11:51:00 RRSAgent has joined #eo 11:51:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc 11:51:12 zakim ,this will be eowg 11:51:16 zakim, this will be eowg 11:51:16 ok, shawn; I see WAI_EOWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 39 minutes 11:51:22 chair: Shawn 11:52:09 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0092.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html 11:52:25 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html 11:52:37 shawn has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html 12:17:15 agenda+ Agenda review 12:17:24 agenda+ Quick Reference: general 12:17:33 agenda+ Quick Reference: Introduction 12:17:50 agenda+ Quick Reference: customizing section 12:18:15 agenda+ Quick Reference: conformance & other 12:18:29 agenda+ Quick Reference: title 12:18:43 agenda+ WAI-ARIA documents 12:25:21 shadi has joined #eo 12:28:09 agenda+ F2F meeting, hotel 12:29:10 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has now started 12:29:11 +Shadi 12:29:33 zakim, dial shawn-617 12:29:33 ok, shawn; the call is being made 12:29:34 +Shawn 12:29:46 Harvey has joined #eo 12:30:32 Henny has joined #eo 12:31:29 + +020851aaaa 12:31:32 judy has joined #eo 12:31:49 zakim, aaaa is really Henny 12:31:49 +Henny; got it 12:32:41 Alan has joined #eo 12:33:24 Wayne has joined #eo 12:33:54 +doyle 12:34:04 regrets: Andrew, Jack 12:34:12 +??P7 12:34:28 zakim, ? is really Sylvie 12:34:28 +Sylvie; got it 12:35:25 zakim, who is here? 12:35:25 On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny, doyle, Sylvie 12:35:26 On IRC I see Wayne, Alan, judy, Henny, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn 12:35:27 scribe: Shadi 12:35:33 agenda? 12:35:50 +Wayne_Dick 12:35:54 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:35:58 agendum 1. "Agenda review" taken up [from shawn] 12:36:02 +??P10 12:36:11 zakim, ??P10 is me 12:36:11 +Alan; got it 12:36:30 slh: who had a look at the documents for reading? 12:36:34 Sylvie has joined #eo 12:36:45 zakim, mute Henny 12:36:45 Henny should now be muted 12:36:59 sd: quick reference, and sent comments 12:37:19 wd: quick reference briefly, WAI-ARIA more closely 12:37:35 ac: WAI-ARIA overwhelmed me 12:37:45 zakim, mute me 12:37:45 Shadi should now be muted 12:37:47 zakim, who is making noise? 12:37:58 zakim, take up agendum 2 12:37:58 agendum 2. "Quick Reference: general" taken up [from shawn] 12:38:03 +[LC] 12:38:05 Alan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sylvie (6%), doyle (9%) 12:38:18 zakim, [LC] is Justin 12:38:18 +Justin; got it 12:38:34 zakim, unmute Henny 12:38:34 Henny should no longer be muted 12:38:40 ac: intimidating, lots of content 12:39:12 slh: other first reactions? 12:39:25 hs: agree with ac, lots of stuff there 12:39:35 ...especially for recurring users 12:39:51 ...maybe have a cover page for first-time users? 12:40:45 wd: is the form functional? for example, selected scripting and it gave me everything 12:40:49 zakim, mute Henny 12:40:49 Henny should now be muted 12:41:48 Liam has joined #eo 12:43:35 wd: wasn't very helpful, gave me too much 12:43:51 zakim, take up agendum 3 12:43:51 agendum 3. "Quick Reference: Introduction" taken up [from shawn] 12:44:35 zakim, unmute henny 12:44:35 Henny should no longer be muted 12:44:39 slh: most said this was long, where can we cut it down? 12:45:06 ...issue with cover page is that some people may be directly pointed to this part 12:45:45 hs: can select to hide introduction, not sure if people will find it 12:45:47 no 12:46:04 slh: who found that? 12:46:38 slh: what if it was right beside the introduction? 12:46:45 [agreement] 12:47:04 jt: after i've read it, just hide 12:47:05 zakim, mute Henny 12:47:05 Henny should now be muted 12:47:56 saz: not convinced that cover page wouldn't work, we can point there pretty clearly 12:48:10 ...like on the tools list. but either options work for me 12:48:18 zakim, unmute Henny 12:48:18 Henny should no longer be muted 12:48:44 slh: what are the pros and cons of having a separate cover page vs having the show/hide option? 12:48:53 +Liam_McGee 12:49:26 ds: separate page makes it more readable to me, long text is opposite to a *quick* reference 12:49:51 ...but something immediately clear that it can be customized works 12:50:07 slh: do we need both show/hide and cover page? 12:50:16 zakim, mute Henny 12:50:16 Henny should now be muted 12:50:19 wd: no, its too much 12:50:23 [agreement] 12:50:53 action: suggest the show/hide option around the heading of the introduction 12:51:49 slh: any information that is not necessary? 12:54:00 sd: first sentence should come later 12:54:11 Am unable to join by phone What is the proper phone number? 12:54:13 slh: note that this will not stay there 12:54:37 [agreement with sd] 12:55:47 lmg: better to tell people what this resource is before pointing them to a different one 12:56:06 slh: any reasons not to switch the first & second paragraphs? 12:56:27 wd: not sure if it should be a paragraph 12:57:15 action: suggest to switch first and second introduction paragraphs 12:57:54 zakim, code? 12:57:54 the conference code is 3694 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), shadi 12:58:19 zakim, unmute henny 12:58:19 Henny should no longer be muted 12:59:08 jt: not sure why that last paragraph is there, sounds more like a disclaimer 12:59:24 hs: is more supplementary information, not for the user 12:59:33 slh: not user-centric? 12:59:41 [agreement] 13:00:01 zakim, mute Henny 13:00:01 Henny should now be muted 13:00:57 jt: don't think rewording will help, it shouldn't be up there 13:01:02 wd: it should go 13:02:42 slh: important to know that techniques are not exhaustive, there are other ways to meet the success criteria 13:03:19 wd: see people not able to understand these terms, rely on me to explain it 13:05:11 lmg: can shorten several parts, much of the information is additional and not often needed 13:05:21 Henny_ has joined #eo 13:05:23 ...for example sufficient techniques 13:05:32 ...vs adivsory techniques 13:05:40 q+ 13:06:44 saz: maybe additional information page? 13:06:53 slh: will be such a page 13:07:24 q- 13:08:17 zakim, mute Henny 13:08:17 Henny was already muted, Henny_ 13:09:06 wd: in my mind, "informative" is unecessary and i often ignore it 13:09:33 slh: how does that term for people not heavily involved with standards? 13:09:44 jt: doesn't tell me anything 13:09:44 zakim, who is here? 13:09:44 On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny (muted), doyle, Sylvie (muted), Wayne_Dick, Alan (muted), Justin, Liam_McGee 13:09:46 On IRC I see Henny_, Liam, Sylvie, Wayne, Alan, judy, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn 13:10:03 wd: should drop it 13:11:05 lmg: information ... not required for conformance -maybe not something useful to say to everyone 13:11:17 s/information/informative 13:11:49 saz: usual developer not care normative, or informative 13:12:24 Suggested minimum: This Quick Reference is based on the 17 May 2007 WCAG 2.0 draft. Anyone can submit new techniques to the Working Group at any time. For additional information on WCAG 2.0 and its supporting documents see Overview of WCAG 2.0 Documents. 13:12:24 saz: usual developer not care normative, or informative 13:13:24 action: suggest to only include the absolute minimum in the introduction, and move other information else where 13:13:30 zakim, take up next 13:13:30 agendum 1. "Agenda review" taken up [from shawn] 13:13:48 zakim, take up agendum 3 13:13:48 agendum 3. "Quick Reference: Introduction" taken up [from shawn] 13:13:51 zakim, take up agendum 4 13:13:51 agendum 4. "Quick Reference: customizing section" taken up [from shawn] 13:14:19 zakim, close agendum 1, 2, 3 13:14:19 I don't understand 'close agendum 1, 2, 3', shadi 13:14:25 zakim, close agendum 1 13:14:25 agendum 1, Agenda review, closed 13:14:27 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 13:14:28 2. Quick Reference: general [from shawn] 13:14:28 zakim, close agendum 2 13:14:28 agendum 2, Quick Reference: general, closed 13:14:29 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 13:14:30 zakim, close agendum 3 13:14:31 4. Quick Reference: customizing section [from shawn] 13:14:32 agendum 3, Quick Reference: Introduction, closed 13:14:33 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 13:14:34 4. Quick Reference: customizing section [from shawn] 13:15:02 slh: what is the benefit of the scripting version? 13:15:26 ...see difference to without scripts 13:16:46 q+ to comment on scripts 13:16:51 jt: recurring submissions seems tedious 13:17:21 lmg: changes after submissions are not clear 13:17:52 zakim, unmute Henny 13:17:52 Henny should no longer be muted 13:18:01 slh: do people like the scripting? 13:18:05 q+ 13:18:13 wd: doesn't really help 13:18:21 jt: doesn't help me at all 13:19:19 hs: relatively new paradigm of interface, not sure if people are already used to it 13:19:59 ac: it is meant for experienced users, they can learn how to use this document 13:20:14 ...customization is important 13:20:40 zakim, mute henny 13:20:40 Henny should now be muted 13:20:48 ack me 13:20:50 slh: customization will be kept, the javascript is the question 13:21:24 wd: scripting gets into the way of people who can't use scripting 13:22:01 ...but not in this case 13:22:40 slh: everyone gets the button regardless if scripting or not 13:23:27 zakim, unmute henny 13:23:27 Henny should no longer be muted 13:23:53 lmg: are we talking about the customization function or the submit button? 13:24:57 slh: do people like the function of selecting a checkbox and having things showing/hiding without submitting? 13:25:04 ack sylvie 13:25:04 Sylvie, you wanted to comment on scripts 13:25:28 sd: depends on the users, designers and developers may like it 13:25:47 ...but people with disabilities may be disturbed by it 13:26:24 q+ to say that checking a checkbox should not prompt a page reload. 13:26:25 ...maybe people will not understand why the page suddenly changes 13:26:43 ...or why the button suddenly appears 13:27:07 ...the text "save setting options" is not clear to me 13:28:04 q+ to ask whether you can hide all three levels (A, AA and AAA). 13:28:19 zakim, mute henny 13:28:19 Henny should now be muted 13:28:56 zakim, mute Sylvie 13:28:56 Sylvie should now be muted 13:29:17 -Alan 13:30:08 saz: like the overall function, the target audience is designers and developers (even if with disabilities) 13:30:26 ...can improve a lot of the usability but the function helps 13:30:54 zakim, unmute henny 13:30:54 Henny should no longer be muted 13:32:01 q- 13:32:05 queue/ henny 13:32:13 jt: not aparent that my actions had any effects, don't know what changed 13:33:57 lmg: script can either submit the page which would cause a reload, or to show/hide which gives no clues on the changes 13:34:24 zakim, mute henny 13:34:24 Henny should now be muted 13:34:27 hs: if one gets a message notification it may help 13:36:26 slh: issue if a lot of things are unselected, then anchors don't work well 13:37:01 saz: how did the usability tests with designers/developers work? 13:37:33 slh: can't remember 13:37:59 wd: really can't detect the differences when changes are made 13:40:27 jt: correlation between SC 1.1.1 and CSS may not be clear to everyone 13:40:41 saz: not the scripting issue 13:40:52 slh: relates to wd's observation 13:41:36 action: raise bug that when CSS is not selected, still get CSS advisory techniques 13:45:33 wd: push out everything on you in case you might miss something but in turn it hides what you need to find 13:46:42 A person with blindness or low vision has no programatic way to find the essential search items. 13:47:20 saz: focusing on CSS, versus evaluating a page that includes CSS 13:47:46 saz: perhaps additional options for different use case 13:49:00 +Judy 13:50:00 -Wayne_Dick 13:50:14 agenda? 13:51:27 lmg: having thoughts about turning on/off 13:51:39 ...the semantics don't seem to work 13:52:49 lmg: turning sections on/off is not consistent, for example can't turn off the TOC 13:53:23 q+ 13:53:30 ...can turn off A, AA, and AAA -don't see why this is useful 13:53:34 ack j 13:54:21 jb: rationale was so that one could see the most basic requirements -the guidelines 13:55:49 lmg: why are techniques and failures together? 13:56:06 slh: because WG thinks that it is important 13:56:20 lmg: what if someone wants to see the failures alone? 13:56:33 slh: relates back to wd's point, need to rediscuss 13:57:06 lmg: should automatically save settings 13:57:09 q+ 13:57:33 q+ to say that the setting changes should be an option, because i might want to do something different the next time i use it. 13:58:17 slh: what happens when you go away and come back later? 13:58:37 saz: can be notified that settings are preset 13:58:40 ack j 13:58:40 judy, you wanted to say that the setting changes should be an option, because i might want to do something different the next time i use it. 13:58:42 q- 13:59:41 saz: i hear cookies and privacy concerns... 13:59:42 zakim, who's here? 13:59:42 On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny (muted), doyle, Sylvie (muted), Justin, Liam_McGee, Judy 13:59:44 On IRC I see Henny_, Liam, Sylvie, judy, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn 14:02:03 lmg: have an issue with the labeling -in forms mode screen reader users often tend to miss headers 14:02:26 ...prefer to have slightly longer labels like "show CSS" etc 14:02:57 ...add verbs like "show" to have a better construction 14:03:44 ...take out the labels on the fieldsets 14:06:29 sd: notes will be missed unless read line-by-line 14:07:58 action: in the customizing section, add a disabled checkbox with the HTML that is always selected (as opposed to the note) 14:09:36 zakim, mute sylvie 14:09:36 Sylvie should now be muted 14:11:35 lmg: suggest to remove the notification in the red brackets 14:12:01 ...suggest to notify through the heading and the title 14:12:32 slh: issue is how to communicate once a customization is made 14:13:30 +Bingham 14:15:26 saz: understood lmg saying take out legends for the fieldsets but therefore have more elaborate labels for the individual controls 14:16:41 agenda? 14:16:53 zakim, close agendum 4 14:16:53 agendum 4, Quick Reference: customizing section, closed 14:16:54 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:16:55 5. Quick Reference: conformance & other [from shawn] 14:17:04 zakim, take up agendum 5 14:17:04 agendum 5. "Quick Reference: conformance & other" taken up [from shawn] 14:17:10 zakim, unmute henny 14:17:10 Henny should no longer be muted 14:17:33 slh: who realized that at the bottom were conformance requirements? 14:17:41 [1 yes, 2 no] 14:18:09 lmg: kind of a prize for the ones who read all the way to the end 14:18:14 zakim, mute henny 14:18:14 Henny should now be muted 14:18:41 zakim, unmute sylvie 14:18:41 Sylvie should no longer be muted 14:19:53 lmg: it's there just in case you may need it 14:19:54 jt: doesn't fit with the quick reference 14:20:22 zakim, unmute henny 14:20:22 Henny should no longer be muted 14:20:29 sd: maybe a page navigation (like on the other WAI pages) listing the

s 14:21:07 lmg: move the table of contents as a page navigation? 14:21:21 zakim, mute henny 14:21:21 Henny should now be muted 14:21:35 sd: no, TOC is too long, a brief overview 14:21:36 zakim, mute Sylvie 14:21:36 Sylvie should now be muted 14:22:55 zakim, take up agendum 8 14:22:55 agendum 8. "F2F meeting, hotel" taken up [from shawn] 14:23:09 slh: very busy time of the year in boston 14:23:37 ...if you are planning to stay at the conference hotel, please make your reservations soon 14:23:44 ...preferably today 14:24:26 Topic: new Chair 14:24:49 jb: i'm stepping down from my role as EOWG chair to focus on other WAI work 14:25:06 ...especially on WAI-AGE and other standard harmonization work 14:25:20 ...slh will be the new chair 14:26:03 ...the work in this group is really important to me, think it is vital 14:26:19 ...will continue to participate, but no longer as chair 14:26:58 ...it was an honor to chair the group, hoping you will continue to support Shawn 14:27:23 ...really important work being used by people all around the world 14:27:42 ds: big hug, will miss you being around all the time 14:27:45 zakim, unmute henny 14:27:45 Henny should no longer be muted 14:27:58 ...your heart had been in this 14:30:06 -doyle 14:30:07 -Justin 14:30:08 -Henny 14:30:10 -Shadi 14:30:11 -Sylvie 14:30:12 -Liam_McGee 14:30:16 -Judy 14:31:21 Liam has left #eo 14:37:02 -Bingham 14:37:04 -Shawn 14:37:06 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended 14:37:07 Attendees were Shadi, Shawn, +020851aaaa, Henny, doyle, Sylvie, Wayne_Dick, Alan, Justin, Liam_McGee, Judy, Bingham 14:56:57 zakim, bye 14:56:58 Zakim has left #eo 14:57:06 rrsagent, make logs world 14:57:12 rrsagent, make minutes 14:57:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-minutes.html shadi 14:57:13 rrsagent, make logs world 14:57:17 rrsagent, bye 14:57:17 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-actions.rdf : 14:57:17 ACTION: suggest the show/hide option around the heading of the introduction [1] 14:57:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T12-50-53 14:57:17 ACTION: suggest to switch first and second introduction paragraphs [2] 14:57:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T12-57-15 14:57:17 ACTION: suggest to only include the absolute minimum in the introduction, and move other information else where [3] 14:57:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T13-13-24 14:57:17 ACTION: raise bug that when CSS is not selected, still get CSS advisory techniques [4] 14:57:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T13-41-36 14:57:17 ACTION: in the customizing section, add a disabled checkbox with the HTML that is always selected (as opposed to the note) [5] 14:57:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T14-07-58