18:40:57 RRSAgent has joined #xmlprotocol 18:40:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-irc 18:41:03 rrsagent, make log member 18:41:09 zakim, this will be xmlp 18:41:09 ok, cferris; I see WS_XMLP()3:00PM scheduled to start in 19 minutes 19:00:42 WS_XMLP()3:00PM has now started 19:00:49 +Chris_Ferris 19:01:06 Jonathan has joined #xmlprotocol 19:01:53 Topic: agenda - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2007Oct/0000.html 19:03:47 anish has joined #xmlprotocol 19:04:20 +Jonathan_Marsh 19:06:32 +Yves 19:07:48 Present: Chris, Yves, Jonathan, Anish 19:08:41 scribe: cferris 19:08:52 topic: approval of minutes 19:09:00 minutes from 9/12 approved as posted 19:09:08 topic: administrative 19:09:24 deferred 19:09:29 topic: action items 19:09:52 [DONE] ACTION: Chris to create issue from Mark's email and close with no action 19:10:16 [DONE] ACTION: Chris to follow-up with Yves to make [publication] happen next week 19:10:34 [PENDING] ACTION: Chris to upload new implementation page. 19:11:23 topic: MTOM Policy LC issues 19:11:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2007Oct/0005.html 19:13:49 Fabian proposes to delete the 3rd paragraph and add the fourth in his change proposal 19:15:28 +Anish 19:15:32 jonathan: not sure that is quite right 19:16:07 chris: what if we removed "in the absence of such an indicator"? 19:16:17 jonathan: thinking... 19:18:25 jonathan: looking at 4506 19:19:26 the last sentence in the issue resolution was: "To ensure that a response message is serialized as application/xop+xml a client 19:19:26 can send an application/xop+xml request message." 19:20:04 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4506 19:20:16 chris: looks like cut-n-paste error 19:20:23 jonathan: yes, looks that way 19:20:43 ... just add "To " to the 3rd paragraph 19:21:02 chris: all agree to adopt original resolution and add word "To"? 19:21:39 jonathan: still slightly lost, think adding "To" is right 19:22:40 unanimous 19:23:26 RESOLUTION: close issue 5173 by adding "To" to the garbled sentence and move to 4th paragraph as in the original issue resolution for 4506 19:23:30 OK followed all the links - don't see anything that modifies the "to". 19:23:30 rrsagent, where am i? 19:23:30 See http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-23-30-1 19:24:14 ACTION: Chris to send response to Fabian with WG's resolution 19:26:33 RESOLUTION: agree that citations should be consistent and that we need to recheck all the links to ensure that they are all current 19:26:39 rrsagent, where am i? 19:26:39 See http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-26-39 19:26:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2007Sep/0000.html 19:26:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2007Sep/0000.html 19:28:13 anish: can we update homepage to link to bugzilla? 19:28:22 yves: sure, I updated but will check 19:28:46 ACTION: Chris to respond to Mohamed re: 5174 19:29:14 chris: next issue 5175 19:29:15 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5175 19:30:50 chris: agrees 19:31:12 jonathan: may be overkill to include references to multipart/related and XOP 19:33:08 side note: resolution of Fabian's issue is in the edcopy (and edcopy updated. 19:33:14 jonathan: replace "using" with ... 19:34:59 chris: here's what sect 1 says now: 19:35:00 This specification describes a domain-specific policy assertion for the SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism W3C Recommentation [MTOM] that can be specified within a policy alternative as defined in Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework [WS-Policy]. For backwards compatibility, the policy assertion can also be used in conjunction with the SOAP 1.1 Binding for MTOM 1.0 [MTOMS11] Member Submission. 19:36:04 anish: he is adding second sentence 19:36:43 jonathan: let's accept what he has suggested 19:37:11 anish: what does change is whether section 4 is implied by the assertion or not 19:37:22 ... sect 4 is about http/soap features 19:37:42 ... think it says how soap/http binding deals with the feature 19:38:17 chris: in abstract only references section 3 19:38:39 anish: if I have this on a binding that is soap/http, am I required to do what section 4 sez? 19:38:58 ... and if I put it on a non-soap/http binding, what does it mean 19:39:13 chris: get rid of section reference altogether? 19:39:28 anish: if we want this to be used for other bindings... 19:39:33 jonathan: which we do 19:52:51 anish: for intro, what ram proposes is okay 19:53:10 jonathan: good with ram's proposal 19:57:09 RESOLUTION: issue 5175 closed with proposal from Ram as described in issue 19:57:14 rrsagent, where am i? 19:57:14 See http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-57-14 19:57:54 ACTION: Chris to respond to Ram re issue resolution for 5175 19:58:30 ACTION: Chris to open new issue related to discussion above for reinforcing section 3.3 as specific to binding protocol details 19:58:48 ACTION: Anish to draft proposal for new issue against section 3.3 19:59:58 topic: review of ws-policy primer and guidelines 20:00:07 no takers 20:00:31 ACTION: Chris to reply to Paul regarding no action/comments from XMLP WG on primer and guidelines 20:01:33 -Anish 20:01:34 -Jonathan_Marsh 20:01:35 -Chris_Ferris 20:01:36 -Yves 20:01:38 WS_XMLP()3:00PM has ended 20:01:39 call next week 20:01:39 Attendees were Chris_Ferris, Jonathan_Marsh, Yves, Anish 20:01:56 NO call the following week due to ws-i f2f and anish in tokyo 20:02:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-minutes.html anish 20:02:14 rrsagent, please draft minutes 20:02:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-xmlprotocol-minutes.html cferris 20:02:27 adjourned 20:38:03 Noah has joined #xmlprotocol 21:20:26 cferris has left #xmlprotocol 22:15:05 Zakim has left #xmlprotocol