15:02:04 RRSAgent has joined #owl 15:02:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/03/03-owl-irc 15:02:14 zakim, this is owl 15:02:14 ok, alanr; that matches SW_OWL()10:00AM 15:02:47 zakim, who is on the call? 15:02:47 On the phone I see Peter_Patel-Schneider, ??P9, Alan, Elisa_Kendall, Evan_Wallace 15:03:00 zakim, ??P9 is IanH 15:03:00 +IanH; got it 15:03:15 zakim, ??P9 is IanH 15:03:15 I already had ??P9 as IanH, alanr 15:03:34 zakim, who is here? 15:03:34 On the phone I see Peter_Patel-Schneider, IanH, Alan, Elisa_Kendall, Evan_Wallace 15:03:39 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Elisa, alanr, pfps, IanH, sandro, trackbot-ng, ewallace 15:04:19 zakim, mute me 15:04:19 IanH should now be muted 15:06:17 I just pinged Bijan and he will be joining shortly. 15:08:02 +??P24 15:09:03 my ontology talk http://ashby.csail.mit.edu/presentations/Interontology08.ppt 15:09:21 bijan has joined #owl 15:09:23 Agenda: Next steps for Primer 15:09:32 2) Overview ideas from Elisa 15:09:33 zakim, mute me 15:09:33 sorry, bijan, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:09:41 3) Reference Material / Evan 15:09:44 zakim, who is here? 15:09:45 On the phone I see Peter_Patel-Schneider, IanH (muted), Alan, Elisa_Kendall, Evan_Wallace, ??P24 15:09:47 4) Cookbook? 15:09:47 On IRC I see bijan, RRSAgent, Zakim, Elisa, alanr, pfps, IanH, sandro, trackbot-ng, ewallace 15:09:54 zakim, ??P24 is me 15:09:54 +bijan; got it 15:09:56 zakim, mute me 15:09:56 bijan should now be muted 15:10:02 -Peter_Patel-Schneider 15:10:23 waiting for you to reconnect, peter 15:10:30 +Peter_Patel-Schneider 15:11:20 Remember the reset button on early apples? 15:12:04 +1 (am working toward that) 15:12:07 earlier would be better 15:12:11 +1 15:12:13 +1 sounds good 15:12:17 +1 15:12:22 +1 for me -1 for Deb 15:13:39 zakim, unmute me 15:13:39 bijan should no longer be muted 15:13:40 q+ 15:14:28 zakim, unmute me 15:14:28 bijan was not muted, bijan 15:14:38 q+ 15:15:22 previous vote was whether to aim for FPWD of primer for next heartbeat 15:15:33 Deb: Worried about Overview happening 15:15:46 Deb: Wants to couple 2 in order to make sure it does 15:16:24 There will be other opportunities to object, even tactically 15:16:43 But there's no promises that the wg will endorse an overview! 15:17:07 Alan: We are committed to overview, but blocking one for the other is not a good argument. 15:18:02 q+ 15:18:05 Alan: Doesn't hear objection from deb about primer per se. 15:18:08 ack bijan 15:18:21 ack alanr 15:18:36 ack Bijan 15:19:02 The concern is that an overview/quickstart document is really needed by some of her customers, and that the primer alone doesn't provide this functionality 15:19:06 Alan: General sense is that Primer should move forward 15:19:36 The idea would be to make sure that this kind of document is addressed by the WG 15:20:27 Bijan asks what how to decide which materials in the wg, which not 15:20:34 asks elisa to respond 15:20:50 q+ to respond to Bijan as well 15:20:59 q+ 15:21:41 We should discuss that 15:22:40 Elisa: Document saying why you care, quick links, here's where to go if you want a deeper dive 15:24:23 Is there anything new to this discussion? 15:24:39 zakim, mute me 15:24:39 bijan should now be muted 15:25:15 ewallace, perhaps not, but I still don't know what the terms of debate are 15:26:27 (rather, the evaluation criteria) 15:26:50 2) Overview 15:27:13 so what is the end-status for the primer? 15:27:40 aim for FPWD, unencumbered 15:28:26 overview: relatively short 15:28:56 very short description of language at front. Document roadmap (2-3 sentences) if you need x go to document y 15:29:12 Decsription of what kind of application people are working on . What it's good for. 15:29:17 Summary of what's new. 15:29:47 Feature summary like before. Each feature with a link. 15:30:06 very short summary and links in to other documents. 15:30:31 quick on a link and go. 15:30:40 like card for programming language. 15:30:44 crib sheet. 15:30:46 q+ 15:30:50 ack alanr 15:30:50 alanr, you wanted to respond to Bijan as well and to 15:31:11 zakim, unmute me 15:31:11 IanH should no longer be muted 15:31:25 ack ianh 15:31:36 q+ 15:31:38 q? 15:33:27 There's a semantic web reference card: http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/_file_directory_/resources/94.pdf 15:33:39 I have no idea how much its used 15:34:13 q+ 15:34:45 ack alanr 15:34:46 ack bijan 15:35:46 Alan: Sees two audiences given Elisa's description. Risks same problem as before. Would be better if it was one audience and tight. 15:36:14 Elisa: Maybe stuff about applications is separate. Perhaps mush of what Elisa wants with quick start and What Deb wants. 15:36:57 Alan: Perhaps two points of view re: "Language Features" - vocabulary centered view versus function centered view. 15:37:01 q+ 15:37:52 one reason we had to direct to the "right" document before is that they weren't factored well, IMO 15:39:02 q? 15:39:05 q+ 15:39:44 Elisa: Different sets of tags to run in to same set of documents. 15:40:24 That was on the proposal as well 15:41:21 no links 15:41:44 I though that short was the basic idea here 15:41:50 Elisa: Semantic web reference card, not quite right. Too short for what she was looking for. 15:41:59 Conrad spoke very highly of : http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#appC 15:42:03 whcih seems similar in detail 15:42:19 Appendixes B and C 15:42:20 q? 15:42:29 ack alanr 15:42:33 q+ 15:43:24 Ian: problem with overview "fell between two stools" (?) stools = thing to sit on, presumably ;-) 15:43:54 Ian: Likes SW reference card. 15:44:04 Elisa wants one like this that's alive. 15:44:08 Look at the link to the section of the reference 15:44:17 See: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#appC 15:44:28 Elisa: Maybe more than one. 15:44:42 Ian: Bit too many things at once. 15:45:44 I definitely want to mark up the specs so one can extract and rearrange sections in a smart way...so that other folks can create arbitrary versions (instead of us doing every possible variant) 15:46:03 q? 15:46:08 ack IanH 15:46:23 The SW reference card is cool. 15:46:34 q+ 15:46:41 Alan: Is typesetting/layout as important? 15:46:43 I didn't want to say it wasn't a good effort. 15:47:01 Elisa: Important but not sure what ultimate layout it. 15:47:16 But it does try to cover an amazing amount of terrain 15:47:45 Would like to see 3rd column expanded, 4th with link. 1 to semantics, 1 to mapping etc. 15:47:49 q? 15:47:58 "coupled with quick start"? 15:48:01 ack alanr? 15:48:03 ack bijan 15:48:09 ack alanr 15:48:15 zakim, unmute me 15:48:15 bijan was not muted, bijan 15:48:30 q+ to ask what "coupled with quick start"? means 15:48:45 s/3rd column/middle column/ 15:49:15 q? 15:49:27 Bijan: Trying to arrange specs to this is even possible. 15:49:32 s/to/so 15:50:07 ack alanr 15:50:07 alanr, you wanted to ask what "coupled with quick start"? means 15:50:16 zakim, mute me 15:50:16 bijan should now be muted 15:50:26 q+ 15:50:53 zakim, unmute me 15:50:53 IanH should no longer be muted 15:51:38 Ian: can see quick reference guides but don't know what this has to do with overview. 15:52:24 Deb 15:52:45 What about the intro of the primer? 15:52:54 Deb's audience: People who fund projects who need introductory tests. High level intro to the semantic web and why you care. 15:53:05 Elisa want quick guide. 15:53:27 In the US have trouble getting people to fund these projects because they don't see the need. 15:54:12 In the EU multilingual is more taken, but not here as much. Place where people can grab a couple of paragraphs to justify. 15:54:42 do we have a good idea of the totality of what is wanted by Deb? 15:55:50 Rec track? 15:56:08 -1 to rec track (esp. as a separate document) 15:56:09 why rec track? 15:56:19 I also wonder why rec track? 15:56:21 why separate document? 15:56:33 q+ 15:56:39 q+ 15:56:40 q- 15:56:50 It needs to have a separate, available, visible link to it - whether or not it's separate. 15:56:54 ack Bijan 15:57:28 The quick guide could be an appendix to another of our documents. 15:57:36 It would be fine with me if it isn't rec trak, but is linked on the home page from the documents right up at the top. 15:57:36 rec'edness 15:57:53 ack pfps 15:57:57 zakim, mute me 15:57:57 bijan should now be muted 15:58:24 Bijan: Rec track is heavy/expensive 15:58:28 And it burdens future working groups! 15:58:28 Peter agrees. 15:59:16 q? 16:00:12 I think we will need some index like thing (and have started on it), but I'm at the moment indifferent to the layout 16:00:41 +1 to index - I'm indifferent to whether it is an appendix or something on the home page 16:00:49 q+ 16:01:18 Alan: Looking for consensus on content, 1 pager. 16:01:34 I think layout is important and would like to see it be separate & printable on its own. 16:01:53 peter worries about pushback on 1 page displayable anywhere. 16:02:18 q? 16:02:23 ack pfps 16:03:06 q+ 16:03:29 zakim, unmute me 16:03:29 bijan should no longer be muted 16:03:53 q+ to point out that print version can have variant. 16:06:37 ack bijan 16:06:42 ack alanr 16:06:42 alanr, you wanted to point out that print version can have variant. 16:08:05 Also might be worth asking Tim Finin on how used the semweb card is 16:08:14 I do 16:08:16 I'll ask 16:08:28 Jim had nothing to do with the card 16:08:50 perhaps he would know whether or not folks are using it, though 16:09:13 What about Primer for FPWD -- what are we doing about that? 16:09:53 Should we do a review of the Primer pre-pub? 16:10:12 I thought that review is needed - we need to identify reviewers 16:10:22 Elisa, perhaps...remember UMBC and UMCP aren't hte same institution :) 16:10:27 And Jim's at RPI now ;) 16:10:32 bye 16:10:32 -Evan_Wallace 16:10:33 -Alan 16:10:34 -bijan 16:10:34 -Elisa_Kendall 16:10:37 -IanH 16:11:01 Action: Alan to send note to WG summarizing feeling re: FPWD of Primer. We are going for it 16:11:01 Created ACTION-96 - Send note to WG summarizing feeling re: FPWD of Primer. We are going for it [on Alan Ruttenberg - due 2008-03-10]. 16:11:10 Action: Alan to send cookbook proposal 16:11:10 Created ACTION-97 - Send cookbook proposal [on Alan Ruttenberg - due 2008-03-10]. 16:11:59 Action: Alan to ask W3C view on "1 page printout?" 16:11:59 Created ACTION-98 - Ask W3C view on \"1 page printout?\" [on Alan Ruttenberg - due 2008-03-10]. 16:13:20 ewallace, you still here? 16:15:38 disconnecting the lone participant, Peter_Patel-Schneider, in SW_OWL()10:00AM 16:15:41 SW_OWL()10:00AM has ended 16:15:42 Attendees were Peter_Patel-Schneider, Alan, Evan_Wallace, Elisa_Kendall, IanH, bijan 16:21:31 rrsagent, draft minues 16:21:31 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft minues', alanr. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:21:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:21:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/03/03-owl-minutes.html alanr 16:21:46 rrsagent, make minutes public 16:21:46 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', alanr. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:21:59 rrsagent, make log world readable 16:21:59 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make log world readable', alanr. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:22:05 rrsagent, make log public 16:53:03 Conrad has joined #owl 17:02:24 The phone bridge is saying the conference is resrtricted. 18:10:12 Zakim has left #owl 18:29:47 alanr has joined #owl