14:52:05 RRSAgent has joined #swd 14:52:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-irc 14:52:28 rrsagent, bookmark 14:52:28 See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-irc#T14-52-28 14:52:33 zakim, this will be swd 14:52:33 ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started 14:52:48 zakim, ??p5 is TomB 14:52:48 +TomB; got it 14:52:58 Meeting: SWD WG 14:53:00 Chair: Tom 14:53:44 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0043.html 14:54:22 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html 14:54:46 Regrets: Guus, Daniel, Diego, Ralph, Jon, Simone, Sean, Elisa, Clay 14:55:13 rrsagent, please make record public 14:58:14 edsu has joined #swd 14:58:45 Antoine has joined #swd 15:00:24 Bern has joined #swd 15:00:49 +??P16 15:00:59 + +0120682aaaa 15:01:10 zakim, aaaa is Bernard 15:01:10 +Bernard; got it 15:01:10 zakim, P16 is Antoine 15:01:11 sorry, Antoine, I do not recognize a party named 'P16' 15:01:28 vit has joined #swd 15:01:36 seanb has joined #swd 15:01:56 +[LC] 15:02:26 +[LC] 15:02:32 Scribe: Bernard 15:02:38 Scribenick: Bern 15:03:10 +??P34 15:04:13 +??P7 15:05:37 Topic: Admin 15:05:59 TomB proposes accept minutes of 3rd July 2007 15:06:06 No objections, 15:06:10 Alistair's regrets: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0056.html 15:06:11 Resolved 15:06:21 Next telecon 17th July 15:06:29 ACTION: Guus to propose dates in Oct for Amsterdam meeting on SKOS [recorded in [43]http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action01] 15:06:36 --continues 15:06:40 Topic: SKOS 15:06:49 ACTION: Antoine to raise issue of adding broader/narrower relations in skos [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action03] 15:06:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0012.html 15:07:10 --DONE 15:07:44 Antione: proposal is related to former SKOS extension document 15:08:05 ...with broaderGeneric, broaderPartitive etc. 15:08:18 ...eg. one is meant to represent part-whole relationships 15:08:30 ...some users have spotted these ideas and would like to use them 15:08:44 ...so should we represent these ideas as part of SKOS? 15:08:50 TomB: what is your opinion? 15:09:10 Antione: some correspond to commonly-accepted relationships in thesaurus domain 15:09:39 ...but may be some problems because some relationships are handled by multiple SKOS properties, such as broaderPartitive and relatedPart 15:09:59 ...but generally I thin it would be a good idea to recognise that these properties were proposed 15:10:20 ...and some users want to use these properties as part of their models 15:10:36 TomB: anyone know how extensively these proeprties are already beeing used? 15:10:55 ...it has a W3C URI and people are using it yet it's status seems ambiguous 15:11:07 ...anyone checked to see amount of usage? 15:11:36 Antoine: usage now is not important, but as long as they remain public and they correspond to common thesaurus usage then some users 15:11:44 ...may start using them. 15:11:51 Seanb: what is cost to us to include them? 15:12:22 Antoine: not expensive, but I'm not sure they cover all the established needs. Some papers describe these kinds of links, but there are more 15:12:43 ...but if we want to be extensive, or do we want to limit to the current extensions? 15:13:02 TomB: has anyone raised any objections, other than partititive issue? 15:13:31 ...what status they attained in original project and why they weren't moved into rest of spec? 15:14:08 Antoine: I think it was for the readabiity of the standard, and to be clear about what properties can be extended by users. 15:14:10 aliman has joined #swd 15:14:43 ...For example, a kind of link that can be thought of is e.g. a painter, and a painting process. This relationship is not currently expressed in the 15:15:14 ...SKOS model, so some users may be confused about how to create their extensions? Should they be a sub property of broader or some more core property? 15:15:38 TomB: suggest we move on today, but discuss when Alistair is here to discover historical context 15:15:56 ACTION: Guus to move Action 26 forward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action04] 15:16:01 --continues 15:16:10 ACTION: Guus to post user experience reports for ISSUE-26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action05] 15:16:14 --continues 15:16:25 -- ISSUE-33: Grouping Construct (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33) 15:16:42 Tomb: Alistair has proposed a way forward 15:16:49 -- ISSUE-33: Grouping Construct (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33) 15:16:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0166.html 15:17:39 TomB: Does anyone disagree with this approach? 15:17:46 No response 15:18:08 Antoine: Sean raised some concerns about syntactic constraints 15:18:17 Seanb: haven't had time to consider this yet 15:18:50 Antoine: didn't know if there was redundancy between syntactic and possible future semantic constraints 15:19:02 ...wondering if more experienced people could say something about this 15:19:19 tomB: related to issue 31 15:19:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0166.html 15:20:04 TomB: alistair has added comments about relationship to OWL, specifically OWL-DL 15:21:04 TomB: without alistair's presence we can't make any progress on this today 15:21:14 Topic: RDFa 15:21:44 TomB: last week Ralph suggested a discussion about the difference between class and role 15:21:55 ...is there anyone on the telecon to discuss this? 15:22:03 aliman has joined #swd 15:22:05 ACTION: Ralph to Discuss possibility of meeting for RDFa in Cambridge [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] 15:22:08 --continues 15:22:12 TOPIC: Recipes 15:22:20 ACTION: Ralph to Discuss possibility of meeting for RDFa in Cambridge [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] 15:22:25 --continues 15:22:33 Topic: Vocabulary Management 15:22:41 TomB: Lisa is not on call 15:22:57 ...so let's continue to next meeting 15:23:11 ...not enough people on the call 15:23:24 [adjourned] 15:23:27 seanb has left #swd 15:23:28 -Vit 15:23:29 -Justin 15:23:31 -Edsu 15:23:32 -Antoine 15:23:36 -Seanb 15:23:41 edsu has left #swd 15:24:08 zakim, list attendees 15:24:08 As of this point the attendees have been TomB, +0120682aaaa, Bernard, Antoine, Edsu, Seanb, Justin, Vit 15:24:40 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:24:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/10-swd-minutes.html TomB 15:25:06 hi tom, antoine, bernard, how's it going? 15:25:21 sorry i couldn't make it, stuck in a meeting. 15:25:22 -Bernard 15:25:26 aliman, hi 15:25:44 we had a short meeting today - lots of regrets (including Guus and Ralph) - it's july... 15:26:01 i saw, a couple of people at the open forum 15:26:06 -TomB 15:26:08 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 15:26:09 Attendees were TomB, +0120682aaaa, Bernard, Antoine, Edsu, Seanb, Justin, Vit 15:26:15 oops 15:26:23 aliman, are you still there? 15:26:28 yep, here 15:26:50 Jon, Elisa, Clay... anyone else? 15:27:18 think it's just you, me, antoine & bern on IRC 15:27:47 Jon, Elisa, and Clay are at the open forum I think 15:28:21 yep 15:29:46 hey there were still things happening here :-) 15:30:06 bye 15:30:16 Antoine has left #swd 15:30:42 aliman has joined #swd 15:30:57 aliman, talk to you next week? 15:31:16 yep, talk to you then. sorry, dodgy wireless here. hope you're well.