12:42:26 RRSAgent has joined #xmlsec 12:42:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-xmlsec-irc 12:42:28 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:42:28 Zakim has joined #xmlsec 12:42:30 Zakim, this will be XMLSEC 12:42:30 ok, trackbot-ng; I see T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM scheduled to start in 18 minutes 12:42:31 Meeting: XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group Teleconference 12:42:31 Date: 06 May 2008 12:42:44 Regrets: Sean Mullan 12:42:50 Chair: Frederick Hirsch 12:43:15 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008May/0002.html 12:56:32 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has now started 12:56:39 +Frederick_Hirsch 12:58:11 CGI616 has joined #xmlsec 12:58:29 +James_Nurthen 12:58:47 CGI616 has left #xmlsec 12:59:04 zakim, who is here? 12:59:04 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, James_Nurthen 12:59:05 On IRC I see RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 12:59:08 jcc has joined #xmlsec 12:59:24 pdatta has joined #xmlsec 12:59:42 James_Nurthen is pdatta 12:59:50 +shivaram 12:59:54 zakim, James_Nurthen is pdatta 12:59:54 +pdatta; got it 13:00:02 shivaram has joined #xmlsec 13:00:19 zakim, who is here? 13:00:19 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram 13:00:20 On IRC I see shivaram, pdatta, jcc, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:00:28 +??P9 13:00:31 +Ed_Simon 13:00:41 zakim, P9 is jcc 13:00:41 sorry, fjh, I do not recognize a party named 'P9' 13:00:53 Zakim, who is here? 13:00:53 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram, ??P9, Ed_Simon 13:00:55 zakim, +??P9 is jcc 13:00:58 On IRC I see shivaram, pdatta, jcc, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:01:00 sorry, fjh, I do not recognize a party named '+??P9' 13:01:09 zakim, ??P9 is jcc 13:01:10 +Hal_Lockhart 13:01:14 +jcc; got it 13:01:22 zakim, who is here? 13:01:22 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram, jcc, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart 13:01:26 On IRC I see shivaram, pdatta, jcc, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:02:35 EdS has joined #xmlsec 13:02:38 zakim, call thomas-781 13:02:38 ok, tlr; the call is being made 13:02:40 +Thomas 13:02:44 +brich 13:02:50 brich has joined #xmlsec 13:03:00 zakim, who is here? 13:03:00 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram, jcc, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart, Thomas, brich 13:03:02 On IRC I see brich, EdS, shivaram, pdatta, jcc, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:03:20 Scribe: Shivaram Mysore 13:03:25 ScribeNick: shivaram 13:03:27 +??P0 13:03:35 TOPIC: 1c) Message has been sent to WS-I Basic Security Profile (BSP) group 13:03:35 re DNames 13:03:52 zakim, ??P0 is konrad 13:03:52 +konrad; got it 13:03:54 zakim, mute ??P0 13:03:54 sorry, tlr, I do not know which phone connection belongs to ??P0 13:03:58 zakim, mute konrad 13:03:58 konrad should now be muted 13:04:13 TOPIC: Administrative 13:04:32 zakim, mute me 13:04:32 sorry, tlr, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 13:04:35 zakim, I am thomas 13:04:35 ok, tlr, I now associate you with Thomas 13:04:37 zakim, mute me 13:04:37 Thomas should now be muted 13:04:40 Should we need to have a meeting next week on May 13th? 13:04:43 rdmiller has joined #xmlsec 13:05:08 whoever is speaking there is being chopped up badly 13:05:11 Incomprehensible to me. 13:05:12 Shivaram suggests having a meeting next week 13:05:15 i will not be able to make next week 13:05:45 regrets from me 13:05:50 I will not be able to attend today due to an unexpected commitment. Regrets, Rob Miller. 13:06:00 hal has joined #xmlsec 13:06:29 next meeting decision to be made at the end of this meeting 13:07:31 minutes approval http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-xmlsec-minutes.html 13:07:48 RESOLUTION: Minutes from April 15, 2008 approved 13:07:59 will do 13:08:09 TOPIC: AC Review 13:08:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2008AprJun/0022.html 13:09:14 q+ 13:09:30 Note: All please have your AC reps to complete the questionnaire 13:09:54 zakim, unmute me 13:09:54 Thomas should no longer be muted 13:09:54 klanz2 has joined #xmlsec 13:10:41 q- 13:10:58 pdatta: question on the questionnaire about intention of implementations - are we held responsible for this? 13:11:20 zakim, who is here? 13:11:20 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram, jcc, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart, Thomas, brich, konrad (muted) 13:11:23 On IRC I see klanz2, hal, brich, EdS, shivaram, pdatta, jcc, Zakim, RRSAgent, fjh, tlr, trackbot-ng 13:11:30 PHB has joined #xmlsec 13:11:37 ack jcc 13:11:39 Thomas responds that answers are neve made public and is just for info sake 13:11:44 zakim, code? 13:11:44 the conference code is 965732 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), PHB 13:11:50 s/neve/never 13:11:50 tlr: no, the purpose of that question is to enable The Director to make an informed judgment whether there is critical mass for moving ahead. 13:12:05 +PHB 13:12:10 ... that is obviously about the intention with which you go into this, not about a formal product commitment, or anything like that ... 13:12:37 TOPIC: F2F Planning 13:13:24 klanz2: if # of people <25/30, it should not be a problem to host 13:13:44 s/klanz2/JCC/ 13:13:59 not much of constraints in terms of date 15-17 July 13:14:13 q+ 13:14:29 q- 13:14:41 q- 13:14:42 ack kl 13:15:17 zakim, mute klanz2 13:15:17 klanz2 should now be muted 13:15:25 klanz2 can also become a possible host in Barcelona 13:15:43 s/Barcelona/Gratz 13:15:48 It's Graz 13:15:51 ;-) 13:15:56 s/Barcelona/Graz/ 13:15:59 s/Gratz/Graz 13:16:02 thanks 13:16:04 ;-) 13:16:26 TOPIC: XML Signature, Second Edition, Issues 13:16:30 s/Barcelona/Graz/ 13:16:46 TOPIC: Editorial fix 13:16:58 RESOLUTION: editorial fixes as outlined in 6a and 6c 13:17:17 TOPIC: References corrections 13:17:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0033.html 13:17:53 q+ 13:18:52 fjh: References for namespaces and Unicode - fixing errata and clarification - shall we update this 13:18:55 ack klanz 13:19:03 http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata#E10 13:20:03 ick, this sounds nasty 13:20:25 klanz2: implementation may have to do something like this: 1.1 doc may be processed as 1.0 doc if there is no namespace 13:20:39 http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-2e-errata#E16 13:21:18 q+ 13:21:33 q- 13:21:43 klanz2: There is direct use of RFC usage, but no normative reference 13:21:51 s/RFC usage/RFC 3986/ 13:24:36 klanz2: There was no consistent usage of namespace in 1.0. There could be some breaking changes depending on how the character sets are handled 13:26:42 Shivaram suggests that we should add a note that at the point of writing the spec, we see the following issues ... 13:26:58 s/>/? 13:27:41 q+ 13:28:28 s/There was no consistent usage of namespace in 1.0./There was no consistent usage of namespace in namespaces 1.0. and namespaces 1.1/ 13:29:02 tlr: if we see that the change causes implementation differences, then we should be hesitant to make the change 13:29:08 ie. namespaces 1.1 have no namespace undeclarations 13:29:27 s/namespaces 1.1 have no namespace undeclarations/namespaces 1.0 have no namespace undeclarations/ 13:31:07 s/fadig/fading 13:33:43 I think by adopting this we, implicitly define XPath datamodel for a subset of XML 1.1, which is good, isn't it? 13:34:19 this subset of xml 1.1 is the one not using namespaces 1.1? 13:34:48 no, we don't make that definition. The erratum says that an XML 1.0 processor can treat certain documents as XML 1.0 even though are called XML 1.1 IF they do not use non-XML 1.0 features. 13:34:49 s/not using namespaces/not using namespace undeclarations/ 13:35:13 So we are not updating it to permit XML 1.1 documents. 13:35:17 @tlr fine with me ... 13:35:45 The connection seems to be getting worse and worse. 13:35:55 If we are working on this issue, then who is going to be working on this? 13:36:03 Konrad, FJH, TLR? 13:36:16 So what we say is then the subset of xml 1.1 with namespaces 1.1, that does not use namespace undeclreations is treated as an xml 1.0 ... 13:37:07 I would suggest Konrad to write this snippet as he seems to be more aware of this impact 13:37:58 and then send the snippet to XML WG for review 13:39:30 pdatta: what is the impact on conformance for markup? 13:39:49 tlr suggests that we talk to the coordination group 13:40:03 and is not specific to XML Signature 13:40:19 as it affects the parser 13:41:24 I would suggest checking with others before making resolution 13:42:53 ACTION: tlr, Write assumptions to references update 13:42:53 Sorry, couldn't find user - tlr, 13:43:18 ACTION: tlr to write assumptions to references update 13:43:18 Created ACTION-152 - Write assumptions to references update [on Thomas Roessler - due 2008-05-13]. 13:44:10 TOPIC: Unicode - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0034.html 13:44:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0034.html 13:48:33 q+ to ask that we come back to the xml 4e question 13:48:45 Proposal by FJH to leave this alone 13:49:12 Pdatta: remove the reference to Unicode 13:49:33 s/pdatta/klanz2/ 13:49:40 sorry - thanks! 13:49:47 +1 13:50:14 RESOLUTION: drop unused Unicode reference 13:50:15 RESOLUTION: Remove the Unicode reference 13:50:24 s/RESOLUTION: drop unused Unicode reference// 13:50:27 q- 13:52:36 http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata 13:53:09 tlr: according to process document, if there is errata for a normative spec, then they would not impact conformance for that version of this specification, but, the errata must be included in the next version and hence would be in conformance as per process then 13:53:54 +1 to tlr for fourth edition 13:54:50 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: update xml reference to 4e, namespaces to 2e 13:54:53 update xml reference to 4th edition and namespace reference to 2nd edition 13:55:10 +1, makes sense given the Process...errata reference 13:55:20 RESOLUTION: update xml reference to 4th edition and namespace reference to 2nd edition 13:55:24 PHB2 has joined #xmlsec 13:55:50 TOPIC: Update to v1 XML Signature and Encryption web pages 13:56:26 rrsagent, drop action 1 13:56:30 rrsagent, drop action 2 13:56:31 TOPIC: Relax NG Schema 13:56:41 trackbot-ng, close ACTION-152 13:56:41 ACTION-152 Write assumptions to references update closed 13:56:52 zakim, mute me 13:56:52 shivaram should now be muted 13:57:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008May/0005.html 13:58:05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008May/att-0005/dsig.rnc 13:58:34 Norm has noted that the RNG schema provided has little testing and review 13:58:50 FJH: looking for volunteers to look at this 13:59:00 What's the time frame for this? 13:59:18 Who uses RNG in the group? 13:59:29 q+ 13:59:35 We dont use RNG ... 13:59:40 ack klanz2 13:59:56 uh, there's echo here 14:00:09 q+ 14:00:09 http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/apidocs/javax/xml/XMLConstants.html#RELAXNG_NS_URI 14:00:11 I will give it a try too 14:00:20 klanz2 will give it a try 14:00:22 ack tlr 14:00:24 ack thomas 14:01:08 q? 14:01:51 Thanks to David for suggesting Norm and Norm for the RNG work 14:02:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008May/0004.html 14:02:26 TOPIC: Review request for XMLHttpRequest 14:02:37 ;-) 14:03:35 If WG memebers have comments, please send them to the list. 14:03:43 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20080415/#security 14:03:55 ;-) 14:04:03 TOPIC: Review request for XMLHttpRequest 14:04:05 sorry 14:04:08 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html 14:04:17 TOPIC: Progressing test case document to W3C Note 14:04:40 Proposed Resolution to accept shortname "xmldsig2ed-tests" 14:04:55 +1 14:04:55 not that short ;) 14:05:17 RESOLUTION: accept shortname "xmldsig2ed-tests" 14:06:03 RESOLUTION: publish test case document with the short name "xmldsig2ed-tests" 14:06:26 ACTOIN: fjh to make the transition request 14:06:44 ACTION: tlr to make the publication of test case document happen 14:06:44 Created ACTION-153 - Make the publication of test case document happen [on Thomas Roessler - due 2008-05-13]. 14:06:49 action: fjh to make transition request for test case document 14:06:50 Created ACTION-154 - Make transition request for test case document [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2008-05-13]. 14:07:22 TOPIC: Best Practices 14:07:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0018.html 14:07:59 TOPIC: Process 14:08:10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0026.html 14:08:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0026.html 14:10:21 TOPIC: Timestamps and Nonces (Hal) 14:10:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0018.html 14:12:06 hal does not have cycles to become an editor, but, can contribute 14:13:37 RESOLUTION: accept material from Hal 14:14:20 TOPIC: limiting the transforms (pdatta) 14:14:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008May/att-0000/00-part 14:14:35 signing XML vs signing Binary 14:14:50 q+ 14:14:59 Do people know that ? http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/xmlsec.txt 14:15:10 zakim, unmute jcc 14:15:10 jcc should no longer be muted 14:15:34 Should be a rich source of dont's ;-) 14:15:50 http://www.isecpartners.com/files/iSEC_HILL_AttackingXMLSecurity_bh07.pdf, 14:15:50 http://www.isecpartners.com/files/XMLDSIG_Command_Injection.pdf, and 14:15:50 http://www.isecpartners.com/files/iSEC_HILL_AttackingXMLSecurity_Handout.pdf. 14:16:27 -PHB 14:17:53 FJH: had this here http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-xmlsec-minutes 14:18:09 q+ 14:18:22 ack klanz 14:19:09 konrad suggests putting all best practices into document, even if conflicting, then review together and resolve 14:19:10 q- 14:19:10 q+ 14:19:15 +1 14:20:33 +1 to hal 14:21:09 s/accept material from Hal/accept material from Hal as input to document/ 14:22:25 hal suggestes having security considerations and performance sections, since security not obvious 14:24:29 q+ 14:24:34 RESOLUTION: accept Pratik's input 14:24:41 q- 14:24:46 ack hal 14:24:49 as reference material 14:24:57 ack klanz 14:25:01 s/reference material/input material/ 14:25:04 most of my comments are derived from Brad Hill's presentations 14:25:11 thanks thomas 14:25:36 -- fjh - time check 14:26:40 - no problem 14:27:22 too much noise 14:28:41 have CVS access so that folks can check in examples, tests cases, etc into the Best Practices section on the repository 14:29:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0029.html 14:32:33 Pratik had a look at Sean's input - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0029.html 14:32:48 fjh: could not hear you about resolution 14:33:14 RESOLUTION: accept Sean's input for best practices 14:33:52 TOPIC: Action item review 14:33:56 q+ 14:33:59 all of them are still open 14:34:09 I volunteer to scribe. 14:34:10 fjh: proposed to skip next week, next call on the 20th 14:34:16 q? 14:34:20 Next Meeting: May 20, 2008 14:34:24 ack klanz 14:34:28 q+ 14:34:42 aob? 14:34:50 EDS will be the scribe for May 20 meeting 14:35:34 xmldsig-more? 14:35:35 phil upate http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0004.html 14:35:35 iana registry 14:35:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Apr/0005.html 14:35:53 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:35:53 On the phone I see Frederick_Hirsch, pdatta, shivaram (muted), jcc, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart, Thomas, brich, klanz2 14:36:30 q- 14:36:33 bye 14:36:36 zakim, unmute me 14:36:37 shivaram should no longer be muted 14:36:55 -Thomas 14:36:56 -pdatta 14:36:58 -jcc 14:36:59 -Hal_Lockhart 14:37:00 -brich 14:37:01 -Ed_Simon 14:37:05 pdatta has left #xmlsec 14:37:07 jcc has left #xmlsec 14:37:26 -klanz2 14:37:30 Zakim, list participants 14:37:30 As of this point the attendees have been Frederick_Hirsch, shivaram, pdatta, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart, jcc, Thomas, brich, PHB, klanz2 14:37:48 RRSAgent, make log public 14:37:57 RRSAgent, generate minutes 14:37:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-xmlsec-minutes.html fjh 14:38:15 http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html 14:38:56 I am not able to access it 14:39:03 got it 14:39:27 I will clean up and send it 14:39:58 -shivaram 14:39:59 -Frederick_Hirsch 14:39:59 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has ended 14:40:01 Attendees were Frederick_Hirsch, shivaram, pdatta, Ed_Simon, Hal_Lockhart, jcc, Thomas, brich, PHB, klanz2 16:54:12 Zakim has left #xmlsec 17:35:45 PHB2 has left #xmlsec