IRC log of swd on 2008-04-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:57:57 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swd
- 14:57:57 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-irc
- 14:58:01 [TomB]
- rrsagent, bookmark
- 14:58:01 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-irc#T14-58-01
- 14:58:05 [TomB]
- zakim, this will be swd
- 14:58:05 [Zakim]
- ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started
- 14:58:11 [Zakim]
- + +0122427aaaa
- 14:58:11 [TomB]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 14:58:12 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Tom_Baker, +0122427aaaa
- 14:58:26 [TomB]
- zakim, aaaa is Quentin
- 14:58:26 [Zakim]
- +Quentin; got it
- 14:58:27 [Qreul]
- zakim, +0122427aaaa is Qreul
- 14:58:27 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 14:58:28 [Zakim]
- sorry, Qreul, I do not recognize a party named '+0122427aaaa'
- 14:58:32 [Clay]
- zakim, LC is Clay
- 14:58:32 [Zakim]
- +Clay; got it
- 14:58:41 [TomB]
- Meeting: SWD WG
- 14:58:45 [TomB]
- Chair: Tom
- 14:59:03 [TomB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0055.html
- 14:59:05 [Zakim]
- +??P26
- 14:59:20 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 14:59:21 [vit]
- zakim, +P26
- 14:59:22 [Zakim]
- I wonder where P26 is
- 14:59:22 [TomB]
- Regrets: Sean, Alistair
- 14:59:27 [vit]
- zakim, +P26 is me
- 14:59:27 [Zakim]
- sorry, vit, I do not recognize a party named '+P26'
- 14:59:31 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p26 is Vit
- 14:59:31 [Zakim]
- +Vit; got it
- 14:59:44 [TomB]
- Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html
- 15:00:02 [TomB]
- rrsagent, please make record public
- 15:00:04 [Ralph]
- Regrets+ Michael
- 15:00:09 [TomB]
- scribe: Vit
- 15:00:12 [TomB]
- scribenick: vit
- 15:00:27 [Zakim]
- +??P30
- 15:00:44 [Ralph]
- zakim, ??p30 is Daniel_Rubin
- 15:00:46 [Zakim]
- +Daniel_Rubin; got it
- 15:00:53 [edsu]
- edsu has joined #swd
- 15:01:22 [marghe]
- marghe has joined #swd
- 15:01:32 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 15:02:07 [edsu]
- Zakim, LC is edsu
- 15:02:07 [Zakim]
- +edsu; got it
- 15:02:32 [JonP]
- JonP has joined #swd
- 15:02:50 [Zakim]
- +nacho
- 15:02:57 [berrueta]
- zakim, nacho is me
- 15:02:57 [Zakim]
- +berrueta; got it
- 15:03:19 [Zakim]
- +Guus
- 15:03:41 [Zakim]
- +JonP
- 15:03:51 [Zakim]
- +Margherita_Sini
- 15:04:27 [Antoine]
- Antoine has joined #swd
- 15:04:36 [Zakim]
- +Antoine_Isaac
- 15:05:27 [vit]
- ACTION: Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01]
- 15:05:33 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:06:30 [vit]
- tomb: ed & clay go on and add instructions related to f2f
- 15:06:46 [Ralph]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/WashingtonAgenda Washington F2F agenda
- 15:06:49 [vit]
- clay: writing up a page about logistics
- 15:06:57 [vit]
- ready by tomorrow
- 15:07:10 [vit]
- add it to wiki and post to list
- 15:07:51 [vit]
- wifi should be working
- 15:07:57 [edsu]
- Clay++
- 15:08:00 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 15:08:22 [Clay]
- de nada
- 15:08:33 [vit]
- tomb: update list of F2F participants if needed
- 15:08:45 [vit]
- .. edit wiki or drop a line
- 15:09:14 [vit]
- ACTION: Guus and Tom draft an agenda for the May f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#action02]
- 15:09:17 [vit]
- --done
- 15:09:27 [vit]
- TOPIC: SKOS
- 15:09:30 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0062.html "SKOS Reference editors' update" [Alistair 2008-04-14]
- 15:10:03 [vit]
- antoine: concerns related to semantics of OWL imports
- 15:10:03 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0063.html "SKOS-XL & label relations" [Alistair 2008-04-14]
- 15:10:30 [vit]
- ... implementation of imports may vary in OWL
- 15:10:45 [Zakim]
- -Guus
- 15:10:58 [vit]
- ... OWL spec is not clear in this respect
- 15:11:18 [vit]
- ... we can say that we recommend OWL imports
- 15:11:22 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0056.html "primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies" [Alistair 2008-04-14]
- 15:11:40 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #swd
- 15:11:40 [vit]
- ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13]
- 15:11:44 [vit]
- --done
- 15:11:57 [vit]
- ACTION: Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08]
- 15:12:02 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:12:15 [vit]
- ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10]
- 15:12:18 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:12:18 [Ralph]
- Regrets+ Simone
- 15:12:30 [Zakim]
- +??P62
- 15:12:47 [Guus]
- zakim, ??p62 is me
- 15:12:47 [Zakim]
- +Guus; got it
- 15:12:56 [vit]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06
- 15:13:25 [vit]
- antoine: relations between label objects unclear... alistair proposed reification n-ary relation
- 15:13:46 [vit]
- ... solution: get all the possible patterns for this into the document
- 15:13:57 [vit]
- ... don't make a preferred choice
- 15:14:04 [vit]
- ACTION: Antoine will review Alistair's proposals w/r/t the relationship between the existing solution and the extension [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06]
- 15:14:13 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:14:47 [vit]
- open skos issues
- 15:14:51 [vit]
- ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09]
- 15:14:53 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:14:59 [vit]
- ACTION: Alistair to review Antoine and Guus' emails to move ISSUE-71 and -74 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action09]
- 15:15:02 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:15:49 [vit]
- tomb: agenda for the f2f - document editors should propose a way how to make use of the f2f time
- 15:16:05 [vit]
- ... look at the wiki and possibly change the agenda/topics
- 15:16:10 [vit]
- TOPIC: RDFa
- 15:16:18 [vit]
- ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
- 15:16:21 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:16:56 [vit]
- ben: small changes, but new editor's draft still needed
- 15:17:05 [vit]
- ...mark working on that
- 15:17:22 [vit]
- feedback would be welcome after the implementation and draft will be ready
- 15:18:10 [vit]
- ... get a draft out before the next meeting
- 15:18:17 [vit]
- ... depends on the TF approving this
- 15:18:35 [vit]
- ... primer draft looking pretty good, positive comments received
- 15:19:06 [vit]
- ... this week incorporating small changes to the syntax
- 15:19:15 [vit]
- ... primer draft by the next week
- 15:19:38 [vit]
- guus: w.r.t. charter extension proposal - what should we plan?
- 15:19:47 [vit]
- ben: let's be pesimistic
- 15:20:02 [vit]
- ... would go to CR in june
- 15:20:32 [vit]
- guus: depends on the implementation report
- 15:20:41 [vit]
- ben: no need to be pesimistic about that
- 15:21:49 [TomB]
- CR is just for implementation - for demonstrating that your spec can be implemented by two independent developers
- 15:22:20 [vit]
- guus: the main conversation happens when you go from last call to CR
- 15:22:31 [TomB]
- Guus: in OWL, from Last Call to CR - consider issues raised
- 15:22:35 [vit]
- ... in case of objections, can be a difficult discussion
- 15:23:14 [vit]
- ben: once the editor's draft is ready, we'll re-notify the previously contacted places
- 15:23:31 [vit]
- ... in pesimistic case CR end of june
- 15:23:37 [vit]
- ... period can be short
- 15:23:45 [vit]
- ... the implementations are already there
- 15:24:32 [vit]
- guus: so that will be in the charter extension proposal then
- 15:25:01 [vit]
- TOPIC: recipes
- 15:25:20 [vit]
- ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
- 15:25:25 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:25:29 [vit]
- ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
- 15:25:32 [vit]
- --continues
- 15:26:38 [Ralph]
- scribenick: ralph
- 15:26:47 [Ralph]
- Topic: Vocab Management
- 15:26:53 [Ralph]
- Guus: we have 4 reviews
- 15:27:26 [Ralph]
- ... all 4 agree it's worthwhile to publish. Editor's should respond to comments and indicate changes to the document
- 15:27:52 [Ralph]
- ... if changes are major, may be a good idea to discuss with reviewers first
- 15:28:05 [Ralph]
- Vit: one of the major points raised in the reviews concerns the Research Topics section
- 15:28:27 [Ralph]
- ... I proposed options to Elisa; we could either remove it or shorten it to two or three sentences
- 15:28:38 [Ralph]
- ... cite some references in case readers are interested
- 15:28:56 [Ralph]
- ... Tom seems to prefer to drop it
- 15:29:11 [Ralph]
- ... Ralph thought it interesting to keep
- 15:29:30 [Ralph]
- ... shortening may be the right compromise
- 15:29:44 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I'd be happy with shortening the Research Topics section to a couple of sentences
- 15:30:23 [Ralph]
- Tom: one point I raised was a connection between this document and our discussion on the policies regarding the SKOS vocabulary
- 15:30:43 [Ralph]
- ... issues with changes to the namespace and deprecated terms
- 15:31:12 [Ralph]
- ... if we're going to discuss this in Washington then whatever consensus we reach in Washington should be recorded in this VM notes
- 15:31:51 [vit]
- ralph: pretty much the same point as tom
- 15:32:15 [Ralph]
- Ralph: I absolutely agree that this VM Note is the place to document our design rationale for the SKOS namespace changes
- 15:32:22 [Ralph]
- ... will Vit and Elisa do that?
- 15:32:36 [Ralph]
- Vit: I agree it should go in this document
- 15:32:47 [Ralph]
- scribenick: vit
- 15:32:53 [vit]
- guus: suggestion for agenda next week
- 15:33:08 [vit]
- ... distribute the preparation tasks for various SKOS issues for the f2f
- 15:33:31 [vit]
- ... ask all the issue owners
- 15:33:46 [vit]
- tomb: just walk through the issues and make sure they'll be covered
- 15:34:15 [vit]
- guus: all the issues should have the proposal ready in two weeks from now
- 15:34:21 [vit]
- ... 30 april would be ok
- 15:34:50 [vit]
- tomb: next week we'll walk through all the issues
- 15:35:05 [vit]
- guus: distribute all the related material on time
- 15:35:14 [Ralph]
- s/30 april/29 april/
- 15:35:21 [vit]
- tomb: every open issues?
- 15:35:49 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-minutes.html Ralph
- 15:36:18 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 15:36:18 [Zakim]
- -Daniel_Rubin
- 15:36:19 [Zakim]
- -Quentin
- 15:36:19 [Zakim]
- -Clay
- 15:36:20 [dlrubin]
- dlrubin has left #swd
- 15:36:21 [Zakim]
- -berrueta
- 15:36:24 [Zakim]
- -edsu
- 15:36:25 [Zakim]
- -Guus
- 15:36:28 [Zakim]
- -Antoine_Isaac
- 15:36:31 [marghe]
- marghe has left #swd
- 15:36:32 [Zakim]
- -JonP
- 15:36:35 [Ralph]
- zakim, list attendees
- 15:36:36 [Zakim]
- -Margherita_Sini
- 15:36:43 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Tom_Baker, +0122427aaaa, Quentin, Clay, Ralph, Vit, Daniel_Rubin, edsu, berrueta, Guus, JonP, Margherita_Sini, Antoine_Isaac, Ben_Adida
- 15:36:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-minutes.html Ralph
- 15:37:37 [Zakim]
- -Vit
- 15:37:45 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 15:37:53 [Zakim]
- -Tom_Baker
- 15:37:54 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended
- 15:37:55 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Tom_Baker, +0122427aaaa, Quentin, Clay, Ralph, Vit, Daniel_Rubin, edsu, berrueta, Guus, JonP, Margherita_Sini, Antoine_Isaac, Ben_Adida
- 15:38:21 [Ralph]
- zakim, bye
- 15:38:21 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #swd
- 15:38:30 [edsu]
- edsu has left #swd