13:01:05 RRSAgent has joined #muse 13:01:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/14-muse-irc 13:01:18 ivan has joined #muse 13:01:20 raphael has joined #muse 13:01:22 Meeting: Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group Review 13:01:27 Zakim has joined #muse 13:01:35 zakim, this will be muse 13:01:35 ok, RalphS, I see W3C_(MUSE)9:00AM already started 13:01:40 zakim, who's on the call? 13:01:41 On the phone I see [CWI] 13:01:49 zakim, cwi is probably Raphael 13:01:49 +Raphael?; got it 13:01:54 zakim, [CWI] is raphael 13:01:54 sorry, raphael, I do not recognize a party named '[CWI]' 13:01:59 oups 13:02:00 Hi Raphael, we still have a meeting on the other end, just wait a bit... 13:02:02 zakim, Raphael is really Raphael 13:02:02 +Raphael; got it 13:02:18 our staff meeting is running over a minute or two, Raphael 13:02:32 agenda+ Visibility of this meeting record 13:02:49 MichaelC has joined #muse 13:02:50 mauro has joined #muse 13:03:05 josema has joined #muse 13:03:31 -Raphael 13:03:32 +Raphael 13:03:33 +Cooper 13:04:00 Yves has joined #muse 13:04:09 IanJ has joined #muse 13:04:10 dom has joined #muse 13:04:12 DanC has joined #muse 13:04:12 kaz has joined #muse 13:04:15 steve has joined #muse 13:04:16 marie has joined #muse 13:04:16 +MIT531 13:04:26 Regrets+ dom 13:04:30 salut raphael 13:04:33 caribou has joined #muse 13:04:35 SusanL has joined #muse 13:04:36 gerald has joined #muse 13:04:37 zakim, mit531 has Steve, Mauro, JoseMa, ralph 13:04:37 +Steve, Mauro, JoseMa, ralph; got it 13:04:38 bonjour marie 13:04:55 Zakim, is DanC here? 13:04:55 DanC, I see DanC in another telecon 13:05:04 klaus has joined #muse 13:05:19 +Gerald 13:05:35 +DanC 13:05:36 ted has joined #muse 13:05:38 +Yves 13:05:39 zakim, please dial SusanL-BOS 13:05:39 ok, SusanL; the call is being made 13:05:39 +SusanL 13:05:46 zakim, please mute me 13:05:47 +Ted 13:05:49 SusanL should now be muted 13:05:59 -Gerald 13:06:08 zakim, call Klaus-sip 13:06:08 ok, klaus; the call is being made 13:06:09 +Klaus 13:06:13 +Gerald 13:06:14 +??P6 13:06:23 -DanC 13:06:23 zakim, ??P6 is ivan 13:06:23 +ivan; got it 13:06:28 +DanC 13:06:32 zakim, call kazuyuki-617 13:06:32 ok, kaz; the call is being made 13:06:34 +Kazuyuki 13:06:38 +Judy 13:06:46 +Ian 13:06:53 brb 13:07:14 zakim, pick a victim 13:07:16 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Mauro 13:07:45 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/talks/MUSE2007/ Slides for presentation 13:07:53 Scribe: Mauro 13:08:00 ScribeNick: mauro 13:08:14 Raphael Troncy, CWI 13:08:35 +Carine 13:08:35 [ Ivan introduces Raphael ] 13:08:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/ Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group 13:09:04 zakim, who's on the call? 13:09:04 On the phone I see Raphael, Cooper, MIT531, Gerald (muted), DanC, Yves, SusanL (muted), Ted (muted), ivan, Klaus, Kazuyuki (muted), Judy, Ian, Carine 13:09:06 MIT531 has Steve, Mauro, JoseMa, ralph 13:09:29 I have been in theater groups that, after a mere weekend of playing together, want to continue as a group forever. I suspect XGs are like that, too ;) 13:09:39 DanC has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/talks/MUSE2007/ 13:09:41 Chair: Raphael Troncy 13:09:55 judy has joined #muse 13:10:11 Chair: Ivan 13:10:16 Presenter: Raphael Troncy 13:10:46 Meeting: Project Review W3C Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group 13:10:46 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/talks/MUSE2007/ Cover Slide 13:10:52 q+ to ask which one is Raphael :) 13:11:05 (which face is Raphael's?) 13:11:18 Raphael: I am in the center with my hand on my belt 13:11:41 [slide 2 - MMSem Pointers] 13:12:08 kudos for using the public mailing list for most of the discussion! 13:12:37 [slide 3 - MMSem Goals] 13:13:07 Liam has joined #muse 13:14:24 [slide 4 - MMSem Activities] 13:15:30 +Liam 13:15:36 [slide 5 - MMSem Deliverables] 13:16:41 -> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/39139/status Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group Patent Policy Status 13:17:10 [slide 6 - Image Annotation on the Semantic Web] 13:17:18 [slide 7 - Image Annotation on the Semantic Web] 13:18:55 [slide 8 - Multimedia Annotation Interoperability Framework] 13:19:19 [slide 9 - Multimedia Annotation Interoperability Framework] 13:21:48 [slide 10 - Managing Personal Photos] 13:24:11 +Richard 13:24:30 [slide 11 - Facetting Music Songs] 13:25:17 r007a has joined #muse 13:26:08 -Judy 13:27:52 zakim, dial mcf-617 13:27:52 ok, marie; the call is being made 13:27:54 +Mcf 13:28:07 zakim, mute mcf 13:28:07 Mcf should now be muted 13:30:31 [slide 12 - Bringing NewsML in the Semantic Web] 13:31:05 [slide 13 - Managing your Web 2.0 Personomy] 13:31:50 [slide 14 - MPEG-7 and the Semantic Web] 13:32:02 "It's an ISO standard, making it difficult to us." 13:32:05 to use. 13:32:26 s/us./use./ 13:33:17 [slide 15 - Multimedia Vocabularies on the Semantic Web] 13:34:50 [slide 16 - Multimedia Semantics: Relevant Tools and Resources] 13:35:08 [slide 17 - Liaison] 13:36:33 [slide 18 - MMSem Success] 13:37:58 [slide 19 - MMSem Future] 13:40:22 q? 13:40:28 Raphael: we hope to submit a new XG charter to W3C in mid-July 13:40:40 q? 13:40:41 --- questions session--- 13:40:43 ... and would like to resume work in September 13:41:15 Raphael: at the XG we used some old schema 13:41:37 ... and the question is if W3C should publish new ontologies 13:41:49 ... and what we should do with that? 13:41:51 q+ 13:41:51 q+ 13:41:58 ack ralph 13:42:13 Ralph: thanks Raphael for an informative session 13:42:27 ... and have the XG consider publishing a ? 13:42:35 Raphael: yes, we have 13:42:41 s/a ?/your ontologies in XG work space/ 13:42:58 -> http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri URIs for W3C Namespaces 13:42:59 ack dan 13:43:01 q+ 13:43:03 ... but we are not sure 13:43:19 DanC: wich community cares for continuing with this activity? 13:43:37 ack ralph 13:44:06 Ralph: the other interesting question is about maintainance 13:44:11 ... and who would do it 13:44:33 ... and I also wonder about the output of the XG 13:45:01 ... what is the challenge for W3C about this output? 13:45:14 DanC: if the community around the ontology is the XG, then the XG is more than welcome to publish the ontology at /YYYY/MM/blah-blah , per http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri 13:45:20 Raphael: [mauro didn't get this...] 13:45:48 +1 13:46:16 Raphael: if we publish an ontology, should we have just the OWL or a document also? 13:46:26 Raphael: the feeling within the group is not to do follow a Rec track 13:46:39 q+ to note that the level of endorsement around a namespace is normally orthogonal to its URI 13:46:47 s/to do follow/to follow/ 13:47:07 ... we would rather try to see if the existing ones are enough 13:47:12 ... we think they are not 13:47:16 Ralph: the consensus of both the SemWeb Best Practices WG and the SemWeb Deployment WG, as documented in the Vocabulary Management Working Draft(s) is that both forms -- the machine-readable OWL and the human-readable HTML are desirable 13:47:34 ack danc 13:47:34 DanC, you wanted to note that the level of endorsement around a namespace is normally orthogonal to its URI 13:47:59 zakim, EricP just arrived in mit531 13:47:59 +EricP; got it 13:48:26 DanC: notes that the level of endorsement around a namespace is normally orthogonal to its URI 13:49:01 Ralph: is useful for the XG to point out what things can be re-used 13:49:18 ... the XG can publish its work, new ontologies 13:49:50 q+ to ask about the "OWL expression of other work" case; remind me of one example? did the XG negotiate rights to do a derivative work? is the original org interested to publish the OWL version? 13:50:22 ... but what part of the community interested would like to see the REC stamp on it? 13:50:40 Raphael: we wondered also abut that within the grouyp 13:50:47 ericP has joined #muse 13:50:56 s/grouyp/group/ 13:51:28 ... about the formality, I am not sure they understand the subleties of W3C process 13:51:45 ... currently we don't need go to the formality of a WG 13:51:46 ack danc 13:51:46 DanC, you wanted to ask about the "OWL expression of other work" case; remind me of one example? did the XG negotiate rights to do a derivative work? is the original org interested 13:51:49 ... to publish the OWL version? 13:51:53 I note that Raphael just uttered one of the things we are concerned about: no distinction between TR and xG report 13:51:53 Raphael: IPTC pretty much happy with things being published somewhere on w3.org 13:52:03 s/need go/need to go/ 13:52:11 ... DIG35 not sure what level of formality we might need 13:52:21 DanC: [Mauro missed the question] 13:52:41 danc: do we have the right for derivative work (related to mpeg-7) 13:53:03 Raphael: yes we have rights to do derivative work 13:53:22 ... I am not sure if we can publish this ontology, I need to check on that 13:53:25 Raphael: we made an official liaison with ISO and they're commenting on our work 13:54:14 DanC: is either of those organizations interested on publishing the OWL? 13:54:15 I3A 13:54:35 Raphael: ISO not interested in publishing OWL 13:54:36 International Imaging Industry Association (I3A) 13:54:59 Ivan: who is in discussions with them? 13:55:01 ... not sure if I3A is interested, but they're OK with W3C publishing when an agreement is signed 13:55:23 Raphael: Daniel is involved on it 13:55:28 q? 13:55:30 q+ 13:55:50 http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison 13:56:13 Raphael: our other question is how to get more industry involvement in follow-on work 13:56:27 (which row in http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison ? a text search for "multimedia" fails) 13:56:37 search for Raphael :-) 13:56:40 (ah... http://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison#I3A ) 13:57:19 Ivan: my initial reaction is that you should try to identify those members that would like to be involve, and they contact their AC Rep 13:57:20 q+ 13:57:26 ack ian 13:57:30 ... I would be happy to do such contacts 13:57:32 yes DanC 13:57:35 Raphael: ok 13:58:25 Ian: we've discussed the potential of confusion between different kinds of TRs; in particular RECs and XG reports 13:58:27 Raphael: yes, sometimes 13:58:44 ... is it the case that [some of the liaisons] really don't care about the difference? 13:58:51 Raphael: they don't seem to care 13:59:05 s/Ralphael/Raphael/G 13:59:08 (just in case :) 13:59:55 ack kaz 14:00:14 Raphael: to participate in the group was a great experience, time consuming but great 14:00:35 Kaz: thanks for a good presentation, sorry to be late, but I was in another meeting 14:01:18 ... we would like to collaborate 14:01:31 [Mauro not sure which group Kaz was referring to] 14:01:32 ... Multi-Modal Interactionn WG 14:01:48 q? 14:01:49 Raphael: that would be great 14:02:03 http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/ 14:02:15 Ivan: when do you plan to finally publish all the documents? 14:02:20 http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/ 14:02:29 s/sorry to be late/it was a pity I couldn't see the presentation at WWW2007/ 14:02:33 (public page is http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/) 14:02:44 Raphael: next week we will send it 14:03:03 s/but I was in another meeting/I attended W3C Track/ 14:03:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/XGR/about.html 14:03:22 Yes we will be happy to make the publication news. 14:03:47 -Kazuyuki 14:03:51 Ivan: can you provide us with a paragraph for the publication? 14:04:09 ... SusanL will then *polish* it 14:04:22 Raphael: yes, will do 14:04:51 IanJ: is it ok to set expectation for next steps on that publication? 14:05:02 leave open public list 14:05:03 close member list 14:05:06 ... what happen with mailing lists, for example? 14:05:08 close xg at the same time as publication 14:05:18 leave wiki open 14:06:36 also, please draft an email for the ac with expectations about next steps 14:06:39 Raphael: yes, the public mailing list open, member list closed, wiki open, the reference to the XG dissapears 14:06:48 s/Multi-Modal Interactionn WG/Multimodal Interaction WG which develops MMI Architecture etc./ 14:07:08 q+ 14:07:13 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:07:13 agendum 1. "Visibility of this meeting record" taken up [from RalphS] 14:07:26 ack ralph 14:07:29 +1 public record 14:07:35 Ralph: I would like to make the records public 14:07:41 Ivan: +1 14:07:52 ... so they will be made public 14:08:05 Ralph: please Raphael go back and check them 14:08:12 +1 thanks Raphael! 14:08:14 rrsagent, please make record public 14:08:22 Ivan: thanks Raphael for his presentation 14:08:41 ACTION: Raphael review the record to be sure we accurately recorded his references to interests of other organizations 14:08:53 -DanC 14:08:54 raphael.troncy@cwi.nl 14:08:59 rrsagent, pointer? 14:08:59 See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/14-muse-irc#T14-08-59 14:09:12 Yves has left #muse 14:09:21 -Yves 14:09:24 -Cooper 14:09:25 -Carine 14:09:26 -Ted 14:09:26 zakim, drop me 14:09:26 Ivan: thanks everybody 14:09:27 Klaus is being disconnected 14:09:28 SusanL has left #muse 14:09:28 -Klaus 14:09:30 -Ian 14:09:32 -Raphael 14:09:33 -ivan 14:09:34 -Richard 14:09:35 MEETING ADJOURNED 14:09:35 -Mcf 14:09:37 -Gerald 14:09:38 -SusanL 14:09:40 -MIT531 14:09:42 -Liam 14:09:44 W3C_(MUSE)9:00AM has ended 14:09:46 Attendees were Raphael?, Raphael, Cooper, Steve, Mauro, JoseMa, ralph, Gerald, DanC, Yves, SusanL, Ted, Klaus, ivan, Kazuyuki, Judy, Ian, Carine, Liam, Richard, Mcf, EricP 14:10:02 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:10:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/14-muse-minutes.html mauro 14:11:25 marie has left #muse 14:14:27 steve has left #muse 14:16:19 ericP has left #muse 14:17:05 please delete. 14:17:13 it's not fatal, but since you asked. :) 14:17:19 ok :) 14:18:22 rrsagent, bye 14:18:22 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/14-muse-actions.rdf : 14:18:22 ACTION: Raphael review the record to be sure we accurately recorded his references to interests of other organizations [1] 14:18:22 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/14-muse-irc#T14-08-41