14:54:55 RRSAgent has joined #swd 14:54:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc 14:55:01 rrsagent, bookmark 14:55:01 See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T14-55-01 14:55:10 zakim, this will be swd 14:55:10 ok, TomB, I see SW_SWD()11:00AM already started 14:55:16 Meeting: SWD WG 14:55:18 Chair: Tom 14:55:52 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0002.html 14:56:05 rrsagent, please make record public 14:56:36 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-swd-minutes.html 14:56:46 +Ralph 14:58:02 Regrets: Daniel, Michael, Diego, Vit, Sean, Alistair, Clay, Simone 14:58:09 Antoine has joined #swd 14:58:37 edsu2 has joined #swd 14:59:23 Edsu, welcome! 15:00:00 +Justin 15:00:22 zakim, justin is really EdSummers 15:00:22 +EdSummers; got it 15:00:40 Elisa has joined #swd 15:00:59 JonP has joined #swd 15:01:08 Bern has joined #swd 15:01:10 +Guus 15:01:43 +Bernard 15:01:46 +Antoine_Isaac 15:02:32 +JonP 15:02:34 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html 15:02:45 guus has joined #swd 15:03:33 rrsagent, pointer? 15:03:33 See http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-03-33 15:03:45 zakim, who is here? 15:03:45 On the phone I see TomB, Ralph, EdSummers, Guus, Bernard, Antoine_Isaac, JonP 15:03:49 On IRC I see guus, Bern, JonP, Elisa, edsu, Antoine, RRSAgent, Zakim, TomB, RalphS 15:03:57 benadida has joined #SWD 15:04:03 dialing in... 15:04:42 + +1.781.237.aaaa 15:04:50 ?aaaa is me 15:04:55 zakim, aaaa is me 15:04:55 +benadida; got it 15:05:48 Scribe: benadida 15:05:57 Scribenick: benadida 15:06:17 Regrets: Daniel, Michael, Diego, Vit, Sean, Alistair 15:06:27 zakim, who is here? 15:06:27 On the phone I see TomB, Ralph, EdSummers, Guus, Bernard, Antoine_Isaac, JonP, benadida 15:06:29 On IRC I see benadida, guus, Bern, JonP, Elisa, edsu, Antoine, RRSAgent, Zakim, TomB, RalphS 15:06:45 TomB: welcome Ed Summers, new member from library of congress 15:06:59 Topic: Admin 15:07:12 +Elisa_Kendall 15:07:17 EdS: doing some experiments with SKOS with Rob Sanderson (Liverpool) 15:07:43 ... categorizing books, new journals. Awkward, PDF form, data munging, figuring out semantics from layout 15:08:00 ... came up with simple SKOS file. 15:08:40 ... connected with TomB, working with colleague on updating formats for library data, taxonomies. 15:09:05 s/colleague/colleague Barbara Tillett/ 15:09:22 ... looking at ways to make data URL-addressable on the web 15:09:45 ... fairly new to semweb, but have followed XML closely 15:10:04 welcome, Ed 15:10:11 thanks :) 15:10:35 TomB: recent publication, use case document is a good place to start. 15:10:59 TomB: PROPOSE to accept minutes of 5/29 telecon 15:11:08 RESOLVED to accept minutes of 2007-05-29 telecon 15:11:47 TomB: postponing discussion of f2f until next week 15:12:08 Topic: SKOS 15:12:38 TomB: comments on readability: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007May/0079.html 15:12:49 Antoine: the confusion came from the last part and the names given to requirements 15:13:00 ... commenter expected names to denote official relationships 15:13:25 ... hopefully can be solved easily for next versiokn 15:13:30 q+ 15:13:30 s/versiokn/version/ 15:13:41 TomB: a number of links need to be made on the site, volunteer? 15:14:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007May/0051.html 15:14:43 TomB: SKOS pages on wiki and w3c web site. They are not quite current, missing links to UCR. 15:14:54 ACTION: Ralph to update SKOS pages to point to UCR 15:15:19 [I want to say a few words about repkying to comments 15:15:19 TomB: no rush 15:15:46 Guus: a few words on replying to comments from outsiders, as this is the first time. 15:16:20 ... if you reply to someone from outside, a number of rules. 15:16:27 ... (1) be extremely polite 15:16:56 ... (2) try to reply by citing the document itself 15:17:10 ... what you remember is not necessarily what the document says 15:17:27 ... (3) is commenter satisfied with response? Can we close the comment? 15:18:13 ... can give some examples of good comment responses 15:18:37 ... if a document gets no response, that's bad. Interest = comments. 15:18:54 ACTION: Guus to point to typical responses that follow these guidelines 15:19:09 s/these guidelines/guidelines described in telecon/ 15:19:31 Antoine: what if something in the mail is very wrong? 15:19:40 I second Guus' comments about the value of giving careful responses 15:20:02 Guus: give a careful, methodical response. The conclusion is not "do you agree," but rather "can you live with it?" 15:20:23 Ralph: looking at the document is indeed important, as memory != document. 15:20:35 TomB: very useful, thanks. 15:20:42 ACTION: Alistair to fix wording on skos issues sandbox 15:20:46 --CONTINUES 15:20:59 ACTION: Alistair will look at raising the examples from the issues to test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-swd-minutes.html#action06] 15:21:01 -- CONTINUES 15:21:10 ACTION: TomB to fix wording of IssuesProcess [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-swd-minutes.html#action10] 15:21:13 --DONE 15:21:24 TomB: look at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess 15:22:13 ... added lifecycle issues mentioned last week 15:22:18 ... if an issue is not in the tracker, it's not an issue 15:22:55 ... issues are assigned, issues are periodically reviewed 15:23:29 (scribe skipping TomB's description of doc, refer to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess) 15:23:43 (Tom reviews 1.2. Life cycle of issues) 15:23:49 s/1.2/1.3/ 15:24:21 TomB: discuss on list or next week 15:24:31 Ralph: small question on transition from "raised" to "open" 15:24:57 ... in this draft, "open" = actively worked on, in other WGs, it feels that open is lower threshold 15:25:38 Guus: if it affects the requirements, it must be recorded 15:25:55 Ralph: worried about issues staying in "raised" state too long. As long as we quickly cover raised issues. 15:26:28 Guus: OWL experience, 60 issues total, 6-7 hairy ones, 6-7 difficult. Once the hairy and difficult were resolved, remaining issues were resolved quickly. 15:26:44 q+ 15:27:17 ack RalphS 15:27:23 ... if we resolve the current issues, we can produce a new WD for SKOS, and then resolve remaining issues. 15:27:44 Ralph: my concern would be resolved if, when we move to LC, we've only address all open issues and we have no raised issues left. 15:27:53 Guus: when we go to LC, issue list should contain no raised or open issue 15:28:00 ... resolved, dropped, or postponed. 15:28:04 Ralph: that's fine. 15:28:26 ACTION: Jon and Alistair: Move SKOS issues over from Sandbox to Tracker on an ongoing basis [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/08-swd-minutes.html#action10] 15:28:29 --CONTINUES 15:28:34 Jon: we haven't coordinated on issues to move 15:29:27 ... can't say we're done with it yet 15:29:45 Issue-26: RelationshipsBetweenLabels (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26) 15:30:20 Guus: proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007May/0057.html 15:31:11 Guus: one issue. current proposal lets you use terms as resources 15:31:32 (scribe getting a bit lost here, less familiar with this work.) 15:32:41 Guus: if we resolve this one issue, we can come to a consensus 15:33:59 Guus: wordsense binds a particular term to a particular meaning 15:34:34 ... proposal: we need to talk about relationships between terms 15:34:57 ... discussion is whether wordsense needs a separate discussion 15:35:00 ... would make SKOS too complex 15:35:50 Antoine: my comment is about refusing to use the word "term" 15:35:56 Guus: matter of naming. 15:36:33 my real comments on issue 26 are http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007May/0072.html 15:36:49 ACTION: Guus to rephrase current proposal, slightly revise naming based on comments 15:37:14 Guus: we are ready to close on this if Daniel gives ok (while traveling) 15:37:21 +1 I like the proposal - would be happy to bring to a vote 15:37:54 Guus: Antoine, could you place my proposal in the wiki, then I will edit? 15:37:57 Antoine: yes, by tomorrow. 15:39:52 Guus: (answer to question), in current SKOS, terms are more directly attached to concept, but old SKOS works ok. 15:41:09 http://www.w3.org/mid/46481A20.3080008@few.vu.nl 15:41:20 ACTION: Antoine to put SimpleExtensionProposal into wiki 15:41:22 Antoine: I am pasting links to original discussions 15:41:31 q+ to ask if we have already determined that this is a necessary requirement 15:41:38 ack Bern 15:41:38 Bern, you wanted to ask if we have already determined that this is a necessary requirement 15:42:12 Bern: was this a necessary requirement before we provided a solution to it? 15:42:16 Guus: we thought it was 15:42:23 Bern: recorded anywhere? 15:42:34 Guus: good question, thought it was a conclusion from Boston f2f. 15:42:50 ... I will look this up 15:43:54 Antoine: an important aspect of this issue, if we don't do anything, no one will be able to represent this kind of link 15:44:08 ... does it bring too much trouble in existing SKOS proposal, is the model really complex? 15:44:42 Guus: in a compromise, we cannot fully satisfy a requirement 15:44:57 Bern: some requirements in clarity, ease of use, may conflict 15:46:15 ACTION: Guus to include a reference to the original requirements in the resolution proposal 15:46:30 Issue-31: BasicLexicalLabelSemantics (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31) 15:47:18 Issue-33: Grouping Construct (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33) 15:47:27 ACTION: Alistair to propose minimal fix for resolution of issue 33 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] 15:47:30 --CONTINUES 15:47:36 SKOS text cases 15:47:44 s/text/test/ 15:47:53 ACTION: Sean to look at the test environment supporting the SKOS semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-swd-minutes.html#action05] 15:48:12 --DONE 15:48:19 Topic: Recipes 15:48:23 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action09] 15:48:25 --CONTINUES 15:48:35 Topic: VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT 15:48:42 ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr 17 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action11] 15:48:46 --DONE 15:49:16 Elisa: a bit more structure/examples can be worked on 15:49:25 ... willing to set up a time to do this 15:49:51 -Guus 15:49:58 scribenick: Ralphs 15:50:10 Topic: RDFa 15:50:18 Ben: RDFa telecons are on the new telecon schedule, meeting Thursdays 15:50:34 ... yesterday there was an alpha release of FireFox Operator support for RDFa 15:50:44 ... documents are a bit behind; working on issues 15:51:04 ... discussing now where to define boundary between RDFa and host language 15:51:09 scribenick: benadida 15:51:21 TomB: any remaining issues. 15:51:34 next telecon next week 15:51:40 -Bernard 15:51:42 -Antoine_Isaac 15:51:43 -JonP 15:51:45 -Elisa_Kendall 15:51:47 -EdSummers 15:51:48 Antoine has left #swd 15:51:49 -Ralph 15:52:29 zakim, list attendees 15:52:29 As of this point the attendees have been Ralph, TomB, EdSummers, Guus, Bernard, Antoine_Isaac, JonP, +1.781.237.aaaa, benadida, Elisa_Kendall 15:52:45 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:52:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-minutes.html TomB 15:53:37 -benadida 15:53:42 -TomB 15:53:43 SW_SWD()11:00AM has ended 15:53:44 Attendees were Ralph, TomB, EdSummers, Guus, Bernard, Antoine_Isaac, JonP, +1.781.237.aaaa, benadida, Elisa_Kendall 15:54:23 so cvs was mentioned -- is that where test cases are? 15:54:36 i should've asked while i had you on the line i guess 15:58:35 benadida has left #SWD 16:58:25 edsu has left #swd 18:31:40 zakim, bye 18:31:40 Zakim has left #swd 18:31:43 rrsagent, bye 18:31:43 I see 13 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-actions.rdf : 18:31:43 ACTION: Ralph to update SKOS pages to point to UCR [1] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-14-54 18:31:43 ACTION: Guus to point to typical responses that follow these guidelines [2] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-18-54 18:31:43 ACTION: Alistair to fix wording on skos issues sandbox [3] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-20-42 18:31:43 ACTION: Alistair will look at raising the examples from the issues to test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-swd-minutes.html#action06] [4] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-20-59 18:31:43 ACTION: TomB to fix wording of IssuesProcess [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-swd-minutes.html#action10] [5] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-21-10 18:31:43 ACTION: Jon and Alistair: Move SKOS issues over from Sandbox to Tracker on an ongoing basis [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/08-swd-minutes.html#action10] [6] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-28-26 18:31:43 ACTION: Guus to rephrase current proposal, slightly revise naming based on comments [7] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-36-49 18:31:43 ACTION: Antoine to put SimpleExtensionProposal into wiki [8] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-41-20 18:31:43 ACTION: Guus to include a reference to the original requirements in the resolution proposal [9] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-46-15 18:31:43 ACTION: Alistair to propose minimal fix for resolution of issue 33 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] [10] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-47-27 18:31:43 ACTION: Sean to look at the test environment supporting the SKOS semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-swd-minutes.html#action05] [11] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-47-53 18:31:43 ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action09] [12] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-48-23 18:31:43 ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr 17 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action11] [13] 18:31:43 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-irc#T15-48-42