IRC log of xhtml on 2007-05-23

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:34:02 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #xhtml
13:34:02 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-irc
13:34:10 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #xhtml
13:34:17 [Steven]
zakim, this will be xhtml
13:34:17 [Zakim]
ok, Steven; I see IA_XHTML2()10:00AM scheduled to start in 26 minutes
13:34:25 [Steven]
rrsagent, make log public
13:34:39 [Steven]
Meeting: Weekly XHTML2 WG Teleconference
13:35:53 [Steven]
Regrets: Alessio
13:36:11 [Steven]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007May/0015
13:36:18 [Steven]
Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007May/0015
13:36:37 [Tina]
Tina has joined #xhtml
13:52:51 [Steven]
Steven has joined #xhtml
13:56:23 [Steven]
rrsagent, pointer?
13:56:23 [RRSAgent]
See http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-irc#T13-56-23
13:59:13 [yamx]
yamx has joined #xhtml
13:59:25 [Rich]
Rich has joined #xhtml
14:00:22 [Zakim]
IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has now started
14:00:22 [ShaneM]
ShaneM has joined #xhtml
14:00:30 [Zakim]
+??P25
14:00:43 [Steven]
zakim, dial steven-617
14:00:43 [Zakim]
ok, Steven; the call is being made
14:00:44 [Zakim]
+Steven
14:01:04 [Steven]
zakim, ??P25 is Rich
14:01:04 [Zakim]
+Rich; got it
14:01:24 [Zakim]
+??P31
14:01:36 [Steven]
Regrets+ Tina
14:01:36 [yamx]
This is Yam.
14:01:44 [Steven]
Zakim, ??P31 is yamx
14:01:44 [Zakim]
+yamx; got it
14:01:50 [Steven]
Regrets+Susan
14:02:53 [Steven]
Scribe: Steven
14:03:04 [Steven]
Steven: Partial regrets from Alex
14:03:12 [Steven]
... he's only on irc
14:04:38 [Zakim]
+??P21
14:04:47 [markbirbeck]
zakim, i am ?
14:04:47 [Zakim]
+markbirbeck; got it
14:04:56 [Steven]
zakim, who is here?
14:04:56 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Rich, Steven, yamx, markbirbeck
14:04:57 [Zakim]
On IRC I see ShaneM, Rich, yamx, Steven, Tina, Zakim, RRSAgent, markbirbeck, Alex-DERI, krijnh
14:05:05 [Zakim]
+ShaneM
14:05:41 [Steven]
Mark: I propose Steven as chair
14:06:05 [Steven]
Yam: Second
14:06:11 [Steven]
Chair: Steven
14:06:52 [Steven]
Topic: Announcements
14:07:53 [Steven]
New members: Susan and John from Progeny
14:08:00 [Steven]
(sent regrets for today)
14:08:08 [Steven]
FtF in NYC in June
14:08:32 [Steven]
Steven: My feeling is that not enough people could come in June
14:08:52 [Steven]
... so the nex next FtF will be in September
14:08:59 [Steven]
... In Madrid if I remember right
14:09:10 [Steven]
s/nex/next/
14:09:28 [Steven]
... 10 and 11 September
14:09:37 [Steven]
Mark: Yes, Madrid
14:10:27 [Steven]
Steven: So do we want to have an editor's meeting on the Monday and or Tuesday?
14:10:58 [Steven]
... (let's do it offline)
14:11:07 [Steven]
Reports back from conferences
14:11:19 [Alex-DERI]
As I already said via mail, I got the OK from DERI, so I could attend the FTF meeting in june
14:11:23 [Steven]
Steven: Mark and I were at the two main ewb conferences the last two weeks
14:11:57 [Steven]
Steven: There was a panel on the future of HTML at XTech
14:15:58 [Steven]
... quite a lot of panelists
14:16:09 [Steven]
... only 45 minutes, so not as lot of time
14:16:22 [Steven]
... BBC interviewed me and Mike Smith (BBC) afterwards
14:16:50 [Steven]
... Another interesting presentation was Joost
14:17:07 [Steven]
... who showed a lovely system using compound documents, XHTML , CSS< SVG
14:17:21 [Steven]
... really nice, and using our idea of how it should be
14:18:00 [Steven]
Mark: The mobile Ajax session was good too, talking about XForms, XHTML2 and so on
14:18:46 [Steven]
... I argued that you can do Ajax declaratively, and the session ended up talking about that as the main point
14:19:01 [Steven]
... Volantis backed me up on this
14:19:14 [Steven]
... they deliver XHTML2 and XForms to mobile devices by transformations
14:22:30 [Steven]
Rich: Do we have any data on how much declarative saves?
14:22:57 [Steven]
Steven: Yes, that is the core of my talks at the moment
14:23:23 [Steven]
... you can show that costs can be reduced to 3% by doing it declaratively
14:23:39 [Steven]
... and we have a couple of real-life examples to back that up
14:25:30 [Steven]
Shane: I wonder if Tina can summarise the thread on www-html
14:25:36 [Steven]
Steven: She sent regrets
14:26:18 [Steven]
Shane: there were two main threads: 1) Why is HTML5 codifying broken behaviour
14:26:28 [Steven]
... why not separate implementation guidelines from spec
14:26:44 [Steven]
... 2) changing the semantics between HTML4 and 5
14:28:11 [Steven]
Steven: It is not clear to me the best way to reach that group of people
14:28:22 [Steven]
... whether it is worth talking on those discussions or not
14:28:31 [Alex-DERI]
As a side note, I'm on HTML5 too
14:29:28 [Steven]
Mark: We need to clarify what the difference is between what we are doing and what they are doing
14:29:40 [Steven]
Alex, so is Mark
14:30:27 [Alex-DERI]
I know
14:32:54 [Steven]
Mark: You can use XHTML2/XForms to show how much work you save compared with using libraries
14:33:42 [Steven]
Topic: Validator
14:34:18 [Steven]
Shane: I fixed the xmlns problem, and passed the changes on, and it will be in the next version
14:34:37 [Steven]
... so you can use xmlns:xxx in markup and not get validation errors
14:35:29 [Steven]
... but you still need a schema
14:37:29 [Steven]
Steven: There was another mail from someone from Japan, mentioning a fix
14:37:37 [Steven]
Shane: That was about C1 characters
14:37:49 [Steven]
... the validator is now fixed, but we need to update our specs
14:38:09 [Steven]
... because we ship xml declarations
14:38:18 [Steven]
... and they now need to be fixed
14:38:35 [Steven]
Steven: In TR space?
14:38:38 [Steven]
Shane: Yes
14:38:47 [Steven]
... but they don't show up in the spec
14:38:53 [Steven]
... I will approach Ian about it
14:39:35 [Steven]
Steven: When will the xmlns fix be shipped?
14:39:40 [Steven]
Shane: It is in beta now
14:40:03 [Steven]
Topic: RDFa
14:43:13 [Steven]
Steven: An excellent demo at XTech of an RDFa extension for Mozilla
14:44:31 [Steven]
... seems to point to maturity of RDFa
14:44:38 [Steven]
... we can move forward on this quite fast
14:44:51 [Steven]
Mark: Lots of talks mentioned RDFa at WWW2007
14:45:21 [Steven]
Topic: XML declaration
14:45:41 [Steven]
Shane: I have just raised the problem with Ian Jacobs
14:45:50 [Steven]
... he says we can't fix it in place
14:45:59 [Steven]
... we have to reissue the specs
14:46:14 [Steven]
Steven: Why?
14:46:18 [Steven]
Shane: Just because
14:46:54 [Steven]
Steven: So it would be a PER
14:46:56 [Steven]
Shane: Yes
14:47:32 [Steven]
Steven: Painless enough
14:48:08 [Steven]
Topic: XML, XML DOM, and QNames
14:49:50 [Steven]
Shane: I had an action item to ask how XML parsing works when QNames get turned into tuples
14:49:56 [Steven]
... the answer was "they don't"
14:50:07 [Steven]
... inside attributes
14:50:46 [Steven]
... and what we are trying to do is allow scoped attribute values in some taxonomy
14:51:09 [Steven]
... so an application has to do the interpretation itself
14:51:59 [Steven]
... So then I said to myself, if the parser isn't helping us, why are we using xmlns to establish the relationship?
14:52:32 [Steven]
... and the conclusion I reached with Mark, is that xmlns is something everyone understands, so we should use it
14:53:09 [Steven]
... but I wonder if we shouldn't use CURIEs, since they don't cary the baggage with them
14:53:17 [Steven]
s/cary/cary/
14:53:23 [Steven]
s/cary/carry/
14:53:36 [Steven]
Mark: DO you mean to change the sysntax of CURIEs?
14:53:39 [Steven]
Shane: No
14:53:45 [Steven]
s/DO/Do/
14:54:21 [Steven]
Mark: It should always have said CURIEs, but because of the pushback we were getting, we said let's use QNames for now
14:56:42 [Steven]
Steven: Are you suggesting we use something other than xmlns for the prefixes?
14:57:01 [Steven]
Mark: We can unbind the connection
14:57:17 [Steven]
... use xmlns, or triples using <link> for instance
14:57:49 [Steven]
... Jeremy Carroll was enthusiastic to use it for SPARQL
14:58:06 [Steven]
... and we can persuade IPTC to use it too
14:58:16 [Steven]
... and it would allow us to have default namespaces
14:58:23 [Steven]
s/namespaces/prefixes/
14:58:46 [Steven]
... if profile = X, the dc maps to this, foaf maps to that, etc.
14:59:12 [Steven]
... and then making XHTML documents much easier to write, cut/paste and so on
15:00:26 [Steven]
Steven: Will the same notation (like namespaces) confuse people
15:00:40 [Steven]
Mark: Good question; one option is to change the syntax of CURIEs
15:01:02 [Steven]
... so they look different
15:01:43 [Steven]
... we could even let people define the separator
15:02:09 [Steven]
... but one scenario is that within the flexibility, we use xmlns as an option
15:02:20 [Steven]
[ADJOURN]
15:02:26 [Steven]
rrsagent, make minutes
15:02:26 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-minutes.html Steven
15:02:35 [Zakim]
-ShaneM
15:02:37 [Zakim]
-Rich
15:02:39 [Zakim]
-Steven
15:02:41 [Zakim]
-markbirbeck
15:02:43 [Zakim]
-yamx
15:02:45 [Zakim]
IA_XHTML2()10:00AM has ended
15:02:47 [Zakim]
Attendees were Steven, Rich, yamx, markbirbeck, ShaneM
15:02:54 [Steven]
rrsagent, make minutes
15:02:54 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-xhtml-minutes.html Steven
15:14:04 [AGraf|mb]
AGraf|mb has joined #xhtml
15:18:05 [AGraf|mb]
so, did i understand that correctly, the ftf in june has been cancelled?
15:18:33 [ShaneM]
yes. there may be an editors meeting that week, but the xhtml working group will not meet on the 11th and 12th.
15:18:43 [ShaneM]
the xforms group will still meet the balance of the week
15:18:53 [AGraf|mb]
ok, thanks
15:19:19 [AGraf|mb]
just so i'm not cancelling the flight for nothing...
15:19:26 [ShaneM]
heh.
16:07:37 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #xhtml
17:08:34 [Levogiro]
Levogiro has joined #xhtml
17:36:31 [ShaneM]
ShaneM has left #xhtml
19:31:22 [ShaneM]
ShaneM has joined #xhtml
20:02:40 [Lachy]
Lachy has joined #xhtml