IRC log of xhtml on 2007-05-23
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:34:02 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xhtml
- 13:34:02 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-irc
- 13:34:10 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #xhtml
- 13:34:17 [Steven]
- zakim, this will be xhtml
- 13:34:17 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; I see IA_XHTML2()10:00AM scheduled to start in 26 minutes
- 13:34:25 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 13:34:39 [Steven]
- Meeting: Weekly XHTML2 WG Teleconference
- 13:35:53 [Steven]
- Regrets: Alessio
- 13:36:11 [Steven]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007May/0015
- 13:36:18 [Steven]
- Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007May/0015
- 13:36:37 [Tina]
- Tina has joined #xhtml
- 13:52:51 [Steven]
- Steven has joined #xhtml
- 13:56:23 [Steven]
- rrsagent, pointer?
- 13:56:23 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-irc#T13-56-23
- 13:59:13 [yamx]
- yamx has joined #xhtml
- 13:59:25 [Rich]
- Rich has joined #xhtml
- 14:00:22 [Zakim]
- IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has now started
- 14:00:22 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #xhtml
- 14:00:30 [Zakim]
- +??P25
- 14:00:43 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 14:00:43 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 14:00:44 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 14:01:04 [Steven]
- zakim, ??P25 is Rich
- 14:01:04 [Zakim]
- +Rich; got it
- 14:01:24 [Zakim]
- +??P31
- 14:01:36 [Steven]
- Regrets+ Tina
- 14:01:36 [yamx]
- This is Yam.
- 14:01:44 [Steven]
- Zakim, ??P31 is yamx
- 14:01:44 [Zakim]
- +yamx; got it
- 14:01:50 [Steven]
- Regrets+Susan
- 14:02:53 [Steven]
- Scribe: Steven
- 14:03:04 [Steven]
- Steven: Partial regrets from Alex
- 14:03:12 [Steven]
- ... he's only on irc
- 14:04:38 [Zakim]
- +??P21
- 14:04:47 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, i am ?
- 14:04:47 [Zakim]
- +markbirbeck; got it
- 14:04:56 [Steven]
- zakim, who is here?
- 14:04:56 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Rich, Steven, yamx, markbirbeck
- 14:04:57 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ShaneM, Rich, yamx, Steven, Tina, Zakim, RRSAgent, markbirbeck, Alex-DERI, krijnh
- 14:05:05 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM
- 14:05:41 [Steven]
- Mark: I propose Steven as chair
- 14:06:05 [Steven]
- Yam: Second
- 14:06:11 [Steven]
- Chair: Steven
- 14:06:52 [Steven]
- Topic: Announcements
- 14:07:53 [Steven]
- New members: Susan and John from Progeny
- 14:08:00 [Steven]
- (sent regrets for today)
- 14:08:08 [Steven]
- FtF in NYC in June
- 14:08:32 [Steven]
- Steven: My feeling is that not enough people could come in June
- 14:08:52 [Steven]
- ... so the nex next FtF will be in September
- 14:08:59 [Steven]
- ... In Madrid if I remember right
- 14:09:10 [Steven]
- s/nex/next/
- 14:09:28 [Steven]
- ... 10 and 11 September
- 14:09:37 [Steven]
- Mark: Yes, Madrid
- 14:10:27 [Steven]
- Steven: So do we want to have an editor's meeting on the Monday and or Tuesday?
- 14:10:58 [Steven]
- ... (let's do it offline)
- 14:11:07 [Steven]
- Reports back from conferences
- 14:11:19 [Alex-DERI]
- As I already said via mail, I got the OK from DERI, so I could attend the FTF meeting in june
- 14:11:23 [Steven]
- Steven: Mark and I were at the two main ewb conferences the last two weeks
- 14:11:57 [Steven]
- Steven: There was a panel on the future of HTML at XTech
- 14:15:58 [Steven]
- ... quite a lot of panelists
- 14:16:09 [Steven]
- ... only 45 minutes, so not as lot of time
- 14:16:22 [Steven]
- ... BBC interviewed me and Mike Smith (BBC) afterwards
- 14:16:50 [Steven]
- ... Another interesting presentation was Joost
- 14:17:07 [Steven]
- ... who showed a lovely system using compound documents, XHTML , CSS< SVG
- 14:17:21 [Steven]
- ... really nice, and using our idea of how it should be
- 14:18:00 [Steven]
- Mark: The mobile Ajax session was good too, talking about XForms, XHTML2 and so on
- 14:18:46 [Steven]
- ... I argued that you can do Ajax declaratively, and the session ended up talking about that as the main point
- 14:19:01 [Steven]
- ... Volantis backed me up on this
- 14:19:14 [Steven]
- ... they deliver XHTML2 and XForms to mobile devices by transformations
- 14:22:30 [Steven]
- Rich: Do we have any data on how much declarative saves?
- 14:22:57 [Steven]
- Steven: Yes, that is the core of my talks at the moment
- 14:23:23 [Steven]
- ... you can show that costs can be reduced to 3% by doing it declaratively
- 14:23:39 [Steven]
- ... and we have a couple of real-life examples to back that up
- 14:25:30 [Steven]
- Shane: I wonder if Tina can summarise the thread on www-html
- 14:25:36 [Steven]
- Steven: She sent regrets
- 14:26:18 [Steven]
- Shane: there were two main threads: 1) Why is HTML5 codifying broken behaviour
- 14:26:28 [Steven]
- ... why not separate implementation guidelines from spec
- 14:26:44 [Steven]
- ... 2) changing the semantics between HTML4 and 5
- 14:28:11 [Steven]
- Steven: It is not clear to me the best way to reach that group of people
- 14:28:22 [Steven]
- ... whether it is worth talking on those discussions or not
- 14:28:31 [Alex-DERI]
- As a side note, I'm on HTML5 too
- 14:29:28 [Steven]
- Mark: We need to clarify what the difference is between what we are doing and what they are doing
- 14:29:40 [Steven]
- Alex, so is Mark
- 14:30:27 [Alex-DERI]
- I know
- 14:32:54 [Steven]
- Mark: You can use XHTML2/XForms to show how much work you save compared with using libraries
- 14:33:42 [Steven]
- Topic: Validator
- 14:34:18 [Steven]
- Shane: I fixed the xmlns problem, and passed the changes on, and it will be in the next version
- 14:34:37 [Steven]
- ... so you can use xmlns:xxx in markup and not get validation errors
- 14:35:29 [Steven]
- ... but you still need a schema
- 14:37:29 [Steven]
- Steven: There was another mail from someone from Japan, mentioning a fix
- 14:37:37 [Steven]
- Shane: That was about C1 characters
- 14:37:49 [Steven]
- ... the validator is now fixed, but we need to update our specs
- 14:38:09 [Steven]
- ... because we ship xml declarations
- 14:38:18 [Steven]
- ... and they now need to be fixed
- 14:38:35 [Steven]
- Steven: In TR space?
- 14:38:38 [Steven]
- Shane: Yes
- 14:38:47 [Steven]
- ... but they don't show up in the spec
- 14:38:53 [Steven]
- ... I will approach Ian about it
- 14:39:35 [Steven]
- Steven: When will the xmlns fix be shipped?
- 14:39:40 [Steven]
- Shane: It is in beta now
- 14:40:03 [Steven]
- Topic: RDFa
- 14:43:13 [Steven]
- Steven: An excellent demo at XTech of an RDFa extension for Mozilla
- 14:44:31 [Steven]
- ... seems to point to maturity of RDFa
- 14:44:38 [Steven]
- ... we can move forward on this quite fast
- 14:44:51 [Steven]
- Mark: Lots of talks mentioned RDFa at WWW2007
- 14:45:21 [Steven]
- Topic: XML declaration
- 14:45:41 [Steven]
- Shane: I have just raised the problem with Ian Jacobs
- 14:45:50 [Steven]
- ... he says we can't fix it in place
- 14:45:59 [Steven]
- ... we have to reissue the specs
- 14:46:14 [Steven]
- Steven: Why?
- 14:46:18 [Steven]
- Shane: Just because
- 14:46:54 [Steven]
- Steven: So it would be a PER
- 14:46:56 [Steven]
- Shane: Yes
- 14:47:32 [Steven]
- Steven: Painless enough
- 14:48:08 [Steven]
- Topic: XML, XML DOM, and QNames
- 14:49:50 [Steven]
- Shane: I had an action item to ask how XML parsing works when QNames get turned into tuples
- 14:49:56 [Steven]
- ... the answer was "they don't"
- 14:50:07 [Steven]
- ... inside attributes
- 14:50:46 [Steven]
- ... and what we are trying to do is allow scoped attribute values in some taxonomy
- 14:51:09 [Steven]
- ... so an application has to do the interpretation itself
- 14:51:59 [Steven]
- ... So then I said to myself, if the parser isn't helping us, why are we using xmlns to establish the relationship?
- 14:52:32 [Steven]
- ... and the conclusion I reached with Mark, is that xmlns is something everyone understands, so we should use it
- 14:53:09 [Steven]
- ... but I wonder if we shouldn't use CURIEs, since they don't cary the baggage with them
- 14:53:17 [Steven]
- s/cary/cary/
- 14:53:23 [Steven]
- s/cary/carry/
- 14:53:36 [Steven]
- Mark: DO you mean to change the sysntax of CURIEs?
- 14:53:39 [Steven]
- Shane: No
- 14:53:45 [Steven]
- s/DO/Do/
- 14:54:21 [Steven]
- Mark: It should always have said CURIEs, but because of the pushback we were getting, we said let's use QNames for now
- 14:56:42 [Steven]
- Steven: Are you suggesting we use something other than xmlns for the prefixes?
- 14:57:01 [Steven]
- Mark: We can unbind the connection
- 14:57:17 [Steven]
- ... use xmlns, or triples using <link> for instance
- 14:57:49 [Steven]
- ... Jeremy Carroll was enthusiastic to use it for SPARQL
- 14:58:06 [Steven]
- ... and we can persuade IPTC to use it too
- 14:58:16 [Steven]
- ... and it would allow us to have default namespaces
- 14:58:23 [Steven]
- s/namespaces/prefixes/
- 14:58:46 [Steven]
- ... if profile = X, the dc maps to this, foaf maps to that, etc.
- 14:59:12 [Steven]
- ... and then making XHTML documents much easier to write, cut/paste and so on
- 15:00:26 [Steven]
- Steven: Will the same notation (like namespaces) confuse people
- 15:00:40 [Steven]
- Mark: Good question; one option is to change the syntax of CURIEs
- 15:01:02 [Steven]
- ... so they look different
- 15:01:43 [Steven]
- ... we could even let people define the separator
- 15:02:09 [Steven]
- ... but one scenario is that within the flexibility, we use xmlns as an option
- 15:02:20 [Steven]
- [ADJOURN]
- 15:02:26 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:02:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-minutes.html Steven
- 15:02:35 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 15:02:37 [Zakim]
- -Rich
- 15:02:39 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 15:02:41 [Zakim]
- -markbirbeck
- 15:02:43 [Zakim]
- -yamx
- 15:02:45 [Zakim]
- IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has ended
- 15:02:47 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Steven, Rich, yamx, markbirbeck, ShaneM
- 15:02:54 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:02:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-minutes.html Steven
- 15:14:04 [AGraf|mb]
- AGraf|mb has joined #xhtml
- 15:18:05 [AGraf|mb]
- so, did i understand that correctly, the ftf in june has been cancelled?
- 15:18:33 [ShaneM]
- yes. there may be an editors meeting that week, but the xhtml working group will not meet on the 11th and 12th.
- 15:18:43 [ShaneM]
- the xforms group will still meet the balance of the week
- 15:18:53 [AGraf|mb]
- ok, thanks
- 15:19:19 [AGraf|mb]
- just so i'm not cancelling the flight for nothing...
- 15:19:26 [ShaneM]
- heh.
- 16:07:37 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xhtml
- 17:08:34 [Levogiro]
- Levogiro has joined #xhtml
- 17:36:31 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has left #xhtml
- 19:31:22 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #xhtml
- 20:02:40 [Lachy]
- Lachy has joined #xhtml