14:51:35 RRSAgent has joined #forms 14:51:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc 14:51:42 rrsagent, make log public 14:52:20 Regrets: Mark 14:52:44 a few others as well... 14:52:52 Did you mean MarkS or MarkB 14:52:53 ? 14:53:11 Oh, forgot to say... Steven 14:53:16 ruff 14:53:20 lol 14:53:37 MarkB, I forgot MarkS was back :-) 14:53:48 Mark Seaborne is back? 14:53:56 markseaborne has joined #forms 14:53:57 s/Regrets: Mark/Regrets: MarkB/ 14:54:07 speaking of him... :-) 14:54:10 Mark, hi! 14:54:15 Regrets+Joern 14:54:15 Hello there :-) 14:54:23 welcome back! :-) 14:54:25 Regrets:Uli 14:54:29 ta very much 14:54:37 s/:/+/ 14:54:39 we missed you! 14:54:50 Yes, esp. with Leigh being out today :-) 14:54:53 well, you should take aim more carefully then! 14:54:59 wink, wink, nudge, nudge 14:54:59 hmmmm 14:55:10 markseaborne, are u replacing david landwehr? 14:55:11 I don't know! 14:55:15 yes 14:55:25 though only on the WG :-) 14:55:31 sure :-) 14:55:44 he wanted to spend more time with his family ;-) 14:55:49 lol 14:56:00 Regrets+Nick 14:56:07 Regrets+Leigh 14:56:10 Charlie has joined #forms 14:57:03 ok... 14:57:11 HTML_Forms()11:00AM has now started 14:57:12 switching laptops 14:57:17 mom 14:57:18 +John_Boyer 14:57:40 I thought sebastian didn't like laptops? 14:57:44 Roger has joined #forms 14:57:52 i bought him one :} 14:57:52 He seems to like IBM thinkpads... 14:58:06 (well, he paid for it...) 14:58:21 Schnitz has joined #forms 14:58:27 zakim, code? 14:58:27 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Schnitz 14:58:38 fair enough 14:58:47 ebruchez has joined #forms 14:58:56 Charlie, hi, the X40 is so great, thanks so much :-) 14:58:57 You see that there is a UK Zakim now MarkS 14:59:09 +??P30 14:59:13 -John_Boyer 14:59:14 +John_Boyer 14:59:27 zakim, ??p30 is me 14:59:27 +Schnitz; got it 14:59:29 goodness 14:59:36 wellsk has joined #forms 14:59:37 zakim, who is here? 14:59:37 On the phone I see John_Boyer, Schnitz 14:59:38 On IRC I see wellsk, ebruchez, Schnitz, Roger, Charlie, markseaborne, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, Steven 14:59:42 +[IBM] 14:59:57 zakim, [IBM] is Charlie 14:59:57 +Charlie; got it 15:00:08 +Raman 15:00:16 +[IBM] 15:00:26 zakim, dial steven-617 15:00:26 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:00:28 +Steven 15:01:28 lars has joined #forms 15:01:28 +??P48 15:01:30 zakim, who is here? 15:01:30 On the phone I see John_Boyer, Schnitz, Charlie, Raman, [IBM], Steven, ??P48 15:01:33 On IRC I see lars, wellsk, ebruchez, Schnitz, Roger, Charlie, markseaborne, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, Steven 15:01:34 zakim, ??p48 is roger 15:01:35 +roger; got it 15:02:29 +??P53 15:02:32 +??P51 15:02:35 Chair: John 15:03:07 raman, ping 15:03:27 -??P53 15:03:34 well, I was ??P53 15:03:43 so I guess Lars was 51 15:03:47 zakim, I am ??P51 15:03:57 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0083.html 15:04:00 +lars; got it 15:04:06 +[IPcaller] 15:04:06 John_Boyer has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0083.html 15:04:11 zakim, ebruchez is [IP 15:04:12 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0083.html 15:04:14 sorry, ebruchez, I do not recognize a party named 'ebruchez' 15:04:25 zkim, [IP is ebruchez 15:04:26 +??P57 15:05:07 raman has joined #forms 15:05:08 Scribe: raman 15:05:08 me 15:05:15 Scribe: Raman 15:05:29 it is MarkS 15:05:32 zakim, [IP is ebruchez 15:05:32 +ebruchez; got it 15:05:40 but you can't hear me for some reason 15:05:54 zakim, who is here? 15:05:54 On the phone I see John_Boyer, Schnitz, Charlie, Raman, [IBM], Steven, roger, lars, ebruchez, ??P57 15:05:54 MEEEEE!!!!!! 15:05:56 On IRC I see raman, lars, wellsk, ebruchez, Schnitz, Roger, Charlie, markseaborne, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, Steven 15:06:09 zakim, IBM is wellsk 15:06:09 +wellsk; got it 15:06:23 zakim, ??P57 is markseaborne 15:06:23 +markseaborne; got it 15:06:32 I am having problems with speech 15:06:35 don't know why 15:06:44 I'm shouting as loud as I can 15:06:46 zakim, ack markseaborne 15:06:46 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:06:50 IS THAT BETTER!!!!!! 15:06:53 no 15:06:55 nope 15:07:15 yes 15:07:16 zakim, unmute markseaborne, PLEASE! 15:07:16 I don't understand 'unmute markseaborne, PLEASE!', lars 15:07:23 It is a hardware problem at this end 15:07:27 mpf 15:07:32 my mic isn't working 15:07:42 scribe: raman 15:07:49 rrsagent, make minutes 15:07:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-minutes.html Steven 15:08:04 congratulations 15:08:06 Thanks :-) 15:08:13 yeah, great to have you back 15:08:14 nice to be back 15:08:15 welcome! 15:08:18 :-) 15:08:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0084.html 15:08:32 rrsagent, make log public 15:08:42 http://www.w3.org/2007/06/forms-diffs-1.7-1.14.txt 15:09:07 Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference 15:10:01 Topic: Charter 15:10:02 http://www.w3.org/2007/06/forms-diffs-1.7-1.14.txt 15:10:16 http://www.w3.org/2007/03/forms-charter.html 15:10:59 zakim, mute me 15:10:59 Schnitz should now be muted 15:12:13 zakim, unmute me 15:12:13 Schnitz should no longer be muted 15:12:21 steven, +1 15:15:13 scribe: Sebastian 15:15:23 scribenick: schnitz 15:15:43 ACTION: John to respond to Chris Lilley about the relationship between XHTML Transitional and the Forms & HTML WGs 15:15:53 -roger 15:16:00 Topic: Coming Calls 15:16:22 John: Regrets for next week? 15:16:24 Charlie: YES 15:16:35 John: +Leigh 15:16:40 +Raman 15:16:52 Raman: regrets next week 15:16:52 + +03491211aaaa 15:16:57 John: we habe enough people 15:17:08 RESOLUTION: Next call will take place as planned 15:17:09 zakim, 211aaa is roger 15:17:09 sorry, Roger, I do not recognize a party named '211aaa' 15:17:20 Topic: Questionaire for the summer period 15:17:27 zakim, aaaa is Roger 15:17:27 +Roger; got it 15:17:30 John: Steven, status? 15:17:39 Steven: On my to-do list 15:17:54 Topic: XForms evening at XML conference 15:18:04 John: We have thumbs up from Dave Steinhard 15:18:13 John: conflict on Dec 4 15:18:21 John: affects Steven 15:18:44 Steven, cannot do much, unfortunately 15:18:54 s/Steven,/Steven: 15:19:15 RESOLUTION: We will continue with Dec 4, w/o Steven 15:19:16 28http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0081.html 15:19:47 John: We need a copy for a call for papers 15:19:57 John: we should have an invited speaker 15:20:07 John: I propose Michael Kay 15:20:16 Raman: possible 15:20:39 Raman: That focus is XML though, I rather see Jacob Nielson, focus on Usabilityt 15:20:55 s/Usabilityt/Usability 15:21:10 John: Would Jacob attract the audience? 15:21:14 Raman: YES 15:21:46 ACTION: Steven to provide contact details for Jacob 15:22:23 Charlie: That would warm people up 15:22:38 rrsagent, pointer? 15:22:38 See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-22-38 15:22:42 John: other ideas? 15:22:49 Steven: Kurt Cagle 15:22:54 Sebastian: +1 15:23:02 Raman: +1 15:23:13 ACTION: John to invite Kurt Cagle 15:23:23 Topic: Joint Forms Task Force 15:23:33 John: Pushed it up to the HCG 15:23:43 John: Agreed about equal membership 15:23:52 John: Then push it back down to chairs 15:23:59 28http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jun/0070.html 15:24:03 John: Letter is out, no response yet 15:24:13 John: Problem is, Dave is not here 15:25:08 Raman: Don't rush, the TF could be quickly smashed 15:25:23 Raman: IMHO, won't go anywhere 15:25:36 Raman: Its a mess, I have no idea what to do 15:25:47 John: 12 people on the HTML WG side have interest 15:26:39 Raman: They won't allow wiggle room 15:29:54 Sebastian, Raman: Not rushing it is a good idea 15:30:26 John: Those interested from other side could in the meanwhile could be looking into ease of authoring 15:30:35 Raman: Just do it. 15:30:46 s/other side/our side 15:31:01 Topic: Action Item List 15:31:13 John: Issue Tracking is important 15:31:31 John: The Action Item List grows, but we need more folks take on work on a weekly basis 15:31:46 Raman: I have not been doing much 15:32:14 John: The Wiki needs more work 15:32:42 ACTION: WG members look into their Action Items, and start working on them on the Wiki 15:33:10 Raman: ciao 15:33:12 -Raman 15:33:22 Topic: LC Issues 15:33:39 28http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Controls?id=72;user=guest;statetype=4;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:34:26 Issue Controls/72 15:34:35 John: Issue from Steven 15:34:50 John: Do we have an ETA on this? 15:35:05 Steven: Did we accept it? 15:35:14 John: Classified as still needing work 15:35:42 Steven: trying to work this out... 15:35:54 John: It needs approval 15:36:28 Steven: Somebody things this is a solution, but the group need to discuss this, but it doesn't say what the resolution is 15:36:40 Steven: the first thing is that the wording should be different 15:37:04 Steven: Then, very few controls says what the default styling should be 15:37:15 Sebastian: UA CSS? 15:37:21 Steven: Possibly 15:37:36 Sebastian: Display property? 15:38:05 Sebastian: inline for trigger 15:38:36 Steven: ah default UA CSS would be fine 15:38:49 John: things like relevant go beyond, though 15:39:16 Steven: relevant is display: none for irrelevant 15:39:30 John: Is this a informative appendix? 15:39:36 Steven: should be stronger 15:40:02 Steven: Maybe not MUST, but in case of validity, it SHOULD always be visible as being invalid, e.g. 15:40:42 Steven: I do not require a particular presentation but we should require that something needs to be done 15:40:59 John: this seems like for ALL form controls, not particular ones 15:41:31 Steven: Select1 inline as a drop-down, block as radio? 15:41:40 Lars: Radios could be inline 15:41:48 Steven: Maybe, maybe all inline 15:42:06 Sebastian: Radio button themselves could be inline-block 15:43:05 Steven: That is CSS3 15:43:16 Sebastian: Right 15:44:01 Erik: It is diffcult, in can be both vertial and horizontal 15:44:07 I agree with Erik 15:44:16 John: don't know whether we should go down that route 15:44:30 Steven: There is a certain level that has to be normative 15:44:41 Steven: you should expect certain things to happen 15:44:54 Steven: So you know what to put in a User CSS 15:45:09 Steven: Establishing Basic Expectations 15:45:18 Lars: Default UA CSS? 15:45:27 Steven: Just say all controls are default inline 15:45:42 Steven: and all MIPS are all perceivable by the user 15:45:44 Isn't presentation more down to the host language? 15:45:48 John: what about read-onlu? 15:45:55 i'd suggest whatever language we specify clarify that this is just for visual UIs 15:45:56 You really need some context before you can make assumptions 15:46:02 s/read-onlu/read-only 15:46:16 Steven: No, read-only also could have a hint, like being grey 15:46:53 Steven: disabled, the label is greyed out, read-only, the value is greyed out 15:47:01 Erik: its the way it behaves 15:47:26 Lars: I also find it more convenient to see what to expect 15:48:00 John: in other langauges read-only e.g. is not shown 15:48:12 Steven: you can control that, we are talking about the default 15:48:31 Erik: we would just say its an indication, not e.g. being grey 15:48:45 John: someone needs to write the text 15:48:52 Sebastian: Steven is the one 15:48:58 ACTION: Steven to write something up 15:50:10 Sebastian: It would be good to have a mapping into CSS 3 UI syntax 15:50:31 PROPOSED: all controls should be default inline, and that all MIP properties should be visible on attached controls 15:50:42 s/something up/text for Issue Controls 72 15:50:49 for visual interfaces 15:50:55 s/visible/perceivable 15:51:08 don't think inline has an equivalent in voicexml 15:52:10 Roger_ has joined #forms 15:52:16 PROPOSED: all controls should be default inline, and all MIP properties should be preceivable on attached controls 15:52:41 for visual interfaces... 15:54:31 Charlie: OK, I'm happy 15:54:45 POPOSAL: all controls should be default inline, and all MIP properties should be perceivable on attached controls without interaction 15:54:57 Lars: From an XForms perspective, controls should be more abstract 15:55:00 r/POP/PROP/ 15:55:07 s/POP/PRO/ 15:55:11 Charlie: I think its OK since inline is not only for visual medias 15:55:22 RESOLUTION: all controls should be default inline, and all MIP properties should be perceivable on attached controls without interaction 15:55:24 John: works for me, any objection 15:55:29 No objections 15:55:39 Steven, thanks 15:55:45 28http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Controls?id=73;user=guest;statetype=4;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:55:47 Topic: Issue 73 15:55:57 Controls/73 15:56:09 John: We already agreed on a resolution see the notes 15:56:22 zakim, who is making noise? 15:56:34 Schnitz, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 15:56:40 John: Steven, you raised a media type issue 15:57:06 John: use @value instead of @ref, and we modified to say "in addition to" 15:57:18 Erik: why do you actually need the ref attribute? 15:57:25 John: we discussed that 15:57:42 John: we tried to mirror with the xforms output the things you can with the xforms upload 15:58:23 Erik: I you have an output the media type will be chosen by the author, as to opposed to the upload, probably 15:59:02 John: upload the media type attibute constrains, output picks that up to feed to rendering engine 15:59:50 John: ref attribute was added to easy sync between output and upload 15:59:59 Erik: I am skeptical 16:00:19 Steven: We tried to be consistent with upload 16:00:38 Steven: when we do not want to be consistent, because they are different, fine, then never mind 16:01:09 Erik: The media type value is a string, not a single node, don't confuse that 16:01:20 John: we need an action item to make the change 16:01:28 John: the value attribute will be added 16:01:37 John: the question is whether we throw out ref 16:01:55 Erik: we are generally working around not having attribute value template 16:02:12 Erik: I don't really see why we would use ref attribute, only for symmetry, is not enough 16:02:24 John: Top of the hour 16:02:29 thx 16:02:30 bye bye 16:02:33 -Charlie 16:02:39 -ebruchez 16:02:39 Roger_ has left #forms 16:02:41 -wellsk 16:02:43 -John_Boyer 16:02:44 wellsk has left #forms 16:02:47 -Steven 16:02:53 -Roger 16:02:55 -Schnitz 16:02:59 -lars 16:03:01 -markseaborne 16:03:03 HTML_Forms()11:00AM has ended 16:03:06 John_Boyer has joined #forms 16:03:07 Attendees were John_Boyer, Schnitz, Charlie, Raman, Steven, roger, lars, [IPcaller], ebruchez, wellsk, markseaborne, +03491211aaaa 16:03:13 John_Boyer has left #forms 16:03:15 rrsagent, make minutes 16:03:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-minutes.html Steven 16:03:18 John_Boyer has joined #forms 16:03:23 Steven, thanks 16:03:24 rrsagent, make minutes 16:03:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-minutes.html John_Boyer 16:03:39 rrsagent, bye 16:03:39 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-actions.rdf : 16:03:39 ACTION: John to respond to Chris Lilley about the relationship between XHTML Transitional and the Forms & HTML WGs [1] 16:03:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-15-43 16:03:39 ACTION: Steven to provide contact details for Jacob [2] 16:03:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-21-46 16:03:39 ACTION: John to invite Kurt Cagle [3] 16:03:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-23-13 16:03:39 ACTION: WG members look into their Action Items, and start working on them on the Wiki [4] 16:03:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-32-42 16:03:39 ACTION: Steven to write something up [5] 16:03:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-forms-irc#T15-48-58 16:03:54 markseaborne has left #forms