15:00:06 RRSAgent has joined #swd 15:00:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc 15:00:09 -Tom 15:00:11 JonP has joined #swd 15:00:16 Meeting: SWD WG 15:00:21 should i try to call back? 15:00:27 zakim, who's on the call? 15:00:27 On the phone I see +0122427aaaa 15:00:35 +[LC] 15:00:40 +??P15 15:00:45 +Ralph 15:00:51 + +1.312.059.aabb 15:00:51 zakim, LC is Clay 15:00:51 +Clay; got it 15:01:08 zakim, +0122427aaaa is qreul 15:01:08 +qreul; got it 15:01:18 Antoine has joined #swd 15:01:22 edsu has joined #swd 15:01:27 -??P15 15:01:50 +Antoine_Isaac 15:01:51 Guus has joined #swd 15:02:01 +Jon_Phipps 15:02:16 scribenick: Antoine 15:02:19 +[CTIC] 15:02:28 zakim, ctic is Diego 15:02:34 +Diego; got it 15:02:39 zakim, Jon_Phipps is me 15:02:40 +JonP; got it 15:02:44 +??P34 15:02:48 zakim, who is here? 15:02:48 On the phone I see qreul, Clay, Ralph, +1.312.059.aabb, Antoine_Isaac, JonP, Diego, ??P34 15:02:52 On IRC I see Guus, edsu, Antoine, JonP, RRSAgent, Clay, Tom, qreul, berrueta, Zakim, Ralph 15:03:11 zakim, aabb is Guus 15:03:26 +Guus; got it 15:05:40 +[LC] 15:05:54 zakim, LC is edsu 15:05:54 +edsu; got it 15:06:50 +Tom 15:07:27 -??P34 15:07:46 Topic: Admin 15:08:14 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0031.html 15:08:31 +??P34 15:08:31 PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Mar 4 telecon: 15:08:31 http://www.w3.org/2008/03/04-swd-minutes.html 15:08:49 -> http://www.w3.org/2008/03/04-swd-minutes.html previous 2008-03-04 15:08:58 zakim, ??p34 is Tom 15:08:58 +Tom; got it 15:09:28 RESOLVED: to accept accept minutes of the Mar 4 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/03/04-swd-minutes.html 15:09:35 +Ben_Adida 15:09:54 ACTION: Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] 15:09:57 rrsagent, please make record public 15:10:02 -- CONTINUES 15:10:12 Guus: this action will stay for another month 15:10:19 Chair: Guus 15:10:29 Guus: F2F Meeting 15:11:18 Tom: I cannot attend on Friday 15:11:22 [I need to be back in the US by Wednesday night] 15:11:27 Guus: Tuesday-wednesday 15:11:35 Tom: OK with me 15:11:54 Guus: I'll set up a poll for this 15:12:39 Guus: venue: London or Amsterdam? 15:13:43 Guus: who could host in London? Alistair is not there. 15:13:53 Tom: we need to ask 15:14:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-minutes.html Ralph 15:14:16 Ed: any option is fine with me 15:14:38 Guus: Washington could be an option 15:15:07 Ed: we can look into that 15:15:16 s/that/LC hosting/ 15:15:39 s/Jon/Ed/ 15:16:23 ACTION: Guus to set up a poll for a meeting 6-8 may with different possible venues Amsterdam, Boston, London or Washington 15:16:39 :) 15:16:49 Topic: SKOS 15:17:01 Regrets: Alistair,Elisa, Daniel, Sean, Margherita 15:17:09 ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] 15:17:15 -- CONTINUES 15:17:31 Ed: I had some difficulties with the wiki 15:18:12 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables 15:18:21 ... Antoine might have updated it 15:18:29 Antoine: not since publication 15:19:13 Tom: still missing the target dates 15:19:37 Ralph: if you have time could we try to see what my wiki problems are after the call? 15:19:38 ... if they're the same as the Reference this could be added 15:20:13 Antoine: formal status on Primer? 15:20:49 Guus: RDFa: Primer is note, Reference recommendation 15:21:15 ... OWL: both references 15:21:23 Ralph: it's up to WG to decide 15:22:56 Guus: I can live with either way 15:23:13 ... suggest we let it open for the moment 15:23:33 -- SKOS Reference (Alistair, Sean) 15:23:50 Guus: not much comments 15:23:59 ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties (updating RDF schema) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action06] 15:24:02 -- CONTINUES 15:24:10 ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] 15:24:13 -- CONTINUES 15:24:28 -- SKOS-XL: eXtension for Labels 15:24:47 Guus: let's wait till Alistair is here 15:25:05 "Open" SKOS Issues - http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/3 15:25:21 Guus: I added a mail to the agenda 15:25:30 ... thought on specialization of relations 15:25:52 ... I would go for a minimum set of specializations we really understand 15:26:18 ... there are definitively issues with defining the semantics of predefined extensions 15:26:40 ... e.g. broaderGeneric as sub-propery of subClassOf 15:27:02 Topic: RDFa 15:27:30 Ben: we're getting very good comments 15:27:42 ... there is a couple of issues we're still loking at 15:27:48 ... people are looking at the details 15:28:04 ... we want to rush asap a quick-fix to the Primer 15:28:16 ... what would be the process? 15:28:38 .. there is no real change in the flows/examples 15:29:09 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0032.html 15:29:15 Guus: brief round: Diege, Ed can you look at the changes in the mail? 15:29:33 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080310/ RDFa Primer editor's draft 15:30:30 Ed: the Primer has grown and grown 15:30:34 s/Ed/Ben 15:32:01 Ben: the document has been reviewed in the context of the TF 15:32:09 Diego: no reason to hold the change 15:32:13 Ed: OK 15:32:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0032.html 15:33:18 ben++ # for rapid fixes to the primer 15:33:43 RESOLVED to publish a new version of the RDFa Primer as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0032.html 15:35:05 ACTION: Ralph and Ben to publish web version of the new RDFa Primer 15:36:30 Guus: do we have any ideas on TAG review? 15:36:51 Ralph: participants of the TAG expressed the intention to make comments 15:37:07 ... no indication for the TAG making a formal review 15:37:32 Guus: so we can close the comment period to march 18 15:37:59 Ralph: the EARL (?) group might make a review 15:38:15 s/(?)// 15:38:29 Guus: March 21 in fact 15:38:39 ... is still assume to be the deadline 15:39:03 Ben: we're in good shape for application report 15:39:21 ... 3/4 implementations before the end of April 15:39:52 Guus: has the process for Candidate Rec changed since the last 3-4 years? 15:40:16 ... has Tim been following this? 15:40:26 ... or will Steve dot it? 15:40:34 Ralph: I will ask 15:41:30 Ralph: one comment might be whether we should change the document regarding profile URI 15:42:06 ... during the candidate rec we might specify this requirement 15:43:13 ... for the transition from candidate rec to rec we could make the change 15:43:24 ... to satisfy the reviewers 15:43:47 Guus: if we make the change which is a design one should we go back to 1st call? 15:44:03 Ralph: we can make changes at this point 15:44:14 ... once we're in CR it's different 15:44:27 marghe has joined #swd 15:45:34 ... we need to note the changes 15:45:50 Guus: what if the comments happens and is an objection? 15:46:00 +Marghe 15:46:30 Ben: if this is the one sticky point it's ok 15:46:54 ... we can make an answer 15:48:13 ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] 15:48:25 -- CONTINUES 15:48:48 ACTION: Ben to clarify target date of publication of primer as note and update deliverables page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/04-swd-minutes.html#action08] 15:48:54 -- CONTINUES 15:49:03 Ben: we'll be pushing on the Primer in March 15:50:00 Guus: we should freeze the Primer for May 1 15:50:04 Ben: OK 15:50:12 Topic: Recipes 15:50:38 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0036.html "[Recipes] roadmap to the next draft" [Diego 2008-03-11] 15:50:41 Guus: Diego sent a mail on the issues to make the document a note 15:51:01 Diego: first one regards the example 15:51:08 ... moving the exampl to other domain 15:51:28 ... can be done very quicky, except if we move to w3c.org 15:52:06 Jon: is it something we can do with CVS access? 15:52:32 Ralph: feel free to do so 15:53:40 ACTION: Diego, Jon and Ralph to coordinate files for w3c site? 15:53:47 s/?// 15:53:55 s/files/Recipes examples/ 15:54:03 Diego: next comment is for recipes n6 15:54:11 ... management of white spaces 15:54:16 ... very simple addition 15:54:37 q+ 15:54:40 Guus: I'd like to have the comment on the WG space 15:55:14 Ralph: I'm not sure this is a useful thing, it makes the recipe less clear 15:55:53 Diego: I 'll ask the commenter to move the discussion on the WG list 15:55:56 the whitespace escaping technique is _useful_ from a practical standpoint but it makes the example more obscure 15:56:51 Diego: other comments needs discussion 15:57:06 ... 4 issues raised by Ian Davis 15:57:33 ... we would like to get opinion from the previous editors 15:57:48 ... on vocabulary URI vs. vocabulary document URI 15:57:50 I would like to see this in context 15:58:43 Tom: what we need is namespace URI 15:59:01 +1 to Ralph's suggestion 15:59:14 ... what we can say is mention namespace URI an example 15:59:25 s/T/Rl 15:59:38 s/Tom/Ralph 16:00:35 Ralph: we use "vocabulary URI" to mean "namespace URI" but "namespace URI" is a term of art in SemWeb and we thought it better for new users to not use "namespace URI". The first time we use "vocabulary URI" we can say "also known as 'namespace URI'" 16:00:39 Guus: and give an example 16:01:21 Jon: about Htaddress problem 16:01:33 Guus: can we have it as an appendix? 16:01:53 -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/58 issue 58 16:02:04 s/Htaddress/ISSUE-58 16:03:14 Ralph : no one seems to have a simple solution 16:03:39 Diego: propose to let the document like that and mention that no simple solution could be found 16:03:58 s/simple solution/simple solution to handling q values in .htaccess/ 16:04:36 Jon: Tim's comment on Cool URIs call for discussion in the WG 16:04:55 Guus: it will be on the agenda next week 16:05:09 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] 16:05:29 -- CONTINUES 16:05:33 [I will try to send email on the 303 redirection / content negotiation comment from Cool URIs. I had a chat with Tim about this last week] 16:05:37 ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] 16:05:42 --CONTINUES 16:06:39 Guus: meeting is adjourned 16:06:43 -Ben_Adida 16:06:44 -qreul 16:06:44 -Clay 16:06:45 -Diego 16:06:46 -edsu 16:06:50 -JonP 16:06:57 zakim, list attendees 16:06:57 As of this point the attendees have been Tom, Ralph, +1.312.059.aabb, Clay, qreul, Antoine_Isaac, Diego, JonP, Guus, edsu, Ben_Adida, Marghe 16:07:07 rrsagent, please draft minuts 16:07:07 I'm logging. I don't understand 'please draft minuts', Ralph. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:07:08 -Tom 16:07:09 rrsagent, please draft minutes 16:07:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-minutes.html Ralph 16:07:15 -Marghe 16:07:21 marghe has left #swd 16:08:08 Ralph: can i bug you about the wiki briefly? 16:08:18 s/wiki/wiki permissions/ 16:15:01 -Ralph 16:15:03 -Guus 16:15:20 -Tom.a 16:15:43 Tom has joined #swd 16:16:23 zakim, drop antoine 16:16:23 Antoine_Isaac is being disconnected 16:16:25 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 16:16:27 Attendees were Tom, Ralph, +1.312.059.aabb, Clay, qreul, Antoine_Isaac, Diego, JonP, Guus, edsu, Ben_Adida, Marghe 16:16:30 rrsagent, bye 16:16:30 I see 11 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-actions.rdf : 16:16:30 ACTION: Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] [1] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-09-54 16:16:30 ACTION: Guus to set up a poll for a meeting 6-8 may with different possible venues Amsterdam, Boston, London or Washington [2] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-16-23 16:16:30 ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] [3] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-17-09 16:16:30 ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties (updating RDF schema) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action06] [4] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-23-59 16:16:30 ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] [5] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-24-10 16:16:30 ACTION: Ralph and Ben to publish web version of the new RDFa Primer [6] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-35-05 16:16:30 ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [7] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-48-13 16:16:30 ACTION: Ben to clarify target date of publication of primer as note and update deliverables page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/04-swd-minutes.html#action08] [8] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-48-48 16:16:30 ACTION: Diego, Jon and Ralph to coordinate files for w3c site? [9] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T15-53-40 16:16:30 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [10] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T16-05-09 16:16:30 ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [11] 16:16:30 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-irc#T16-05-37