Subject: [LC response] To Daniel Barclay
Thank you for your comment
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
You are correct in saying that this is an error; it has now been fixed.
Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.
PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL
In the rdf:plainLiteral specification at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-rdf-plain-literal-20090611/, in section 2, the first example says: ClassAssertion( a:i MinCardinality( n a:property DatatypeRestriction( xs:string xs:length 1 ) ) ) Those (top-level) arguments are backwards, right? (The OWL 2 Class Assertions specification section at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/#Class_Assertions specifies that the class-expression argument comes before the individual argument: 9.6.3 Class Assertions A class assertion ClassAssertion( CE a ) states that the individual a is an instance of the class expression CE. ClassAssertion := 'ClassAssertion' '(' axiomAnnotations ClassExpression Individual ')' )