13:59:28 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:59:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc 13:59:30 RRSAgent, make logs member 13:59:30 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:59:32 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:59:32 ok, trackbot-ng; I see MWI_BPWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:59:33 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:59:35 Date: 11 September 2007 13:59:53 rrsagent, make logs member 14:00:22 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has now started 14:00:23 Chair: Jo 14:00:26 + +1.519.880.aaaa 14:00:29 zakim says i am the only one on the bridge 14:00:38 this seems unlikely to me 14:00:39 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0001.html 14:00:49 zakim, who is here? 14:00:50 On the phone I see +1.519.880.aaaa 14:00:56 On IRC I see RRSAgent, jo, kemp, abel, matt, trackbot-ng 14:01:02 Magnus has joined #bpwg 14:01:11 yes 14:01:14 OK 14:01:23 zakim, aaaa is kemp 14:01:28 +kemp; got it 14:01:32 zakim, code? 14:01:40 the conference code is 2283 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jo 14:02:10 +jo 14:02:13 -kemp 14:02:15 +kemp 14:02:23 +Magnus_Lonnroth 14:02:27 Andrew has joined #bpwg 14:02:43 +Rodrigo 14:02:52 rob has joined #bpwg 14:02:55 zakim, Rodrigo is me 14:02:55 +abel; got it 14:03:49 + +078997aabb 14:03:53 + +079320aacc 14:04:11 +SeanPatterson 14:04:24 zakim, aabb is Andrew 14:04:24 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' 14:04:40 zakim, aacc is Rob 14:04:40 +Rob; got it 14:04:46 zakim, who is here? 14:04:46 On the phone I see kemp, jo, Magnus_Lonnroth, abel, Rob, +079320aadd, +1.630.414.aaee 14:04:48 On IRC I see rob, Andrew, Magnus, Zakim, RRSAgent, jo, kemp, abel, matt, trackbot-ng 14:05:17 zakim, aaee is SeanPatterson 14:05:18 +SeanPatterson; got it 14:05:28 zakim, aadd is ROb 14:05:28 +ROb; got it 14:05:35 zakim, ROb is Rob 14:05:35 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'ROb' 14:06:39 SeanPatterson has joined #bpwg 14:06:53 scribenick: rob 14:07:28 Topic: Problem Statement 14:07:39 zakim, who is here? 14:07:39 On the phone I see kemp, jo, Magnus_Lonnroth, abel, Rob, ROb, SeanPatterson 14:07:43 On IRC I see SeanPatterson, rob, Andrew, Magnus, Zakim, RRSAgent, jo, kemp, abel, matt, trackbot-ng 14:08:28 zakim, Rob is really andrew 14:08:28 sorry, jo, I do not recognize a party named 'Rob' 14:08:53 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0001.html 14:09:40 jo: Jo posted new draft of problem statement Friday last week 14:09:53 ... Any review comments? 14:10:01 Magnus: fine 14:10:22 ... ref HTTP spec things are copied verbatim from 14:10:55 -> New draft http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/070907 14:12:20 jo: re-weaved section 1 substantially 14:12:45 Andrew: on 1st sight looks easier to get into 14:14:00 jo: want to put this in front of BPWG (this draft) to show direction we're moving off in 14:14:08 ACTION: Jo to move terminology section to an appendix in Problem Statement Document 14:14:23 Created ACTION-553 - Move terminology section to an appendix in Problem Statement Document [on Jo Rabin - due 2007-09-18]. 14:15:05 Magnus: in section 2 can't find the 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 headlines - where are they? 14:15:13 -> Guidelines http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/2007-08/CTGuidelines.html 14:15:54 jo: they are contents titles in the guidelines doc itself, not in the problem statement 14:16:21 -> TF HOme Page http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/Overview.html 14:17:46 -SeanPatterson 14:18:26 jo: ed note requesting comments in techniques section - would the statement benefit from moving the techniques alongside the problem narrative? 14:18:41 +SeanPatterson 14:18:57 Andrew: agree would be better not to have a techniques section in the problem statement 14:19:34 Magnus: except to note the HTTP spec contains a lot of useful techniques that exist already 14:21:07 jo: eg Cache-Control: no-transform and Via: 14:21:22 ACTION: Magnus to draft a passage on possible use of existing HTTP headers with examples 14:21:22 Created ACTION-554 - Draft a passage on possible use of existing HTTP headers with examples [on Magnus Lönnroth - due 2007-09-18]. 14:22:28 ACTION: Jo to raise an issue on folding the second section into the first to make the document clearer 14:22:35 Andrew has joined #bpwg 14:22:39 Created ACTION-555 - Raise an issue on folding the second section into the first to make the document clearer [on Jo Rabin - due 2007-09-18]. 14:23:58 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Current draft of problem statement to be brought to BPWG as a work in progress 14:24:05 +1 14:24:08 +1 14:24:14 +1 14:24:17 RESOLUTION: Current draft of problem statement to be brought to BPWG as a work in progress 14:25:28 -> Actions on Problem Statement http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/11 14:25:48 jo: briefly look at above to check open actions 14:26:21 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Close ACTION-533 and ACTION-539 14:26:28 RESOLUTION: Close ACTION-533 and ACTION-539 14:26:48 Topic: Guidelines 14:27:27 -> Open Actions on Guidelines http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/12 14:27:28 jo: no changes to this doc yet 14:28:11 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Close ACTION-534 14:28:16 RESOLUTION: Close ACTION-534 14:29:11 ... what is a reasonable time-frame for the open actions? 14:29:12 q+ 14:29:20 ack and 14:30:41 ... hearing due date a bit before next meeting in 2weeks time 14:30:47 ... say 18th? 14:30:54 q- 14:31:26 ACTION: JO to amend due dates to 18th Sept on ACTION-540 etc. 14:31:41 Created ACTION-556 - Amend due dates to 18th Sept on ACTION-540 etc. [on Jo Rabin - due 2007-09-18]. 14:31:44 Topic: AOB 14:32:06 Andrew: aware no target date for quick-wins 14:32:24 ... keen to get some guidelines out sooner than later 14:33:32 jo: recalls "by end of year" from the F2F kick-off 14:33:44 ... but can't find it in charter 14:34:06 ... reasonable to have a last-call-for-comments draft by then 14:34:23 ... will raise issue for discussion on list 14:34:33 ACTION: Jo to raise an ISSUE on deliverable timeframes, and what the milestones are e.g. FPWD, Last Call etc. 14:34:43 Created ACTION-557 - Raise an ISSUE on deliverable timeframes, and what the milestones are e.g. FPWD, Last Call etc. [on Jo Rabin - due 2007-09-18]. 14:35:21 q+ 14:35:28 ack and 14:35:35 all agreed "end-of-year" seems reasonable 14:36:15 Andrew: any pointers to recommended reading? 14:37:10 jo: would be good to have a list of references 14:37:56 Andrew: other W3C groups? 14:38:06 ACTION: Andrew to stimulate debate and collect references to existing techniques white papers etc. from commercial companies within W3C and so on 14:38:07 Created ACTION-558 - Stimulate debate and collect references to existing techniques white papers etc. from commercial companies within W3C and so on [on Andrew Swainston - due 2007-09-18]. 14:38:11 jo: UWG (Rhys) 14:38:20 ... amongst others 14:38:55 zakim, drop me 14:38:55 jo is being disconnected 14:38:56 -jo 14:38:56 -kemp 14:38:57 -ROb 14:38:58 -SeanPatterson 14:38:59 -Magnus_Lonnroth 14:39:00 Magnus has left #bpwg 14:39:01 -abel 14:39:03 MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended 14:39:04 Attendees were +1.519.880.aaaa, kemp, jo, Magnus_Lonnroth, abel, +078997aabb, +079320aacc, SeanPatterson, Rob 14:39:18 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:39:18 apparently MWI_BPWG()10:00AM has ended, jo 14:39:23 On IRC I see Andrew, SeanPatterson, rob, Zakim, RRSAgent, jo, kemp, abel, matt, trackbot-ng 14:39:28 rob has left #bpwg 14:39:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:39:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-minutes.html jo 14:41:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:41:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-minutes.html jo 14:42:40 Present: Jo, Rob, Magnus, Andrew, Abel, SeanP, Aaron 14:42:47 Regrets: Rhys 14:42:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:42:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-minutes.html jo 14:43:41 rrsagent, make logs public 14:53:42 abel has left #bpwg 14:54:59 rrsagent, bye 14:54:59 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-actions.rdf : 14:54:59 ACTION: Jo to move terminology section to an appendix in Problem Statement Document [1] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-14-08 14:54:59 ACTION: Magnus to draft a passage on possible use of existing HTTP headers with examples [2] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-21-22 14:54:59 ACTION: Jo to raise an issue on folding the second section into the first to make the document clearer [3] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-22-28 14:54:59 ACTION: JO to amend due dates to 18th Sept on ACTION-540 etc. [4] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-31-26 14:54:59 ACTION: Jo to raise an ISSUE on deliverable timeframes, and what the milestones are e.g. FPWD, Last Call etc. [5] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-34-33 14:54:59 ACTION: Andrew to stimulate debate and collect references to existing techniques white papers etc. from commercial companies within W3C and so on [6] 14:54:59 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-bpwg-irc#T14-38-06