13:34:29 RRSAgent has joined #xhtml 13:34:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-irc 13:36:17 RolandMerrick has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0080.html 13:37:33 Zakim, this will be XHTML2 13:37:33 ok, Roland; I see IA_XHTML2()9:45AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 13:38:10 Meeting: XHTML2 WG Weekly Teleconference 13:38:28 Chair: Roland 13:38:42 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0080.html 13:39:15 rrsagent, make minutes 13:39:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-minutes.html Roland 13:39:27 rrsagent, make log public 13:39:42 Regrets: Steven 13:41:50 IA_XHTML2()9:45AM has now started 13:41:56 +Roland 13:44:21 yamx has joined #xhtml 13:44:32 +Gregory_Rosmaita 13:44:53 markbirbeck has joined #xhtml 13:45:06 zakim, code? 13:45:06 the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 13:46:01 Scribe: Gregory_Rosmaita 13:46:05 ScribeNick: oedipus 13:47:00 regrets+ Steven_Pemberton 13:47:10 +??P9 13:47:18 +??P10 13:47:22 zakim, ??P9 is yamx 13:47:22 +yamx; got it 13:47:27 zakim, i am ??P10 13:47:27 +markbirbeck; got it 13:48:28 +??P11 13:49:30 zakim, Alesssio is ??P11 13:49:30 sorry, oedipus, I do not recognize a party named 'Alesssio' 13:50:17 zakim, ??P11 is Alessio_Cartocci 13:50:17 +Alessio_Cartocci; got it 13:50:30 rrsagent, make minutes 13:50:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 13:52:29 XML Base (Second Edition) - Steven not around to address 13:52:38 RM: face2face meeting -- any registrants? 13:52:45 RM: a lot of no answers so far 13:52:57 wiki : http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml2/wiki/2008-06-Minneapolis-FtF 13:53:03 registration: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/32107/xhtml2ftf200806/ 13:53:11 RM: poll those on phone 13:53:16 Yam: no, don't think so 13:53:29 GJR: probable conflict 13:53:44 MB: still negotiating -- away most of may on business trips 13:54:01 AC: don't think can attend, but interested in doing so remotely 13:54:05 TOPIC: CURIES 13:54:43 RM: SP sent replies out to TAG; discovered earlier, unaddressed comment from TAG: talked with Shane about it, don't know where SM got to with thAt; same on Mime Types 13:55:42 Yam: 2 Minor comments: distinguish XHTML Basic 1.0 and 1.1 - remove ambiguity; CSS file for the W3C TR is very old, improper use -- says updated 2006, but much older than that 13:55:51 RM: send comments to list, please so on record 13:56:09 RM: last time talked to StevenP, still no feedback from Steve Bratt on either document 13:56:38 Yam; Basic 1.1 M12n - transition request pending, right? 13:56:40 RM: correct 13:56:41 TOPIC: Access Model 13:56:52 s/Access Model/Access Module 13:57:20 GJR: request for activate="inspect" dropped 13:59:10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0083.html 14:00:26 GJR: awaiting Jim Allan post to public-xhtml2 -- GJR will ping him today -- hopefully get to list today 14:00:43 RM: once get material, will review and can vote next week to go to Last Call 14:00:49 TOPIC: Role Module 14:01:02 RM: comes out of second LC soon -- no comments thusfar 14:01:10 TOPIC: RDFa Feedback 14:01:31 MB: few comments on RDFa -- most of them resolved; nothing that affects things materially 14:02:20 TOPIC: RM Comments 14:02:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Apr/0066.html 14:03:31 RM: comments on MimeType 14:03:55 RM: Appendix A. Compatibility Guidelines comments: 14:04:06 s/MimeType/Mime draft 14:05:15 RM: looking for specificity; re: empty elements, helpful for authors to use this and not have to go off and find attributes that it effects; empty elements is a hsort list (included in email cited above) -- should list them in document 14:05:41 RM: document ought to make it as easy as possible for reader to create a new document, rather than leave it to them to discover rules 14:05:47 RM: is that something people agree with? 14:05:51 MB: yes 14:05:53 GJR: yes 14:06:03 Yam: yes 14:06:37 RM: lang and xml:lang - says use xml:lang - does not say don't or should not use lang attribute; need to state use xml:lang and not lang 14:07:05 MB: given goal of this is to make it so html and xhtml interchangable, don't know if should be so strong on XML features 14:07:19 RM: agree good question -- encountered when drafting examples 14:07:51 GJR: have not been able to find AT that switches in response to xml:lang - still key off lang 14:07:56 RM: good example 14:08:39 MB: target renderer is XML renderer, not an HTML renderer; describe best practice for authors of XHTML document whose work will be served as HTML; should be stated other way around to get best results - use lang and xml:lang 14:09:12 RM: best answer i have is specify both -- should record which browsers and which versions support xml:lang -- shouldn't leave issue of use of other one dangling 14:09:22 MB: do use xml:lang or use lang or specify both 14:09:37 s/MB: do use/RM: do use 14:10:22 MB: generic XML feature use that has been the model, but if HTML feature available, why not use it? if we tell people to use XSL rather than CSS will have problem -- can't load boath stylesheets; 14:11:20 RM: aiming for those that work in browsers we are interested in -- likely will be HTML versions; finding a lot of HTML browsers do support XML features, but picked and chosen; develop sample documents to run against series of browsers, record results and report 14:11:53 MB: seems like a lot of work to gain very little; know UAs support HTML, so need to ensure that XHTML works 14:12:23 RM: features that only work in XML/XHTML are the issue -- what about them? HTML browsers recognize limited set of XML features need to document 14:12:38 MB: if make assertion, have to prove it; someone's got to do this work 14:12:48 RM: good practices or recommendation -- this is the way to do it 14:13:16 MB: if start recommending things that aren't really necessary, then making more work for all involved -- reduce work to do verification by scaling down requirements 14:13:28 Tina has joined #xhtml 14:13:56 RM: don't want reader to infer -- do use lang, use xml:lang -- should say "do this, and don't do that" 14:14:20 MB: fragment identifiers -- same thing -- use id attribute, do not use name attribute 14:14:52 RM: can't just say "do what HTML does" -- won't work with XHTML compact forms 14:15:38 RM: don't make distinctions between 1.0 and 1.1 -- clarify what Basic means -- going back to yam's point 14:15:50 RM: want document that is valid XHTML rendered by HTML 14:16:06 Yam: completely different in mobile -- some can support basic 1.0 and some basic 1.1 14:16:26 RM: like those to be XHTML Basic, rendered in a non-mobile UA that renders HTML 14:17:05 Yam: more interested in how UA can inform its capabilities using HTTP protocol; like to make very clear how will profile be used to identify basic 1.0 or basic 1.1 14:17:37 Yam: such notificiation is VERY important in mobile devices 14:17:58 RM: SM says Mime document follows these rules -- implements what says you should do 14:18:29 RM: additional comments, please send to list and we will work through them; 14:18:36 RM: other items for discussion? 14:19:01 Yam; send mime type comment to xhtml mailing list 14:19:42 s/Yam: send/Yam: will send 14:19:46 RM: adjourn 14:19:54 -Roland 14:19:56 -markbirbeck 14:19:59 -Alessio_Cartocci 14:20:00 -yamx 14:20:10 rrsagent, make minutes 14:20:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 14:20:14 zakim, bye 14:20:14 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Roland, Gregory_Rosmaita, yamx, markbirbeck, Alessio_Cartocci 14:20:14 Zakim has left #xhtml 14:20:19 rrsagent, make minutes 14:20:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 14:20:51 regrets+ Tina 14:20:53 rrsagent, make minutes 14:20:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/30-xhtml-minutes.html oedipus 14:21:42 rrsagent, please part 14:21:42 I see no action items