12:46:37 RRSAgent has joined #xmlsec 12:46:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/07-xmlsec-irc 12:46:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:46:40 Zakim has joined #xmlsec 12:46:42 Zakim, this will be XMLSEC 12:46:42 ok, trackbot-ng; I see T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM scheduled to start in 14 minutes 12:46:44 Meeting: XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group Teleconference 12:46:46 Date: 07 August 2007 12:47:29 trackbot-ng, please be confused 12:49:53 rmiller has joined #xmlsec 12:50:48 fjh has joined #xmlsec 12:51:29 trackbot-ng, please start meeting 12:51:50 hi frederick 12:52:03 I just submitted a bug report about trackbot not accepting "please" in that phrase... Did it some minutes ago 12:52:39 fjh has joined #xmlsec 12:52:42 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has now started 12:52:49 +??P0 12:53:11 tlr has changed the topic to: XMLSEC | 965732 | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0006.html 12:53:15 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0006.html 12:53:17 zakim, call thomas-78 12:53:17 I am sorry, tlr; I do not know a number for thomas-78 12:53:20 zakim, call thomas-781 12:53:20 ok, tlr; the call is being made 12:53:21 +Thomas 12:53:33 zakim, ??P0 is rmiller 12:53:33 +rmiller; got it 12:53:34 +Frederick_Hirsch 12:54:10 rdm has joined #xmlsec 12:54:19 zakim, rmiller is really rdm 12:54:19 +rdm; got it 12:54:34 zakim, who is here? 12:54:34 On the phone I see rdm, Thomas, Frederick_Hirsch 12:54:35 On IRC I see rdm, fjh, rmiller, Zakim, RRSAgent, tlr, trackbot-ng 12:55:36 tlr has joined #xmlsec 12:57:03 CGI663 has joined #xmlsec 12:57:22 cgi663, who are you? 12:57:25 zakim, fjh is Frederick_Hirsch 12:57:25 sorry, fjh, I do not recognize a party named 'fjh' 12:57:30 Sean has joined #xmlsec 12:57:31 zakim, Frederick_Hirsch is fjh 12:57:31 +fjh; got it 12:57:38 zakim, mute me 12:57:38 fjh should now be muted 12:57:43 zakim, unmute me 12:57:43 fjh should no longer be muted 12:58:54 Topic: Administrivia 12:59:13 +sean 12:59:16 zakim, who is here? 12:59:16 On the phone I see rdm, Thomas, fjh, sean 12:59:17 On IRC I see Sean, rdm, fjh, Zakim, RRSAgent, tlr, trackbot-ng 12:59:38 Regrets: Juan Carlos Cruellas 12:59:53 +Ed_Simon 13:00:28 EdS has joined #xmlsec 13:01:01 Topic: administrvia 13:01:08 fjh: sean to scribe next meeting 13:01:20 fjh: first item is the workshop 13:01:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0056.html 13:01:35 info on position papers 13:01:59 fjh: we all should be writing position papers. deadline is 14 Aug 13:02:08 ... they need to get done this week 13:02:34 Review and approval of last meeting's minutes 13:02:40 Topic: minutes 13:02:41 http://www.w3.org/2007/07/31-xmlsec-minutes 13:03:03 RESOLUTION: Minutes approved 13:03:08 klanz2 has joined #xmlsec 13:03:22 Topic: Action Item Review 13:03:59 +??P8 13:04:09 ACTION-26: remains open 13:04:10 zakim, ? is klanz2 13:04:10 +klanz2; got it 13:04:50 q+ 13:05:02 ack tlr 13:05:17 klanz2: working on a position paper and should have it done by the deadline 13:06:12 tlr: there is quite a bit of work that needs to be done once the position papers start coming in 13:06:25 ... early submission is best 13:06:34 ... will discuss more next week 13:07:07 ACTION-50: open and should be done by Thomas 14 Aug 13:07:15 Giles has joined #xmlsec 13:07:25 zakim, agenda? 13:07:25 I see nothing on the agenda 13:07:53 agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0006.html 13:08:07 + +30281039aaaa 13:08:08 ACTION-65: open 13:08:23 zakim, aaaa is Giles 13:08:23 +Giles; got it 13:10:05 ACTION-68: open, Sean will confirm if it is done 13:10:44 Sean: we have a test plan 13:10:54 ... need to start implementing the test cases 13:11:34 ... need to assign test cases for implementation 13:11:39 I hear Sean saying "we need the test cases as data, as opposed to descriptions". 13:11:56 sean, is that accurate? 13:12:02 yes 13:12:06 PHB has joined #xmlsec 13:12:08 ACTION-70: closed, duplicate of 65 13:13:06 ACTION-71: open 13:13:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0005.html 13:15:47 ACTION: juan carlos add test case for RFC 4514 warning 13:15:48 Created ACTION-75 - Carlos add test case for RFC 4514 warning [on Juan Carlos Cruellas - due 2007-08-14]. 13:17:02 ACTION-72: open 13:17:09 konrad: reviewing old and new XPointer, still in progress 13:17:32 ... discovered wide use, action-73 13:18:39 tlr: need to verify we have comment list, parties in action-73 can use it 13:18:56 public-xmlsec-comments@w3.org 13:19:23 German Sparkasse? 13:19:37 q+ 13:19:43 ack tlr 13:20:26 tlr: we are not depricating anything that has not been depricated before 13:20:39 s/depricating/deprecating/g 13:20:48 ... this may be on the edge of our scope 13:21:22 ... for the workshop 13:21:50 tlr: suggest asking for workshop position paper on XPointer and use cases 13:22:12 tlr: it is important to understand the non web service use cases 13:22:47 ACTION-73: open 13:23:35 fjh: we will discuss XPointer later in the agenda 13:23:53 topic: xmldsig-core draft 13:23:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0007.html 13:24:17 In this specification, a 'same-document' reference is defined as a 13:24:27 URI-Reference that does not contain a URI. [URI] 13:24:50 , in other words a hash sign ('#') followed by a fragment identifier [URI]." 13:25:39 q+ 13:25:42 fjh: It makes perfect sense RFC 2396 , but not for RFC3986 13:25:58 ack tlr 13:26:05 ... we may want to add some wording to clarify 13:27:38 fjh: the hash is not technically part of the fragment so we will need to discuss the hash 13:28:19 ... should we just say a hash and a fragment identifyer? 13:28:30 klanz2: +1 13:28:31 s/discuss/mention/ 13:28:39 s/identifyer/identifier/ 13:29:22 just say - In this specification, a 'same-document' reference is defined as a hash followed by a fragement identifier. 13:29:27 RFC 2396: 13:29:37 URI-reference = [ absoluteURI | relativeURI ] [ "#" fragment ] 13:29:37 absoluteURI = scheme ":" ( hier_part | opaque_part ) 13:29:37 relativeURI = ( net_path | abs_path | rel_path ) [ "?" query ] 13:29:44 s/fragement/fragment/ 13:29:44 defined as a URI refrence that consists of a hash sign ('#') followed by a fragment. 13:30:31 URI-reference = URI / relative-ref 13:30:54 same_document_URI = [ "#" fragment ] 13:31:02 In this document same-document reference ="#" fragment 13:32:02 URI reference that consists of hash sign ('#') followed by fragment identifier or an empty URI 13:32:29 fragment identifier -> fragment 13:34:26 ACTION: frederick to make changes to document to (a) clarify same-document URI reference, (b) change reference to URI 13:34:27 Created ACTION-76 - Make changes to document to (a) clarify same-document URI reference, (b) change reference to URI [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2007-08-14]. 13:34:38 http://www.w3.org/2006/12/xml-c14n11 13:34:46 trl: need to define URI 13:34:54 to replace @@ in draft 13:35:32 use this through interop testing, at C14N11 to PR might change, use this until then 13:36:15 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621/ 13:36:27 klanz2: it may be worse for the interop participants to be aware of comment in appendix A 13:36:33 s/worse/worth/ 13:36:44 klanz2: should include changes in Appendix A in testing (in CR draft) 13:37:02 s/comment/comments 13:38:08 fjh: we need to decide what to do about the URI 13:38:33 ... any issues using the URI that Thomas has suggested? 13:38:35 ACTION: frederick to update algorithm URIs for c14n11 13:38:35 Created ACTION-77 - Update algorithm URIs for c14n11 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2007-08-14]. 13:39:07 RESOLUTION: agree to use http://www.w3.org/2006/12/xml-c14n11 for c14n11 through interop (at least) 13:39:41 zakim, mute me 13:39:41 sorry, tlr, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 13:39:44 zakim, I am thomas 13:39:44 ok, tlr, I now associate you with Thomas 13:41:42 are you saying that there are corrections to the C14N11 CR draft Appendix A that need to be considered? 13:42:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/0050.html 13:43:24 answer is yes, corrections to Appendix A in CR draft are not listed in CR draft but should be considered in our testing 13:43:51 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621 13:43:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/att-0050/Apendix_20060625.html 13:45:00 klanz2: The correct Appendix A for C14N11 is reflected in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/att-0050/Apendix_20060625.html 13:45:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Jun/att-0050/Apendix_20060625.html 13:48:01 fjh: we want to use the one that has benn corrected by Konrad 13:48:09 tlr: +1 13:48:10 Need to have note that we are using update to CR 13:48:13 +1 13:48:18 s/benn/been 13:48:39 Note needs to be in interop test document and interop event notes 13:49:20 ACTION: frederick to put note about corrected appendix A all over the place, including editor's note in xmldsig-core editor's draft 13:49:21 Created ACTION-78 - Put note about corrected appendix A all over the place, including editor's note in xmldsig-core editor's draft [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2007-08-14]. 13:50:29 klanz2: concerned about strong discourage of XPointer, since have been available since 2002 and used 13:51:08 ... should warn rather than discourage 13:51:30 Now: Support of the xpointer() scheme [XPointer-xpointer] beyond the minimal usage discussed in this section is discouraged. 13:52:42 discouraged for future signature generation (?) 13:54:14 tlr: Those who use full XPointer should lobby for Xpointer advancement 13:54:28 +1 to tlr 13:54:41 zakim, mute me 13:54:41 klanz2 should now be muted 13:55:05 q+ 13:55:11 q+ 13:55:40 ack klanz2 13:55:43 ack klanz 13:55:46 ack fjh 13:56:25 klanz2: concerned that we are working on an addition and not a revision 13:56:30 klanz2: addition binds all implementations, and this edition of XML Sig is an addition not revision 13:56:37 s/addition/edition/ 13:56:48 s/an addition/ 13:56:53 s/an additino/ 13:56:59 s/an addition// 13:58:37 Sounds like we are stuck; Let's think about this over next week. 13:58:40 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:58:40 On the phone I see rdm, Thomas, fjh, sean, Ed_Simon, klanz2, Giles 14:00:05 -sean 14:00:08 fjh: see you next week 14:00:16 -Giles 14:00:18 -Ed_Simon 14:00:44 tlr: do you want me to stay online ... 14:00:54 EBICS etc ... ? 14:01:11 zakim, who is on the call? 14:01:11 On the phone I see rdm, Thomas, fjh, klanz2 14:01:16 rrsagent, make log public 14:01:30 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:01:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/07-xmlsec-minutes.html tlr 14:02:13 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:02:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/07-xmlsec-minutes.html tlr 14:03:15 -fjh 14:03:16 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:03:16 On the phone I see rdm, Thomas, klanz2 14:03:49 -klanz2 14:03:54 I was kicked out one sec 14:04:03 let's go to skype instead 14:04:05 zakim, drop me 14:04:05 Thomas is being disconnected 14:04:06 -Thomas 14:04:12 zakim, what is the code? 14:04:12 the conference code is 965732 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), klanz2 14:04:24 -rdm 14:04:29 T&S_XMLSEC()9:00AM has ended 14:04:31 Attendees were Thomas, rdm, fjh, sean, Ed_Simon, klanz2, +30281039aaaa, Giles 14:04:45 call you on skype OK? 14:04:49 ok 14:05:41 PHB has left #xmlsec 14:06:08 skype is slow .... 14:21:48 http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-element/ 16:31:42 Zakim has left #xmlsec 17:10:50 tlr has joined #xmlsec