13:10:47 RRSAgent has joined #xhtml 13:10:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/10/24-xhtml-irc 13:10:54 zakim, this will be xhtml 13:10:54 ok, Steven; I see IA_XHTML2()10:00AM scheduled to start in 50 minutes 13:12:26 rrsagent, make log public 13:12:41 Meeting: Weekly XHTML2 WG Teleconference 13:13:14 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Oct/0096 13:13:23 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Oct/0096 13:20:55 oedipus has joined #xhtml 13:21:17 Tina has joined #xhtml 13:30:30 ShaneM has joined #xhtml 13:32:29 myakura has joined #xhtml 13:36:56 ShaneM has joined #xhtml 13:48:12 alessio has joined #xhtml 13:49:16 hi 13:58:40 IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has now started 13:58:43 Schnitz has joined #xhtml 13:58:47 +Gregory_Rosmaita 13:58:49 zakim, code? 13:58:49 the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Schnitz 13:59:59 + +013868aaaa 14:00:17 Roland has joined #xhtml 14:00:38 markbirbeck has joined #xhtml 14:00:49 Regrets: Tina 14:01:04 zakim, dial steven-617 14:01:04 ok, Steven; the call is being made 14:01:06 +Steven 14:01:42 +ShaneM 14:01:43 yamx has joined #xhtml 14:01:43 zakim, codes? 14:01:44 I don't understand your question, markbirbeck. 14:01:47 zakim, 013 is Roland 14:01:47 sorry, Steven, I do not recognize a party named '013' 14:01:56 zakim, code? 14:01:56 the conference code is 94865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 14:02:01 + +1.303.410.aabb 14:02:01 zakim, +013 is Roland 14:02:02 +Roland; got it 14:02:09 +??P13 14:02:30 +??P14 14:02:30 zakim, ??p13 is me 14:02:31 +Schnitz; got it 14:02:33 +??P20 14:02:39 zakim, mute me 14:02:39 Schnitz should now be muted 14:02:57 Zakim, ??P15 is Rich 14:02:57 I already had ??P15 as ChriLi, Rich 14:03:05 Zakim, ??P14 is Rich 14:03:05 +Rich; got it 14:03:09 zakim, who is here? 14:03:09 On the phone I see Gregory_Rosmaita, Roland, Steven, ShaneM, +1.303.410.aabb, Schnitz (muted), Rich, ??P20 14:03:10 zakim, ??p20 is Alessio 14:03:14 On IRC I see yamx, markbirbeck, Roland, Schnitz, alessio, ShaneM, myakura, Tina, oedipus, RRSAgent, Zakim, Steven, Rich, krijnh 14:03:18 +Alessio; got it 14:04:03 -Alessio 14:04:14 Hi Shane 14:04:31 zakim, ??p14 is Alessio 14:04:31 I already had ??P14 as Rich, alessio 14:04:33 +??P20 14:04:43 zakim, ?P20 is yamx 14:04:43 sorry, yamx, I do not recognize a party named '?P20' 14:04:52 zakim, ??P20 is Yamx 14:04:52 +Yamx; got it 14:04:57 zakim, who is here? 14:04:57 On the phone I see Gregory_Rosmaita, Roland, Steven, ShaneM, +1.303.410.aabb, Schnitz (muted), Rich, Yamx 14:04:59 On IRC I see yamx, markbirbeck, Roland, Schnitz, alessio, ShaneM, myakura, Tina, oedipus, RRSAgent, Zakim, Steven, Rich, krijnh 14:05:11 zakim, Rich is Alessio 14:05:11 +Alessio; got it 14:05:19 zakim, aabb is Rich 14:05:19 +Rich; got it 14:05:24 zakim, who is here? 14:05:24 On the phone I see Gregory_Rosmaita, Roland, Steven, ShaneM, Rich, Schnitz (muted), Alessio, Yamx 14:05:26 On IRC I see yamx, markbirbeck, Roland, Schnitz, alessio, ShaneM, myakura, Tina, oedipus, RRSAgent, Zakim, Steven, Rich, krijnh 14:06:12 Scribe: Steven 14:06:28 Zakim, mute me 14:06:28 sorry, oedipus, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:06:37 zakim, mute Gregory_Rosmaita 14:06:37 Gregory_Rosmaita should now be muted 14:06:57 +??P21 14:07:09 zakim, i am ? 14:07:09 +markbirbeck; got it 14:07:10 GJR *should* be there -- our meeting conflicts with HTML WG meeting 14:08:53 U.S. changes at 2am 4 november 2007 14:09:11 I think japan time does NOT changte next week 14:09:33 the week after that there won't be a call. 14:10:22 Roland: The FtF is in a week and a half, unfortunately few of us will be there, so Steven and I will get together to decide what to do 14:10:38 Topic: Call times 14:10:50 Steven: European time changes next week, watch out! 14:11:03 ACTION Steven: send message about call times 14:11:19 ITS Best Practices 14:11:22 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Oct/0019 14:11:47 Topic: Reviews 14:12:04 Steven: Mark, Shane and I agreed to review ITS 14:12:08 ... no deadline though 14:12:21 Roland: Let's set one 14:12:36 Shane: 15 Nov? 14:12:39 Steven: OK 14:12:46 Mark: OK 14:13:37 Steven: CSS Mobile profile is realted to our work on Basic, so it was thought we should review 14:14:09 s/real/rela/ 14:14:18 ... deadline Nov 13 14:14:26 ... I would like to review 14:14:31 Yam: I will too 14:15:10 ACTION: Yam and Steven to review CSS Mobile Profile last call by Nov 13 14:15:24 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-css-mobile-20071019 14:15:46 Topic: Aria 14:16:09 Rich: What we have agreed is to have a meeting next week 14:16:16 ... with some other groups 14:16:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Oct/0098.html 14:17:01 joint meeting Wednesday, October 31 at 9:00AM EST, 13:00 GMT to build W3C consenus on supporting ARIA more easily and consistently between HTML, XHTML and SVG 14:17:31 Rich: We won't make decisions, only discuss the issues 14:17:44 ... it is to get ARIA into HTML, XHTML and SVG 14:18:05 ... there is a problem with colon in IE7 14:18:23 ... we don't wnat different solutions for different markups 14:18:33 s/wnat/want/ 14:18:54 Rich: I am in favoiur of aria-* for the attributes 14:19:23 Steve: saw RS' message - don't understand -- something to do with CSS and colons 14:19:46 Rich: CSS Selectors cannot be fired if have a colon in IE 14:19:53 Steve: problem with attribute selectors? 14:19:59 Rich: IE has them but buggy 14:20:30 Rich: IE7 has attribute selectors; to trigger, can't have colon delimited attribute; would have to refresh doc to pick up CSS change 14:21:25 Rich: if change value of an ARIA propert (checked from true to false) if use NS attribute, can't set CSS selector to trigger CSS styling; if remove colon and use aria dash, can set CSS Selector that will change with it, but to cause CSS to redraw, need to refresh page via javascript, then picked up 14:21:39 Steve: markup design based on bug in IE7 14:21:49 Rich: 70% use; years before goes away 14:22:09 Steve: heard from ChrisW that IE going to implement CSS 2.1 -- will it be fixed in IE 7.1 14:22:18 Rich: said that about IE7, too 14:22:31 Steve: bug in IE CSS Selectors determining markup? 14:22:44 Steve: IE7 *may* 14:23:22 q+ 14:23:36 Rich: had discussions with Marc Silbey of microsoft and email discussions with ChrisW -- no comitment as to date may be fixed; may not even be IE 7.1 could be IE 8 14:23:53 ???: would be useful to have ChrisW's take on this 14:24:19 Rich: hope call can remain small; ChrisW welcome to call; copied to PFWG 14:24:30 ??? = Roland 14:25:03 Steve: understand keen getting into firefox3 and next version of opera, so want agreed syntax now, but not convinced that part of the solution is based on a bug in one version of IE -- not sufficient reason for chosing a solution 14:25:16 Rich: don't see why needs namespacing? put role in, why not this? 14:26:35 Roland: things getting mixed up; focus on IE7 is irrelevant because no solution for IE6 -- one way of doing ARIA is binding mechanisms using CSS selectors using attributes, not work on IE6, so not a solution for ARIA; colon issue irrelevant -- need another technique to bind to library -- dojo, for example, walks DOM and finds attribute settings 14:26:41 Rich: dramatically increases download time 14:26:51 Roland: makes no sense 14:26:59 Rich: want to get away from writing all this script 14:27:07 Roland: only a solution for IE 7.x plus 14:27:54 Mark is doing most of the talking here, not Roland 14:28:48 Mark: first: naming convention used for attribute based on particular technique in ARIA -- could be lots of ways of implementing ARIA -- one is using CSS selectors, but not only way; doesn't HAVE to be done that way; bigger issue solutions for XML and XHTML -- big hole that is missing -- ghettoizing things; creating walls and wars between groups; should consider a number of namespacing techs; define in more abstract way 14:29:18 Mark: define role so 3 different ways to do same thing and cover all use cases 14:29:47 ???: what do we need to find a solution to? no real clear statement of problem -- several ways to address 14:29:57 Rich: want consistency across technologies 14:30:17 ???: one, 2, or three may be acceptable, or may choose 1 out of range of all possible solutions 14:31:04 Steve: advantage of namespacing -- will work in any XML based ML without designing new solution; why not SMIL use ARIA properties -- XML based -- if set of namespaced would work out of box 14:31:40 Rich: current ARIA spec does what you suggest; problem is XHTML serialization issue; want same thing for XHTML5 and HTML5 -- both without namespaces 14:31:45 Steve: XML without namespaces 14:31:59 Mark: chameleon and non-chamelon -- there are 2 ways 14:32:18 previous comment roland's 14:34:24 mark: have technology stack -- fairly verbose way of writing things (spell out namespaces, etc.) -- doesn't lend itself to hand-authored content or familiar content; XML namespaces over the top for HTML and XHTML -- not proposing new namespace, but having aria-checkbox instead of putting all into XML namespace 14:34:26 Rich: just put aria in xh role? 14:35:34 mark: any XML language should be able to list attributes and create validatable language -- SteveP's position; HTML -- why matter? no namespaces, so do what's simplest; 2 ends of spectrum 14:36:01 mark: firefox supports aria- could work in SVG -- what is point of differentiating the 2? 14:36:20 mark: not much different than XML events -- namespaced version and non-namespaced version 14:36:23 Steve: we do? 14:37:01 ???: can use ev: (e v colon) anywhere around element; ev-event could be global 14:37:22 ??: point of using namespacing is that works on DOM level? 14:37:52 mark: problem XML namespaces trying to solve -- 14:38:18 ??: convenient version and namespace version -- bring into namespace 14:38:50 ???: same for ARIA? attribute checkbox -- maybe should have adopted standard prefix convention 14:38:59 Steve: reinventing namespaces in a way 14:39:17 mark: problem with namespacing is that it imposes technology on people not all software supports 14:39:39 roland: have to explore all alternatives; expand alternatives via 31 october meeting 14:40:05 so is the problem "how do we scope attribute names and element names in a world where namespaces dont work" ? 14:40:09 Roland: Shall we continue, or move on 14:40:22 Mark: We need to be cross-cutting 14:40:41 ... take a step back and before we assume it can't be done, we need to ask some hard questions 14:41:04 ... then we could make these technologies available in many more places 14:41:05 big plus one to stepping back and trying to adopt a standard prefix convention -- ARIA in DAISY (XML-based) 14:41:20 Roland: We need a solution, how urgent is this? 14:41:27 next generation of DAISY will be CDF for all intents and purposes 14:41:33 Rich: If we miss Firefox 3, we miss a year 14:42:02 ... if we agree on aria- and then fix corrs-cutting issues, that would be good 14:42:09 s/corss/cross/ 14:42:25 Rich: I want to use this as a catalyst 14:42:32 ... for instance for RDFa 14:42:51 RDFa been mentioned before as ARIA implementation model 14:42:57 Mark: We shouldn't lose aria:checkbox, but also include the alternate syntax 14:43:34 ... we should seriously consider whether to include both versions of the attributes 14:43:47 objection came from SVG 14:44:02 Steven: Wasn't hyphen a problem? I thought some wanted underscore? 14:44:07 Rich: No decision yet 14:44:10 objection to underscore mostly "aesthetic" and "ergonomic" -- no real basis for objecting to underscore 14:44:21 no real arguments against underscore have been advanced 14:44:32 GJR would like to be on call 14:44:42 Roland: Who will participate next week in the call? 14:44:46 Steven: I will 14:44:53 Mark: I will try to be there 14:45:28 Roland: About publications and roadmap 14:45:36 ... we have others that are ready to go 14:45:44 Topic: Pubs 14:45:51 Roland: What is ready to go? 14:45:57 Shane: A FPWD of access 14:46:18 ... do we have a shortname? 14:46:26 Steven: Good question. I will check 14:46:29 plus one to access module public working draft as soon as practicable 14:46:36 ACTION: Steven assure there is a shortname for the access module 14:47:21 Shane: Next - XML Events 2l we have a shortname, and a FPWD, so on to the next version 14:47:31 s/|/,/ 14:47:43 Shane: CURIE draft 14:47:50 ... with changes foillowing RDFa 14:48:03 s/foil/foll/ 14:48:22 Shane: Those three are ready to turn the crank 14:48:32 .... XHTML2 once updated with RDFa can go 14:48:49 Roland: Everyone OK with that? 14:50:04 preliminary PF comments (with accompanying thread) begin at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2007OctDec/0028.html 14:50:07 should finalize today at PF telecon (noon boston time today) 14:50:11 Steven: And I will push M12N through its transition, either to CR or PR, depending on whether we can have a zero-length CR 14:50:45 Roland: Shane will ensure that there is an XHTML2 EWD, in order to progress to WD 14:51:12 Shane: There is a whole bunch of stuffr in XHTML2 that defines how RDFa works, and that needs to be pulled and refer to the RDFa draft 14:51:24 similar to TAG complaint about CURIES in XHTML Role? 14:52:06 Mark: What is different in XHTML2 that isn't in the modules 14:52:25 Steven: section etc, and some global attributes like media href src 14:52:45 Shane: [scribe missed] 14:53:48 first forms/html wg joint task force telecon may be 31 october 2007, as well 14:53:48 Mark: We might be able to do an XHTML 1.2 that includes the existing modules 14:54:08 Steven: THen the step to XHTML2 is smaller 14:54:14 s/TH/Th/ 14:54:29 Mark: Meta and link everywhere is hard in existing browsers 14:54:44 ... but otherwise, I would propose we do it, if it is on our charter 14:56:18 Steven: Well, we produced XHTML1.1+RDFa without a sepc 14:56:38 ... we have the modules on our charter, we just make a DTD/scvhema that combines them 14:56:43 s/sepc/spec/ 14:56:46 s/sepc/spec/ 14:57:05 s/scvh/sch/ 14:57:32 Roland: Let's get our modules out, and then decide what we want to do with them 14:57:36 Topic: AOB 14:59:15 Rich: Is there any coordination on who owns the XHTML namespace? 14:59:24 Steven: Yes, will be talked about at the TP I think 14:59:37 -ShaneM 14:59:39 -Roland 14:59:40 -Alessio 14:59:41 bye 14:59:41 -markbirbeck 14:59:42 -Yamx 14:59:43 -Rich 14:59:44 -Gregory_Rosmaita 14:59:44 -Steven 14:59:45 -Schnitz 14:59:46 IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has ended 14:59:52 Shane: It is on the W3M management call today 14:59:52 Attendees were Gregory_Rosmaita, +013868aaaa, Steven, ShaneM, +1.303.410.aabb, Roland, Schnitz, Alessio, Yamx, Rich, markbirbeck 14:59:52 alessio has joined #xhtml 15:00:14 Shane: But just because it is in the namesapce doesn't mean it is in the language 15:00:22 Steven: It is a non-problem really 15:00:32 Mark: Unless someone changes the meaning of something 15:00:43 [ADJOURN] 15:00:49 rrsagent, make minutes 15:00:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/24-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:04:12 markbirbeck and schnitz - is wednesday 31 october, from 1700 UCT to 1800 UCT or 1800 UCT to 1900 UCT work for joint forms task force call? 15:04:58 rrsagent, make minutes 15:04:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/24-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:05:42 Chair: Roland 15:06:06 s/Steve:/Steven:/G 15:07:23 i/saw RS' message/Scribe: oedipus 15:07:32 rrsagent, make minutes 15:07:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/24-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:08:15 i/so is the problem "how /Scribe: Steven 15:09:19 rrsagent, make minutes 15:09:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/24-xhtml-minutes.html Steven 15:11:25 oedipus, yep would work for me 15:12:11 thanks schnitz -- that's currently the leading 2 candidates (31 october at 1700 UCT or 1800 UCT for 1 hour) 16:08:42 ShaneM has left #xhtml 16:39:25 Zakim has left #xhtml