12:22:19 RRSAgent has joined #tsdtf 12:22:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc 12:22:26 Zakim has joined #tsdtf 12:22:38 zakim, this will be tsdtf 12:22:38 ok, shadi; I see WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 12:22:46 meeting: TSD TF 12:22:56 chair: CarlosV, Christophe 12:23:43 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jul/0013.html 12:23:55 agenda+ Proposal for a new metadata element for internal notes 12:24:10 agenda+ Updated metadata document: testElements 12:24:26 agenda+ Reviews of test samples 12:29:56 Christophe has joined #tsdtf 12:30:13 zakim, agenda? 12:30:13 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 12:30:14 1. Proposal for a new metadata element for internal notes [from shadi] 12:30:15 2. Updated metadata document: testElements [from shadi] 12:30:16 3. Reviews of test samples [from shadi] 12:30:44 zakim, code? 12:30:44 the conference code is 8783 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), shadi 12:30:54 carlosI has joined #tsdtf 12:31:05 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has now started 12:31:12 +??P0 12:31:21 +Christophe_Strobbe 12:31:47 MichaelC has joined #tsdtf 12:31:49 +CarlosI 12:31:59 zakim, ? is really me 12:31:59 +shadi; got it 12:34:37 + +1.617.324.aaaa 12:35:36 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:35:36 agendum 1. "Proposal for a new metadata element for internal notes" taken up [from shadi] 12:35:53 scribe: CarlosI 12:36:04 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:36:04 agendum 1. "Proposal for a new metadata element for internal notes" taken up [from shadi] 12:36:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jul/0006.html 12:36:32 CS: don't see any objections nor comments 12:37:52 RESOLUTION: add new internalNotes element to the schema 12:39:33 ACTION: CS to add the new internalNotes to the schema 12:39:33 Created ACTION-1 - Add the new internalNotes to the schema [on Christophe Strobbe - due 2008-07-22]. 12:40:02 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/tracker/ 12:40:57 CS: how I tell the tracker the action is done? 12:41:57 SAZ: you can edit actions in the tracker 12:42:06 zakim, take up agendum 2 12:42:06 agendum 2. "Updated metadata document: testElements" taken up [from shadi] 12:42:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jul/0003.html 12:43:15 CS: need to document some elements the test samples were using 12:43:56 CS: they have been added to the metadata description 12:44:04 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL#metadata 12:46:43 zakim, take up agendum 3 12:46:43 agendum 3. "Reviews of test samples" taken up [from shadi] 12:47:38 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42683/batch1/ 12:47:44 CS: several abstentions 12:47:50 Results: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42683/batch1/results 12:48:08 SAZ: We may need to go one by one 12:48:56 SAZ: people abstain instead of raise concerns 12:49:21 SAZ: Try to see what are the issues one by one 12:49:51 SAZ: the poll is open, so people can change their votes 12:52:24 CS: the reviews make open questions intead raise issues 12:53:15 "Suggest changes to the review results (please elaborate below)" 12:56:12 SAZ: the problem is that "not sure" is not a valid review result 12:56:24 SAZ: the review was not finished 12:56:36 SAZ: there was an issue with the review itself 12:57:45 SAZ: in some cases you may disagree or suggest changes to a review 13:01:05 ACTION: Shadi to review with Tim his reviews 13:01:05 Created ACTION-2 - Review with Tim his reviews [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2008-07-22]. 13:02:37 action: Shadi to change the 4th option in the WBS survey to "Suggest changes to the review results (please elaborate below)" 13:02:37 Created ACTION-3 - Change the 4th option in the WBS survey to \"Suggest changes to the review results (please elaborate below)\" [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2008-07-22]. 13:03:57 SAZ: now #16 13:04:08 SAZ: 2 abstains 1 disagree from CS 13:04:16 SAZ: let's see why 13:08:40 SAZ: some issues look more related to the content review 13:09:21 CI: agree, but the review criteria ask for checking if they are accurate 13:10:41 SAZ: difficult to totally separate structure and content review 13:11:00 SAZ: the idea was that structure can be done automatically 13:14:17 ACTION: Shadi to improve the word accurate in the structure review 13:14:17 Created ACTION-4 - Improve the word accurate in the structure review [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2008-07-22]. 13:15:20 CI: move the comments on description and purpose from the structure review to the content review on test sample #16 13:15:30 ACTION: CI to move the comments on description and purpose from the structure review to the content review on test sample #16 13:15:30 Created ACTION-5 - Move the comments on description and purpose from the structure review to the content review on test sample #16 [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2008-07-22]. 13:16:21 SAZ: somebody need to update the test samples with the new internalNotes element 13:16:54 ACTION: CS to move the information of techComment to internalNotes 13:16:54 Created ACTION-6 - Move the information of techComment to internalNotes [on Christophe Strobbe - due 2008-07-22]. 13:17:47 ACTION: CI update the structure review once the test sample has been updated 13:17:47 Created ACTION-7 - Update the structure review once the test sample has been updated [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2008-07-22]. 13:18:46 SAZ: now move to #18 13:18:53 SAZ: basically the same 13:19:26 CS: there is a new comment about pointers consistency 13:19:54 SAZ: this was raised in the ERT WG and there was a resolution to create some guidelines 13:20:07 SAZ: may put this on hold now and come back later 13:23:54 CI: what about separate the review process into automatic and manual? 13:24:15 SAZ: it's more about neutral interpretation than about been automatically tested or not 13:27:09 CI: may need to record these general issues somewhere to be aware of them 13:27:47 CS: there is something like that in the wiki 13:27:59 CS: the brainstorming corner 13:28:04 http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/BrainstormingCorner 13:28:32 SAZ: CI can get back to the group when the pointers guidelines are done 13:28:39 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL 13:28:53 CI: this solve this specific issue but what happen with others? 13:29:35 CI: we can also use internal notes 13:29:47 SAZ: can be this done automatically? 13:30:08 CS: yep 13:30:56 ACTION: CS add on internalNotes for every test case that the use of pointers should be reviewed 13:30:56 Created ACTION-8 - Add on internalNotes for every test case that the use of pointers should be reviewed [on Christophe Strobbe - due 2008-07-22]. 13:32:50 CI: it's better to have an individual internalNote with a specific ID for each issue 13:33:43 CI: for example the pointers issue can be ID="1" 13:34:31 ACTION: SAZ to update the using TCDL document to say that pointers will be updated in the future 13:34:31 Sorry, couldn't find user - SAZ 13:35:10 ACTION: Shadi to update the using TCDL document to say that pointers will be updated in the future 13:35:11 Created ACTION-9 - Update the using TCDL document to say that pointers will be updated in the future [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2008-07-22]. 13:37:04 SAZ: don't lose your heart, this is the first one but next ones may be easier 13:37:16 CS: next teleconference? 13:37:25 SAZ: try the next week 13:37:39 SAZ: would like to finish the first batch 13:38:01 -Michael_Cooper 13:38:03 -Christophe_Strobbe 13:38:09 -CarlosI 13:38:11 -shadi 13:38:11 WAI_TSDTF()8:30AM has ended 13:38:12 Attendees were Christophe_Strobbe, CarlosI, shadi, +1.617.324.aaaa, Michael_Cooper 13:39:34 MichaelC has left #tsdtf 14:11:08 zakim, bye 14:11:08 Zakim has left #tsdtf 14:11:16 rrsagent, make logs world 14:11:20 rrsagent, make minutes 14:11:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-minutes.html shadi 14:11:21 rrsagent, make logs world 14:11:26 rrsagent, bye 14:11:26 I see 10 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-actions.rdf : 14:11:26 ACTION: CS to add the new internalNotes to the schema [1] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T12-39-33 14:11:26 ACTION: Shadi to review with Tim his reviews [2] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-01-05 14:11:26 ACTION: Shadi to change the 4th option in the WBS survey to "Suggest changes to the review results (please elaborate below)" [3] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-02-37 14:11:26 ACTION: Shadi to improve the word accurate in the structure review [4] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-14-17 14:11:26 ACTION: CI to move the comments on description and purpose from the structure review to the content review on test sample #16 [5] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-15-30 14:11:26 ACTION: CS to move the information of techComment to internalNotes [6] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-16-54 14:11:26 ACTION: CI update the structure review once the test sample has been updated [7] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-17-47 14:11:26 ACTION: CS add on internalNotes for every test case that the use of pointers should be reviewed [8] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-30-56 14:11:26 ACTION: SAZ to update the using TCDL document to say that pointers will be updated in the future [9] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-34-31 14:11:26 ACTION: Shadi to update the using TCDL document to say that pointers will be updated in the future [10] 14:11:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-tsdtf-irc#T13-35-10