14:19:07 RRSAgent has joined #sweo 14:19:07 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/01/30-sweo-irc 14:19:13 rrsagent, set log public 14:19:25 Meeting: SWEO Weekly Telco 14:19:31 Chair: Susie 14:19:41 Regrets: Pasquale 14:20:35 Susie has joined #sweo 14:34:13 Susie has joined #sweo 14:53:16 bengee has joined #sweo 14:55:29 Andrea has joined #SWEO 14:57:19 LeeF has joined #sweo 14:57:46 SW_SWEO()10:00AM has now started 14:57:53 +LeeF 14:57:59 zakim, mute me please 14:57:59 sorry, LeeF, muting is not permitted when only one person is present 14:58:09 zakim, that's a ridiculously dumb rule 14:58:09 I don't understand 'that's a ridiculously dumb rule', LeeF 14:58:29 Yes, I know you don't. If you understood it, you wouldn't have done it in the first place. 14:58:35 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:58:35 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:58:36 +Ivan 14:59:34 +Susie 15:00:17 +benji 15:00:21 +??P3 15:00:49 +Frank 15:00:56 kidehen has joined #sweo 15:00:59 JacekK has joined #sweo 15:01:04 zakim, ??P3 is kidehen 15:01:04 +kidehen; got it 15:01:24 zakim, mute me please 15:01:24 LeeF should now be muted 15:01:39 Zakim, what is the code 15:01:39 I don't understand 'what is the code', Kjetil 15:01:42 +??P11 15:01:43 Zakim, what is the code? 15:01:43 FrankC has joined #SWEO 15:01:43 the conference code is 7936 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Kjetil 15:01:55 zakim, ??P1 is andea 15:01:55 +andea; got it 15:02:15 zakim, andea is andrea 15:02:15 +andrea; got it 15:02:35 +??P13 15:02:45 Zakim, ??P13 is me 15:02:45 +Kjetil; got it 15:03:09 +??P15 15:03:21 zakim, ??P15 is me 15:03:21 +JacekK; got it 15:04:22 Zakim, pick a scribe 15:04:22 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose JacekK 15:04:58 Zakim, pick a scribe 15:04:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose JacekK 15:05:03 Zakim, pick a scribe 15:05:03 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Ivan 15:05:10 + +1.603.886.aaaa 15:05:13 scribenick: ivan 15:05:22 zakim, aaaa is Melli 15:05:22 +Melli; got it 15:05:23 brb as baby calls 15:05:55 topic: debrief for sweo 15:06:07 http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Next_Steps 15:06:15 susie: benji entered some information on the wiki for this 15:06:20 Melli has joined #sweo 15:06:22 ... we may want to start with that 15:06:39 ... what went well, what should be done better next time 15:06:49 ... at the top benji listed the business presentation 15:06:57 ... which is hard to say where it goes now 15:07:06 ... it is hard to tell because it is work in progress 15:07:17 ... but it looks like progressing well, jeff's doc is excellent 15:07:27 ... I view that as almost a success 15:07:52 Susie: next area is collaterals 15:08:02 ... ie, flyer 15:08:23 ... benji claims that it was successful, but the challenge was that many different people had different views 15:08:32 ... that made it hard to create 15:08:40 ... it would be easier to create multiple flyers 15:08:51 ... but having collaterals aligned with messaging is important 15:09:03 ... the other problem was that the comm team was not there early enough 15:09:20 ... i think the fact that we did that was a success, we learned on the process 15:09:35 ... next time we would have the high level message first, with the agrrement of the comm team 15:09:43 ... maybe have multiple flyers 15:09:45 q+ 15:10:57 ivan: the swedish office will use this for the first time, the first feedbacks are positive 15:11:09 susie: under the collateral, let us include the cool uri 15:11:23 ... it is more technical than initially expected sweo would create 15:11:39 ... i think that will be a valuable resource 15:11:46 ... something that it is very much needed 15:11:59 ... we should have put it into w3c process in an early stage 15:12:11 ... it would have given us better reviews 15:12:18 ... but it is something which is valuable 15:12:31 susie: community projects: the success around those are mixed 15:12:47 ... the lod is huegely successful, and it has its life of its own 15:13:02 ... the knowee may go forward, that is something else that might be successful 15:13:25 ... but kjetil could not put time into his community project, and the powder one did not start at all :-( 15:13:40 ... i do not know what we could have done differently 15:13:49 ... the steps of selection seemed good 15:14:16 susie: faq document has definitely been succesful 15:14:31 ... as i mentioned, Lilly uses it for its recruitement... 15:14:36 Zakim, who is talking? 15:14:41 susie: the case study is also very successful 15:14:49 Kjetil, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Susie (70%), kidehen (45%), Frank (4%), andrea (51%), Melli (40%) 15:14:52 ... people find it very useful 15:15:08 ... and it is referred to frequently 15:15:17 ... something that we should continue developing 15:15:24 susie: information gathering 15:15:34 ... something that we could have worked on a smoother fashion 15:15:44 ... different people had different ideas 15:15:58 ... it would have been wonderful to gather all the info with a shiny user interface 15:16:14 ... but in reality we do not have the resource to develop something like that, it was a tricky task 15:16:37 ... i guess again it would have been to be much more concrete at the very beginning with everybody in agreement 15:16:51 ... and then try to move forward, we lost a bit our direction 15:17:07 susie: the preferred document collection is still ongoing, and it is difficult to judge where it will progress 15:17:19 ... danny sent out some info, but it still needs polishing 15:17:28 ... it is also a tricky one to pursue 15:17:38 susie: the enterprise survey 15:17:55 ... it was good at the beginning to get feedback to help influence the group 15:18:02 ... we failed in writing the survey 15:18:13 ... the challenge there that we had a single person bottleneck:-( 15:18:21 ... that is also a lesson learnt 15:18:27 susie: logos 15:18:43 ... benji's view is that it is quite a success but not as much as suspected 15:18:56 ... benji worked a lot a tech logos 15:19:11 ... it seems like that we worked a lot on something that did not have a result 15:19:27 ... but our work pushed the comm team to really take the sw logo seriously 15:19:34 ... i think the outcome of the work is really good 15:19:41 ... having helped create this is good 15:19:57 susie: that is what we focussed on 15:20:03 ... i think we did good stuff 15:20:20 ... comments, thoughts, feeling, ideas? 15:20:28 q+ 15:20:32 ack ivan 15:20:35 ack Kjetil 15:21:07 Kjetil: good summary, we have been thinking about what our customer need? 15:21:51 ... the ent. survey was very important for us 15:22:00 ... but also for our own consulatncy company 15:22:11 ... it is something that we would commit to do in near future 15:22:34 ... so i think that is something that we would perhaps do another one 15:23:01 ... the problem was to have member using time on sweo work 15:23:16 ... it is a bit difficult to convince management to put manpower into sweo 15:23:37 ... whatever we would want should be more convicing for people who have the budge 15:23:56 susie: on the en. survey, it was a good resource for the sweo work 15:24:11 ... wing actually presented it on a meeting 15:24:32 ... but i agree that the survey was done 18 months ago, that is a while ago for tech area 15:24:33 It would be quite interesting to do a follow-up and compare, though i have no idea who has the bandwidth for it :) 15:24:43 ... maybe the new sweo might want to do it 15:24:54 ... the challenge is to get enough people to answer 15:25:14 ... for the current one, many responder did not answer all questions, only the simple one 15:25:31 ... it is also quite hard to get people to participate in sweo 15:25:44 ... we will have to work on the charter to be more concincing 15:26:19 ... when this group was started, we expected lots of marketing people, but the profile of the people participating did not match that 15:26:29 ... for the next one it is a challenge to get that... 15:26:34 q? 15:26:37 uldis has joined #sweo 15:26:44 q+ 15:27:08 +1 15:27:11 +1 15:27:15 +1 15:27:18 +1 15:27:19 ivan: I think that is the right time to thank Susie, who did a great job chairing! 15:27:21 +1 indeed 15:27:21 +5 15:27:21 +1 15:27:31 +1 15:27:33 + infinitie 15:27:39 ahaha 15:27:49 don't we all, zakim, don't we all. 15:27:57 Topic: extension 15:28:07 susie: last week we discussed the extension 15:28:17 ... we have not a comfirmation yet 15:28:30 ... but it is likely to be done 15:28:40 ... business presentation 15:28:44 ... uri document 15:28:55 ... benji's project 15:29:04 ... improvement of the use cases 15:29:20 ... document collection 15:30:11 MartinD has joined #SWEO 15:30:21 ... these are the items we used for an extension 15:30:36 +??P8 15:30:39 Zakim, ??P8 is me 15:30:39 +uldis; got it 15:30:41 ... if we get the extension, we will continue the calles 15:30:54 ... we would then continue on these topics 15:31:01 topic: business presentation 15:31:08 susie: jeff is not on the call 15:31:11 +??P9 15:31:16 ... but it seems to progress well 15:31:29 zakim, ??P9 is martin 15:31:29 +martin; got it 15:31:43 ... we got feedbacks from Ian Jacobs 15:31:45 + +49.176.2.aabb 15:31:54 zakim, aabb is Leo 15:31:54 +Leo; got it 15:32:18 ... ivan, lee and Ian provided feedbacks 15:32:32 ... we are finishing the document and then jeff can convert that into a set of slides 15:32:44 Topic: info gathering 15:33:10 susie: i looked at the web site, I still hit a couple of glitches 15:33:27 ... basically my browser had problems to go to any of the web sites 15:33:38 ... it kind of hangs, eg, on the sparql demo page 15:34:01 leo: when tim and I looked at it? 15:34:25 kingsley: is susie supposed to interact with w3c or the openlink site? 15:34:38 Susie: i used the official info gathering point 15:34:47 ... but i just want to look at the result 15:34:59 leo: the think the thing is a bit buggy 15:35:17 kidehen: it is not necessarily bug 15:36:22 kidehen: you should give me a list that you and tim agreed are issues 15:36:29 ... (to leo) 15:36:38 ... then i can look at some very specific items 15:36:45 ... then I can comment 15:36:56 Susie: Leo, you seem to have a list of things 15:38:00 action Leo: send to kingsley the agreed action items 15:38:07 topic: cool uri document 15:38:27 susie: it is likely that sweo will be extended, so leo, you will time to update the document 15:38:44 leo: i did not do anything yet, we are having tough project work here 15:38:51 ... I will then squeeze it in 15:39:54 ivan: if we get the extension, it may be two months, that might be your deadline 15:40:14 Susie: even if we get it, help of february would be a really good deadline 15:40:25 Leo: we may want to have another editor 15:40:35 Susie: what about asking danny? 15:40:51 ... richard and max? 15:41:03 ... max I do not think so, he has his phd to finish 15:41:14 ... richard is now at deri, but i will try 15:41:21 -Leo 15:41:35 Topic: use case 15:41:52 Melli: i expect to have the update done within a week or so 15:41:55 I didn't make progress this past week because my SWEO time went to the biz prez instead, sorry! back to use case facets this week :) 15:42:39 ivan: the use case project _will_ continue regardless of the extension 15:42:57 Topic: FAQ 15:43:07 -Melli 15:43:20 Susie: harry halpin submitted something on GRDDL 15:43:38 ivan: I have not seen it yet 15:44:07 Zakim, mute me 15:44:07 Kjetil should now be muted 15:44:19 ivan: we may also have an entry on the sparql followup 15:44:24 topic: preferred document 15:44:32 susie: danny is not here, no update 15:44:42 topic: comm project 15:45:02 kidehen: i am still waiting on the final dataset for a reload 15:45:10 ... there will be a conference 15:45:11 q+ 15:46:00 ivan: W3C has a track at the WWW conference, always with a SemWeb session 15:46:21 ivan: there will be a half-hour overview of linking open data project within that track 15:46:36 susie: knowee? 15:46:43 bengee: i am about to launch! 15:46:58 ... i hope to be able to launch it today! 15:47:06 :-) 15:47:17 Topic: AOB 15:47:25 1...2...3...... 15:47:37 +q 15:47:42 ack ivan 15:47:57 susie: i would like to thank everybody for their work and intpu 15:48:02 s/intpu/input/ 15:48:18 FrankC: I saw on the wiki next step that the use cases will be maintained 15:48:25 ... does it mean that we can add 15:48:34 ivan: YES! 15:48:47 FrankC: what is the procedure? 15:48:57 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/ 15:49:07 Susie: we have entered information on the page for submission 15:49:13 ... there is an email alias 15:49:35 member-sw-case-studies@w3.org 15:49:38 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/submit.html submission page 15:50:55 susie: we are all done... 15:50:55 +1 to susie for coordinating this... :-) 15:50:57 Zakim, unmute me 15:50:57 Kjetil should no longer be muted 15:51:01 ... thanks everybody 15:51:05 -Frank 15:51:05 adjourned 15:51:06 -kidehen 15:51:07 -Kjetil 15:51:07 -Susie 15:51:08 -JacekK 15:51:09 -uldis 15:51:10 kidehen has left #sweo 15:51:10 -martin 15:51:12 -LeeF 15:51:12 -benji 15:51:14 -andrea 15:51:16 -Ivan 15:51:18 SW_SWEO()10:00AM has ended 15:51:20 Attendees were LeeF, Ivan, Susie, benji, Frank, kidehen, andrea, Kjetil, JacekK, +1.603.886.aaaa, Melli, uldis, martin, +49.176.2.aabb, Leo 15:51:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:51:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/01/30-sweo-minutes.html ivan 15:53:38 bengee has left #sweo 16:02:40 and engaged the Topic Maps community in a bit of debate 16:05:05 yay Kjetil! :) 16:07:01 you know it is a good thing when random people with non-sensical nicks start mentioning SPARQL in forum posts ;-) 16:08:59 -Melli 16:53:31 MartinD has left #SWEO 17:56:13 ivan has joined #sweo 17:56:29 ivan has left #sweo 18:05:02 Zakim has left #sweo 18:26:56 MartinD has joined #SWEO 18:27:06 MartinD has left #SWEO