IRC log of tagmem on 2008-07-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:54:57 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tagmem
- 16:54:57 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-tagmem-irc
- 16:55:15 [Stuart]
- zakim, this will be tag
- 16:55:15 [Zakim]
- ok, Stuart; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
- 16:55:26 [Stuart]
- Meeting: TAG Weekly
- 16:55:44 [Stuart]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/07/10-agenda
- 16:55:58 [Stuart]
- Chair: Stuart Williams
- 16:56:08 [Stuart]
- Scribe: Jonathan Rees
- 16:56:40 [Stuart]
- trackbot, status
- 16:57:09 [Zakim]
- TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started
- 16:57:16 [Zakim]
- +TimBL
- 16:57:54 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 16:58:01 [Stuart]
- zakim, ??P9 is me
- 16:58:01 [Zakim]
- +Stuart; got it
- 16:58:35 [Ashok]
- Ashok has joined #tagmem
- 16:59:26 [Zakim]
- + +1.617.253.aaaa
- 16:59:58 [Stuart]
- zakim, +1 is jar
- 16:59:58 [Zakim]
- +jar; got it
- 17:01:32 [Zakim]
- +Ashok_Malhotra
- 17:01:58 [ht_wylie]
- ht_wylie has joined #tagmem
- 17:02:25 [DanC]
- DanC has joined #tagmem
- 17:02:32 [Zakim]
- +DanC.a
- 17:02:35 [jar]
- Getting started.
- 17:02:45 [jar]
- Comments on agenda? No.
- 17:02:59 [jar]
- Minutes re 26 June telecon. OK?
- 17:03:20 [jar]
- (not the joint call, the one before it)
- 17:03:37 [jar]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/06/26-tagmem-minutes
- 17:03:42 [jar]
- approved.
- 17:04:07 [jar]
- Henry to scribe next week
- 17:04:13 [Ashok]
- Stuart, regrets from next week's call
- 17:04:32 [Ashok]
- s/from/for/
- 17:05:05 [jar]
- Ashok and Tim express regrets for next week.
- 17:06:33 [jar]
- Henry: Let's meet next week anyhow
- 17:06:55 [DanC]
- ok by me to cxl 31 Jul, 7 Aug, 14 Aug
- 17:07:15 [jar]
- Resolved: skip those three.
- 17:09:28 [jar]
- Now discussing how to continue OASIS/XRI interaction
- 17:09:52 [jar]
- Ashok volunteering to talk to Marty about data integration use case in about 2 weeks
- 17:11:39 [jar]
- stuart: Concerned that maybe nothing will get done over the summer
- 17:12:20 [jar]
- shoot. lost my phone link
- 17:12:30 [jar]
- hang on
- 17:12:43 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 17:12:46 [DanC]
- HT: I hope to use the summer break to do the drafting I was planning to do
- 17:12:52 [jar]
- or someone else scribe please... 60 seconds
- 17:13:16 [Zakim]
- +jar
- 17:13:20 [jar]
- ahh... back.
- 17:14:14 [timbl]
- timbl has joined #tagmem
- 17:14:22 [jar]
- HT: Missing: a serious analysis of why http doesn't meet their requirements.
- 17:14:33 [timbl]
- q+
- 17:14:40 [Stuart]
- ack timb
- 17:15:02 [Zakim]
- -jar
- 17:15:22 [ht_wylie]
- timbl: The problem is not how to evolve the mechanism
- 17:15:26 [Ashok]
- TimBl: Who is the design authority?
- 17:15:48 [ht_wylie]
- ... it's a social problem -- they don't trust, or want to work with, ICANN and the rest of the authority structure
- 17:15:54 [Zakim]
- +Jonathan_Rees
- 17:15:58 [Ashok]
- ask them is is that it cannot be done technically or socially
- 17:16:07 [ht_wylie]
- ... This kind of group wants to be _socially_ independent of ICANN and so on
- 17:16:13 [Ashok]
- do you want to be independent of ICANN
- 17:16:42 [DanC]
- q+ to think about the "independent naming system"
- 17:16:44 [jar]
- stuart: Have you seen latest decision from ICANN, re TLDs for sale?
- 17:16:51 [timbl]
- yes
- 17:17:24 [DanC]
- impact of lots more top level domains on the Web? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 26 June) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Jun/0113.html
- 17:17:48 [Stuart]
- ack Danc
- 17:18:48 [jar]
- danc: XRIs are showing up in oauth namespace declarations. Namespaces are given as URIs.
- 17:19:26 [jar]
- danc: (Therefore XRIs need to be URIs, for that purpose.)
- 17:19:38 [DanC]
- (I tried to say IRI; but since IRIs and URIs share a scheme registry.)
- 17:20:10 [Ashok]
- but XRI not registered as URI scheme
- 17:20:28 [jar]
- ht: If an XRI URI scheme is applied for, then it will have to meet the bar for new URI schemes
- 17:21:09 [jar]
- ht: What can we do to help meet our obligations here?
- 17:21:40 [ht_wylie]
- At some point on the call, I said "Now _that's_ a technical question we could dig into . . ." . . . what was that?
- 17:21:41 [jar]
- stuart: Shall we: frame questions and encourage conversation?
- 17:22:08 [jar]
- danc: Not sure that will help keep things alive over the summer.
- 17:22:16 [jar]
- poll
- 17:22:41 [jar]
- danc: Discussion should take place on www-tag
- 17:23:10 [jar]
- ashok: Yes, encouraging summer conversation is a good idea
- 17:23:12 [ht_wylie]
- Found it: 'HST thinks that addressing the "http scheme did not allow us to to use non-DNS authority resolution" is a very concrete challenge that we could focus on'
- 17:24:13 [DanC]
- s/Discussion should take place on www-tag/Discussion on www-tag is convenient for me, though I wonder whether it'll reach critical mass/
- 17:24:38 [jar]
- ht: Maybe we can dig in on at least one definite issue, the one about distributed authority.
- 17:25:48 [jar]
- stuart: Looking for ways to make it not fall silent and lose context
- 17:27:31 [jar]
- timbl: Maybe put the argument on a wiki, lay it out there
- 17:28:11 [jar]
- timbl: Let's consider priorities w.r.t. other activities, maybe recruit others to help
- 17:28:29 [timbl]
- We could spend an hour of the next meeting to state our position
- 17:28:46 [DanC]
- but that wouldn't be any better.
- 17:30:08 [ht_wylie]
- HST is willing to try to start a thread
- 17:30:21 [jar]
- danc: A real back and forth would be better than presentations
- 17:31:28 [ht_wylie]
- ACTION: Henry S to start a thread on non-DNS authority resolution on www-tag
- 17:31:28 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-167 - S to start a thread on non-DNS authority resolution on www-tag [on Henry S. Thompson - due 2008-07-17].
- 17:32:40 [jar]
- danc: Let's drop video
- 17:32:50 [jar]
- Item 4, contentTypeOverride-24
- 17:32:51 [Zakim]
- -TimBL
- 17:32:53 [DanC]
- http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/07/life_without_mime_type_sniffin.html
- 17:33:05 [DanC]
- http://www.w3.org/blog/tag/
- 17:33:42 [jar]
- danc: How visible is the TAG blog?
- 17:35:07 [jar]
- danc: TAG finding says sniffing is security risk. But HTML5 says do sniff sometimes.
- 17:35:41 [jar]
- danc: Economics of following http spec are hopeless - doing the right thing loses market share.
- 17:36:13 [ht_yoyo]
- ht_yoyo has joined #tagmem
- 17:36:48 [jar]
- danc: Now, there's the "I mean it" flag
- 17:38:02 [Stuart]
- Hixie's response was interesting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jul/0079.html
- 17:40:09 [jar]
- ... and somtimes there's a browser configuration switch that says "follow the spec"
- 17:40:21 [jar]
- s/somtimes/sometimes/
- 17:41:14 [jar]
- ... and maybe things are getting better with compliance
- 17:41:24 [Stuart]
- DanC I you can point me a the 'controls' I'll be happy to 'live dangerously'.
- 17:41:34 [jar]
- ... I think the TAG should talk about this some more
- 17:41:47 [jar]
- (Note no quorum now)
- 17:44:19 [Stuart]
- q?
- 17:45:41 [jar]
- danc: Details on sniffing in html5 are reasonable, not just a wholesale endorsement of some popular browser's behavior
- 17:46:15 [jar]
- ... e.g. <img src="something whose content-type is text/plain">
- 17:46:46 [jar]
- stuart: Would you be willing to take on editor role?
- 17:46:51 [jar]
- danc: yes
- 17:48:29 [DanC]
- issue-34?
- 17:48:29 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-34 -- XML Transformation and composability (e.g., XSLT,XInclude, Encryption) -- OPEN
- 17:48:29 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34
- 17:48:43 [jar]
- ... example: content type xhtml+xml, but then treated by client as atom feed due to namespace in the xml file
- 17:48:49 [DanC]
- issue-33?
- 17:48:49 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-33 -- Composability for user interface-oriented XML namespaces -- OPEN
- 17:48:49 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/33
- 17:49:10 [DanC]
- Dave Baron's msg was about the boundary between CDF and the TAG, about which I'm curious
- 17:53:34 [jar]
- Moving on. F2F prep?
- 17:53:48 [jar]
- Meeting formally adjourned.
- 17:54:19 [Zakim]
- -Ashok_Malhotra
- 17:55:50 [Stuart]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 17:56:48 [jar]
- rrsagent, pointer
- 17:56:48 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-tagmem-irc#T17-56-48
- 18:07:16 [jar]
- http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=10903+NW+45+Highway+Parkville,+MO&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=81.220239,111.972656&ie=UTF8&ll=39.272398,-94.805489&spn=0.080798,0.109348&t=h&z=13
- 18:08:12 [DanC]
- http://www.missouririverpaddling.com/TheRivers.html
- 18:09:28 [Stuart]
- Big rapid at: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=10903+NW+45+Highway+Parkville,+MO&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=81.220239,111.972656&ie=UTF8&t=h&ll=39.257213,-94.831967&spn=0.014289,0.043087&z=15&iwloc=cent
- 18:12:45 [Zakim]
- -Stuart
- 18:12:53 [Zakim]
- -Jonathan_Rees
- 18:13:21 [Zakim]
- TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended
- 18:13:23 [Zakim]
- Attendees were TimBL, Stuart, +1.617.253.aaaa, jar, Ashok_Malhotra, DanC.a, Jonathan_Rees
- 19:21:56 [timbl]
- timbl has joined #tagmem
- 20:41:07 [timbl]
- timbl has joined #tagmem
- 22:17:37 [timbl]
- timbl has joined #tagmem