Susie Stephens wrote:
> 1. Personally, I feel OWL2 is a wrap-up of different recent efforts in the > OWL community from different research forces, such as EL from Dresden, QL > and RL from Manchester/Oxford. Given the usage of OWL 1.0 is quite limited > in the industry compare to the usage of RDF, it may cost many extra efforts > and is very challenging to teach system developers to use new OWL2, in > particular, identifying different subsets of OWL2 for developers with > limited logic background.
Personally, I feel the same. (see my other messages to the list for more technical comments by our group)
PeterPatel-Schneider 02:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Just point to response to 26.