LC3 Responses/GB1

To: barabucc@cs.unibo.it
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Subject: [LC response] To Gioele Barabucci

Dear Gioele,

Thank you for your comment
     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jul/0011.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

We have added a brief explanation of the acronyms and a statement about the relationship between the profiles to the introduction of the Profiles document and to the Primer. The diffs are:

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Profiles&diff=25087&oldid=24645
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=25100&oldid=25085

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,
Ian Horrocks
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group

CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.

PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL

could you please document the meaning of the EL, QL and DL acronyms in
the overview section of owl2-profiles and other OWL 2 documents?

Also, could you explicitly state whether an OWL 2 profile is a strict
subset of another?