
- 15:04:24 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 15:04:27 [msporny]
- Regrets+ Steven_Pemberton
- 15:04:45 [markbirbeck]
- Regrets+ markbirbeck
- 15:04:49 [markbirbeck]
- Sorry. :)
- 15:05:05 [markbirbeck]
- I'll be on IRC for a little while, but have to leave early to get kids.
- 15:05:20 [Zakim]
- +JeremyCarroll
- 15:05:22 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/2 CR comments
- 15:05:40 [msporny]
- Present+ Jeremy_Carroll
- 15:05:51 [ShaneM]
- Have people seen this? http://www.umbel.org/
- 15:06:44 [Ralph]
- scribe: Ralph
- 15:07:08 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 15:07:39 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben to talk to Allan about CR ISSUE-122 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action15]
- 15:07:41 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:08:04 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Jeremy to write up TQ's contribution for impl report and wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action16]
- 15:08:06 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:08:13 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: I've written the report, will post soon
- 15:08:40 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: Manu to write up current issues with information resource vs. actual resource with regard to Audio RDF vocabulary. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action14]
- 15:09:14 [msporny]
- http://rdfa.info/wiki/uri-vs-resource-ambiguity-problem
- 15:09:43 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Michael to rewrite and extend http://rdfa.info/wiki/Tutorials for RSS (maybe with seq) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 15:09:45 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:10:01 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: Shane to make ISSUE-121 editorial change and report back [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action13]
- 15:10:18 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Shane respond to commentor for ISSUE-121
- 15:10:22 [JeremyCarroll]
- JeremyCarroll has joined #rdfa
- 15:10:34 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Shane to write home page for SPREAD. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:10:37 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:10:47 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01]
- 15:10:49 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:11:05 [JeremyCarroll]
- http://www.topquadrant.com/w3c/RDFa/ is the current draft report
- 15:11:07 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ben to follow up with Elias on JavaScript test harness + EARL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-rdfa-minutes.html#action13]
- 15:11:10 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:11:21 [Ralph]
- Ralph: do we consider this important enough to keep at this point?
- 15:11:35 [Ralph]
- Manu: they wanted to get it for the implementation report
- 15:12:26 [Ralph]
- ... it was going to make Michael and Ben's life easier to create the implementation report for Javascript
- 15:12:30 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+ to mention TQ's conformance statement
- 15:12:37 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll, you wanted to mention TQ's conformance statement
- 15:12:49 [JeremyCarroll]
- The conformance of the RDFa input depends on the conformance of the RDFa parser being used, currently Fabien Gandon's transform. Therefore we do not submit a separate report.
- 15:12:49 [JeremyCarroll]
- It is not clear what conformance tests we should do on the RDFa editing functionality. As is, the normal process of software maintenance should ensure that all output from the RDFa editor is legal RDFa input, with the expected triples, and most reasonable RDFa input can be produced with the editors. The autocomplete facility will currently generate qnames rather than CURIEs, since the other RDF formats currently do not use CURIEs. If and when other RDF
- 15:13:10 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: while writing the report for TopQuadrant, I noted the following: (see above)
- 15:13:39 [Ralph]
- ... any advice on anything better to say?
- 15:13:50 [Ralph]
- Shane: QNames are technically a subset of CURIEs
- 15:13:56 [Ralph]
- ... so you _are_ generating CURIEs
- 15:14:26 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: just a question about providing an implementation report for RDFa consumers
- 15:15:12 [Ralph]
- Manu: for the implementation report, we have a set of implementations that run against the RDFa test harness
- 15:15:32 [Ralph]
- ... if an RDFa parser is setup correctly it can be [automatically] run against the test harness
- 15:15:42 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 15:15:42 [Ralph]
- ... so the expectation is to say whether or not you pass each test
- 15:16:07 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: the existing tests are for RDFa parsers. TopQuadrant integrates parsers written by others
- 15:16:24 [Ralph]
- ... for the editing functionality it's hard to know what to say
- 15:17:00 [Ralph]
- Manu: my understanding is that the implementation report planned to only cover parser tests
- 15:18:46 [Ralph]
- Ralph: perhaps TopQuadrant could show how to use its tools to generate the test examples (or their equivalent)
- 15:18:49 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: nice idea
- 15:19:01 [ShaneM]
- q+ to discuss the implementation report
- 15:19:40 [Ralph]
- Manu: yes, would be nice to describe a full round-trip; generating then parsing RDFa
- 15:20:35 [Zakim]
- ShaneM, you wanted to discuss the implementation report
- 15:20:56 [Ralph]
- Shane: in the spec we only define conformance for _parsers_
- 15:21:07 [Ralph]
- ... in the implementation report we can have sections that talk about other supporting tools
- 15:21:19 [Ralph]
- ... so, e.g., user agents; IE, Opera, FireFox
- 15:21:43 [msporny]
- Ralph: We should say something about SearchMonkey as well.
- 15:22:06 [msporny]
- Ralph: We could also point out the implementations that do a subset.
- 15:22:11 [Ralph]
- Ralph: yes, for example it would be good to mention SearchMonkey, even though they don't yet support all of RDFa
- 15:23:00 [Ralph]
- Shane: it's also good to document that browsers don't break when they're fed RDFa
- 15:23:15 [Ralph]
- ... though we don't actually have any user agent conformance clauses
- 15:23:29 [Ralph]
- [DONE] ACTION: Manu write haudio examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action06]
- 15:23:47 [Ralph]
- Manu: these are 1-1 mappable to the microformat vocabulary
- 15:24:11 [Ralph]
- ... Toby Inkster has written a tool to intersperce RDFa in haudio microformat
- 15:24:21 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action03]
- 15:24:25 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:24:35 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:24:36 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:24:45 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 15:24:48 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:25:00 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:25:01 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:25:29 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I hand-wrote a bunch of comments on that last week, never got to enter them :(
- 15:25:38 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action11]
- 15:25:39 [Ralph]
- -- continues
- 15:25:59 [ShaneM]
- q+ to ask about RDF and hVideo
- 15:26:06 [Ralph]
- Manu: there's been a lot of work in the SIOC vocabulary that has to do with posts and the authors of posts
- 15:26:34 [Ralph]
- ... SIOC is meant for bloggers and folks who post news
- 15:27:11 [Ralph]
- Shane: regarding haudio, Manu mentioned generalized media RDF. Is there a video RDF?
- 15:27:28 [Ralph]
- Manu: yes, there's a base vocabulary for media on which the audio and video vocabularies build
- 15:27:37 [Ralph]
- ... media builds off of Dublin Core
- 15:28:13 [Ralph]
- Shane: for example, how might one annotate IMDB with RDFa
- 15:28:35 [Ralph]
- Manu: this vocabulary is intended to help with that; marking up television episodes, all the actors, grips, etc.
- 15:28:56 [Ralph]
- ... we have 80-85% coverage of the use cases we've found so far
- 15:29:08 [Ralph]
- ... we've looked at a large number of Web sites that publish this sort of data
- 15:29:26 [Ralph]
- ... ties in with BBC comments on non-accessibility of microformats data, esp. the date format
- 15:30:12 [Ralph]
- ... the accessibility problem is that screen readers attempt to read out data that's only intended for the machines
- 15:30:30 [Zakim]
- ShaneM, you wanted to ask about RDF and hVideo
- 15:31:04 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: who's the BBC contact?
- 15:31:26 [msporny]
- I've been chatting with Michael Smethurst at the BBC about Audio/Video/Media RDFa
- 15:33:22 [Ralph]
- Topic: HTML4, HTML5, and CR plans
- 15:34:02 [Ralph]
- Manu: we've been seeing more traffic on the lists noting that it's nice to have XHTML support but what about HTML4 and HTML5
- 15:34:18 [Ralph]
- ... we've pointed out that the markup won't break HTML4/5 tools
- 15:34:30 [Ralph]
- ... but the users want validation
- 15:35:15 [msporny]
- Ralph: Well, HTML4 doesn't have a working group
- 15:35:29 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+ to note this issue should go through to ac review
- 15:35:32 [msporny]
- Ralph: HTML5 has it in their charter to support RDFa plus some others
- 15:35:44 [Ralph]
- s/support/support extensibility for
- 15:36:28 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: this issue of the more extensive ambition of the RDFa folk won't go away
- 15:36:39 [Ralph]
- ... we do want RDFa used with HTML4
- 15:37:14 [Ralph]
- ... the conversations on the mailing list show that some just want to get the job done while others are concerned about conformance
- 15:37:38 [Ralph]
- ... I think we have to acknowledge that the discussion continues though we've made a particular choice and it's the right one
- 15:37:56 [Ralph]
- ... we've specified what can be specified correctly while acknowledging that some will use it with HTML4
- 15:38:12 [Ralph]
- ... the tone of the primer does not rule out RDFa+HTML4 even though we can't specify it
- 15:38:14 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 15:38:14 [ShaneM]
- q+ to discuss how to define ajn HTML4 profile
- 15:38:26 [Ralph]
- ... we know that _in practice_ RDFa+HTML4 is usable even though it won't validate
- 15:38:43 [Ralph]
- Manu: could we create something that would work with the W3C validator?
- 15:39:00 [Ralph]
- Shane: the W3C validator uses NSGMLS through a perl interface (opensp)
- 15:39:27 [Ralph]
- ... opensp in SGML mode
- 15:39:34 [Ralph]
- ... validating a document against a DTD
- 15:39:45 [Ralph]
- ... it will do this for any DTD that it is aware of
- 15:39:53 [markbirbeck]
- markbirbeck has joined #rdfa
- 15:40:06 [Ralph]
- Manu: could we create a DTD for RDFa+HTML4?
- 15:40:24 [Ralph]
- Shane: SGML mode does not understand @xmlns
- 15:40:53 [Ralph]
- ... so we'd need a different way to define prefixes or a way to persuade the validator to ignore @xmlns errors in certain types of documents
- 15:42:02 [Ralph]
- Ralph: we don't actually have a charter to do anything except XHTML
- 15:42:31 [Ralph]
- ... so we're on weak ground to ask for any changes in the validator
- 15:43:03 [Ralph]
- Shane: what would be the best way for us to support RDFa in an HTML4 environment? Does it make sense to push @xmlns into this environment or should we create another prefixing mechanism?
- 15:43:12 [Ralph]
- Manu: it would be really nice to not have to change anything
- 15:43:18 [JeremyCarroll]
- q+
- 15:44:15 [Ralph]
- Manu: or add a flag to parsers indicating whether they're processing HTML4/5 and find a different attribute than @xmlns
- 15:44:19 [markbirbeck]
- Hey guys...really sorry I'm not there. However, I think the easiest way to get out of the @xmlns bind is via CURIEs, and not RDFa.
- 15:44:23 [Ralph]
- ... everything other than @xmlns maps cleanly
- 15:44:34 [Ralph]
- Shane: yes, everything else works fine
- 15:44:38 [markbirbeck]
- Will have to explain more either next week, or on the list.
- 15:44:46 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: how many actual HTML4 tools will have a problem with RDfa?
- 15:44:55 [Ralph]
- ... the validator doesn't matter in the big picture
- 15:44:57 [markbirbeck]
- (Unless I work on a strawman with Shane....)
- 15:45:05 [Ralph]
- Manu: the validators matter for adoption
- 15:45:16 [ShaneM]
- I like the idea of @ns
- 15:45:27 [Ralph]
- ... authors don't want to hear complaints from their bosses about documents that don't validate
- 15:45:37 [Ralph]
- Jeremy: so just ask the validator to ignore XML namespaces
- 15:45:46 [Ralph]
- Shane: I think there is already a control for this
- 15:46:07 [Ralph]
- ... when it's validating in XML mode via a DTD it has to ignore namespace errors
- 15:46:14 [msporny]
- Mark - it would be really great to hear your thoughts on this (on list, or via the wiki)
- 15:46:15 [ShaneM]
- @ns="prefix URI prefix2 URI..."
- 15:46:34 [Ralph]
- Shane: I already have the code to patch the W3C validator to do this
- 15:46:45 [Ralph]
- ... but other authoring tools also have 'validate me' buttons
- 15:46:55 [Ralph]
- ... we'd want those other validators to also work
- 15:47:13 [markbirbeck]
- Manu...really sorry for absence. Speak to you all soon...gotta go. :)
- 15:47:15 [Ralph]
- ... but sure, we can tell people it's OK to put RDFa in HTML
- 15:47:41 [ShaneM]
- ack sh
- 15:47:41 [Zakim]
- ShaneM, you wanted to discuss how to define ajn HTML4 profile
- 15:48:02 [Ralph]
- Manu: we can't say there's backing from any W3C process but we can point to a starting place
- 15:48:04 [Zakim]
- JeremyCarroll, you wanted to note this issue should go through to ac review and to
- 15:49:22 [ShaneM]
- q+ to discuss html5 and namespaces
- 15:49:44 [msporny]
- q+
- 15:49:56 [msporny]
- ack shaneM
- 15:49:56 [Zakim]
- ShaneM, you wanted to discuss html5 and namespaces
- 15:50:18 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I think the HTML5 spec will have to address something like namespaces
- 15:50:29 [Ralph]
- ... we should not get out ahead of that
- 15:50:37 [Ralph]
- ... whether they accept @xmlns or not, we need to wait
- 15:50:50 [Ralph]
- Shane: I disgree; we've overloaded @xmlns and that's a mistake
- 15:51:09 [Ralph]
- ... it's a convenience but in the real world @xmlns is not the way to extend grammars
- 15:51:27 [msporny]
- ack msporny
- 15:51:30 [Ralph]
- ... if HTML5 does not define @xmlns we could still do something else and HTML5 wouldn't care
- 15:51:50 [Ralph]
- ... vocabulary extention needs something other than XML namespaces
- 15:52:25 [Ralph]
- Manu: the issue we're up against is how to stuff this into validators
- 15:52:39 [Ralph]
- Shane: I like the @ns= idea
- 15:53:40 [Ralph]
- Manu: it would be nice to have something that shows people how to put RDFa into HTML4/5 and get it validated
- 15:53:45 [Ralph]
- ... would the W3C object?
- 15:53:56 [Ralph]
- Ralph: no one moderates what we put in our wiki :)
- 15:54:06 [Ralph]
- Topic: RDFa Best Practices
- 15:54:27 [Ralph]
- Manu: it's becoming evident that there are right ways and wrong ways to use RDFa vocabularies
- 15:54:57 [Ralph]
- ... for example, I wasn't aware that the Dublin Core vocabulary is now a legacy vocabulary and we should really be using DC Terms
- 15:55:10 [Ralph]
- ... would be nice to have a tool that reminds people about current best practices
- 15:55:21 [Ralph]
- ... like a lint for RDFa
- 15:55:37 [Ralph]
- ... suggestions for improving markup or flagging mistakes
- 15:55:38 [ShaneM]
- q+ about lint for rdfa/xhtml+rdfa
- 15:55:49 [ShaneM]
- q+ to discuss lint for rdfa/xhtml+rdfa
- 15:55:55 [Zakim]
- ShaneM, you wanted to discuss lint for rdfa/xhtml+rdfa
- 15:56:13 [Ralph]
- Shane: there's a validator side-project that has a framework for doing this sort of thing
- 15:56:28 [Ralph]
- ... I'm certain that Olivier would welcome our help to do this
- 15:56:33 [Ralph]
- ... I'll even volunteer
- 15:56:45 [Ralph]
- ... the tricky part will be deciding the rules
- 15:56:56 [Ralph]
- ... the tool is very good about suggesting how you should have done X or Y
- 15:57:22 [Ralph]
- ... it was written to support the Appendix C validation of HTML
- 15:57:46 [Ralph]
- Manu: first thing is to come up with some best practices
- 15:57:49 [Ralph]
- ... document these in the wiki
- 15:58:03 [Ralph]
- ... when we get 10 or 15 we could roll them into the tool
- 15:58:16 [msporny]
- ACTION: Start Best Practices Section on the rdfa.info wiki
- 15:58:20 [Ralph]
- Shane: makes sense
- 15:58:28 [Ralph]
- s/Start/Manu: Start
- 15:59:36 [Ralph]
- Topic: Misc
- 15:59:53 [Ralph]
- Shane: I'm especially interested in feedback on -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jul/0048.html "Re: RDFa Primer comment"
- 16:00:06 [Ralph]
- ... we need to have a consistent message from this Task Force
- 16:00:11 [Ralph]
- Manu: agree
- 16:00:23 [Ralph]
- ... and we'll have to do more work on HTML4/5 before saying anything
- 16:00:28 [Ralph]
- [adjourned]
- 16:00:32 [Zakim]
- -McCarron
- 16:00:36 [Zakim]
- -msporny
- 16:00:42 [Zakim]
- -JeremyCarroll
- 16:00:43 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 16:00:43 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
- 16:00:44 [Zakim]
- Attendees were McCarron, Ralph, msporny, JeremyCarroll
- 16:00:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
- 16:01:22 [Ralph]
- i/scribe: Ralph/Topic: Action Review
- 16:01:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-minutes.html Ralph
- 16:02:09 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 16:02:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdfa
- 16:02:11 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- I see 13 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to talk to Allan about CR ISSUE-122 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action15] [1]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-07-39
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Jeremy to write up TQ's contribution for impl report and wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action16] [2]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-08-04
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael to rewrite and extend http://rdfa.info/wiki/Tutorials for RSS (maybe with seq) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [3]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-09-43
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane respond to commentor for ISSUE-121 [4]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-10-18
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane to write home page for SPREAD. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [5]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-10-34
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [6]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-10-47
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben to follow up with Elias on JavaScript test harness + EARL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-rdfa-minutes.html#action13] [7]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-11-07
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu write the perl code for Slashdot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] [8]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-24-21
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark create base wizard suitable for cloning [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [9]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-24-35
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark write foaf examples for wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action07] [10]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-24-45
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [11]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-25-00
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph think about RSS+RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-rdfa-minutes.html#action11] [12]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-25-38
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Start Best Practices Section on the rdfa.info wiki [13]
- 16:02:11 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/17-rdfa-irc#T15-58-16